shadowkat: (Default)
[personal profile] shadowkat
So, after the Twilight spoiler...where Allie and others are suggesting that Twilight isn't really a villian or big bad, and that he is redeemable. I went back and re-read the issue where Buffy and Twilight fight, and Twilight critically injures Satsu - putting her in the hospital. I was curious to see if it was possible to redeem Twilight or see Twilight in a positive light, without sending an anti-feminist and sexist, not to mention misogynistic message. I don't believe it is, but I'm open to other views on this score.



Buffy to Satsu: People who love me tend to oh, die...maybe go to a hell dimension, or burn up, or they start letting vamps suck on em and they leave, they all leave, even my friends, sooner or later everybody realizes there's something wrong...something wrong with me, or around me, or... Wow. Did not mean to end up there. (she's crying).

Twilight then throws a boulder at her. And she's bleeding from the nose, injured.

Twilight: The Chosen One Always in Pain...and always complaining. Just like a girl. (This is where he critically injurs Satsu, by breaking her nose, then kicking her into a stone crypt two feet or more away.)

[Buffy goes to slice up the center with the Scythe]

Twilight: I know that move slayer. Le me show you some of mine. (He takes her by the scruff of her shirt in front and pulls her skyward, they are flying.) Understand this girl. You cannot fight me.

Buffy: Understand this ass-clown - I probably will anyway. (she puts the scythe in choke-hold around his neck).

Twilight : I'd expect no less. But I watched you and the witch - it seemed you didn't like flying.

Buffy: I get used to things real fast.

Twilight: Very well then, let's ride. Do you know that I actually came here to talk? (he crashes her into a church) But there you were ...going on about how hard it is for you, and well..I just hate to see you cry. (he is about to stab her with church steeple)

Buffy: Go ahead. Church me. Plenty more where that came from.

Twilight: Well that's the issue isn't it? One Slayer. Was all right. But all these girls...the world can't contain them and they will suffer for that. I'll not kill you now. My first gift is my last. I know that you meant well. But you have brought about disaster. And it falls to me to avert it.

Buffy: Twilight. That's you.

Twilight: Have you made a difference? Have your slayers helped change anything in this world?
Have they helped you?

Twilight to his subordinates/army comrades who have asked why he didn't kill her: That's been done. To Little Effect. The trick is to strip her of her greatest armor...her moral certainity. However hapless she may be about her personal life. This girl has always firmly believes she was on the side of right. And there's one thing I've learned about the slayer...

Meanwhile Buffy is comforting Satsu, and has taken Satsu to the hospital. Both women are covered in bandages. Satsu feels she's failed Buffy in some way, but Buffy reassures her and gives her strength. Then she has the following discussion with Xander...asking him Twilight's questions:

Buffy: Are we doing any good? We've been fighting more demons, but...but it just seems like there's more demons to fight and what is that because of us?

Xander: Buffy, turn around. I live with a bunch of slayers. Dozens of girls who are so filled up with purpose, with confidence they didn't have before...the walls are vibrating with it. I can't sleep the place is so charged....

What you've created here is a lot more than just monster fighters.

Buffy: Connection. Why can't I feel it.

Xander: Maybe you don't get to. Maybe the leader, the girl who brings it all together, is the one that has to give that up.

So my question is - is Twilight redeemable here? Is there any way of interpreting Twilight's dialogue to Buffy as anything other than sexism personified? He seems to want her to remain the one slayer, one lone superhero, like himself. Not share the power - because world can't handle it?

Is there another interpretation? Because I can't see how Twilight can be seen as anything other than an anti-hero. If he is meant to be heroic in any way, or is redeemed, what is that saying?

This issue and the one's that follow seem to state the opposite. Twilight in the Retreat arc attacks a bunch of powerless people, who he knows powered down and gave their power to the earth. He kills them and his own people without seeming to care. Earlier, he engineers either Faith or Gigi's death in No Future For You. And in A Long Way Home - he makes it possible for Amy and Warren to capture Willow and torture her. He's also responsible for countless deaths in Tokyo, not to mention elsewhere.

How is Twilight any different than Angelus or Adam? Is there any difference? Both see themselves as the hired gun, the chosen one to take down Buffy and change the world to fit their desires and their perspective - only difference is Twilight appears to want to restore order or the status quo (a la Wolf Ram and Hart) while Angelus and Adam wanted chaos.

And if he is just a pawn or puppet of the Powers That Be or God - does that excuse his actions? How does he know that's what the Powers or God wants? If you have the best intentions, does that make you right? Can good be achieved through evil? Do the ends ever justify the means?

What about Buffy? Outside of the robbery...and maybe stealing a sub, has she really hurt people? Or is she trying to empower them, give them the ability to make their own choices?
To decide their own fate?

Granted Buffy is far from perfect and empowering all the potential slayers does have dicey consequences in some respects, but with the onslaught of vampires...and demons, doesn't it make sense? And what is so wrong with these girls having power? Why should just one have it?



[ETA: WARNING - While the post is free of the Twilight reveal spoiler, the comments and discussion below are NOT. Do not read the comments if you do not wish to be spoiled. The post can be discussed with or without the spoiler.

ETA2:I'm very spoiled on Buffy S8, so no worries from my perspective. Don't have time to respond now or engage, since at work and very busy. Will come back later.]

Date: 2010-01-11 09:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com
If it's evil by incompetence, I'd say it's still Kafkaesque and counterproductive in the extreme - assuming that he doesn't think killing thousands of innocent people is a perfectly good plan A, in which he's very competently evil. Plus, at least in the TV series, Angel came quite a long way since season 1. For starters, since "Prophecy Girl", he knows that Buffy's very existence flies in the face of prophecy.

(I was trying to follow Shadowkat's wish to have this post free of THAT spoiler, but... Sorry.)

Date: 2010-01-11 09:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com
* ...in which CASE he's very competent at being evil.

Date: 2010-01-11 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com
I don't think that it will turn out to be the case that the story is as simple as Angel deciding to save the world by becoming an evil mass murderer. If that is the story, I agree that here, like in so many other places, Joss would owe us more story on pain of having left huge plot holes like the ones you identify in his wake. Now, it looks like season 8 is so riddled with plot holes that it's more hole than story, true. But there's got to be some limit to it, right? That's why I prefer my option #3. Things as they seem is all bad math. My brain can't help but gravitate to the conclusion that things are not as they seem. It's probably a stupid brain. But it's really quite persistent on this point.

Date: 2010-01-11 02:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com
I don't think that it will turn out to be the case that the story is as simple as Angel deciding to save the world by becoming an evil mass murderer.

I certainly hope not. On the other hand, I'm scratching my head as to what other motivations could possibly be better. Oh well. I didn't mean to get into this again. My brain is a bit stubborn as well. :-)

Date: 2010-01-11 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
(I was trying to follow Shadowkat's wish to have this post free of THAT spoiler, but... Sorry.)

Appreciate the attempt...but I think I lost that battle with the first comment. ;-)

Tis okay, I was hoping to have a broader discussion with folks who aren't spoiled, but they appear to be avoiding all posts on the topic. And to be honest, until the Angel reveal - I was responding to the whole Twilight thing very differently as I think we all were. So the discussion may require the spoiler? (shrugs)


Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 04:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios