![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
shadowkatWhat (if any) books would you ban from a high school library? Are there certain subjects that you feel are inappropriate for teenagers regardless of literary merit?
I wouldn't ban any books from a high school library. At the age of 16 - I read Rosemary Rodgers and Harold Robbins, I also thumbed through Erica Jong's Fear of Flying (the most boring thing I'd attempted). I read anything and everything I could - as did my parents when they were young, which may be why they didn't constrict my reading. My father used to read Ian Fleming novels. Reading shows you different worlds and different perspectives. When you read, you think. You choose how to respond to the text. It is an interactive enterprise. To ban a book, any book, is sending the wrong message. Also, the most violent, and graphic novel of all time is probably the Bible. Ages ago - only monks were permitted to read it, because it was considered too difficult for the common folk.
After reading this interview with Brad Meltzer, who I have read previously - his writing not the interview, I realized why I am struggling with the Buffy comics. I am not a Brad Meltzer fan. I have read him before, more than once.
I read his breakout novel - the best-selling Dead Even - one of the millions of legal thrillers that now feel rather interchangable. To put it mildly, Meltzer makes John Grisham feel like Cormac McCarthy or Shakespeare in comparison. Grisham has more depth, not to mention more believablity and better characterization. Meltzer's characters are somewhat one-dimensional pretty people, with a cliche flaw, while Grisham's I can actually visualize. I compare the two, because they write the same genre, as does David Baldacci - who is also much much better. There's a reason Baldacci has done better. And I'm not necessarily a Baldacci fan. The best of the bunch is Scott Turow, who wrote the famous Paper Chase. Turow's sentences stick with you longer. The only thing I remember about Dead Even, besides the fact that I found it disappointing and a waste of money, much the same way I felt when I read a Danielle Steele novel - is the hero escapes a kiler by hiding under a subway platform. I remember it, because I've stood on many a platform contemplating how that is possible. At the time I was reading it - I was taking the subway and thinking, no this is not possible, you can't do it. Now that I work for a commuter rail service, I know it is impossible. The book is rather beyond belief, particularly if you know anything about law. But hey, it was a first effort. So I thought, after reading all the hype on Identity Crisis - the comic that changed the DC Universe and rocketed into a new era - or so they said, comic book publishers tend towards the hyperbole, to check it out. Read the entire thing in the space of a half hour maybe less in the comic book store, along with Whedon's endorsement - it too was forgettable - the only thing I remember is the built up about Batman and why he decided to collect dossiers on all the Justice Leaguers because he realized through the events in Identity Crisis that they could be dangerous to humanity, since they were all powerful. Batman's the duped detective in the story who manages to unravel the thing. That was interesting. The mystery? It was basically a domestic dispute..or something. I didn't find it interesting and didn't care, so don't remember what it was or what it entailed. All I remember is the split between Batman, Superman and Wonderwoman or the tension, there wasn't really a split as a result of it. Outside of that? It drug. I scanned. But unlike Buffy, they had less characters, and developed the minor ones a bit more.
The same thing is happening in the Buffy comic - I am finding that the story is dragging.
The suspense lacking and my suspension of disbelief...cracking. But hey what can we expect from someone who thinks Georges Jeanty can deliver emotional moments? I guess he does, I guess this is subjective. But I'm not seeing it. Where? I admit I may be too busy trying to figure out who is who to notice. Also the My Little Pony (TM BFG) artwork sort of lacks emotional weight in my opinion. It's too magna lite.
At any rate if Meltzer is behind the big Twilight reveal...this probably means we'll get it late in his run - ie, around March, and that it will probably be someone I really don't think is believable but all the clues lead to. I'm admittedly worried it will be Spike - even if it makes no logical sense, but I've read Metzler - he's plots don't make logical sense to me - they tend to hackneyed. Eh. I hope I'm wrong. Maybe it will be better than I think. Maybe Twilight will be Hank Summers - that's who I really want it to be - I can fanwank that one. The others, I really can't. And everyone else is sort of yawnworthy. But with Metzler? Can't say I have a lot of faith in the outcome. But I could be wrong. At any rate, going into this with extreemly low expectations. I may even thumb through it or read others reviews before buying this round, we shall see. I have not bought any Metzler novels since Dead Even - which I handed off to my Granny at the time, who also thought it was one of the crappier mysteries she'd read. We ripped it apart on the phone one night. Had quite a blast doing it. So if I buy the comics - that will be the first thing I've purchased by Metzler since Dead Even.
Beginning to think Fury, Bell, Greenwalt and Noxon were necessary components to the Whedon mix. That and the actors themselves.
I wouldn't ban any books from a high school library. At the age of 16 - I read Rosemary Rodgers and Harold Robbins, I also thumbed through Erica Jong's Fear of Flying (the most boring thing I'd attempted). I read anything and everything I could - as did my parents when they were young, which may be why they didn't constrict my reading. My father used to read Ian Fleming novels. Reading shows you different worlds and different perspectives. When you read, you think. You choose how to respond to the text. It is an interactive enterprise. To ban a book, any book, is sending the wrong message. Also, the most violent, and graphic novel of all time is probably the Bible. Ages ago - only monks were permitted to read it, because it was considered too difficult for the common folk.
After reading this interview with Brad Meltzer, who I have read previously - his writing not the interview, I realized why I am struggling with the Buffy comics. I am not a Brad Meltzer fan. I have read him before, more than once.
I read his breakout novel - the best-selling Dead Even - one of the millions of legal thrillers that now feel rather interchangable. To put it mildly, Meltzer makes John Grisham feel like Cormac McCarthy or Shakespeare in comparison. Grisham has more depth, not to mention more believablity and better characterization. Meltzer's characters are somewhat one-dimensional pretty people, with a cliche flaw, while Grisham's I can actually visualize. I compare the two, because they write the same genre, as does David Baldacci - who is also much much better. There's a reason Baldacci has done better. And I'm not necessarily a Baldacci fan. The best of the bunch is Scott Turow, who wrote the famous Paper Chase. Turow's sentences stick with you longer. The only thing I remember about Dead Even, besides the fact that I found it disappointing and a waste of money, much the same way I felt when I read a Danielle Steele novel - is the hero escapes a kiler by hiding under a subway platform. I remember it, because I've stood on many a platform contemplating how that is possible. At the time I was reading it - I was taking the subway and thinking, no this is not possible, you can't do it. Now that I work for a commuter rail service, I know it is impossible. The book is rather beyond belief, particularly if you know anything about law. But hey, it was a first effort. So I thought, after reading all the hype on Identity Crisis - the comic that changed the DC Universe and rocketed into a new era - or so they said, comic book publishers tend towards the hyperbole, to check it out. Read the entire thing in the space of a half hour maybe less in the comic book store, along with Whedon's endorsement - it too was forgettable - the only thing I remember is the built up about Batman and why he decided to collect dossiers on all the Justice Leaguers because he realized through the events in Identity Crisis that they could be dangerous to humanity, since they were all powerful. Batman's the duped detective in the story who manages to unravel the thing. That was interesting. The mystery? It was basically a domestic dispute..or something. I didn't find it interesting and didn't care, so don't remember what it was or what it entailed. All I remember is the split between Batman, Superman and Wonderwoman or the tension, there wasn't really a split as a result of it. Outside of that? It drug. I scanned. But unlike Buffy, they had less characters, and developed the minor ones a bit more.
The same thing is happening in the Buffy comic - I am finding that the story is dragging.
The suspense lacking and my suspension of disbelief...cracking. But hey what can we expect from someone who thinks Georges Jeanty can deliver emotional moments? I guess he does, I guess this is subjective. But I'm not seeing it. Where? I admit I may be too busy trying to figure out who is who to notice. Also the My Little Pony (TM BFG) artwork sort of lacks emotional weight in my opinion. It's too magna lite.
At any rate if Meltzer is behind the big Twilight reveal...this probably means we'll get it late in his run - ie, around March, and that it will probably be someone I really don't think is believable but all the clues lead to. I'm admittedly worried it will be Spike - even if it makes no logical sense, but I've read Metzler - he's plots don't make logical sense to me - they tend to hackneyed. Eh. I hope I'm wrong. Maybe it will be better than I think. Maybe Twilight will be Hank Summers - that's who I really want it to be - I can fanwank that one. The others, I really can't. And everyone else is sort of yawnworthy. But with Metzler? Can't say I have a lot of faith in the outcome. But I could be wrong. At any rate, going into this with extreemly low expectations. I may even thumb through it or read others reviews before buying this round, we shall see. I have not bought any Metzler novels since Dead Even - which I handed off to my Granny at the time, who also thought it was one of the crappier mysteries she'd read. We ripped it apart on the phone one night. Had quite a blast doing it. So if I buy the comics - that will be the first thing I've purchased by Metzler since Dead Even.
Beginning to think Fury, Bell, Greenwalt and Noxon were necessary components to the Whedon mix. That and the actors themselves.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-11-19 05:28 pm (UTC)Since his first issue won't be out until February, late in his run would be around May. And even then, I wouldn't be surprised if they take the classic "Twilight takes his mask off facing away from the camera, cut to Buffy saying 'Oh my God, it's YOU?!?' - end of issue" approach. It's a superhero comic, right? Assuming, that is, that Twilight is ever revealed at all
Oh he'll be revealed. I'm just wondering if we'll be able to recognize who it is without a name shout-out or something. Too many of these people look alike. The only one that would not require a name shout out is Willow and Xander - because she has red hair and he has an eye-patch. Or Giles - as long as he is wearing glasses.
And the "Oh GOD, it's you?" - that's pretty much how they did the big reveal in "Identity Crisis" - if memory serves. Then they did a quick unravel to show us all the little clues we were missing - by Batman, the Great Detective explaining it or something like that. I remember shrugging at the time and thinking, yeah, makes sense, but why don't I care? The murderer was a superhero in Identity Crisis - that was the big reveal. Not one we knew or cared that much about. A sort of subsidiary character that I hadn't seen or heard of prior to that comic and cared little for.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-19 06:19 pm (UTC)Well, THAT certainly inspires confidence. ;-) Maybe Adam or Hank Summers aren'tt as inconceivable as I assumed they were.