(no subject)
Jan. 24th, 2020 10:15 pmWhere have I been?
I've been compulsively adding my meta and essays to Archive of Our Own, all week long (at night & occasionally on lunch breaks) and I think I broke it? I also think I broke Dreamwidth? Both crashed on me tonight. At different points. Either that or the Universe wants me to take a breather, already.
And...oh ghod, have I written a shitload of meta. Also a shitload of episode and television series reviews. I haven't even made it through July 2009 yet, and I already have over 60 works uploaded and saved. 21 are Doctor Who, 35 are Buffy.
And I haven't even gotten to the monster meta that I did..."Buffy the Vampire Slayer and the Pitfalls of Television" -- which is basically me playing with footnotes.
I'm beginning to wonder if I can or should attempt to back it all up on Archive of Our Own?
This is part of the March Meta Matters Challenge. Apparently they want Meta Writers to add their content to Archive of Our Own -- and save it. (I'm not sure they know what they are asking? Meta writers are often more prolific than fanfic writers. For one thing, Meta doesn't necessarily require betaeing and it's easier and faster to write. Plus you can be as short or lengthy as you want.)
(I'm shadowkat67 over year. So far all my kudos are on "Figuring out Angel's Pesky Curse" which is kind of bewildering. But okay. )
I've been compulsively adding my meta and essays to Archive of Our Own, all week long (at night & occasionally on lunch breaks) and I think I broke it? I also think I broke Dreamwidth? Both crashed on me tonight. At different points. Either that or the Universe wants me to take a breather, already.
And...oh ghod, have I written a shitload of meta. Also a shitload of episode and television series reviews. I haven't even made it through July 2009 yet, and I already have over 60 works uploaded and saved. 21 are Doctor Who, 35 are Buffy.
And I haven't even gotten to the monster meta that I did..."Buffy the Vampire Slayer and the Pitfalls of Television" -- which is basically me playing with footnotes.
I'm beginning to wonder if I can or should attempt to back it all up on Archive of Our Own?
This is part of the March Meta Matters Challenge. Apparently they want Meta Writers to add their content to Archive of Our Own -- and save it. (I'm not sure they know what they are asking? Meta writers are often more prolific than fanfic writers. For one thing, Meta doesn't necessarily require betaeing and it's easier and faster to write. Plus you can be as short or lengthy as you want.)
(I'm shadowkat67 over year. So far all my kudos are on "Figuring out Angel's Pesky Curse" which is kind of bewildering. But okay. )
no subject
Date: 2020-01-25 04:05 pm (UTC)Also, wow, you really have written a LOT of meta posts. Oof.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-25 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-25 07:18 pm (UTC)"Pitfalls of Television" was a whole lot more than "playing with footnotes." It was the best, most comprehensive essay I've ever read about how the vagaries of TV production affect the creative path of a TV series (in this case, Buffy).
(And I gotta admit: I'm impressed by a lot of footnotes. How many in that essay? 114?)
no subject
Date: 2020-01-25 08:57 pm (UTC)Did get a few responses...all bewildering. I mean I have over 80s works and they picked those "three" to comment on? Alrighty then.
The three?
1. Figuring out the Buffy Episode Crush
2. That Ianto needed to be killed in Children of Earth and he wasn't the only character killed. (the Janto fans are really annoying.)
3. Amazing Moffat - Forests of the Dead...Silence in the Library
Honestly, they weren't my best work.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-25 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-25 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-26 03:18 am (UTC)Steven's Universe is a fandom over there by the way. It's not Buffy specific. It's all fandoms.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-26 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-26 03:17 am (UTC)Also I think I broke the Archive of Our Own Site again. I have 103 works saved. Which is an insane amount of meta.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-26 03:43 am (UTC)Yes, 103 is insane. :)
no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 02:45 am (UTC)Good decision on the comics. I stopped reading the comics long ago.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 03:32 am (UTC)But canon? Nah. I'd say fanfic.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 01:27 pm (UTC)Yeah, it's impossible to stay canonical when you completely switch mediums. Movie to television yes. But television to comic or novels? No.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 05:49 pm (UTC)It's kind of like arguing a lot of things - depends on how you define canon, fanfic, etc. Or what wavelength you are on. If you aren't defining it in the same way or don't agree on the definition, the argument is a waste of time.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 08:44 pm (UTC)He said the same thing about Bryan Lynch's Angel comics, then back-pedaled. I don't either. Also, it was a collaborative work -- he's not the sole author/creator of it. It's highly egotistical and narcissistic for him to think so.
no subject
Date: 2020-01-27 09:27 pm (UTC)Exactly.