shadowkat: (Default)
[personal profile] shadowkat
I finally saw it! (I may well be among the last people on DW to have seen it.) I was accidentally spoiled by sci-fi writer John Scalzi, so knew what to expect going in. And a lot of people on FB were being a bit vocal about it. DW was nicer -- thank you for that. I got somewhat spoiled by FB and Scalzi. In this case, that was probably a good thing. Less traumatizing. Also, I'm long-time comic book fan and reader, so I know they'll undo everything that happened in this movie in the next installment.

(I've read one too many of these sorts of scenarios.)

Was surprised by it -- it was a much better film that I'd expected. And a far better one than Last Jedi in some respects. The directors and writers had a lot of balls to hold in the air, and they managed to not drop any of them. Considering we had lots of characters and various locations, they did a could job developing all of them -- in part by simplifying the plot. A convoluted plot would have killed this film. It required a simple plot, a clear goal, and a complicated villain. Last Jedi had a convoluted plot, no clear goals, and a simplistic villain. As a result it was harder to follow, I plan to watch it again on "On Demand". Although, to be fair, I think, if you aren't into the Marvel films or the characters, and haven't seen them -- you'd be lost too. This film much like Jedi is targeted towards a specific nitch audience -- the ones who have seen all the films and are familiar with all the characters. Co-worker saw it on a cruise with his wife, and she drove him nuts asking him who everyone was.

Take aways? We have scenes with Benedict Cumberbatch and Robert Downy Jr. Stroke of genius to put Tony Stark and Dr. Strange together with Peter Quill, Chris Pratt. Although three actors tend to play smart-ass arrogant assholes. Watching them on screen together? Comic gold. Also Thor and Rocket and Groot and Peter Dinklater. We've got Scarlett Johnaseen, Ogya, and Wanda fighting together.

The cast? To die for. Peter Dinklater, Chris Evans, Chris Helmsworth, Robert Downey Jr., Benedict Cumberbatch, Scarlet Johannson, Chadwick Bosman, Letitia Wright, Mark Ruffalo, Gweyneth Paltrow, Don Chedal, William Hurt, Josh Brolin, Karen Gillian, Chris Pratt, (a lot of Chris's, damn that's a popular name, very happy it's not mine (grins evilly)), Bradley Cooper, it goes on and on.

I laughed my head off at times, and I cried. It's a devastating movie in places. You spend a great deal of it going..."Oh nooooo, nooo.....Damn it." The audience was NOT happy at the end of it. There was a very disgruntled crowd leaving the movie theater. "That movie sucked. Dumb movie. I can't believe they did that." I thought it was somewhat risky and really got it's point across.

It is an impossible film to discuss without serious spoilers. So still above the spoiler cut? Great FX, great fighting scenes, and a good tight plot and good character development. It was nowhere near as busy as I'd expected. Like I said, pleasantly surprised and a far better film than Avengers 1, Avengers 2 or Justice League, all of which had less characters. And Brolin played a fascinating villain.



1. The theme -- I rather liked, because I've been pondering it for a while now. What would happen if I could just snap my fingers and half the population on the globe would disappear? (I live in NYC, I'm aware there are a ton of people daily). Would it make things better? This film asks that question and doesn't preach about it or get on a soap box, it legitimately explores it from various points of view -- the villain Thanos, who is Titan, akin to a God, but not quite, believes in balance. And firmly believes that the Universe is out of balance. That there are too many people or too much life to support it. And if he removed half the life in the universe, it would be back in balance, people would be happier, there would be enough for everyone. There's just too many people, if he could snap his fingers and mercifully kill half of them by wiping them out of existence...life would be better for everyone. And it would be random. So he wouldn't pick people or anything. That's his goal. He just wants to put everything back into balance, and since no one else is willing to, or is strong enough to make these sacrifices and make these decisions to do it, he will. In other words, he decides to play God. And he is convinced he's right.

Villains don't see themselves as villains, they see themselves as heroes and saviors. In their point of view -- what they are doing is the right thing to do. Thanos isn't a guy who wants to rule the Universe or control it, he doesn't want power for his own sake, but in order to make things right, so people aren't starving, in pain, wanting things they can't have, competiting for things...he wants balance, equality for all, peace...he wants to sit and watch the sun rise and be quiet. And he's willing sacrifice EVERYTHING to make the Universe peaceful and balanced again.

Nice idea, in theory. But...whose to say killing off half the population of the Universe puts it into balance? How do you know that those you killed and destroyed won't do wonderful things to make it grow and continue life in marvelous ways? How can you possibly see the fabric of reality...from such a limited and myopic perspective? And how egotistical and arrogant to think you can. Yes, it is tempting to think...if I could just wave a magic wand and get rid of half the people, preferrably the ones I don't care about or like, life would be better. But would it? We don't know how it fits together. We can't see the tapestry of the universe because we are mere strands inside of it. It is arrogant to think that we can, and even more arrogant to claim there is no pattern and no meaning and no connections. We are lights interacting and building on each other...

To kill half of the universe is akin to well chopping off an arm or a leg. Thinking you won't notice.
Of course you will.

AVENGERS INFINITY WAR does a good job of showing this. In various ways. How each of the characters is strengthened by those around them. One character is no greater than the others. And as they work with one another, they build on each other's strengths. It is their team-work, they interactions that make them interesting.

When Thanos rips the half away, which he does... we see how weaker they become. Thor is nothing without Loki, Loki gives Thor perspective, and to a degree humor. He makes him question himself. Loki is the first to be ripped away. (And I sort realized at that point this movie was not like the others.)

Then we see the interactions between Spiderman, Stark, Strange, and Starlord. All four are strong personalities...and Stark wants to desperately control the show, but he lets the others help and they prove effective. Quill comes up with the plan. Strange finds a way to mystically distract. It works but it doesn't. Because Quill loses it over Gamora's death. Our connections make us strong and weak at the same time. The comedy, the camraderi. How each sacrifices for the others.

And on the ground with Captain America, Hulk, Black Widow, Winter Solider, Black Panter et all..how they work together to help the Vision and Wanda aka Scarlet Witch.

When each loses someone...when their comrades turn to dust before their eyes, clinging to life...we see first hand the flaw in Thanos thinking. It is far from merciful, and it pulls light away, leaving the survivors drowned in grief and chaos. There's no gratitude for Thanos, only grief, despair, and hate.

Genocide as Strange states does not heal a universe.

2. The film took a huge risk, it killed over half the characters. At the end we are left with the four original Avengers - Tony Stark, Steve Rogers, Thor, Black Widow, The Hulk, Don Cheadal, and a few of Black Panthers female warriors along with Rocket from Guardians of the Galaxy along with Karen Gillian's Ameilia. Also the electronic husk of The Vision. Everyone else is dead. Including (if you were smart and watched the credits) Nick Fury and Cobie Smulders. That's right they killed off everyone's favorites.

Bucky
Starlord
Gamora
Spiderman
Black Panther
Dax
Groot
Loki
Dr. Strange

the list goes on and on.

It's tramautizing to watch. Loki dies early on as does Gamora. Both painfully. And with huge sacrifice.

Doctor Strange does something interesting, which provides a clue to where the writers may be going with all of this. Stark tells Strange that Thanos has been in his head since the War on NY, and Thanos had sent Loki to Earth for the Tesserect. Then, Strange states that he will protect the mind stone at all costs, even if that means letting Stark or Spiderman die. Then..Strange views 17.4 million possible outcomes, and when Stark asks which one they won, Strange states only one.

So...when Thanos holds Stark's life in his grasp. Strange states that he will give Thanos the "Time" Stone in exchange for Stark's life. "Spare him, and I will give you the stone, no tricks." It shocks the hell out of Stark and the audience. After he does it, Stark asks why...and he says we're in the end game now. Then, just before Strange melts away into dust...he tells Stark that "it was the only option, the only way."

He saw every alternate future, every possibility in time, and realized the only way to win was to exchange the stone for Stark's life. To make that sacrifice.

[My guess, knowing what I know about the actors contracts and who wants to resign, and when they run out -- they run out after Avenger's Infinity War Part II by the way, that Stark, Captain America and Thor may well sacrifice themselves to bring everyone else back. Chris Evans, Robert Downy Jr. and Chris Helmsworth want to move on and don't want to continue after Infinity War Part II. I don't know about Scarlett Johannson and Mark Ruffalo I also know that The Black Panther beat the pants off of the Iron Man and Captain America franchises and there's no way in hell that Disney will pass up the money that franchise will bring in. Infinity War was filmed at the same time as Black Panther. Also, Spiderman: Homecoming did very well last year...so ditto. They aren't dropping that franchise either.

Infinity War Part II will most likely be the original Avengers -- Hawkeye, Captain America, Iron Man, Don Cheadal, the Hulk, with Ant Man, the Wasp, Captain Marvel, Rocket, Ogay and a female Black Panther - Letitia Wright joining forces to undo what Thanos wrought.]

3. The character moments in this surprised me.

* Thanos and Gamora...we really got a lot of character development on the villain. Thanos is the most developed villain since well Black Panther's Killmonker, and Loki. Like the other two, this man has depth and rational. He loves Gamora and truly mourns killing her. As he mourns the fact that she rejects him and hates his purpose and doesn't understand it any longer. She also mourned what she thought was his passing.

* Thor and Loki -- Thor truly mourns Loki and suffers through it. And Loki makes a huge sacrifice for Thor and the world, trying to take out Thanos.

* Thor/Groot/Rocket -- very good interaction that develops all three. Rocket who is forced to show empathy. Groot who shows empathy and caring for someone other than himself and actually matures. And Thor...who has to find a way to get past his grief.

* Stark/Spidey, Stark/Pepper Potts, Stark/Dr. Strange, and Stark/Quill -- all good character moments in relation to Tony Stark, who is forced to face his own demons and own egotistical impulses. Quill is Stark's mirror, as is Strange, both egoists who think they know everything. Both fast talking.
Then there's Spidey, who is a younger version of all four...and informs them as well.

* Quill/Gamora -- and how he has to deal with the fact she loves him, but also needs him to kill her. When he finally does...it's only bubbles, because Thanos has the reality stone by this stage.

* The ground crew doesn't get quite as many great moments, although there's a good one between Wanda and Vision, along with Captain America/Bucky. This group doesn't get quite as much as the other group, due to a lot of characters in play.


4. The plot for such a busy film was surprisingly tight and held together. Far better than other films I'd seen with huge casts lately. I think it is because it was so simple. The villain had a simple goal -- get the stones, wipe out half the population. The heroes had one goal -- stop him by any means necessary. And some of those means were almost impossible. It did make it clear that once Strange gave up the Time Stone, it was over. There was no way they could stop him. Why Strange did it is interesting. Although, I'm not sure they had much of a chance after he got the Reality and Soul stones to be honest. Also, I'm not sure Strange could have avoided giving it to him, which may be why he did it. He realized that he'd missed the opportunity to stop it. That once they lost the ability to remove the "glove", the game was over and there was a limited number of chances.

Or Strange saw it all play out and knew what he had to do ahead of time and that's why he was so upset. "It was the only option, Tony."

I didn't see any plot holes or continuity issues in this. And it felt as if they had plotted this out well ahead of time. So kudos to the writers and directors.



Overall? I'd give the film a B+/A- for what it is.

Date: 2018-05-13 10:49 pm (UTC)
yourlibrarian: Natasha in a Headset (AVEN-NatashaHeadset-famira.png)
From: [personal profile] yourlibrarian
Sorry, I was referring to my thoughts on Infinity Wars.

Re: Regarding the Plot..

Date: 2018-05-14 07:58 pm (UTC)
yourlibrarian: Close up of Tony with gritted teeth (AVEN-TonyHotLines-Zugma.PNG)
From: [personal profile] yourlibrarian
. Regarding beginning bit? Valkeri was most likely killed on the ship along with everyone else -- there's no way she could have survived that

It was later explained by the directors that she escaped the ship along with half of the Asgardians. Apparently there was a line about the escape but clearly I wasn't the only one to miss it!

I can't remember all of Thor: Raganoraock -- but wasn't Thor's hammer destroyed in that film by Hela? Which is why he went to get an Ax to kill Thanos

Yes, but then when he thinks he can't win the battle without it, Odin appears to him and reminds him that he's not the god of hammers. And so just as in the arena, he begins wielding lightning without it. The point being that the hammer simply channels Thor's powers, it's not the source of them. So why does Thor need the axe? And why would it "revive" him?

And yeah, the fact that Thor doesn't cut off either head or hand is beyond stupid, though I agree that there are character reasons why people do what they do. The problem is that the accumulating number of dumb (and plot convenient) decisions starts to become obvious whereas there would be other ways you could write scenes where our heroes simply didn't get the opportunity to do things that might have worked.

So it was a problem in the film overall, that certain things don't get tried given all the powers everyone had. For example, if Thanos has the power to remake the universe with the gauntlet, why kill people? Why not create more planets and resources? His motivation in the comics made much more sense -- he's immortal so he longs to die. Therefore he kills millions in an effort to get Lady Death's attention and her willingness to bring him to her realm, in other words, to give him death.

So when Thanos arrives, they attack him from various angles, but not really as a unified group, which is why he wins.

Nice point, yes, I agree that this is where the buildup across films starts paying off.

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 08:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios