Bridgerton Review
Jan. 3rd, 2021 12:12 pmI finished watching Bridgerton on Netflix last night. This is the new Shondra Rhimes series, helmed by her protegee, and long time writer Chris Van Dunsen.
It is a fun series. Fluffy, soapy, and very true to the "Regency-style" historical romances written by American writers. These aren't high-brow fiction by the way, but fun fluffy relationship dramas focusing on gender politics and place in a bygone age. They are mainly "fantasy" fiction and those reading and enjoying them - don't tend to view them as much more than fantasy. If I were to compare them to a painting - I'd say one of those romantic landscapes from the romantic period. Historically accurate, they aren't - and there are alas plot holes and inconsistencies aplenty in the genre. It's fun though, with witty banter, sex scenes, and everything works out in the end. There's a reason I've been reading the genre for the last several years - it's comforting, like a nice warm blanket, a cup of coca with marshmallows, and a fluffy pastry.
In watching it - I thought with glee - ah, the Regency Romances I've been reading (and forgetting with equal frequency) brought to life. It should be noted that part of the appeal of the genre is how easily I can forget it. It takes up no place in the old brain. It's fun little escape or distraction.
That said, they shouldn't be discounted so arbitrarily, any more than Bridgerton should. The romance genre much like daytime soaps, superhero/action comics (Marvel and DC) - do examine social issues. They just often do it with a light touch. It's not the point of their narratives, and it's more of a passing glance, that may or may not be followed up on or delved into with greater depth. Often it's just kind of commented on. Sandition, Pride & Prejudice, Downton Abbey or the Crown - this isn't. It's more akin to the early seasons of Grey's Anatomy or Scandal. It's a touch above the Hallmark movie, and a touch below the BBC Masterpiece Theater British Costume Drama.
I watched a little of Andrew Davies' Sanditon this morning and a little of Outlander - both work hard for historical accuracy, and delve deeply into social issues, and the history of the times. The romance, such as it is, is secondary. Neither have a happy ending. And they stick in the head longer.
In Sanditon, which also takes place during the Regency Period or close enough, lighting is done by candles, the streets of London are dark and dingy, and muddy. Bridgerton in stark contrast, is clean and neat. Racism is more than commented on - it's dwelled on in Sanditon but admittedly from a white perspective.
Bridgerton has a great deal in common with Shonda Rhimes other series, Scandal and Grey's Anatomy, where social issues are commented on, but the main focus are the romantic and familial relationships. Everything is background noise. Rhimes hired medical consultants for Grey's - so the hospital masks, and for the most part the hospital itself fits what most would expect. But if you know anything about hospitals or medicine, it will most likely jar you. Same here, with Bridgerton, they hired historical consultants to get fashion, furnishings, dance routines, etc correct, but if you know anything of the period or British history - it will probably jar you.
The other commonality, is plot inconsistencies.( Read more... )
Overall rating? B+
It is a fun series. Fluffy, soapy, and very true to the "Regency-style" historical romances written by American writers. These aren't high-brow fiction by the way, but fun fluffy relationship dramas focusing on gender politics and place in a bygone age. They are mainly "fantasy" fiction and those reading and enjoying them - don't tend to view them as much more than fantasy. If I were to compare them to a painting - I'd say one of those romantic landscapes from the romantic period. Historically accurate, they aren't - and there are alas plot holes and inconsistencies aplenty in the genre. It's fun though, with witty banter, sex scenes, and everything works out in the end. There's a reason I've been reading the genre for the last several years - it's comforting, like a nice warm blanket, a cup of coca with marshmallows, and a fluffy pastry.
In watching it - I thought with glee - ah, the Regency Romances I've been reading (and forgetting with equal frequency) brought to life. It should be noted that part of the appeal of the genre is how easily I can forget it. It takes up no place in the old brain. It's fun little escape or distraction.
That said, they shouldn't be discounted so arbitrarily, any more than Bridgerton should. The romance genre much like daytime soaps, superhero/action comics (Marvel and DC) - do examine social issues. They just often do it with a light touch. It's not the point of their narratives, and it's more of a passing glance, that may or may not be followed up on or delved into with greater depth. Often it's just kind of commented on. Sandition, Pride & Prejudice, Downton Abbey or the Crown - this isn't. It's more akin to the early seasons of Grey's Anatomy or Scandal. It's a touch above the Hallmark movie, and a touch below the BBC Masterpiece Theater British Costume Drama.
I watched a little of Andrew Davies' Sanditon this morning and a little of Outlander - both work hard for historical accuracy, and delve deeply into social issues, and the history of the times. The romance, such as it is, is secondary. Neither have a happy ending. And they stick in the head longer.
In Sanditon, which also takes place during the Regency Period or close enough, lighting is done by candles, the streets of London are dark and dingy, and muddy. Bridgerton in stark contrast, is clean and neat. Racism is more than commented on - it's dwelled on in Sanditon but admittedly from a white perspective.
Bridgerton has a great deal in common with Shonda Rhimes other series, Scandal and Grey's Anatomy, where social issues are commented on, but the main focus are the romantic and familial relationships. Everything is background noise. Rhimes hired medical consultants for Grey's - so the hospital masks, and for the most part the hospital itself fits what most would expect. But if you know anything about hospitals or medicine, it will most likely jar you. Same here, with Bridgerton, they hired historical consultants to get fashion, furnishings, dance routines, etc correct, but if you know anything of the period or British history - it will probably jar you.
The other commonality, is plot inconsistencies.( Read more... )
Overall rating? B+