Exactly. She missed the point. Or she doesn't want to see it. Her response felt defensive to me, which I can understand - because she got crucified by the internet. But she also deserved to be. Unfortunately, I think the New York Times enjoyed the response - because it means people cared and read it.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2011-04-23 02:16 am (UTC)Her response felt defensive to me, which I can understand - because she got crucified by the internet. But she also deserved to be. Unfortunately, I think the New York Times enjoyed the response - because it means people cared and read it.