shadowkat: (Default)
[personal profile] shadowkat
1. We Can't Leave Florida.

I have family members shaming my Aunt M for not evacuating. I even told her she should and then started to do a bit of research...and well, found the above article.

2. Reboot of The Greatest American Hero with an Indian-American Woman in the lead -- I'm guessing Indian as from India? This is an issue ...up until roughly the 1990s, Native Americans were referred to as Indians.
Why? Because an Italian explorer named Christopher Columbus decided to prove the world was round by sailing from Spain to the West Indies. Instead he ran smack dab into the Americas. So he called the natives there Indians. The Europeans being entitled self-centered asses, invaded the new world and decided to name the inhabitants there Indians, as opposed to using their actual tribal names, and named themselves Americans. Why Americans? Because another Italian named , Amerigo Vespucci actually figured out this was a new continent and not the West Indies like Columbus thought. He was a bit brighter. So to celebrate these two Italians, and give Italy a ego boost, the new world was called Americas, and the inhabitants Americans. And to celebrate Europe's successful invasion and colonization of this new world, we have Columbus Day, which also celebrates Italian heritage.

Don't remember Greatest American Hero? It's that 1980s show that starred Robert Culp and William Katt. I found the original hilarious in places. Although the best thing in it was Robert Culp.

Actually now that I think about it, an Indian-American playing the role is fitting. Although considering the ahem, American etymological history of the words Indian and American...the two together sound a bit redundant.

3. Alias Grace Premiering this Fall on Netflix...this looks really good. Better actually than "A Handmaid's Tale" which frankly never appealed to me. (ie. less preachy, more complicated.)

4. The Mary Sue is Hiring an Assistand Editor -- anyone (ahem under the age of 35) looking for a job editing, writing, and researching content for a radical liberal feminist blog, with a location in Manhattan? Writing about fannish things, such as role playing games, comics, television, film, etc with a LGBTQ and feminist bent?

It looked appealing to me, but I'm too old this stuff, and I'm about to hit my ten-year anniversary at the Railroad, which is a tad more financially secure and a lot more stable. This is young gal's gig. (Something one worries about past middle age. If I was 25, I'd do it in a heartbeat. But I'm a wee bit past that..and find myself bewildered and rolling my eyes at the fact that there is actually job like this that actually pays money, and where was this over twenty years ago, when I'd have applied for it?... LOL!)

5. Flirting with television shows...

* Series of Unfortunate Events (Netflix)
* Black Sails, White Princess, Outlander (try again), American Gods, on Starz as a trial
* Fortitude - Netflix
* Expanse
* Broadchurch

Or just working on my book...half my mind is on the damn hurricane, and worried about other personal stuff.

Date: 2017-09-11 10:47 pm (UTC)
amyvanhym: (unoriginalsin)
From: [personal profile] amyvanhym
I'm more saying that feminism is in itself a hateful and poisonous ideology, especially the radical kind. But yeah, among other crap the Mary Sue is responsible for getting the Honey Badgers (a group of human rights activists who are routintely marginalized because the humans whose rights they defend are male) kicked out of the Calgary Expo. As far as I know the lawsuit over that is ongoing, though I haven't totally kept up with it.

Date: 2017-09-12 12:43 am (UTC)
amyvanhym: (unoriginalsin)
From: [personal profile] amyvanhym
The foundational belief among feminist denominations is patriarchy theory. Patriarchy theory assigns the male sex to the existence of sex roles and the harm done by those roles. That is inherently misandrist. If there is a denomination of feminism that doesn't accept patriarchy theory, that denomination might not be sexist, but I haven't yet run into such a sect.

On generalizing: when a person adheres to a religious or political ideology, identifying with it to the point of calling themselves an "ist" of that kind, they are choosing to generalize themselves. In order to not be generalized, reject ideological adherence.

All sorts of people kill, especially hateful people. Misogynists and misandrists kill. The opposite of 'feminist' is not 'misogynist' any more than the opposite of 'Christian' is 'sinner.' Feminism is an ideology. The opposite of feminist is anti-feminist. I am anti-feminist because I find feminism to promote sexist beliefs, which are mostly misandric (men are violent aggressors) and sometimes misogynistic (women are weak victims). I reject feminism because I reject misandry and misogyny.

Your phrasing "poor little white dude" has a distinctly hateful racist and sexist flavor. In just societies, the accused is innocent until proven guilty. What evidence of guilt did you posess in these cases that was not acknowledged by the courts? Note: gender and skin color don't count as evidence of guilt.

Be careful not to generalize the social forces that you've gleaned from your personal anecdotes onto the rape and domestic violence cases of unrelated individuals. Unlike feminists and other ideologues, these people have not chosen to generalize themselves.

Can you provide a source to substantiate your claim that women are considered property of their husbands in Missouri? My google-fu failed on that one. But in any case, if a protection notice is a legal document, I expect it should be worded carefully.

How many women's shelters and how many men's shelters are there in Kansas City, and how are they funded? I ask because in Canada, publicly funded women's shelters are everywhere, while men's shelters are practically non-existent, and the few that do exist must get their funding from private donors, and all of this seems to be a widespread feminist-driven trend.

It seems to me you've argued for women's rights activism here, rather than feminsim. I support both women's rights and men's rights.

Some individual men demean, harass and discriminate against women. Some individual women demean, harass and discriminate against men. The difference is that only one sex has the support of an institutionally fundeded and accepted ideology to help them do so. Regarding better work: you haven't mentioned whether those individual men were more dedicated and/or capable than those individual women. Further, different work is better for different people, so when you say "better work," I don't know whether you're taking men's and women's personal preferences into account.

Like all words, "girl" can be used in a multitude of ways. It is not inherently degrading.

Who was the non-corrupt alternative to Trump?

Feminism certainly is ideological bias. Misandry and misogyny both exist. 'The patriarchy' as commonly described by feminists does not exist.

.
Edited (fukn typos) Date: 2017-09-13 08:05 am (UTC)

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 03:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios