shadowkat: (Default)
[personal profile] shadowkat
1. This link touched me today in such a way that tears silently rolled from my eyes:

http://65redroses.livejournal.com/139488.html?nc=1147

It's the journal of a young woman who had cystic fibrosis and recently died. Her words remind me a bit of Cassie's from the BTVS episode "Help" except different.

2. Today is cool, but soft and springlike, with a bit of flower in the air, and a light dusting of rain...and I went to my new church to listen to a liturgical choir on Palm Sunday. The Choir was singing a new arrangement on Handel's Chandos Anthem - using the psalm from David in the Old Testament, My song Alway. Was quite lovely and I'm not a fan of liturgical choral music - tends to put me to sleep or just annoy me. But this was lovely, felt a bit like listening to a rumbling brook or a quiet breeze in a glade as swans swim by. Although, in reality, I was sitting on a cedar pew, with a red cushion beneath me, staring up at tiffany stained glass, with light streaming in, as the choir sang...their voices melding with the string instruments that backed them.

As I sat there, I thought on other things...

As a child my father used to entertain me in church by clasping his hands together and saying, this is the church, then steepling his index fingers, and here is the steeple, and...he'd open up his thumbs (open the doors), and then wriggle his fingers - "here are all the people".
Looking around the church - it struck me, not for the first time, that it was the people that made it what is was. The choir, the pastor/minister, the congregation...it always is, regardless of the religion.

3. Found this while looking for spoilage on Buffy Issue 35 - which I'm still being foiled on.
Dang it. I want to know where the stupid story is heading before I invest any more of my precious time and money on it. If it's heading towards Twuffy fighting the big bad and living happily ever after? Count me out. Because you know, that's just beyond my capabilities of suspenison of disbelief. Plus if I wanted to read that - I'd be reading the Twilight novels, thank you very much.

Anyhow, what I did find out, which you may already know about and chose to ignore...is what that one-shot I predicted would show up either in August or December would be.

In the break between Buffy #35 and 36, there will be a one-shot centered on Riley the purpose of which will be to explain a lot of the plot developments that have recently happened in "Season Eight." #36 will be out in September where Joss Whedon will conclude the writing of the final five-issue arc.

Apparently they realized that Riley hasn't been doing anything in the comics and they sort of need to explain what he has been doing so that we can you know actually care when and if he kicks the bucket. (Don't worry, Whedon only kills characters I like not one's I'm ambivalent about. Well he might kill them, but they usually get brought back without skin.)
Am curious to see if they can make the character actually interesting and not just further the cliche on military dudley do-right that they started - since As You Were. Shame. Was a half-way interesting character up As You Were, and any hopes that I might have had of the comics changing that foul-up has been blown to smithereens. Something tells me the one-shot isn't going to help that any - unless Whedon writes it, as opposed to Petrie or someone else.

Personally, I just wish they'd get on with the story already. The fact they are still doing well and still have readers, like myself, is bewildering considering how thin this story has been stretched out. What can I say? We're all clearly masochists when it comes to serials written by Joss Whedon.


4. Caprica - not much to say really. I liked last week's episode better. The best parts were the three girls, the weak parts focused on Clarice Willow and Amanda Graystone - who may have died, but not so lucky on Clarice Willow - who I was really hoping would die, that character is beginning to just annoy me. And I'm beginning to agree - the STO story isn't working. I only know why Barnabas is a terrorist from James Marsters interviews on the topic, not from the show. I should know from the show! We need an episode that tells us exactly why Barnarbas is blowing things up. Right now, he seems to be doing it as a bit of a power-play with Willow. He's more of a smuggler than anything else - but we don't know what or why he is smuggling things. All we know is he like Willow manipulates teens to do his bidding - which is realistic, lots of religious cults recruit teenagers to do their bidding - was all the rage back in the 1970s. Saw numerous movies about it.

At any rate, I will state I liked the scenes with Marsters, even if they didn't make a lot sense. And felt incoherent. Not Marsters fault. That's the writing. The writers clearly have not figured out the whole STO angle yet.

What does work...is the scenes between Zoe and Philoben, Zoe and Graystone, and Zoe and Lacey.
Also the whole bit with Tamara, Josef and Josef's female friend (who it turns out was also aiding him in the V-world). Her interaction with Tamara was interesting. She lets Tamara know that Tamara has to sever the link to her father so both of them can move on. Her father can't live in the virtual world and Tamara can't come back to the real one.

So while I still adore Caprica on many levels, the story is uneven when it comes to the STO.
This could change once things heat up...and we get into Lacy's character a bit more. Up to now, she's been on the periphery aiding Zoe. When the series picks up again, she may be front and center. Also Willow is clearly going to be more involved...according to the previews.
But right now...that part of the story is the weak link. I'm hoping they are daring enough to let Amanda Graystone bite the bullet so to speak, because her arc was also weighing the story down. But I doubt it. There's a secret there - that we haven't been told - a reason why she wanted to kill herself - what did she see in that room. Was it a memory? Not sure.

Date: 2010-03-29 03:33 am (UTC)
rahirah: (Default)
From: [personal profile] rahirah
You know, Joss, having one-shot comics is great for spotlighting less-knoen characters for the purpose of fleshing them out. One-shot comics done for the purpose of explaining your main plotline are just evidence of sloppy writing. |:P

Date: 2010-03-29 04:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alocalmaximum.blogspot.com (from livejournal.com)
Yes, it's pretty sloppy that a one-shot is needed to explain the main arc. But, you know, I still like the comics (even if I agree that they're flawed).

Espenson is writing it. So not as good as if Joss were writing it, but better than Petrie. I liked "Harmonic Divergence" and I like the way Espenson writes Riley (especially in "The Replacement") so I'm looking forward to it. Petrie is a very good writer, except that he has a huge blind spot when it comes to Riley. He just likes him way too much. This wasn't a problem in most of his S4/S5 episodes; "The Initiative," one of the Rileyest episodes in the series, is actually quite good because the Riley-as-goofy-good-guy thing gets undercut constantly with the parallels with Spike; same with his "Fool for Love" scenes. But he does reduce him to Dudley Do-Right in "As You Were." He likes Faith as well, but doesn't let it cloud his judgment of the character.

I do hope Riley doesn't die actually...I hope you're wrong about the one-shot existing just for this reason. But you may be right. Honestly, there isn't anyone I'd be happy with dying. Both because I still like the characters, and, more importantly, that the characters haven't been developed enough this season for me to be satisfied with them being offed. Oh well.

Date: 2010-03-30 11:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Hmmm...I'm on the fence about the comics. I do not consider them canon to the tv series - too many errors and gaps in continuity and out of character moments. Plus, different mediums. You can't do a tv series as a comic book - it is impossible, as they have proven.

I enjoy them for what they are. But I can't take them seriously. And there are aspects that I find grating. ;-)

As for the characters? I don't mind character death if it is done well.

Characters that would further the plot and resolve things if killed and I sort of think they should kill: Twilight and Dawn. Actually, make that just Dawn for plot, and Twilight because I find the character beyond annoying and the worst villian ever. Also a good way to ruin one of my favorite characters. I liked Angel. I hate Twangel. Proof - I suppose, that Angel is only interesting if he is no where near Buffy. ;-)

Characters that have lived past their usefulness? Warren

Characters that require more development and explanation: Xander, Riley,
Satsu, Kennedy, Spike, Giles, Faith,

Characters that I'd stop following the story if they died:Spike, Buffy

Characters that I wish they'd bring back from the dead and I think did require more story: Anya, Renee and Ethan

Characters that I'm ambivalent about and don't really care what they do with: Amy, Riley, Dawn, Kennedy, and Andrew and about 85% of the slayers with names I keep forgetting

I'm tired of the B/A angst it's redundant. And Twangel is just...words fail. People call it blight, and that's not a bad term, I prefer Twuffy, because I laugh when I think of it.

Sorry for the snark - in a dastardly bad mood tonight. ;-)

Date: 2010-03-29 09:02 am (UTC)
shapinglight: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
I don't mind the idea of a Riley special, but like [livejournal.com profile] rahirah, I think it shouldn't be necessary to have it just to explain why the character's in the story at all, because as it stands, his presence is hard to explain.

Date: 2010-03-29 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
I sort of wish they'd kept Riley out of the comics and just did the one-shot. That would have given the one-shot a bit more flexibility. Or if they had to put him in the comics...to at the very least provided us with a reason why he was there - besides the obvious, he's there because he used to date and have sex with Buffy.
I get that Whedon's going for some metaphorical theme on Buffy and her exe's who resemble her Daddy issues here...but seriously...this could be better done.

Oh well, I'll wait and see what people think of it.
I'm just hoping it's not Espenson filling the blanks of her Retreat arc.

Date: 2010-03-29 05:04 pm (UTC)
shapinglight: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
I'm just hoping it's not Espenson filling the blanks of her Retreat arc.

Agreed. Was so disappointed in that arc, though looking back I'm not sure how much of it was Jane's fault. It depends on whether she was just given marks to hit to get the story from A to B, or whether she was told in specific detail what to write.

Date: 2010-03-30 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Hard to tell - for certain. From the interviews it sounds like she was just given marks to hit and no clear direction outside of that. She sounded as if she were clueless as to where it was going, and had relatively little idea what the main plot was.
(Which explains a lot.) She acted more like a hired gun, then
part of the actual team, which to date appears to be just Whedon, Meltzer, Jeanty and Allie.

Date: 2010-03-30 08:48 pm (UTC)
shapinglight: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
Then I guess the silliness of the plot (the whole giving the power back to the earth) is her fault. :(

Mind you, she was badly let down by the art. Battle scenes are not Jeanty's forte.

Date: 2010-03-30 11:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Agreed.

Although - I think the plot points are Whedon's not Espenson. I give Espenson credit for the stuff I liked and Whedon/Allie credit for the stuff I didn't. ;-)

Sigh. To be honest, I'm very close to giving up on the comics at this point. After looking at the preview pages of issue 34, it's going to take a lot for me to buy that issue (which looks like a piece of crap based on those four pages alone) and issue 35. OR to
continue after that. I'm not liking the story the writer has chosen to tell me and I've reached the point in my life that if I don't like a story, if it bores me? I stop reading. Life is painful and tough enough without adding to it.

Date: 2010-03-29 09:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com
to explain a lot of the plot developments that have recently happened in "Season Eight."

You know, if you're 4 years into a story and still have to come up with extra issues to make the plot comprehensible, there's a good chance you're doing something wrong...

was all the rage back in the 1970s. Saw numerous movies about it.

There's a lot of 70s influences in Caprica, I think (not just the original BSG) - there's something of the same "death of the dream" feel to it that there is to many late-60s/early 70s films, except filtered throught a post-9/11 SF lens. Zoe crashing the car was a clear ripoff homage to Vanishing Point (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067927/), for instance.

Otherwise, agreed both on the STO (that's been my main complaint about them all along - what the hell are they trying to achieve, and why?) and on the supremely dull (in every sense of the word) Amanda. Though Tamara and Zoe broke my heart in this. Good series. Still with the potential to be great. But the break isn't going to help matters...

Date: 2010-03-29 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
You know, if you're 4 years into a story and still have to come up with extra issues to make the plot comprehensible, there's a good chance you're doing something wrong...

My thoughts exactly. If they have to explain the plot to us, then there's a problem. The last issue was hilarious, in a way that I seriously doubt was intentional.

Though Tamara and Zoe broke my heart in this. Good series. Still with the potential to be great. But the break isn't going to help matters...

Feel much the same way. When Tamara and Zoe are on-screen - the show works. It also works when we are concentrating on Daniel Graystone or Sam Adama to an extent. Lacey...I'm on the fence about. The STO bit, you are correct, needs a bit more clarification. What is Barnabas hoping to accomplish? Willow seems to want eternal life? But I'm not sure about Barnabas. I know where they are going with it and why - but only because I read the interviews. If I hadn't? I wouldn't know. This needs to be on screen.

And sigh, the last time Amanda was interesting was when Sam was threatening to kill her for Josef. Sort of wish he had now.

Date: 2010-03-29 08:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com
The last issue was hilarious, in a way that I seriously doubt was intentional.

What - you mean we were supposed to take the sparkling vampire and fated eternal love and implied Xander/Cordy kiss-fanfare seriously? Huh. ;-)

Willow seems to want eternal life?

As I understand it, she already believes in eternal life - she's a True BelieverTM - but she wants to be able to present absolute proof of it in order to win people over. And therefore she may be after Daniel's avatar research... or something. I'm not sure her plan makes a whole lot of sense, but hey, that's the BSG!verse; as long as you say there's a plan, there's a plan. :-)

Date: 2010-03-30 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
What - you mean we were supposed to take the sparkling vampire and fated eternal love and implied Xander/Cordy kiss-fanfare seriously? Huh. ;-)

Well yes that.. (although to be honest I find it difficult to take comics seriously on any level, I mean, they are comics after all ..not to mention comics about a superpowered girl killing vampires, when ahem, she's not shagging them
;-0 ) ...and also the headquarters, Giles muttering about sturm and drang (again) and the implied Twuffy sex.
Seriously, Twuffy??? Bangle, maybe. But Twuffy? LOL!

As I understand it, she already believes in eternal life - she's a True BelieverTM - but she wants to be able to present absolute proof of it in order to win people over. And therefore she may be after Daniel's avatar research... or something.

I got the feeling it was more than that. It's not just proof she wants, she wants the ability to achieve it while living, to actually go there. She wants to prove it is possible, but only for STO and a specific place.

Date: 2010-03-30 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com
But Twuffy? LOL!

I prefer "Blight" myself. ;-)

I got the feeling it was more than that.

You may well be right. After BSG, I try to not think too hard about everyone's long-term planning in Caprica and just watch it for the metaphors and the drama.

Date: 2010-03-30 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Not surprised, after looking at the spoilers for issue 34, I tend to agree.
Blight on the series. ;-) Twuffy however makes me giggle. I can't take these comics remotely seriously - they jumped the shark with issue 33.

True. When it comes to planning and tv series and comic books, it's best to not think too hard about it. Intricate plots that make logical sense aren't exactly a strong point of either medium. Although will give Caprica and BSG credit, they make more sense than Whedon currently is. ;-)

Date: 2010-03-30 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Twuffy??? Nope.. I call them Blight and have since the beginning.LOL

~Ami

Date: 2010-03-30 11:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
At this point Blight may be a better name, as in a blight on the entire series. Enuf to kill it and Whedon for me permanently, unless he kills Twilight. We'll see.

On the other hand, Twuffy is funnier, it makes me giggle just thinking it.
I can't take these comics seriously anymore, they jumped the proverbial shark with issue 32 and keep on going.

Date: 2010-03-29 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] embers-log.livejournal.com
I'm enjoying Caprica, but (like you) I find Zoƫ's story arc to be the most compelling... I don't care about her Mother living or dying... and I would have found it more exciting if Sister Clarice was blown up! And (like you) I want a lot more about Lacy and her situation....
but I'm loving Zoe and Tamara, and enjoying JM as Barnabas; generally I'm feeling like I'll hang in there and see where this takes us, because I was always interested in the cylon backstory in BSG.

Re: The Buffy comics, I guess I don't feel that my time and money are being wasted... I spend more on soda pop, and I do get a laugh out of these (although, amazingly, Felicia Day's 'Guild' comic book was WAY WAY better! Did you check it out?). I'm not attached to the story line, but there is no way I'm quitting on it (and I do not believe for one instant that we are going to get any kind of Bangle 'happy ending' that would be ridiculous! In fact I expect a huge problem sending both Angel & Buffy into despair with him returning to LA and more IDW comics, while she is spring boarded into BtVS season 9).

Date: 2010-03-30 10:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
I agree on Caprica.

I may be done with Whedon and the comics. We'll see. Right now the spoilers for issue 34 are beyond silly. The only way, I'll continue at this point is if Twilight is killed. If that doesn't happen? I'm done.

Date: 2010-03-30 11:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] embers-log.livejournal.com
wait... what? Isn't Twilight = Angel? You can't kill Angel because IDW is still selling comic books w/him.... Or is the theory that Twilight isn't Angel and only looks like him?

I'm just curious because I'm reading your post as tho you said if Joss doesn't kill Angel then you're done... which seems like you might just as well announce that you're done since Joss clearly can't kill him.... Just make him really miserable, like he always does.

But of course I don't read the spoilers, too much fandom angst for my taste.

Date: 2010-03-30 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Sorry, I shouldn't be posting tonight. I'm in a horribly bad mood at the moment. And am not thinking clearly. Or at all.

Date: 2010-04-04 03:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] embers-log.livejournal.com
I just want to assure you that I didn't mean you - I never thought that you seriously expect Angel and Buffy to marry or anything!

Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 11:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios