(no subject)
Aug. 13th, 2008 10:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
A Negative Review of Breaking Dawn by Elizabeth Hand in the Washington Post
To appreciate this you have to know that Elizabeth Hand wrote the anti-romantic, pro-feminist book Waking The Moon - considered a bit of an underground cult hit in dark fantasy.
And one of her pals writes book reviews and pulpy vampire horror novels amongst other things.
Neither have ever made the splash Twilight is. But both, I will state, have written somewhat better books - I was actually able to read and enjoy Hand. She's not great...the book's fun, but a bit over-the-top in places regarding the rituals. Donna Tartt's Secret History was a lot better. As was Tom Tyron's Harvest Home, but whatever.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 04:13 pm (UTC)Donna Tartt's novel wasn't either.
I think the only truly "feminist" authors I've read in this category might be Sherri Tepper who wrote Grass, Elizabeth Bear, and Octavia Butler.
Of course depends on how narrowly we're defining it.
Hand considers herself a feminist author, but then so does Meyer and Whedon, so that is not saying all that much. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 03:45 am (UTC)What cracked me up was how often I had to look up words while reading...she has serious 50-cent word use issues, and it comes across very pretentious. Eventually I ended up reading her first published novel, and she included an afterward in the new printing where she admitted that it is a weakness that her professors used to tell her was pretentious. And it was hilarious...her first novel was UNBELIEVABLY worse than her later ones. LOL.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 04:17 pm (UTC)Not a fan of Hand, to be honest. Only read Waking the Moon, which I barely remember - read it over 10 years ago. But - it was readable and sort of enjoyable.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 06:02 am (UTC)