shadowkat: (doing time)
[personal profile] shadowkat
[ETA: Apologies - apparently I spelled Bernie Sanders, last name wrong. But hey at least I was consistent about it.]

After Book Club and work, where we skirted around the topic and then skirted back again, I'm curious as to where the political landmines lie on my livejournal flist and the degree to which I should avoid all things political. (Book club was doing a better job of skirting, work not so much -- cubical mate likes to rant about Trump on a daily basis.) I already know where they lie at work and on Facebook, and with family. The people on Facebook are pro-Bernie Saunders, the people at work are either pro-Trump, Clinton, Saunders or staying quiet. And the book club seems to be leaning towards Cruz or no one. Meanwhile my mother is actively campaigning for Clinton.

So a poll. For this poll - I attempted to list all the presidential candidates currently running, but got tired after listing over 20 of them. Most of which, I'd never heard of. I thought, geeze, there's a lot of presidential candidates. And here, I thought only ten people were running, turns out I was wrong. In case you are remotely interested - the complete list of currently registered Independent Candidates running for President on the Independent Ticket, can be found HERE:

[Poll #2035065]

I forgot to list undecided. Damn it.

I tend to stay away from this topic, because...blood pressure inducing. But I'm curious to see where my flist falls. Are you all Bernie Saunder's fans? Or are you all Trump fans? (Ghod, I really really hope not. But one never knows...Honestly I can't imagine a Trump fan reading and enjoying my journal, but stranger things have happened.)

Currently, I don't feel strongly about any of the candidates...except that I'll probably have to move to New Zealand if Trump wins. The man has dead eyes.

[ETA: Apparently there is 1524 people who are running for president of the US. As an aside? This sort of reminds me of scrolling through television channels hunting for something to watch, over a thousand channels, and still, nothing is on!]

Date: 2016-01-30 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Agreed. And she's right...we do have regulations in place, but they've been weakened by other regulations.
Each procedure has a loop-hole or a workaround. We don't necessarily need new laws, we need to strengthen and implement the laws currently in place.

For example -- it's not that billionaires don't have to pay taxes, they do. But there are a lot of ways to avoid it, if you know how. Pre-tax dollars, 401 Ks, tax shelters, charitable contributions...etc.

Have you seen "The Big Short" -- it talks about how the banks were regulated, regulations are in place along with regulatory agencies, but the regulatory agencies were making deals behind the scenes and not regulating the banks. It's a fascinating breakdown on how the system collapsed on itself and why.

And I've talked with my co-worker who emigrated from Russia to the US and he said the problem with Russia was all the back room deals, bribes, and bureaucracy. Certain people, people who could work the system, could get anything they wanted, while honest folks couldn't get scraps. It wasn't the rules, but how they were implemented and who was implementing them.

The devil is the details.

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 31st, 2025 09:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios