(no subject)
Jul. 11th, 2015 12:39 pm1. So, Roger Rees died. As did Omar Sharif this week. I'm more saddened by Roger Rees, he was younger and I adored him.
2. Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell is not really holding my attention, which makes sense the book didn't either. It's very "male" without really any women in it. And the two that are - look alike. Although, I'm not sure that's the problem...it may be a mood thing or television in general this summer?
3. The soap opera that I've been watching for the last 15-20 years, mainly as something to discuss over the phone with my mother besides health, family, books and what we are doing at this particular moment in our lives (lately from my mother's end of the conversation this has been my father's rapidly deteriorating digestive health, which has me worried and frustrated because I can't do a dang thing about it and it may result in a cancellation of their August trip, and because my mother has no filter and likes to go into gory details) ...has jumped the proverbial shark. (Okay I know that's an oxymoron, soap operas by design jump the shark on an annual basis. But this time I think they may have gone a step too far.) What did they do? Oh, they brought a five year old kid that had been killed in a hit and run by a major character, back to life. Apparently, after the kid donated his kidneys saving another character's life, he was hijacked from the hospital and raised on an island off the coast of Greece by the villains, just to torture the major character. The kid is now 10 and has no memory of his family, (wondering if he still has his kidneys?), and is just a tad creepy (possibly the actor not the character...not the most attractive or appealing kid on the planet).[Apparently they brought the kid back to life - so that they could send off the major character looking like an iconic hero...ignoring for a moment that he raped his one true love back in the day. Shame they couldn't ret-con that, not that they haven't tried.]
This story arc may spell the end of the soap opera for my mother and I. Apparently we're not alone...the ratings have dived and the writers are struggling to save it.
Sigh, how you know you are watching a soap opera?
( Read more... )
The problem with long-running serials is eventually you end up with writers writing their own personal fantasy fanfic about the characters and ignoring anything that gets in the way of their fantasy fanfic. Also the turn-over in writers is high - so as a result continuity tends to get lost in the shuffle. There's a reason people make fun of serials.
On the other hand - no one handles topical issues or emotional character arcs better than soap operas and long-running serials. But if you care too much about plot or logical plot progression - the soap opera will drive you batty. Just as if you care too much about character progression or emotional character arcs, the episodic procedural will drive you batty. Because characters don't change, grow or progress in episodic procedurals, even though the actors do.
American Television, unfortunately, is populated by both extremes. Which may explain my current boredom with the medium?
4. I'm tempted to rewatch Farscape or possibly Firefly -- except Farscape was more satisfying. (ie. I liked the actors playing the leads better. Ben Browder is sexier than Nathan Fillon and in my opinion a better actor. Clearly, I'm in a minority on this point.) Considered Buffy, but Farscape was more satisfying, the ending of Buffy disappointed me. Every time I re-watch it - I get annoyed with the writers...oh such great potential and so many things and ways you could go...and you did THAT? Really?
ARRRGH! It's like most television series, you want to re-watch about 50% of it, and ignore the other half completely. Farscape is more or less the same - 65% of it is great, the rest...not so much. I just happen to like the ending of Farscape better, not that it necessarily ended happily. I just felt it wrapped up all its emotional loose ends, while the writers of Buffy were more interested in the special effects and forgot they had to wrap up various emotional loose ends.
2. Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell is not really holding my attention, which makes sense the book didn't either. It's very "male" without really any women in it. And the two that are - look alike. Although, I'm not sure that's the problem...it may be a mood thing or television in general this summer?
3. The soap opera that I've been watching for the last 15-20 years, mainly as something to discuss over the phone with my mother besides health, family, books and what we are doing at this particular moment in our lives (lately from my mother's end of the conversation this has been my father's rapidly deteriorating digestive health, which has me worried and frustrated because I can't do a dang thing about it and it may result in a cancellation of their August trip, and because my mother has no filter and likes to go into gory details) ...has jumped the proverbial shark. (Okay I know that's an oxymoron, soap operas by design jump the shark on an annual basis. But this time I think they may have gone a step too far.) What did they do? Oh, they brought a five year old kid that had been killed in a hit and run by a major character, back to life. Apparently, after the kid donated his kidneys saving another character's life, he was hijacked from the hospital and raised on an island off the coast of Greece by the villains, just to torture the major character. The kid is now 10 and has no memory of his family, (wondering if he still has his kidneys?), and is just a tad creepy (possibly the actor not the character...not the most attractive or appealing kid on the planet).[Apparently they brought the kid back to life - so that they could send off the major character looking like an iconic hero...ignoring for a moment that he raped his one true love back in the day. Shame they couldn't ret-con that, not that they haven't tried.]
This story arc may spell the end of the soap opera for my mother and I. Apparently we're not alone...the ratings have dived and the writers are struggling to save it.
Sigh, how you know you are watching a soap opera?
( Read more... )
The problem with long-running serials is eventually you end up with writers writing their own personal fantasy fanfic about the characters and ignoring anything that gets in the way of their fantasy fanfic. Also the turn-over in writers is high - so as a result continuity tends to get lost in the shuffle. There's a reason people make fun of serials.
On the other hand - no one handles topical issues or emotional character arcs better than soap operas and long-running serials. But if you care too much about plot or logical plot progression - the soap opera will drive you batty. Just as if you care too much about character progression or emotional character arcs, the episodic procedural will drive you batty. Because characters don't change, grow or progress in episodic procedurals, even though the actors do.
American Television, unfortunately, is populated by both extremes. Which may explain my current boredom with the medium?
4. I'm tempted to rewatch Farscape or possibly Firefly -- except Farscape was more satisfying. (ie. I liked the actors playing the leads better. Ben Browder is sexier than Nathan Fillon and in my opinion a better actor. Clearly, I'm in a minority on this point.) Considered Buffy, but Farscape was more satisfying, the ending of Buffy disappointed me. Every time I re-watch it - I get annoyed with the writers...oh such great potential and so many things and ways you could go...and you did THAT? Really?
ARRRGH! It's like most television series, you want to re-watch about 50% of it, and ignore the other half completely. Farscape is more or less the same - 65% of it is great, the rest...not so much. I just happen to like the ending of Farscape better, not that it necessarily ended happily. I just felt it wrapped up all its emotional loose ends, while the writers of Buffy were more interested in the special effects and forgot they had to wrap up various emotional loose ends.