shadowkat: (Default)
[personal profile] shadowkat
1. The only drawback of binging the Great British Baking Show is ...I start to crave the things they are baking or to bake myself...which isn't something I can do at all for various reasons. But I keep having fantasies of doing gluten free, grain free versions of all the items. LOL!

2. This youtube video about Sense8 cheered me up considerably, thanks to shapinglight for the link.




3. Ava Duvernay is bringing Octavia Butler's sci-fi novel Dawn to the small screen

“[A]fter war has culminated in a nuclear apocalypse and the near extermination of the human race, the survivors are rescued by an alien species and kept in suspended animation on an Earth-like spaceship. Lilith Iyapo, a black woman, is the first to be awakened and is chosen to lead her people into an uncertain future. She is faced with a choice: adapt or die. But, what good is survival if it comes at the cost of humanity?”

4. The Best Tweet on Our Impending Doom

No comment.

5. Disney ends Netflix Deal in 2019 in order to start its own streaming service

Disney CEO Bob Iger just announced that the media giant will be ending its deal with Netflix, pulling its programming from the streaming platform when their deal comes to a conclusion in 2019. The ultimate goal is to host the shows and movies on Disney’s own streaming service, which will launch around the same time. It’s incredibly disappointing news that could potentially pose some small upside—and make no mistake, the upside is small.

Netflix not only loses out on Disney features like Moana, Lilo & Stitch, The Emperor’s New Groove, and more direct Disney properties, but will likely also lose its Star Wars offerings (e.g., Rogue One: A Star Wars Story). But the biggest potential loss of all is Netflix’s current lineup of Marvel shows: Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, Iron Fist, The Defenders, and The Punisher. Remember: Disney owns both Lucasfilm and Marvel. There aren’t exactly too many details out yet about the deal’s end, but it would be safe to guess that Disney wants all those major, award-winning properties on their own streaming platform.

There’s an interesting conversation that’s popping up as well regarding the proliferation of streaming services. For many people who are trying to cut off their dependence on cable television (either as a cost-cutting measure or otherwise), the competing streaming services represent a potential higher overall cost. After all, Netflix isn’t quite the one-stop-shop anymore for streaming movies or shows. But one company having less of a monopoly is supposed to be a good thing, right? We’ll see, I guess.


I think it may backfire on Disney. Because I can't afford to be on that many streaming services. Nor do I need to be. And Disney isn't broad enough for me. I'm only really watching the Marvel series from Disney.

Date: 2017-08-10 10:20 am (UTC)
shapinglight: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
I think it may backfire on Disney. Because I can't afford to be on that many streaming services. Nor do I need to be. And Disney isn't broad enough for me. I'm only really watching the Marvel series from Disney.

I kind of hope it does backfire. There are too many of them now. Hard to keep up.

I find I don't care about the Marvel series any more. Jessica Jones was the only one I really liked - and even then not enough to rewatch it.

Date: 2017-08-10 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ex_peasant441
There are too many of them now. Hard to keep up.

I'm guessing that what will happen is they will start to specialise more, to capture the majority of a particular genre like sci-fi or historical or shows about leaving people on an island or whatever. If that happens we will actually start to see a broader range within each niche genre, to provide variety and widen the net for that market. So the number of subscription services any individual wants to belong to should drop while quality within each genre should improve. Not sure how long it will take for this change to come through though, so we could have an expensive few years ahead if we want to watch everything in our particular genre.

Date: 2017-08-10 09:37 pm (UTC)
yourlibrarian: PlottingSam-starofthemorn (SPN-PlottingSam-starofthemorn)
From: [personal profile] yourlibrarian
I think Disney will be one of the few producers who can pull this off. (I think CBS will have less luck with its version). The reason is that families have few options for children's programming and if they've decided to cut cable then a Disney channel with on-demand programming would be very appealing. The fact that they include content that crosses over from teen to adult will also help. The brand name continues to have a very strong draw. Of course, the monthly cost will also be a strong factor.

The larger point though is quite true. I'm already unwilling to buy content from Amazon or other sources because we already pay for Netflix DVDs and streaming plus cable. That's a huge bill already. A la carte programming works well if you don't have more than 10 things you want to watch in any month. But that adds up too. A group account can be feasible, but one person would need to have a lot of both money and time.



Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 04:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios