Books, TV, and Film mini reviews...
Oct. 21st, 2024 08:06 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
shadowkat1. Books
* Gave up on or DNF (Did not Finish) Live Long Evil (Time of Iron - Book 1) - I may come back to it, but I don't know. The writing is sloppy for a traditionally published book and very YA, even though it feels like it is slanted towards an adult audience? It's an interesting idea - I just wish it was executed a bit better. (I'm wondering if Illona Andrews who is executing a similar idea, will fare better? They are good at world building and you kind of have to be for this to work?)
The set-up is that Rae has just turned 21 and is dying of some sort of cancer. I can't remember what it is or if I was told what it is. (Which is a problem right there. Shows the writer isn't interested in certain details.)She's stuck in a hospital, visited mostly by her younger sister, who is absolutely stunning, who is in love with a fantasy series entitled Time of Iron. To the extent that she does cosplay, and attends fantasy conventions. Each of the characters in the story have multiple names and titles..like the Lady Dipped in Blood, the Lady of Hope, The Emperor, etc and so on. Rae never really read the books, and only later editions. Her sister is reading them to her in the hospital, and she pokes fun at them.
Then one night, a woman comes to her and offers her a way to live - she just has to choose to pass through a door to the fantasy realm in her sister's favorite series and pick a flower from the Emperor's Gardens, the flower will cure her cancer or all her ills. The series's realm was made real by all the fans love of it and belief in it. She'll take on the body of one of the fictional characters best suited to her - one recently left vacant. And has such and such limited time to complete her task. (I think it is 48 hours?)
I like the idea, but the execution is on the sloppy side and a bit ridiculous? At any rate, I was bored by it. I tried to read it on the way down to Hilton Head, but found myself staring out into space most of the time. Did not hold my attention at all. The blurbs say it has great banter - I'm wondering about the source of the blurbs and the editor? Because the banter is falling flat. Also it doesn't have an interesting world or characters - too Game of Thrones light. Reminds me of what various folks tried with Harry Potter and Narnia. Not a trope I particularly like. It's rarely executed all that well.
I may come back, but not certain.
* Finished Bayou Moon by Illona Andrews - [I did it as an AudioBook via a credit. I basically get free audio books for a monthly subscription price. And since I get a lot of audio books - it's worth it. You can get these for free via other sources and the library, I've just not figured it out as of yet. Without the subscription - they would cost close a bundle a shot. So worth it.]
This is more horror novel than romance. It's urban fantasy, with a heavy dose of body horror, biological science fiction/fantasy, and mad scientist worked in. The antagonist fuses the protagonist's mother with a magical tree like creature, with tentacles and vines - it's horrific. And the sort of thing that can give nightmares. The villain is something out of a horror film. There is a romance, and because the romance is the central focus not the horror aspects - it ends happily and not with the emphasis on the horror.
It's also really long-winded. I kept thinking it was over, only to have another problem or cliff-hanger that kept it going. There are way too many characters for one person to lend their voice too - so I got confused occasionally, because some of them sounded a like. The narrator is good, but not that good. (I may be spoiled with the Graphic Audio Full-Cast Dramatizations. Because this narrator is better than most.)
Overall? I enjoyed it. It had a lot interesting side-characters. The writers are really good at writing and developing side or supporting characters. Not everyone is. It's hard to do well. I love these writers for that ability alone, that and their ability to write good dialogue. A lot of novelists suck at dialogue. They need to read more plays. (That's how you learn to write dialogue - read and see plays, not musicals, plays.)
* Currently reading two things:
- 1) Home Before Dark by Riley Sager - this is the horror novel that Joe Hill (Stephen King's kid, and the writer of the Lock & Key series, among other things) recommended on Twitter a few weeks back - and I read the synopsis on Good Reads and grabbed it.
It's selling point? It will appeal to fans of the Haunting of Hill House series by Mike Flanagan - since it has a similar vibe. (That was hands down the best ghost series that I've seen - it scared me, and I still can't forget certain images from it. Also it was endlessly fascinating.)
It is set up as your run of the mill - Haunted House book, but after about the first chapter or prologue, I realized it wasn't at all. It's two books or a book within a book - told in two separate first person points of view. The "book" or "story within the story" is "House of Horrors" written by the protagonist (Maggie Holt) dead father, Ewan Holt over fifteen years ago. Ewan has since died of Cancer in his sixties, already long divorced from her mother, Jess. Apparently the book resulted in a divorce. Upon his death, her father not only leaves her the proceeds and royalties from his book (approximately $400,000), but also leaves her the "haunted" house that he apparently never got rid of or sold.
Maggie believes the book he wrote, which had disrupted her life is a work of fiction. Or lies. Even though her father insists that is entirely true and none of it was made up. And we're given information that could go either way. A graveyard in the back yard appears to be made up, yet a record player playing by itself, and a Chandelier turning on by itself, are real and happen while Maggie is there. But is someone else turning them on or is Maggie?
Both her parents want her to stay away from the house. Neither will talk about the book. And Maggie who left the house with her parents at the age of five, can't recall anything from that period of her life. Outside of snippets. She's also had night terrors ever since.
Add a dead body that falls through the kitchen ceiling. And well, we have a gothic mystery, where you can't quite trust anyone, and are uncertain if the house has ghosts or nefarious people making mischief, as is Maggie.
It's the first book that has held my attention in a while - in regards to reading. And that isn't a comic book.
[Comic books are easy, they are about 30 pages, sometimes 50 if that, and mostly art. Not everyone can read them of course (folks think differently) - for some the art or visuals makes no sense at all. They don't think visually or in pictures. But I can read art well - it's actually easier for me than words. I think in visuals. So reading a comic is akin to reading a story-board, which is why comics make great films. You don't have to do all that much. The dialogue is there, along with the visual setups.]
-2 Currently listening to Fate's Edge by Illona Andrews - this is book three in their Edge series, which I'm thinking they wrote prior to the Kate Daniels and Innkeeper series, which are a whole lot better. I like it though - these stories focus on down on their luck people, with little to no money, and are struggling to make things work. This one has potentially the most interesting hero - a con artist and gambler, and an interesting heroine, who is trying to distance herself from a family of grifters. They are going after something valuable in a Pyramid in this world's version of Egypt. So it's more of an adventure story and less of a horror novel like the previous two books were. Or so it seems at this point.
Like the others it is a romance/sci-fantasy/urban fantasy hybrid. And it is the third book in the series. You don't really have to read them in order? But it helps - to understand the hero in each book and what his motivations are. I mean, the hero in book two, is in book one. And the one in book three, is featured prominently in book two and the two kids (that I'm thinking come with him but not certain) are introduced in book one.
If you've read The Innkeeper Series - this is in the same world as that series with the same sci-urban fantasy hybrid. Also four of the side characters in The Innkeeper Series are side characters in these books. (It's why I started reading them initially, in the hoped of getting some of their back story.) George and Jack get introduced in Book 1, and make a brief appearance in Book 2. Sophie (aka Lark) is introduced in Book 2 along with Gaston. All four of these characters are adult badasses in Books 2-3 of the Innkeeper series. But side characters, who are described as somewhat ruthless and sociopathic in character. I'm trying to figure out how they got from cute kids to ruthless and borederline sociopathic adults. So far? I'm not seeing anything convincing. Also they aren't in it enough. There's a lost opportunity here? An interesting story would be how the kids grew up and the love story between George and Sophie (Lark). But it remains in the distant background. These writers do that a lot. Albeit less so with the Kate Daniels series - where various side characters get their own books, and own pov. It may be why the Kate Daniels series is by far the strongest of the series - the side characters are allowed to take off in separate stories written and self-published by the writers. (Illona Andrews self-publishes a lot of their books, which I find fascinating. They also have a bunch that are traditionally published. Having read both? I can't tell the difference.)
2. Television
* Watched a lot of Dancing with The Stars (DWTS) ("Hulu") with my eighty-two year old mother (she turned 82 last Friday). Mainly because we couldn't find anything else to agree to watch together. (I have the same problem with Wales - we scroll forever and you can scroll forever on these streaming channels now. Plus they are badly indexed. The suggestions for me from Netlix are not the same as for my mother.)
Anyhow, this season is kind of fun. We even watched an episode from last season - but mother wasn't that enthralled - she's more interested in Pommel Horse guy.
We are alike in this way? We both love to watch dance. Prefer it to watching concerts. Although mother likes to watch the classical concerts and choirs, and perform herself in choirs. I need the dance element. Watching people sing kind of bores me. Listening to them on the other hand - I adore and can do endlessly. I tend to see stories or people dancing when I listen to music, or pictures. See? I think visually.
[Also watched our soap, where we agree on all the characters and storylines. It's why we watch it - because we agree. We only have a handful of shows. And with streaming - we rarely watch shows at the same time, one of us is ahead of the other. We can rec stuff to each other. But our tastes tend to vary per mood. But when it comes to GH, we agree on everything. I've watched soaps all my life for the same reasons some people watch sports or play board games - it gives me something to discuss and do with my mother, and when my grandmother was still alive - and in her right mind - it gave me something to do with her. When it comes to family? Life is easier if you can find common denominators.]
* Finished (after I got home) The Perfect Couple (Netflix) starring Nicole Kidman and Liv Schrieber finally. It's okay. It's based on a Elin Hibbrand (sp?) beach book. Wales read it and said it was similar to the series, except the book was told in the first person pov or the pov of the bride. The series kind of is too, but makes the mistake of jumping to various other points of view - and veering away from the Bride, to the point in which we kind of lose track of her and don't care all that much. I think she's more of a focal point character in the novel.
This has too many characters. And too many twists and turns (some bordering on outlandish and poorly developed). I lose a lot of characters in it, and my attention span wandered. It's also harder to figure out the murder - because of the lack of development of various integral to the plot side characters. I barely know Thomas's wife, the mistress, or the younger brother, or even Thomas. I also barely know Amelia, or her parents. It jumps around too much and doesn't develop them enough. I don't know if the book did a better job or not - haven't read it. But it reminded me, as did the Illona Andrews novels and Live Long Evil - that character development of side-characters and world building are kind of crucial. If you don't want to develop a lot of side-characters, get rid of a few or combine them.
But don't leave hanging out there like stock characters with no real purpose outside of a plot point here or there.
* Also watched three more episodes of The Great British Baking Show -(Netflix) after I got home. It's fun, they fixed the problems they had in S8-10. This season (12) is better. I think the new host really helped make the show a little warmer, like it had been previously. It's my comfort show.
* Tracker - which is now on Hulu. It's about a guy who was raised by a mentally ill survivalist father in the woods, with his mother and two siblings. His estranged older brother may or may not have been responsible for his brother's death. At any rate, Colt, played by Justin Hartley of This is Us fame, tracks down missing people or people who have been kidnapped or lost in the woods. He works with two women in an RV. One may or may not be his sister. The two women are Lesbians and very likable.
There's also a lawyer, who he previously had a relationship with, and reluctantly took his cases. She's not in the next two episodes - so this may be a one time thing. Nor is the rookie cop that he appeared to be having a romantic hook up with - but doesn't pop up again. Instead the focus is on his mother and estranged family, and what went down with his Dad. Romance is thrown out the window. (Wise move. It works better without it.)
It's set up as a kind of "help/save someone" once a week, A plot line, with
the family character centric B plot-line in the background. Most network shows are set up in this fashion - Monster, Case, Problem of the week, + character centric back story. My difficulty with this format is I get bored easily - and when I do, my attention wonders. And it is for reasons that continue to bewilder me, difficult to write a good A-Monster/Case/Problem of the week plot line. They either go over-the-top or absurd (see 9-1-1, 9-1-1 Lone Star, Doctor Odyssey) or stick to tried and true tropes/scenarios of which there are only so many. Kid lost in the woods. Kid kidnapped by someone hunting money. Etc. Seen a couple of these stories, you've seen all the possible A-Plot Lines. The only way to jazz them up is throwing new characters at them. And hiring decent actors and building interesting supporting players, plus a really good B plot line that threatens to take over the story.
Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel did the latter, they built interesting supporting players, portrayed by good actors, and came up with a really good B plot line that often took over the story. Also they provided a definite emotional arc for each of the main characters.
Tracker is doing the throw new characters, using trite and true tropes, and trying to build one or two innovative side-characters. But I'm not sure about the B plot line. I've tried it before, and it hasn't stuck either time. I'm not sure I can get to S2, where Jenson Anckles takes on the role of the estranged brother.
* Two more episodes of Season 2 of Sullivan's Crossing - it's similar to Virgin River (adapted from a series of contemporary family drama/romances by Robyn Carr. Carr appears to write contemporary family drama novels...which kind of fall somewhere between Lifetime and Hallmark. They have more edge than Hallmark (not as boring and better actors/scripts/dialogue), but not quite the edge of Lifetime (about the same in actors, better scripts/dialogue). I kind of enjoy it? I like family relationship dramas. This one takes place in Nova Scotia. Big City Doc returns to her father's lodging/campground business to see him, and deal with issues she's running away from. Think Norther Exposure and Gilmore Girls - but not quite the same level of writing. She falls for the local handyman (Chad Michael Murray of One Tree Hill), struggles with her Dad (Scott Patterson of Gilmore Girls), and has an odd-sibling/romantic rivalry with Lola. Add to the mix, the Native Canadian couple running her father's campground, the Black diner owner and his ex-model sister (and Doc's best friend), the owner's son, and the local Fire/Rescue group - and we have a series, with quirky or not-so-quirky residents, and family drama. It kind of makes me miss Gilmore Girls and Northern Exposure which did all of this ever so slightly better?
* On the plane - I watched over half of IF - the Ryan Renyolds film with I think the little girl from The Last of Us? It's much better than I expected. The Imaginary Friends are interesting and innovative, and it is heartwarming in places. I thought about going back to it on the way home on the plane, but decided against it. It made me cry. I really don't want to cry on the plane again. Also laugh in places.
It's about a little girl who lost her mother, and whose father is in the hospital for a heart operation. While staying with her paternal grandmother, she stumbles upon a bunch of Imaginary Friends, who she can actually see. They've been forced into retirement and out of service, once their child moves on with out them. She decides to see if she can help them and is given the job of finding them new kids. But she comes up with something a bit better.
It's kind of musical, but not at the same time. It has a few - dance and song numbers which fit the story, and are realistically rendered. Very imaginative. And works well for children or families. I watched it on the plane - because when I selected Hacks (R rated raunchy LGBTQA adult comedy), it told me that this had adult "visual" content that may not work for kids or the people around me. I looked around me, and thought, okay, Hacks is so not worth the trouble, I'll pick something else. I had a small child on one side of me, a couple of kids behind, and an older gentleman next to me. He was falling asleep to a horror film, that he couldn't hear. No one could really see it. I was sitting on the aisle.
I may have to hunt for it on Prime or Hulu, to see if I can see all of it uninterrupted. It exceeded expectations. I heard it was awful, it wasn't. Helped by the fact that we're really following and in the little girl's pov not Ryan Renyolds (who I like well enough - but a little can go a long way).
* Gave up on or DNF (Did not Finish) Live Long Evil (Time of Iron - Book 1) - I may come back to it, but I don't know. The writing is sloppy for a traditionally published book and very YA, even though it feels like it is slanted towards an adult audience? It's an interesting idea - I just wish it was executed a bit better. (I'm wondering if Illona Andrews who is executing a similar idea, will fare better? They are good at world building and you kind of have to be for this to work?)
The set-up is that Rae has just turned 21 and is dying of some sort of cancer. I can't remember what it is or if I was told what it is. (Which is a problem right there. Shows the writer isn't interested in certain details.)She's stuck in a hospital, visited mostly by her younger sister, who is absolutely stunning, who is in love with a fantasy series entitled Time of Iron. To the extent that she does cosplay, and attends fantasy conventions. Each of the characters in the story have multiple names and titles..like the Lady Dipped in Blood, the Lady of Hope, The Emperor, etc and so on. Rae never really read the books, and only later editions. Her sister is reading them to her in the hospital, and she pokes fun at them.
Then one night, a woman comes to her and offers her a way to live - she just has to choose to pass through a door to the fantasy realm in her sister's favorite series and pick a flower from the Emperor's Gardens, the flower will cure her cancer or all her ills. The series's realm was made real by all the fans love of it and belief in it. She'll take on the body of one of the fictional characters best suited to her - one recently left vacant. And has such and such limited time to complete her task. (I think it is 48 hours?)
I like the idea, but the execution is on the sloppy side and a bit ridiculous? At any rate, I was bored by it. I tried to read it on the way down to Hilton Head, but found myself staring out into space most of the time. Did not hold my attention at all. The blurbs say it has great banter - I'm wondering about the source of the blurbs and the editor? Because the banter is falling flat. Also it doesn't have an interesting world or characters - too Game of Thrones light. Reminds me of what various folks tried with Harry Potter and Narnia. Not a trope I particularly like. It's rarely executed all that well.
I may come back, but not certain.
* Finished Bayou Moon by Illona Andrews - [I did it as an AudioBook via a credit. I basically get free audio books for a monthly subscription price. And since I get a lot of audio books - it's worth it. You can get these for free via other sources and the library, I've just not figured it out as of yet. Without the subscription - they would cost close a bundle a shot. So worth it.]
This is more horror novel than romance. It's urban fantasy, with a heavy dose of body horror, biological science fiction/fantasy, and mad scientist worked in. The antagonist fuses the protagonist's mother with a magical tree like creature, with tentacles and vines - it's horrific. And the sort of thing that can give nightmares. The villain is something out of a horror film. There is a romance, and because the romance is the central focus not the horror aspects - it ends happily and not with the emphasis on the horror.
It's also really long-winded. I kept thinking it was over, only to have another problem or cliff-hanger that kept it going. There are way too many characters for one person to lend their voice too - so I got confused occasionally, because some of them sounded a like. The narrator is good, but not that good. (I may be spoiled with the Graphic Audio Full-Cast Dramatizations. Because this narrator is better than most.)
Overall? I enjoyed it. It had a lot interesting side-characters. The writers are really good at writing and developing side or supporting characters. Not everyone is. It's hard to do well. I love these writers for that ability alone, that and their ability to write good dialogue. A lot of novelists suck at dialogue. They need to read more plays. (That's how you learn to write dialogue - read and see plays, not musicals, plays.)
* Currently reading two things:
- 1) Home Before Dark by Riley Sager - this is the horror novel that Joe Hill (Stephen King's kid, and the writer of the Lock & Key series, among other things) recommended on Twitter a few weeks back - and I read the synopsis on Good Reads and grabbed it.
It's selling point? It will appeal to fans of the Haunting of Hill House series by Mike Flanagan - since it has a similar vibe. (That was hands down the best ghost series that I've seen - it scared me, and I still can't forget certain images from it. Also it was endlessly fascinating.)
It is set up as your run of the mill - Haunted House book, but after about the first chapter or prologue, I realized it wasn't at all. It's two books or a book within a book - told in two separate first person points of view. The "book" or "story within the story" is "House of Horrors" written by the protagonist (Maggie Holt) dead father, Ewan Holt over fifteen years ago. Ewan has since died of Cancer in his sixties, already long divorced from her mother, Jess. Apparently the book resulted in a divorce. Upon his death, her father not only leaves her the proceeds and royalties from his book (approximately $400,000), but also leaves her the "haunted" house that he apparently never got rid of or sold.
Maggie believes the book he wrote, which had disrupted her life is a work of fiction. Or lies. Even though her father insists that is entirely true and none of it was made up. And we're given information that could go either way. A graveyard in the back yard appears to be made up, yet a record player playing by itself, and a Chandelier turning on by itself, are real and happen while Maggie is there. But is someone else turning them on or is Maggie?
Both her parents want her to stay away from the house. Neither will talk about the book. And Maggie who left the house with her parents at the age of five, can't recall anything from that period of her life. Outside of snippets. She's also had night terrors ever since.
Add a dead body that falls through the kitchen ceiling. And well, we have a gothic mystery, where you can't quite trust anyone, and are uncertain if the house has ghosts or nefarious people making mischief, as is Maggie.
It's the first book that has held my attention in a while - in regards to reading. And that isn't a comic book.
[Comic books are easy, they are about 30 pages, sometimes 50 if that, and mostly art. Not everyone can read them of course (folks think differently) - for some the art or visuals makes no sense at all. They don't think visually or in pictures. But I can read art well - it's actually easier for me than words. I think in visuals. So reading a comic is akin to reading a story-board, which is why comics make great films. You don't have to do all that much. The dialogue is there, along with the visual setups.]
-2 Currently listening to Fate's Edge by Illona Andrews - this is book three in their Edge series, which I'm thinking they wrote prior to the Kate Daniels and Innkeeper series, which are a whole lot better. I like it though - these stories focus on down on their luck people, with little to no money, and are struggling to make things work. This one has potentially the most interesting hero - a con artist and gambler, and an interesting heroine, who is trying to distance herself from a family of grifters. They are going after something valuable in a Pyramid in this world's version of Egypt. So it's more of an adventure story and less of a horror novel like the previous two books were. Or so it seems at this point.
Like the others it is a romance/sci-fantasy/urban fantasy hybrid. And it is the third book in the series. You don't really have to read them in order? But it helps - to understand the hero in each book and what his motivations are. I mean, the hero in book two, is in book one. And the one in book three, is featured prominently in book two and the two kids (that I'm thinking come with him but not certain) are introduced in book one.
If you've read The Innkeeper Series - this is in the same world as that series with the same sci-urban fantasy hybrid. Also four of the side characters in The Innkeeper Series are side characters in these books. (It's why I started reading them initially, in the hoped of getting some of their back story.) George and Jack get introduced in Book 1, and make a brief appearance in Book 2. Sophie (aka Lark) is introduced in Book 2 along with Gaston. All four of these characters are adult badasses in Books 2-3 of the Innkeeper series. But side characters, who are described as somewhat ruthless and sociopathic in character. I'm trying to figure out how they got from cute kids to ruthless and borederline sociopathic adults. So far? I'm not seeing anything convincing. Also they aren't in it enough. There's a lost opportunity here? An interesting story would be how the kids grew up and the love story between George and Sophie (Lark). But it remains in the distant background. These writers do that a lot. Albeit less so with the Kate Daniels series - where various side characters get their own books, and own pov. It may be why the Kate Daniels series is by far the strongest of the series - the side characters are allowed to take off in separate stories written and self-published by the writers. (Illona Andrews self-publishes a lot of their books, which I find fascinating. They also have a bunch that are traditionally published. Having read both? I can't tell the difference.)
2. Television
* Watched a lot of Dancing with The Stars (DWTS) ("Hulu") with my eighty-two year old mother (she turned 82 last Friday). Mainly because we couldn't find anything else to agree to watch together. (I have the same problem with Wales - we scroll forever and you can scroll forever on these streaming channels now. Plus they are badly indexed. The suggestions for me from Netlix are not the same as for my mother.)
Anyhow, this season is kind of fun. We even watched an episode from last season - but mother wasn't that enthralled - she's more interested in Pommel Horse guy.
We are alike in this way? We both love to watch dance. Prefer it to watching concerts. Although mother likes to watch the classical concerts and choirs, and perform herself in choirs. I need the dance element. Watching people sing kind of bores me. Listening to them on the other hand - I adore and can do endlessly. I tend to see stories or people dancing when I listen to music, or pictures. See? I think visually.
[Also watched our soap, where we agree on all the characters and storylines. It's why we watch it - because we agree. We only have a handful of shows. And with streaming - we rarely watch shows at the same time, one of us is ahead of the other. We can rec stuff to each other. But our tastes tend to vary per mood. But when it comes to GH, we agree on everything. I've watched soaps all my life for the same reasons some people watch sports or play board games - it gives me something to discuss and do with my mother, and when my grandmother was still alive - and in her right mind - it gave me something to do with her. When it comes to family? Life is easier if you can find common denominators.]
* Finished (after I got home) The Perfect Couple (Netflix) starring Nicole Kidman and Liv Schrieber finally. It's okay. It's based on a Elin Hibbrand (sp?) beach book. Wales read it and said it was similar to the series, except the book was told in the first person pov or the pov of the bride. The series kind of is too, but makes the mistake of jumping to various other points of view - and veering away from the Bride, to the point in which we kind of lose track of her and don't care all that much. I think she's more of a focal point character in the novel.
This has too many characters. And too many twists and turns (some bordering on outlandish and poorly developed). I lose a lot of characters in it, and my attention span wandered. It's also harder to figure out the murder - because of the lack of development of various integral to the plot side characters. I barely know Thomas's wife, the mistress, or the younger brother, or even Thomas. I also barely know Amelia, or her parents. It jumps around too much and doesn't develop them enough. I don't know if the book did a better job or not - haven't read it. But it reminded me, as did the Illona Andrews novels and Live Long Evil - that character development of side-characters and world building are kind of crucial. If you don't want to develop a lot of side-characters, get rid of a few or combine them.
But don't leave hanging out there like stock characters with no real purpose outside of a plot point here or there.
* Also watched three more episodes of The Great British Baking Show -(Netflix) after I got home. It's fun, they fixed the problems they had in S8-10. This season (12) is better. I think the new host really helped make the show a little warmer, like it had been previously. It's my comfort show.
* Tracker - which is now on Hulu. It's about a guy who was raised by a mentally ill survivalist father in the woods, with his mother and two siblings. His estranged older brother may or may not have been responsible for his brother's death. At any rate, Colt, played by Justin Hartley of This is Us fame, tracks down missing people or people who have been kidnapped or lost in the woods. He works with two women in an RV. One may or may not be his sister. The two women are Lesbians and very likable.
