shadowkat: (warrior emma)
[personal profile] shadowkat
What you have just finished reading?

Never Judge a Lady by Her Cover by Sarah McLean - which has gotten mixed reviews. While the writer explores some interesting themes and ideas in a new, somewhat subversive manner, her execution could be a heck of a lot better. It's not necessarily horrible (I've read worse) but not all that great either. The plot has holes you could drive a couple of trucks through, the set-up instead of becoming more plausible as you go along, becomes less so. And she makes some rather lazy writing choices - going for what is easy or the short-cut. Noticed this happening a lot in genre novels. In part due to the rush to publish and the lack of good editors.

The set up is after being impregnated at the age of 16, Lady Georgiana (the daughter of a Duke) goes off to the country to have her daughter. Then returns four years later - only to be shockingly rejected by society. Furious, she persuades her stick in the mud brother, the Duke, to finance her gambling den, then enlists three down-on-their-luck nobles to become investors/part owners. To obtain membership - you have to give the owners your darkest secrets as collateral. Providing them with the means to destroy you at any time. Or you can trade in the secrets of others. Georgiana creates two aliases - one is Madame Anna - the prostitute who patrols the casino floors and is the boss of the ladies of the night. The other is the mysterious Chase, a man who holds everyone's secrets and runs the casino. Her partner in crime is Duncan West, a Scandal Sheet Newspaperman, who Chase sends the secrets to...through Anna, never in person. Duncan doesn't know who Chase is. And Duncan, alas, is being blackmailed by his nasty nemesis...the Earl Tremely regarding his own dark past, which Georgiana knows nothing about. Great idea, poor execution, reminding me of several fanfics that I've read - where I got frustrated by the execution.

What you are reading now?

Decided to take a break from McLean and tried a book rec'd by [livejournal.com profile] shipperx, To Please a Lady by Lori Brighton, which is a whole lot better than the McLean novel, surprising enough - considering it's below the radar while McLean's won awards. If it weren't for Shipperx, I wouldn't know it existed. Plus it's a whole lot cheaper. (Making me wonder about the validity of the RITA Awards.) Better execution and in some respects a far more innovative and complex plot structure.

Brighton also has some interesting comments on the Alpha Male/Boddice Ripper romance trope - which I'm not sure you'd notice unless you've read a lot of them. The heroine is in an abusive marriage with a titled Lord. I don't know what his title is, nor does it appear to matter - outside of the fact that he has all the power, she doesn't.
All she had was money. And back then class was power, often more so than money. It takes place in the Victorian Age. Also men had power, regardless of who was on the throne, and women were legally considered their possessions. Her husband is the typical alpha male trope that you see in these novels. Attractive, controlling, domineering, charming, sexually abusive, and broken - he was beaten and humiliated as a child. He sounds a lot like a Judith McNaught hero, making me wonder if Brighton has read her. His mistress - keeps telling the heroine that he can be saved, that he's different with her, that he's just misunderstood. The heroine, after years of mental and physical abuse does not agree. What reminded me of the McNaught and well domineering alpha male trope...going so far as the new adult novels was this exchange between the heroine and the hero (who is not her husband):

James: Why aren't you wearing bloomers?
Eleanor: Oh, my husband forbid me to wear any undergarments once we were married. He wanted to have access to me any time he wanted.
James is horrified and enraged by this.

Now in the boddice ripper/new adult novels this is often considered sexy and titillating, here it is shown as sexist and demeaning. Not to mention...spousal rape.

The hero, James, is equally trapped in an abusive power relationship. He's a male whore in a brothel that caters only to women. Years ago Lady Lavendar blackmailed James into whoring for her in return for being freed from prison, and caring for his family. Or so he believes...in reality she hasn't provided for his family at all. She blackmailed three young boys, the other two have since escaped. James believing her lies and that she saved him from prison, the workhouse, and his family from a similar fate - has stayed...but now he's beginning to wonder...if it was all a set-up.

Both characters are prisoners in relationships where someone else has all the power and is abusing it. What's subversive about the romance is the male is the prostitute with the heart of gold and female is locked in the abusive marriage. And...the trope, often romanticized in these books is laid bare.

After reading so many of the ahem, boddice rippers, it's sort of nice to see a writer take them a bit to task on a few things, albeit subtly.

3. What I'll be Reading Next?

I'm intrigued by the first book in Lori Brighton's Seduction series, I'm reading the last one at the moment. This is "To Seduce an Earl" and it's negative reviews are what's intriguing me - the reviewers don't like the fact that the guy is the damsel, in need of saving, and bitter about being a whore. I find that to an interesting twist. I also like how the writer is playing with the male and female gaze, demonstrating how it can be romantic and demeaning, depending on how it is used and who is doing the gazing.

I keep hoping to Seduce an Earl will drop to the $1.99 price. The other two did, after I bought them at the $3.99 price, dang it.

As an aside, revising my own book has made me a bit more forgiving of things I've found in others novels. It's hard to know what others will like. All you can do is write what you know, what comes from your heart, and what you like...and hope for the best.

Date: 2014-12-18 07:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] londonkds.livejournal.com
That thing with the bloomers is so ahistorical it would utterly throw me out of it. Actually, at that period, most women didn't wear any kind of underpants in the modern sense at all - with multiple layers of long skirt there wasn't really too much point. And bloomers were a *feminist* thing, and widely mocked as such, as the point was that you could do certain active things in them that weren't convenient with a skirt.

Date: 2014-12-18 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Yeah, see? I'm completely oblivious to fashion references. I have no memory for historical details regarding fashion. Now criminal procedures - very much so. Also legal procedures. I've been arguing with a soap opera on my tv set regarding child custody laws. (No, no, no...that does not happen, you stupid tv show. You can't do that!) This is why I have difficulties with a lot of mystery novels, television series, and movies - because I'm easily thrown out of the story when they get the criminal and civil procedures wrong. LOL!

I also have issues with anything that deals with contracts, health care laws, and government regulations.

But fashion? Underwear? Oblivious. LOL!



Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 04:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios