shadowkat: (Fred)
[personal profile] shadowkat
Playing online while watching tv again...at the moment a "Grey's Anatomy" re-run. Grey's is my comfort show.

I have all sorts of cultural things that comfort me and to be honest they are more satisfying to rely on than well, food and alcohol, although I do that too - more than I should. In that category *cough*chocolat*cough* comes to mind.

Some comfort books past and present include - the Spenser novels by Robert Parker (who I almost got a chance to see in person, but passed on it - have learned from experience that I prefer not to meet favorite writers and actors in person), Janet Evanovich's Stephanie Plum novels - which got me through the period of time around 9/11 (I read her novels like crazy on the trains and idiotically sent a fan letter about it to her site, which I wish I hadn't. Some people have foot in mouth disease, I have email in mouth disease.), Jim Butcher's Dresden series, Charlain Harris' Southern Vampire series, The Harry Potter novels, the PG Wodehouse Jeeves and Wooster books, the Lymond Chronicles, and Elizabeth Peter's "Vicky Bliss" mysteries are all examples of some of my comfort reads. Also the X-men comic books. These characters speak to me, their situations, their pain, their struggle. I think the reason I adore the X-men is it is a series of comic books about characters who are misunderstood, exiled, and considered outcasts. The books are about prejudice, discrimination, intolerance, and the struggle against such things. They are about keeping one's dignity and integrity in the face of intolerance and in front of bullies. They are also about the feeling of being cast-out, different. The books I've listed above all have that in common - that idea of being uncomfortable in one's skin. Of feeling like an outsider. Of struggling to fit in. Of being different. Each of the leads is someone who is operating outside societal structure, who likes structure, but at the same time questions it, can't quite handle authority yet desires authority.
In short - the characters speak to me. Also each of the books I've listed above have very strong no-nonsense women in them - women who are not damsels, yet still feminine. Who can be the hero in their own right.

Comfort reads I define as books that do not require much thought. They don't make you bleed. They don't hurt. They won't change your mind or flip you upside down. Although that can happen. They aren't listed as "great literature" and more often than not, someone out there will tease or give you a disapproving nod for choosing to read them. They aren't in short on that academic reading list you'd get from your college professor. These are books you can more or less just emotionally fall into. The world surrounds you. You love the characters. And you do not, I repeat, do not want to come up for air. You just want to stay in this character's world for as long as possible. Curl up in it in front of a hot fire, with a mug of hot coco in your hand, while you just fall into the words. More often than not it is not the writing that makes me feel this way but the characters the writer has created, their inter-relationships, dialogue, etc.

Comfort tv shows are similar.

It's sort of like a scrumptuous dessert for the brain. Except you can eat it again and again without gaining weight or getting sick.

Anywho here's a meme:

What are your comfort reads?

Why?

Date: 2006-08-04 04:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wisewoman.livejournal.com
Well, for a while there my comfort books were The Cat Who... series, but then I read them all. Wow, talk about comfort! Also Anne Perry, I guess. Diana Gabaldon's Outlander series with Claire and Jamie. Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series, although I've had the last book for years now and haven't read it. John Sandford's Prey series, but again, I just read all 16 of them in a row.

Now I'm starting on the Dresden Files, so they'll be my new comfort books, I hope.

;o)

Date: 2006-08-05 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Haven't tried the Outlander series - time travel books bug me, because they never quite know how to deal with the fact that if you travel back in time you will screw up your own future. I've read quite a few, but am bugged by that small detail. The ones I thought dealt with it the best, made that detail the main focus of the book or film.

That said, had another friend rec the book, a friend who does not like romance novels and did not realize it was a romance novel until halfway through the book. She also doesn't like fantasy. The fact she liked it, makes me curious. Just wish it wasn't such a big book. Big books are hard to cart around NYC.

I've read a little Ann Perry. Not a lot.

Dresden is a total comfort read for me - I always want more afterwards. And can't wait for the next one. Also they come out faster than the Harry Potter books do and there's more of them.

Date: 2006-08-05 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wisewoman.livejournal.com
IIRC, Outlander itself isn't that big a book, although the ones that follow it certainly are. Dragonfly in Amber is quite hefty.

I forgot to mention Harry Potter--I love them too, of course. I'll be sorry when it's over.

;o)

Date: 2006-08-06 02:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
I guess it depends on what you consider big. I picked up the Diana Gabaldon Outlander today, and that baby has 850 pages. Granted it you are used to George RR MArtin, that's nothing. But I like my books a tad leaner. Half of that is padding and completely unnecessary.

Date: 2006-08-06 04:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wisewoman.livejournal.com
OMG! That's definitely not the original novel! Was it The Outlander Companion, maybe? I know there's something like that out there as well. The original novel would have been, maybe 300 pages? Probably more like 250. I think I've still got it around here somewhere, I'll check. It was less than 1/2 the size of the sequel, Dragonfly in Amber.

Date: 2006-08-06 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
No, it's definitely the original novel according to the volumn I hold in my hand.
Copyrighted in 1991. Written by Diana Gabaldon. 850 pages - and it is a regular size paperback.
And the title is "Outlander".

Could you be confusing this with something else?

Date: 2006-08-06 04:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wisewoman.livejournal.com
Okay, I just went and found my old copy of Outlander, published in 1991, and I haven't looked at it since then. You might be right...my copy is in hardcover and it's a small book, maybe an inch thick, but when I opened it I found the paper is very thin, the font very small, and it does have 620 pages. If they reprinted it and used a heavier stock, or a larger font, it could go to 800 pages I guess, and be a thicker volume.

Weird.

;o)

;o)

Date: 2006-08-06 01:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
It's small print and thin pages - but also the same paperback size as a Dresden paperback or any of the others on the market. Paperbacks due tend to have more pages than hard back novels - particularly normal size paperbacks. Large size or more expensive "contemporary" paperbacks will have the same number of pages (ie the first paperback editions of the Harry Potter novels as opposed to the second, cheaper printing.)

So your version just had bigger pages - more words could fit.

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 05:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios