Dec. 7th, 2016

shadowkat: (clock)
1. Probably only a reference that Buffy fans will appreciate, but our new President Elect reminds me a great deal of The Mayor from Buffy S3, he even looks a little bit like him. Except I think the Mayor was a bit more charming and easier to watch.

2. Been reading a lot of articles lately about fake news, and how to determine what is and is not fake. Mainly because I've become convinced that the US election was decided largely by "fake news" or the marketing and proliferation of misinformantion via biased sites by people on both sides of the political divide to support their own "populist" agendas. The far left and the far right were equally guilty of this and continue to be, now. I've seen fake news and misinformation from both - not just one side.

As a result of this, many people reached the point in which they didn't trust the media at all, and believed everything was fake news. People have a tendency to leap to broad generalizations and jump to extreme views.

In a way, I sort of miss the days before the internet or information explosion, when there was a bigger focus on print and it was harder to share information quickly. Not to mention more expensive, which meant there was a higher emphasis on fact checking. Although we've always had fake news aka tabloid journalism.

Anyhow, here's a few interesting links:

*. Fake or Real - How to Self Check the News and Get the Facts

if you see your friends sharing blatantly fake news, be a friend and kindly tell them it's not real. Don't shy away from these conversations even if they might be uncomfortable. As said, everyone has to help fix the fake news problem.

And...[the below is paraphrased]

* Pay attention to the domain and URL
* Read the "About Us" section (find out what the site's agenda is and if it has one)
* Look at the quotes in a story Or rather, look at the lack of quotes.
* Look at who said them Then, see who said the quotes, and what they said. Are they a reputable source with a title that you can verify through a quick Google search?
* Check the comments -- If a lot of these comments call out the article for being fake or misleading, it probably is.
* Reverse image search - A picture should be accurate in illustrating what the story is about. This often doesn't happen. If people who write these fake news stories don't even leave their homes or interview anyone for the stories, it's unlikely they take their own pictures. Do a little detective work and reverse search for the image on Google. You can do this by right-clicking on the image and choosing to search Google for it. If the image is appearing on a lot of stories about many different topics, there's a good chance it's not actually an image of what it says it was on the first story.


* What's Fake or What's Real Can Depend on What You Want to Believe


the proliferation of fake and hyperpartisan news that has flooded into Americans’ laptops and living rooms has prompted a national soul-searching, with liberals across the country asking how a nation of millions could be marching to such a suspect drumbeat. But while some Americans may take the stories literally — like the North Carolina man who fired his gun in a Washington pizzeria on Sunday trying to investigate a false story spread online of a child-abuse ring led by Hillary Clinton — many do not.

The larger problem, experts say, is less extreme but more insidious. Fake news, and the proliferation of raw opinion that passes for news, is creating confusion, punching holes in what is true, causing a kind of fun-house effect that leaves the reader doubting everything, including real news.

That has pushed up the political temperature and increased polarization. No longer burdened with wrestling with the possibility that they might be wrong, people on the right and the left have become more entrenched in their positions, experts say. In interviews, people said they felt more empowered, more attached to their own side and less inclined to listen to the other. Polarization is fun, like cheering a goal for the home team.

“There are an alarming number of people who tend to be credulous and form beliefs based on the latest thing they’ve read, but that’s not the wider problem,” said Michael Lynch, a professor of philosophy at the University of Connecticut. “The wider problem is fake news has the effect of getting people not to believe real things.”

He described the thinking like this: “There’s no way for me to know what is objectively true, so we’ll stick to our guns and our own evidence. We’ll ignore the facts because nobody knows what’s really true anyway.”


All of this reminds me of a social pyschology course that I audited in the early part of this century, around 2005. In that course, we read a book that for the life of me, I cannot remember the name of, but it was similar in theme to Thomas Gladwell's Blink. What it said, was how people have a tendency to base decisions on generalizations, assumptions, and misperceptions. They often see what they want to see, or what reinforces their beliefs or attitudes. They don't perceive reality as it is, what they actually see is a reflection of their own internal dialogue or the story in their heads. And put into a social setting, if they are surrounded by like-minded individuals who support this view or reinforce it, it becomes factual. "Everybody thinks this, so it must be true." Mob mentality. "If everyone thinks that X is black, then obviously it is." Even if you personally believe X is green, or see X as green. Rod Sterling actually wrote several Twilight Zone episodes on this theme -- where the mob mentality dictated what was real. If Everybody thinks you should do A, then obviously you should do A, even if A would result in a horrible outcome. It's called "peer pressure" or "social pressure" -- where our reality, opinions, perceptions, and views are dictated by our peers or those around us and not by ourselves.

* Why We Are Hard Wired To Believe Lies --Neuroscientist Daniel Levitin podcast - which sort of supports the above.

3. This is Amazing - Veterans Ask for Forgiveness at Standing Rock



Veterans welcomed and requested not to engage in any violence and to be non-violent.


By the way? After they showed up, the Army Corps of Engineers backed off and denied the permit.

Oh and, Norways Top Banks Divest in Dakota Access Pipeline


Norway's biggest bank, DNB, announced on Thursday that it has sold its stakes in companies that are involved in the construction of the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline.
DNB had said last week that it was “concerned” about the North Dakota pipeline project and would reconsider its involvement.

On Thursday, DNB spokesman Even Westerveld told Aftenposten that the bank has now cut its funding because of the concerns raised by the Standing Rock Sioux, who say the project violates land treaties, desecrates sacred grounds and threatens the drinking water of millions of people who rely on the Missouri River.

Massive protests have been held at Standing Rock for weeks, sometimes resulting in violent clashes with law enforcement.

DNB's holdings were worth around $3 million (26 million kroner). Additionally, DNB is reconsidering three separate loans it has made to help finance the pipeline. The bank's total contributions amount to roughly ten percent of the project's total costs.


Mind-blowing.
shadowkat: (clock)
Been struggling with depression this year, because it has been disappointing on multiple levels. But there are some really inspiring things happening (ie. Standing Rock) ...so must focus on that. Also, this is why I've decided to read romance novels again, specifically historical romance adventure novels. Pure escapist fair, with love as a heavy theme.

Before I discuss further? I ventured into my local Barnes and Nobel, or rather the one on 5th Avenue near my workplace. It's huge. Think "department store" for books. Which cool as that might sound? Lately, B&N has been irritating me. Mainly because they shelve and market a lot of books that..feel mass produced. I wandered through the romance section, which is really tiny, and discovered none of the novels that I read, nor any of the authors I've read were shelved or available in the store. This disappointed me. Not that I'd buy them in print, no room, and I can't read the tiny print. Read everything on e-book at the moment. Will not rant about this. Ranting in lj is a bad idea.

1. What I just finished reading?

The Raven Prince by Elizabeth Hoyt -- it's a story about two not overly attractive people, who fall in love in Georgian England. He's a widowed Earl, she's a widow of a lawyer who was cheating on her. She becomes his secretary, and eventually they fall for each other. There's lots of banter, and it is rather funny in places. Can't tell if it is historically accurate, for two reasons 1) I'm not an expert on Georgian England, no real clue when that is to be honest, guessing sometime in the 1800s? 2) Not clear when this is taking place, she doesn't provide dates, which is admittedly slippery of her. But it is a historical "romance", emphasis on the romance, so it hardly matters. I only care about historical accuracy in straight historical novels, and mysteries. Romances? Not so much. Particularly if the writer is scant on details and I've no clue what period I'm in. This story, like most of Elizabeth Hoyt's novels has a heavy emphasis on fairy tales, actually Hoyt makes up one and sort of tells is within the story. The Title is taken from the fairy tale that Hoyt made up.

2. What I'm currently reading?

His at Night by Sherry Thomas -- another writer that I've read quite a bit of. (I have about five or six go-to writers in this genre.)

Reminds me a lot of The Scarlet Pimpernel by Baroness Orzy, except that was better written. Thomas sucks at plotting. Also, this is book three of her London Trilogy. I've read all three books in the Trilogy, this is the third, and to date my least favorite. The first was Private Affairs, the second The Luckiest Lady, and now His at Night. In all three, I wanted to smack the hero upside the head for being a monsterous twit to the heroine. And in all three, I wanted the heroine to leave him in the lurch, and make him come crawling, begging, on his hands and knees to her. Which of course doesn't happen. Except for possibly The Luckiest Lady, which I liked the best of the three.

The book is compelling, but the plot rambles and doesn't make a lot of sense. Not helped by the distracting and uncompelling romance between the hero's artist brother, Freddie (a hold over from Private Affairs) and their childhood friend. I kept skimming over this romance, mainly because I found it to boring. Freddie isn't that interesting, and his paramour, Angelica, isn't developed enough to be. It was a subplot that doesn't really add much to the central story and I could have done without. Thomas isn't quite as good at developing sibling and familial relationships as Milan.

We have a moustache twirling villain in the heroine's evil uncle. And the frail damsel, in her aunt.
The heroine entraps the hero in marriage, in order to escape her situation. The hero sort of figures out that's what she's aiming to do. But instead of trying to help her out of her situation, he just falls into her trap. Then spends three-quarters of the book resenting her for it, when he isn't making passionate love to her. He appears to have little sympathy for her situation or empathy as to why she felt desperate enough to foist herself upon him. I wanted to smack him.

The hero, Penny (short for Spencer) or Lord Vere, is a covert agent who solves crimes for the Crown.
But he pretends to be a fool -- so he can sneak in and out of places undetected. The reason he's in a position to get entrapped by the heroine is that he's connived to get into her house via a friend's house-party. Basically, he arranges through a superior to have the friend's house party plagued by rats. Everyone at the house party vacates to the heroine, Elissand, domicile. The hero and heroine take one look at each other, and swoon. That is until they converse, and he pretends to be the fool, and she pretends to be a charming hostess who while agree with his every word and smile enchantingly. As they a result, she thinks he's an idiot, albeit a lovely one, and he thinks she's a manipulative bitch, albiet a lovely one. Her opinion of him changes, but his does not. He can't forgive her for manipulating him into marriage.

That's what doesn't quite work. Why doesn't he forgive her? She clearly was desperate and felt she had no other choice. It's not like she screwed up his life. He could have gotten out of it easily enough, or even found a way to help her and get an annulment without consummating the marriage.
But no, he punishes her for it, almost gets her killed by forcing her to return to visit her uncle, which makes him feel awful (as well he should).

In the original, the Pimpernel believes his actress wife has betrayed him, and he can't reveal who he is to her, for fear that she will betray his identity and get him killed. That makes sense.
Here? It makes no sense why he can't reveal who he is to her or why he keeps her at bay. The misunderstanding or conflict that the plot revolves around doesn't quite hold water and as a result the story falls short.

Almost done. Maybe it will redeem itself in the last fifty pages or so. But somehow I doubt it.

3. What I'm reading next?

To Steal a Heart by K.C. Bateman -- about a tight-rope walker/circus performer who gets roped into helping a spy during the Napoleonic Wars. He buys her from her wicked cousin after catching her trying to plant information in his office for said cousin.

My mother read it and recommended it to me. We've been discussing romance novels and various books.
Mother read Hillbilly Elegy, and My Beautiful Friend previously. She recommended Elegy, but not Friend. I don't think I can handle either at the moment. Friend irritated me fifty pages in, so I gave up. It's a mood thing. I want the literary equivalent of chocolate mousse at the moment, not broccoli.

The election has had a derogatory effect on my reading habits and television viewing habits. I can't watch Designated Survivor or Westworld at the moment, and I am devouring romance novels.

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 21st, 2025 11:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios