shadowkat: (Default)
[personal profile] shadowkat
The smell of cooking brownies fills my apt. Yep, I caved and made some more, (no, not from scratch, are you nuts! )and they are baking in my oven. Needed comfort food.

Hard week. Still sore from my tumble on Tuesday. Tired from work - or trying hard not to make any mistakes at work. Way I look at it? I survived my first month and a half. That's something. Healthcare benefits kicked in - ironic if they didn't considering I am working at a healthcare company. So saw some doctors for the requisite check-ups. Today's was the eye doc. Who requires a follow-up visit next week. (Dang it.) But outside of that, all is swell.

Finished my Farscape Marathon. That's right have now watched the entire series, including the four-hour miniseries. And what an interesting ride. I prefer the series to the mini-series by the way. Not that I didn't like the mini-series, I did, loved it. But, the series felt more character centric, less preachy/ideal driven. What is it about tv shows and their latter seasons? They all start getting preachy and "ideal" oriented towards the end, almost as if the writer has decided, wait I've established the characters, now it's "MESSAGE" time. I have a captive audience - time to tell them what I think, before I lose my chance! That said? I think Farscape was the most entertaining in this respect, not to mention most cohesive, and true to its characters. Can't say the same for other tv shows I'm afraid. BTVS? Sort of lost me in the second half of Season 7. Or rather it lost most of its characters. Never felt that way with Farscape, but then Farscape was only on for four years and wrapped up with a four-hour mini. Only other sci-fantasy show that comes close to this level plot-tight character centric - cohesive story-telling, may be Bablyon 5, which was meant to be a tele-novel. Both feel like watching novels for TV. At any rate, I recommend Farscape, with the following adivisories: 1)You have to get to episode 15 or 17 before it takes off. 2)The mini-series won't make much sense if you don't watch the series, trust me on this. It's not a movie you can watch separately from the series, the two are interconnected. 3)If you do not like alien makeup or puppetry and prefer straight, literal story-telling with few visual metaphors - you will probably hate this series. 4) It is morally dark in places and has graphic torture sequences - if you have issues with that or can't handle graphic violence or torture scenes? You may not be able to handle this show. These guys make Whedon and Minear look like wimps.
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
I think the Kennedy problem is similar to the Wood problem. She was brought in as a last minute replacement for the Tara storyline(they were forced to dump), as a result was poorly executed, underwritten, and not given enough build-up or development. Compare Tara's introduction in S4 or Oz's in S2 to Kennedy's in S7 and you can see the difference. Far too abrupt. Oz shows up in the early portion of S2 (Halloween - Fall) and is gradually introduced through the season, building layers, and kisses Willow close to the end of the season (Phases - April). Kennedy is plopped in front of us in Bring on the Night (Dec) and is kissing Willow by Killer in Me, which is what? 2 or 3 episodes later, with little build up. Oh we have cliche meetings in the hall but that's really it. They sped that puppy up.

Also agree on Faith. Very disappointed on how they dealt with her character. Especially after Angel dealt with her so well. The only part of the Faith storyline I liked was Faith/Spike - their interactions made sense. But her interactions with Buffy, Willow, Xander, Giles, and Dawn just seemed off somehow. While she did reconnect on a certain level with Buffy. They never really resolved her conflicts with Willow, Giles or Xander and they had plenty of opportunity. As a result, I just could not buy Willow, Xander, and Giles handing leadership over to Faith. If they'd spent more time showing her connecting with them and less on Caleb and dancing potentials - I might have. The only people we saw her connect with seemed to be Spike, Buffy and Wood.

I'm not sure Whedon was focused on the core four. I got the feeling he was focused on other things - Firefly, his kid, and Angel. He obviously was enamored of the Firefly core actors - Fillion, Torres and Baldwin - since he gave them major roles on Angel and Buffy.
But he seemed to have lost interest in the shows that were currently on the air. Also got a little too preachy - something I saw happening way before S7 by the way. S6 got a little preachy and message heavy at points as well. It's what happens I think when a writer stops trusting his audience, and wants to tell us the story instead of show it. Or maybe it's simply what you said so well above:

It's also just plain hard to keep turning out season-long editions of a brilliant cutting-edge show year after year after year.

Seven years is a long frigging time to be writing a story about a vampire slayer.

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 06:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios