![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
[Lots of people on livejournal are talking about lj april fools jokes, but it doesn't appear on mine. I don't see serialladder or stalkers, or any of this today. In fact my journal looks the same as it always has. Weird.]
Went out with my friend, CW and the IT geeks last evening. During the outing found out an exceedingly odd little tidbit:
Did anyone know that the Broadway (or rather Off-Broadway) revival of Fiddler on The Roof has removed all the Jewish or Judaic elements from the musical? There's no one Jewish in the cast. They've made the story completely secular. Why? Because they wanted to appeal to a broader audience. Now, to make this story just a tad weirder - CW told me that a friend of ours, work colleague, who is "orthodox" jew and a former "rabbi", saw this musical and loved it.
So here I am attempting to imagine Fiddler on The Roof with all the Jewish references removed from it. The musical is partly about anti-semitism and prejudice. Many of the songs actually comment on this.
Also saw what an iPod was. Expensive little gadget. But very handy. Now feel less like an idiot online for not having a clue what one was.
And had an interesting conversation about tv watching where I learned once again that I'm somewhat left of center on this (they adored the procedural shows which I find incredibly dull, I love the more metaphorical/emotional character arc shows)and how our responses to entertainment have a lot to do with our own emotional and psychological makeup at the time of viewing.
Rant on TV suspension of disbelief or shows that are stretching it:
1. 24 - okay how many things can a person possibly do within a 24 hour period? I think 24 just exceeded the suspension of disbelief quota on its gimmick again.
2. The OC - interesting show, but some of the teens look the same age as their parents, this is not good. Misha Barton who plays Marisa looks the same age as her mother. Actually the only two actors who look like they might be teens on this show are the ones playing Seth and Summer and even that I wonder about. Reminds me of Beverly Hills 90210 and the 30 somethings playing 19 year olds. At least the OC has made fun of this factor. I'll give them that. Interesting show. Still not a worthy replacement for ATS, but better than anything else on on Wed with ATS on hiatus.
3. Joan of Arcadia - Joan getting ankle stuck in a washing machine, and why does she always do what these supposed avatars of God tell her?
4. Tru Calling - why hasn't the police questioned Tru yet for always being on the scene of the crime and stalking people who get attacked?
Character bashing/criticism/venting (whatever you want to call it) has raised its ugly head online again. Always does when people get bored. Actually beginning to find some of it fascinating - the bashing/criticism/venting about S7/S6 and certain characters - tells me more about some fans than it does about the show or the authorial intent. It also says something fascinating about the relationship between the author/creators-the text-the viewer/reader. How that relationship can twist, turn and get clouded by outside factors: such as a horrible terrorist event, a fan's depression or own life experiences, an author's loss of interest or some other component of the creation process - say an actor's, and our own cultural values and environment.
There's a lengthy essay somewhere in all this, now the question is? Should I figure it out and write it? Or let it go? Probably let it go...since it's not like I don't have ahem other things I should be focusing on. But it is interesting to think about. How we react to certain characters or stories, why we reacte to them and even more important how we react to one another's views concerning them? It's relatively easy to support or even react to a view that validates your own but how do you react to one that is contrary to it? I'm not very good at reacting to contrary views right now, I admit, but that may be why I find it fascinating.
Went out with my friend, CW and the IT geeks last evening. During the outing found out an exceedingly odd little tidbit:
Did anyone know that the Broadway (or rather Off-Broadway) revival of Fiddler on The Roof has removed all the Jewish or Judaic elements from the musical? There's no one Jewish in the cast. They've made the story completely secular. Why? Because they wanted to appeal to a broader audience. Now, to make this story just a tad weirder - CW told me that a friend of ours, work colleague, who is "orthodox" jew and a former "rabbi", saw this musical and loved it.
So here I am attempting to imagine Fiddler on The Roof with all the Jewish references removed from it. The musical is partly about anti-semitism and prejudice. Many of the songs actually comment on this.
Also saw what an iPod was. Expensive little gadget. But very handy. Now feel less like an idiot online for not having a clue what one was.
And had an interesting conversation about tv watching where I learned once again that I'm somewhat left of center on this (they adored the procedural shows which I find incredibly dull, I love the more metaphorical/emotional character arc shows)and how our responses to entertainment have a lot to do with our own emotional and psychological makeup at the time of viewing.
Rant on TV suspension of disbelief or shows that are stretching it:
1. 24 - okay how many things can a person possibly do within a 24 hour period? I think 24 just exceeded the suspension of disbelief quota on its gimmick again.
2. The OC - interesting show, but some of the teens look the same age as their parents, this is not good. Misha Barton who plays Marisa looks the same age as her mother. Actually the only two actors who look like they might be teens on this show are the ones playing Seth and Summer and even that I wonder about. Reminds me of Beverly Hills 90210 and the 30 somethings playing 19 year olds. At least the OC has made fun of this factor. I'll give them that. Interesting show. Still not a worthy replacement for ATS, but better than anything else on on Wed with ATS on hiatus.
3. Joan of Arcadia - Joan getting ankle stuck in a washing machine, and why does she always do what these supposed avatars of God tell her?
4. Tru Calling - why hasn't the police questioned Tru yet for always being on the scene of the crime and stalking people who get attacked?
Character bashing/criticism/venting (whatever you want to call it) has raised its ugly head online again. Always does when people get bored. Actually beginning to find some of it fascinating - the bashing/criticism/venting about S7/S6 and certain characters - tells me more about some fans than it does about the show or the authorial intent. It also says something fascinating about the relationship between the author/creators-the text-the viewer/reader. How that relationship can twist, turn and get clouded by outside factors: such as a horrible terrorist event, a fan's depression or own life experiences, an author's loss of interest or some other component of the creation process - say an actor's, and our own cultural values and environment.
There's a lengthy essay somewhere in all this, now the question is? Should I figure it out and write it? Or let it go? Probably let it go...since it's not like I don't have ahem other things I should be focusing on. But it is interesting to think about. How we react to certain characters or stories, why we reacte to them and even more important how we react to one another's views concerning them? It's relatively easy to support or even react to a view that validates your own but how do you react to one that is contrary to it? I'm not very good at reacting to contrary views right now, I admit, but that may be why I find it fascinating.
