Feb. 24th, 2019

shadowkat: (Default)
I've now seen six of the eight films nominated, and I can safely say that the only two that I'd have nominated would be Black Panther and Roma. (I haven't seen Green Book or The Favorite -- so can't comment on either.)

There is a discernible pattern emerging -- all the films that I've seen do in some respect critique our society and societal context.

Star is Born and Bohemian Rhapsody are to a degree, separate indictments of the fame machine, looked at from separate perspective. Bohemian is the most problematic of the two and the more I think about Bohemian, the more problematic it becomes. At the end of it -- I felt a stirring need to strangle the two remaining band members of Queen and if Mercury were alive, I can't help but wonder if he'd be forgiving of his band-mates or those who adored the film, overlooking the appalling homophobic subtext. Maybe. I think he was a realist, who knew full-well the world that he inhabited. Also, the cinematography and direction was off in different places and the story jumps about -- and I could on and on. I have to say that of the films nominated, I had the most problems with Bohemian and I'd have kicked it to the curb and replaced it with either Avengers Infinity War or Wrinkle in Time. But hey, that's why the Oscars shouldn't be taken too seriously and are just fun.

Roma directed by Alfonso CuarĂ³n is what I'd call hyper-realism, in which the filmmaker is concerned with providing an as realistic as possible rendering of events and perception. It's also a character piece - told solidly within the perspective of "Cleo" the live-in nanny and cleaning lady of a prominent upper middle class family of four in 1970s Mexico City. It was inspired by Curaron's mother and dedicated to her memory.

Filmed entirely in black and white and in Spanish with English subtitles, it's a moving film if a bit slow in places. (I admittedly kept dozing off, so it took three-four hours to watch it on Netflix. I started at 11 and finished around 3. Let me put it this way -- we spend fifteen minutes watching Cleo clean. Hyper-realism in art isn't necessarily exciting or entertaining, but it can be compelling.)

The film is a brilliant piece of film making. The cinematography at times is spot on and the acting is as naturalistic as you can get without going full-scale documentary. By the end of the film, I'd fallen in love with Cleo, and my heart was in throat.

But the pacing is slow, and I'd have edited some of it out. Also it is at times a bit too heavy-handed an indictment of the male gender. So much so that I began to wonder about the filmmaker and his unresolved feelings towards his own father and the toxic male culture in which he'd been raised. The culture depicted in the film through the innocent and somewhat pained gaze of Cleo is a toxic one, run by men, who care little for anything but their own pleasure and individualistic pursuit of success and fame and pleasure, often through violence. spoilers )

What I'm picking up from the nominated films is a heavy critique of our culture. Only Bohemian Rhapsody and A Star is Born seem to back a way from that a bit, but not completely and with mixed results.

Other than that, and the pacing, it was a good film. And I recommend seeing it.



[I was going to try and see either The Favorite or Green Book -- but they cost $14.99 to rent/buy on Amazon and just, no. ]

Roma is available on Netflix.
we need to be careful about engaging in this type of criticism. Art is not mean
shadowkat: (Default)
And at times disagreeing with the Oscars...while I get the sound editing for Bohemian Rhapsody, not sure I get the best editing Oscar -- it's a film that I thought was in desperate need of a good editor. LOL! But then I really don't get why that film was nominated at all. I wouldn't have nominated it. Why do people love bio-pics, they are always awful and filled with cliches? They keep nominating them, and afterwards...no one remembers them or sees them again. Quick list the ones you remember and enjoyed. I stopped taking the Oscars seriously when the biopic of Gandhi won. The only one's I thought were good? Lawrence of Arabia and ....that's about it. I'm legitmately drawing a blank. All the others were problematic. Will state VICE like Lawrence is interesting because it breaks the rules of biopics and reimagines the bio-pic, not only that -- it mocks the bio-pic and itself, by stating we have no idea about the personal life of this man -- he was private, we're making it up as we go. So two - Lawrence of Arabia and VICE.

I'd have nominated any number of films instead.
run down of the awards so far... )

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 27th, 2025 08:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios