![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Media criticism of two pop culture hits
May. 12th, 2012 12:56 pmAh...someone who was mildly critical of the Avengers flick, and amusingly upset Samuel L Jackson (who I honestly think was joking - seriously, Jackson starred in Snakes on a Plane, this man is no stranger to bad critical reviews.)
NY Times Critic AO Scott's review of the Avengers.
Here's the criticism:
....while “The Avengers” is hardly worth raging about, its failures are significant and dispiriting. The light, amusing bits cannot overcome the grinding, hectic emptiness, the bloated cynicism that is less a shortcoming of this particular film than a feature of the genre. Mr. Whedon’s playful, democratic pop sensibility is no match for the glowering authoritarianism that now defines Hollywood’s comic-book universe. Some of the rebel spirit of Mr. Whedon’s early projects “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Firefly” and “Serenity” creeps in around the edges but as detail and decoration rather than as the animating ethos.
Clearly the critic is a fan of Whedon, just not of the comic book The Avengers. (I'm somewhat the same way, was never much of an Avengers fan. I loved the X-men. But outside of the X-men, group superhero comics bored me. Feel the same way about the Justice League. And yes, it's due to the authoritan aspects of the genre, which Alan Moore famously critiqued in Watchmen. Watchmen is actually a critique of The Avengers and Justice League comics.)
I've read a few Avenger's comics (because they kept crossing over with the X-me) so I know the stories and team. This film is missing a few characters - Scarlett Witch (Magneto's Daughter),
The Wasp, and Antman.
Haven't seen it yet. Just getting this from the various reviews. Flist has been reviewing the Avengers for the past three weeks. I have to keep skipping posts, because I don't want to be spoiled, but I do want a general review.
In other news...I finished The 50 Shades trilogy and have read various reviews and comments on it. Some rather sexist and misogynistic. Someone from SNL stated that they couldn't deal with seeing the middle-aged lady across from them reading this book. Interesting, personally I find seeing a guy reading American Psycho by Brett Easton Ellis across from me, far more disturbing, particularly when he's loving it and looks at me over the rim. (I've read the book and Ellis details the psycho's rape of women in an erotic manner that well, makes you mildly ill.) (Clearly they have no idea what is in the book (50 Shades not American Psycho) or that middle-aged ladies can read a lot worse on the internet, I'm sorry, does this come as a shock to you? Internet erotica (aka porn) is not just read or viewed by horny men. Also middle-aged ladies libidio is a bit more active than 20 something libidios..which possibly explains why middle-aged men prefer to date 20 somethings...they can't keep up with women their own age. LOL! See I can be sexist too.)
This is not to say the books are necessarily good or ground-breaking. The media reaction to them however...is bewildering and somewhat offensive, also proof, in case we needed any, that the media looks at sex the same way a 12 year old boy does - will it give me cooties? I'm also tempted to state the media is a tad on the sexist/misogynistic side of the proverbial fence.
The publishing industry's bewilderment over why they are doing well amuses me greatly. Because, yes, a book can sell millions without being gutted. What's good about the book isn't the sex or really the story for that matter. Nor how it is written - the writing is more or less standard pulp fair. But the how the writer plays with it. If you've read fanfic, and almost everyone reading this journal has, you've seen it before. Text messages in the book. Times and dates. About five to six pages in the back showing everything from the guys point of view at the very end of the last book. Detailed description of every part of the romance. Things editors usually cut out, are left intact. The writer is playing, and we don't often see that in published stories, unfortunately. That is a fault of the publishing industry not writers. And with any luck this book might make the publishing industry rethink their tactics - trust readers more, and stop trying to make everything fit an established formula.
( brief spoilery review of the 50 Shades of Grey Trilogy )
NY Times Critic AO Scott's review of the Avengers.
Here's the criticism:
....while “The Avengers” is hardly worth raging about, its failures are significant and dispiriting. The light, amusing bits cannot overcome the grinding, hectic emptiness, the bloated cynicism that is less a shortcoming of this particular film than a feature of the genre. Mr. Whedon’s playful, democratic pop sensibility is no match for the glowering authoritarianism that now defines Hollywood’s comic-book universe. Some of the rebel spirit of Mr. Whedon’s early projects “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Firefly” and “Serenity” creeps in around the edges but as detail and decoration rather than as the animating ethos.
Clearly the critic is a fan of Whedon, just not of the comic book The Avengers. (I'm somewhat the same way, was never much of an Avengers fan. I loved the X-men. But outside of the X-men, group superhero comics bored me. Feel the same way about the Justice League. And yes, it's due to the authoritan aspects of the genre, which Alan Moore famously critiqued in Watchmen. Watchmen is actually a critique of The Avengers and Justice League comics.)
I've read a few Avenger's comics (because they kept crossing over with the X-me) so I know the stories and team. This film is missing a few characters - Scarlett Witch (Magneto's Daughter),
The Wasp, and Antman.
Haven't seen it yet. Just getting this from the various reviews. Flist has been reviewing the Avengers for the past three weeks. I have to keep skipping posts, because I don't want to be spoiled, but I do want a general review.
In other news...I finished The 50 Shades trilogy and have read various reviews and comments on it. Some rather sexist and misogynistic. Someone from SNL stated that they couldn't deal with seeing the middle-aged lady across from them reading this book. Interesting, personally I find seeing a guy reading American Psycho by Brett Easton Ellis across from me, far more disturbing, particularly when he's loving it and looks at me over the rim. (I've read the book and Ellis details the psycho's rape of women in an erotic manner that well, makes you mildly ill.) (Clearly they have no idea what is in the book (50 Shades not American Psycho) or that middle-aged ladies can read a lot worse on the internet, I'm sorry, does this come as a shock to you? Internet erotica (aka porn) is not just read or viewed by horny men. Also middle-aged ladies libidio is a bit more active than 20 something libidios..which possibly explains why middle-aged men prefer to date 20 somethings...they can't keep up with women their own age. LOL! See I can be sexist too.)
This is not to say the books are necessarily good or ground-breaking. The media reaction to them however...is bewildering and somewhat offensive, also proof, in case we needed any, that the media looks at sex the same way a 12 year old boy does - will it give me cooties? I'm also tempted to state the media is a tad on the sexist/misogynistic side of the proverbial fence.
The publishing industry's bewilderment over why they are doing well amuses me greatly. Because, yes, a book can sell millions without being gutted. What's good about the book isn't the sex or really the story for that matter. Nor how it is written - the writing is more or less standard pulp fair. But the how the writer plays with it. If you've read fanfic, and almost everyone reading this journal has, you've seen it before. Text messages in the book. Times and dates. About five to six pages in the back showing everything from the guys point of view at the very end of the last book. Detailed description of every part of the romance. Things editors usually cut out, are left intact. The writer is playing, and we don't often see that in published stories, unfortunately. That is a fault of the publishing industry not writers. And with any luck this book might make the publishing industry rethink their tactics - trust readers more, and stop trying to make everything fit an established formula.
( brief spoilery review of the 50 Shades of Grey Trilogy )