There's also a lawyer, who he previously had a relationship with, and reluctantly took his cases. She's not in the next two episodes - so this may be a one time thing. Nor is the rookie cop that he appeared to be having a romantic hook up with - but doesn't pop up again. Instead the focus is on his mother and estranged family, and what went down with his Dad. Romance is thrown out the window. (Wise move. It works better without it.)
It's set up as a kind of "help/save someone" once a week, A plot line, with
the family character centric B plot-line in the background. Most network shows are set up in this fashion - Monster, Case, Problem of the week, + character centric back story. My difficulty with this format is I get bored easily - and when I do, my attention wonders. And it is for reasons that continue to bewilder me, difficult to write a good A-Monster/Case/Problem of the week plot line. They either go over-the-top or absurd (see 9-1-1, 9-1-1 Lone Star, Doctor Odyssey) or stick to tried and true tropes/scenarios of which there are only so many. Kid lost in the woods. Kid kidnapped by someone hunting money. Etc. Seen a couple of these stories, you've seen all the possible A-Plot Lines. The only way to jazz them up is throwing new characters at them. And hiring decent actors and building interesting supporting players, plus a really good B plot line that threatens to take over the story.
Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel did the latter, they built interesting supporting players, portrayed by good actors, and came up with a really good B plot line that often took over the story. Also they provided a definite emotional arc for each of the main characters.
Tracker is doing the throw new characters, using trite and true tropes, and trying to build one or two innovative side-characters. But I'm not sure about the B plot line. I've tried it before, and it hasn't stuck either time. I'm not sure I can get to S2, where Jenson Anckles takes on the role of the estranged brother.
* Two more episodes of Season 2 of Sullivan's Crossing - it's similar to Virgin River (adapted from a series of contemporary family drama/romances by Robyn Carr. Carr appears to write contemporary family drama novels...which kind of fall somewhere between Lifetime and Hallmark. They have more edge than Hallmark (not as boring and better actors/scripts/dialogue), but not quite the edge of Lifetime (about the same in actors, better scripts/dialogue). I kind of enjoy it? I like family relationship dramas. This one takes place in Nova Scotia. Big City Doc returns to her father's lodging/campground business to see him, and deal with issues she's running away from. Think Norther Exposure and Gilmore Girls - but not quite the same level of writing. She falls for the local handyman (Chad Michael Murray of One Tree Hill), struggles with her Dad (Scott Patterson of Gilmore Girls), and has an odd-sibling/romantic rivalry with Lola. Add to the mix, the Native Canadian couple running her father's campground, the Black diner owner and his ex-model sister (and Doc's best friend), the owner's son, and the local Fire/Rescue group - and we have a series, with quirky or not-so-quirky residents, and family drama. It kind of makes me miss Gilmore Girls and Northern Exposure which did all of this ever so slightly better?
* On the plane - I watched over half of IF - the Ryan Renyolds film with I think the little girl from The Last of Us? It's much better than I expected. The Imaginary Friends are interesting and innovative, and it is heartwarming in places. I thought about going back to it on the way home on the plane, but decided against it. It made me cry. I really don't want to cry on the plane again. Also laugh in places.
It's about a little girl who lost her mother, and whose father is in the hospital for a heart operation. While staying with her paternal grandmother, she stumbles upon a bunch of Imaginary Friends, who she can actually see. They've been forced into retirement and out of service, once their child moves on with out them. She decides to see if she can help them and is given the job of finding them new kids. But she comes up with something a bit better.
It's kind of musical, but not at the same time. It has a few - dance and song numbers which fit the story, and are realistically rendered. Very imaginative. And works well for children or families. I watched it on the plane - because when I selected Hacks (R rated raunchy LGBTQA adult comedy), it told me that this had adult "visual" content that may not work for kids or the people around me. I looked around me, and thought, okay, Hacks is so not worth the trouble, I'll pick something else. I had a small child on one side of me, a couple of kids behind, and an older gentleman next to me. He was falling asleep to a horror film, that he couldn't hear. No one could really see it. I was sitting on the aisle.
I may have to hunt for it on Prime or Hulu, to see if I can see all of it uninterrupted. It exceeded expectations. I heard it was awful, it wasn't. Helped by the fact that we're really following and in the little girl's pov not Ryan Renyolds (who I like well enough - but a little can go a long way).
no subject
Date: 2024-10-23 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-10-24 02:27 pm (UTC)