Entry tags:
Day #4 of the 30 Day Film Challenge
This is Day #4 of the 30 Day Film Challenge - a Film with a number in the title.
(As an aside, I rather like this challenge. It's fun. Most of them ask what's your favorite movie - honestly, how can you possibly answer that question? Be like picking a favorite book.)
(As an aside, I rather like this challenge. It's fun. Most of them ask what's your favorite movie - honestly, how can you possibly answer that question? Be like picking a favorite book.)
no subject
How about a not great movie for a change? Five Weeks in a Balloon? Patterned after that other 19th-century-travel-romp movie with a number in the title that someone else can take, I thought it was terrible, but critics seemed to have thought it was at least okay.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R_nLE33XWc
no subject
Interesting that you thought that I'd take a movie with 7. 7 is my favorite number. There's just something fascinating about it.
Also, you could do this meme on the number 7 alone...it's ridiculous really. (I came very very close to picking movies with "One" in them. But it felt like cheating and I didn't do it for the same reason I didn't pick one for song with a number in it. Also not white for color. But other's should go for it. Just my particular weirdness.)
That's an entertaining trailer. Ah Irwin Allen - he did a lot of B disaster and adventure films in the 1950s and 60s. Also Fabian...Red Buttons, and sigh, Barbara Eden. Women never fared well in these things, always camera pretty, always stupid.
no subject
Who knew Kevin Spacey could be so creepy?
< strangled laughter >
**************************
Five Million Years to Earth (aka Quatermass and the Pit), dir. by Roy Ward Baker (1967)
Third, and unquestionably best, movie featuring redoubtable British scientist Bernard Quatermass, as he once again protects the world from potentially dangerous extraterrestrial phenomena.
This was a rare foray into science fiction for Hammer studios, but it still managed to elicit chills, as an excavation project at a London subway finds something ancient and inhuman--and waiting to be revived.
Hammer veteran Andrew Kier is a 1000% improvement as Quatermass (over gravel-voiced Yank Brian Donleavy in the first two movies), and a host of great British character actors (led by Barbara Shelley) lend top support. SFX are.... pretty crappy, but the screenplay by series creator Nigel Kneale never talks down to the audience, and the mass freak out finale is still pretty amazing, even after 50 years.
Proto X-Files? Could be! Highly recommended.
https://youtu.be/v5xPvFjPhkQ
no subject
Ah, you and cactus watcher are going for the obscure B movies..from the 1950s era. Hammer and cactus with Irwin Allen.
I've never heard of this one. (Actually haven't heard of either.) Looks interesting, if bizzare. The trailer is kind of head-ache inducing but entertaining. LOL!
no subject
Big influence on Doctor Who, especially on the Pertwee period, they're also notorious for having a different actor as Quatermass in all four stories.
no subject
I'd be curious to see the original two TV series from the fifties (if only to scrub Brian Donleavy's Broderick Crawford impression out of my head); can't imagine where I would find them, though.
no subject
If it's been recorded? You can find it.
no subject
no subject
I also no longer have a DVR that can hook up to my television. I do know you can get R1 and R2 DVRS now. Also file sharing off the net.
If there's a will there's a way, apparently.
[ETA: LOL - about the insect crawling across the camera lense becoming an unplanned alien monster appearance.]
no subject
(Forget what I said before, ok?)
no subject
no subject
no subject
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pv00WE6o1pI
One of my fave finds from recent years. Always a kick to just be randomly flipping through DVDs at the local Barnes & Noble and coming across something you 1) Never heard of, 2) that looks interesting, and 3) is on sale cheap because it's obviously obscure... and then it turns out to be simply marvelous.
Did I mention marvelous? Oh, good. :-)
no subject
Cool choice, by the way. Perhaps I'll catch it some day.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject