It's probably too late for the US, but here it is for those who can do something..

[shadowkat]

Originally posted by cantarina1 at post

Originally posted by electricdruid at The fiasco continues

ACTA in a Nutshell –

What is ACTA?  ACTA is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. A new intellectual property enforcement treaty being negotiated by the United States, the European Community, Switzerland, and Japan, with Australia, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Mexico, Jordan, Morocco, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Canada recently announcing that they will join in as well.

Why should you care about ACTA? Initial reports indicate that the treaty will have a very broad scope and will involve new tools targeting “Internet distribution and information technology.”

What is the goal of ACTA? Reportedly the goal is to create new legal standards of intellectual property enforcement, as well as increased international cooperation, an example of which would be an increase in information sharing between signatory countries’ law enforcement agencies.

Essential ACTA Resources - 

• Read more about ACTA here: ACTA Fact Sheet
• Read the authentic version of the ACTA text as of 15 April 2011, as finalized by participating countries here: ACTA Finalized Text
• Follow the history of the treaty’s formation here: ACTA history
• Read letters from U.S. Senator Ron Wyden wherein he challenges the constitutionality of ACTA: Letter 1 | Letter 2 | Read the Administration’s Response to Wyden’s First Letter here: Response
• Watch a short informative video on ACTA: ACTA Video
• Watch a lulzy video on ACTA: Lulzy Video

Say NO to ACTA. It is essential to spread awareness and get the word out on ACTA.

Via Tumblr

This entry was also posted at http://cantarina.dreamwidth.org/131889.html. (comments: )

[ETA - from me not the original posters: A caveat? Copyright Law gives me a head-ache. I find it confusing and I worked in the damn field for 6-7 years. And the ethics around it to be even more confusing. And I keep changing my mind regarding it. Personally? I think Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is a violation and shouldn't have been done...but then again, maybe not. After all, is it a violation to just insert zombies into Austen's text? I don't know. The whole thing confuses me. And as much as it has always grated on my nerves that people make money reviewing and critiquing others works - as the Momster pointed out, isn't that what historians do? Isn't that a good thing? To which I responded...okay, I'm irritable and edgy and have been walking up and down the street all day long to go to the bathroom..I'm admittedly being a bit irrational about this. It's probably just annoyance that I too can't be lazily sitting on my duff making money off of meta. Actually it is a lot more work than that - you have to do marketing and shit. And who wants to do that?]