shadowkat: (Default)
[personal profile] shadowkat
1. For maia Why You Should Re-Read Paradise Lost


Milton’s Paradise Lost is rarely read today. But this epic poem, at over 350 years old, remains a work of unparalleled imaginative genius that shapes English literature even now.

In more than 10,000 lines of blank verse, it tells the story of the war for heaven and of man’s expulsion from Eden. Its dozen sections are an ambitious attempt to comprehend the loss of paradise – from the perspectives of the fallen angel Satan and of man, fallen from grace. Even to readers in a secular age, the poem is a powerful meditation on rebellion, longing and the desire for redemption.

Despite being born into prosperity, Milton’s worldview was forged by personal and political struggle. A committed republican, he rose to public prominence in the ferment of England’s bloody civil war: two months after the execution of King Charles I in 1649, Milton became a diplomat for the new republic, with the title of Secretary for Foreign Tongues. (He wrote poetry in English, Greek, Latin and Italian, prose in Dutch, German, French and Spanish, and read Hebrew, Aramaic and Syriac).

Milton gained a reputation in Europe for his erudition and rhetorical prowess in defence of England’s radical new regime; at home he came to be regarded as a prolific advocate for the Commonwealth cause. But his deteriorating eyesight limited his diplomatic travels. By 1654, Milton was completely blind. For the final 20 years of his life, he would dictate his poetry, letters and polemical tracts to a series of amanuenses – his daughters, friends and fellow poets.


In Paradise Lost, Milton draws on the classical Greek tradition to conjure the spirits of blind prophets. He invokes Homer, author of the first great epics in Western literature, and Tiresias, the oracle of Thebes who sees in his mind’s eye what the physical eye cannot. As the philosopher Descartes wrote during Milton’s lifetime, “it is the soul which sees, and not the eye”. William Blake, the most brilliant interpreter of Milton, later wrote of how “the Eye of Imagination” saw beyond the narrow confines of “Single vision”, creating works that outlasted “mortal vegetated Eyes”.



I read it in high school. I vividly remember reading it in High School along with Beowulf and Chaucer.

2. For all the frustrated writers out there, you know who you are... Lydia Davis - Ten of My Recommendations for Good Writing Habits -- and no, I've no clue who this lady is.

Did like this one though...

Be mostly self-taught.

There is a great deal to be learned from programs, courses, and teachers. But I suggest working equally hard, throughout your life, at learning new things on your own, from whatever sources seem most useful to you. I have found that pursuing my own interests in various directions and to various sources of information can take me on fantastic adventures: I have stayed up till the early hours of the morning poring over old phone books; or following genealogical lines back hundreds of years; or reading a book about what lies under a certain French city; or comparing early maps of Manhattan as I search for a particular farmhouse. These adventures become as gripping as a good novel.

*


Revise notes constantly—try to develop the ability to read them as though you had never seen them before, to see how well they communicate. Constant revision, whether or not you’re going to “do” anything with what you’ve written, also teaches you to write better in the first place, when you first write something down.


She also suggests reading the best writers out there and one classic per year at least. To which I say...Bleargh. Been there did that. I'm at a point now that I've read enough great writers and enough horrible ones..that I no longer think it matters. Although I do have a tendency to mimic the ones I like.

3. The Rise of the Millenial Hermits or Why No one Wants to Leave Their Apartments Any Longer? -- Forget the Millenials, I'm not sure I want to leave my apartment...


The rise of millennial hermits is a bit puzzling at first blush. Sure, staying inside has its advantages. You’re sheltered from the elements. You can watch TV, which has gotten really good. Your pet is there, if you have a pet. And everyone needs downtime, some of us more than others.

But where are those others, exactly—the people who actually look forward to socializing, at least some of the time? (A search for Etsy products tagged “extrovert” yields a mere 443 results, many of which are actually about introverts.) And if countries around the world, from the US and the UK to Japan and Denmark, are supposedly in the grips of a massive loneliness crisis, why are so many people declaring that their greatest desire in life is to take off their pants and nestle ever-deeper into the couch?

Research suggests that all this homebody chatter is not just for show: Young people really are more prone to staying in these days. One 2018 paper, published in the journal Joule, found that Americans between the ages of 18 and 24 spend a whopping 70% more time at home than the general US population. In another 2018 survey, conducted by the marketing research firm Mintel, 28% of millennials between 24 and 31 said that they preferred to drink at home because going out was too much effort, compared to just 15% of baby boomers who agreed with that statement.

But it’s also true that all those Etsy t-shirts and introvert comics are part of a somewhat paradoxical phenomenon: The internet has given rise to a collective, public performance of solitude.

Date: 2019-11-19 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] mefisto
Paradise Lost is fantastic.

Paradise Lost me

Date: 2019-11-19 04:09 pm (UTC)
cactuswatcher: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cactuswatcher
In my long school career, before I discovered I have a (usually mild) reading disorder. I can remember three times when my normally good reading ability failed me. In high school geometry class I could not follow the proofs as written out in the geometry book. It didn't matter because I could follow the same proofs as the teacher did them in class and I could then do the proofs myself, despite not being able to review them in the book. In college I took a course in philosophy, and the reading was impossibly boring for me. It didn't matter because the instructor was a brilliant lecturer and even though I couldn't do the reading I really liked the class! The other time was when we were supposed to read a lengthy excerpt from Paradise Lost as high school seniors.

Our English teacher must have made a very big deal of the class discussion we were going to have when we students were supposed to have finished reading the excerpt. It might as well have been written in archaic Vulcan as far as I was concerned. It couldn't tell you the first thing about it after having my eyes pass fruitlessly over the whole thing at least twice. The day we were supposed to have the discussion was the only time I ever pretended to be sick for a day because I couldn't do an assignment for one class. I think it was a Friday. I went back on Monday and my classmates were in a tizzy. It turned out the English teacher had in fact been sick that day. She left word with the substitute that *I* of all people was supposed to lead the class discussion! The substitute didn't know what to do, so she punted, and left everything for our return. I think to my teacher's embarrassment I showed that I didn't know anything beyond the introductory material that accompanied the excerpt in the book. (Remember, I had no idea I had a reading problem at that stage of my life. I could just plead I didn't understand it.) It didn't seem anyone else in the class was confident about what they'd read either. So the teacher just gave a lecture that day. I never did read it, but fortunately the lecture was enough that I did well on the test over the material.

Date: 2019-11-19 08:31 pm (UTC)
yourlibrarian: Tony & Peter Parker (AVEN-Tony&Peter-ebsolutely.png)
From: [personal profile] yourlibrarian
In another 2018 survey, conducted by the marketing research firm Mintel, 28% of millennials between 24 and 31 said that they preferred to drink at home because going out was too much effort, compared to just 15% of baby boomers who agreed with that statement.

Honestly, I never understood why anyone went out to drink. So much cheaper and safer at home.

But aside from the obvious factor of saving money, I have to wonder if it doesn't have to do with how awful people have revealed themselves to be. The younger you are the more likely your social time is spent in online spaces and that's certainly proved to be threatening. So why wouldn't you shy away from interacting with strangers?

Date: 2019-11-20 04:02 am (UTC)
maia: (Default)
From: [personal profile] maia
For maia Why You Should Re-Read Paradise Lost

Oh, this is wonderful!! Thank you, shadowkat!!

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 04:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios