shadowkat: (Default)
Missed the concession speech last night and the acceptance speech, but did stay up late enough to see Barack Obama get 297 electoral votes. Now he has 349. He won, surprisingly, Indiana and Virgina. North Carolina remains too close to call - which if you know anything about North Carolina - that is remarkable.

For the first time in eight years, I am proud to be American. [With the possible exception of the three states that passed propositions banning same-sex marriage - which just makes me angry and incredibly sad. It's apparently going to take us a lot longer to get past homophobia. I guess the first step is for people to admit they are homophobic and bigoted. Here's a tip: If you are against same-sex marriage or against homosexuals having the right to marry, have/raise children, have access to spousal health care and death benefits that come with marriage - than yes, you are a bigot and homophobic. There is no middle ground here, folks. Apparently we take two steps forward and two steps back no matter what we do. As a species, we still have a lot of maturing to do.]

Responses at work were mixed.Work reactions, and minor rant )

I love Obama. Just watched him on the news, he said that what makes him angriest is meaness, when people put others down. The person he respects the most is Nelson Mandela. I haven't felt this inspired about a leader in my life. I honestly think Obama is going to be good for my country. He already has been.

At work feeling sluggish, I felt for the first time in I can't remember how long, calm. As if all the anxiety and fear had been removed from my shoulders. I felt filled with hope.

Last night, Wales and I bar-hopped for election results from 7-9pm. We started in a hipster bar that was almost too crowded. Then went to a conservative bar (yes they exist in NYC)that was empty, without any election results. We had to get them to turn to it. They wanted Fox News, we requested any other channel. She begrudgingly did so, then went to the end of the bar. The vibe was bad in that place. So we jumped to a wine bar - which was much rowdier and happier, except for an odd guy in a corner reading a book by Richard Rhodes on War. Finally around 9:15, after Obama got Pennsylvania. Woo-hoo! We went home.

Called my folks - when he got Ohio, and it was 206. But we still weren't sure. CNN was cracking me up, the pro-McCain guy on it (you know the one that John Stewart keeps making fun of), kept saying :" I've done the math five times and I can't figure out how McCain can win this. The only way is if he gets California, but even then, not sure it is enough." At that point Obama had won Virgina, Ohio, Iowa, and PA, along with NY.

The news flipped to Times Square - which had over a million people celebrating as it were New Years Eve! People were screaming for joy.

Now, watching Oprah...who said when she started the show, and it's a comment worth repeating -"For my viewers who were not amongst the 52% who voted for Barack, I understand your pain, believe me, if it had gone the other way, I would be doing my show from Northwestern University Hospital with an intravenous drip." (Sigh, me too, me too. I don't know if I could survive an McCain/Palin win. Not after these last eight years.)

It feels like we've all walked through this very dark tunnel and come out the other side.
I told a woman at work today that if Bush hadn't won the last two elections, if it weren't for those 8 years, I don't think Obama would have been even a candidate. I think if Gore won, McCain may have become President. Was talking to my mother about this, and we agreed that Newt Gringich and Bush and Cheney destroyed their own party. Let me back up and explain that theory - a bit. Our system of government was never meant to be about parties, it's not like the UK or Canada. The branchs are supposed to check each other. When Republican's got both houses of Congress, and the White House, President Bush stopped treating Congress as a separate branch. There's a lengthy article in this month's New Yorker - about Chuck Hagel. A Republican Senator who got annoyed with his own party, and frustrated with the President, who unlike the previous ones, would not talk to him or even listen. He treated Congress as an extension of his own power base. A "rubber stamp". Which lead to two wars and a financial crisis, and the end of their power. Worth noting, according to the news, Republicans stayed home from the polls yesterday. Democrates out-voted Republicans 2-1.

I know this is rambling, but then, most of my posts are - "spontaneous musings". My mother told me a story that touched me today and listening to Peggy Noonan, a Wall Street Journal columnist - who voted for McCain (I don't think she's capable of voting any other way, which is okay.), anyhow...one of my parents close friends from their days in Chicago, way back in 1968, the year after I was born - wrote them a surprising email. He like many, used to be liberal and had become conservative over the years. (As a Government Teacher in High School once told me - when you're young, if you aren't liberal, you have no heart, and when you are old and not conservative - you have no brains. Silly statement by the way, I get that now, but ...well you know.) This friend was planning on voting for John McCain or that's what he told my parents prior to the election. Well, last night, he sent an email - just after the acceptance speech to his son and friends and family. In it, he told my parents that he remebered being with them in Grant Park in 1968 during the race riots, and the fires, during the height of the civil rights movement. Now to see a black man address a peaceful capacity crowd of over a million in that same park, which had once been the site of race riots, was a sight to behold. And yes, he had with pride voted for Barack Obama. Not because he was black, but because he was the best man for the job.

Barack Obama is Martin Luther King's Dream come true - a day in which a man is not judged on the color of his skin. Sure there were a few who voted along race lines, blacks who voted for him because of his skin color, and whites who voted against for those reasons. But the vast majority? Did not. That is something to be proud of.

I am so happy. Today was tough to focus during. I felt tired. And sluggish. As if I was thinking through water. But all through it, I kept smiling, because of what happened last night.
shadowkat: (Default)
[If you haven't already done so, please fill out my political/lj poll - go here: http://shadowkat67.livejournal.com/374888.html}

The US is about to slip into a recession according to the media. (Actually I think they are in deep denial, the US already has. And I think it's not just the US but Global. Like it or not, we affect one another. We can no longer be isolationist or nationalistic, this is a problem that we have to solve together or not at all. Got to give the World Banking Industry credit - they've already figured this out on their own - according to the paper this morning they are gathering together funds to bail out big financial corporations and banks. Now if only our governments can get with the program. I'm no economist, but even an idiot can see that our capitalistic system went a bit insane, unfettered and unregulated, greed got out of control and we are now reaping the results. That said, it occured to me today, what the heck are the US Presidential Candidates economic plans. We've done the character debate to death and let's face it that's largely subjective anyway, no one should be voting completely on just that.]

Anywho here's links. If you are a professional economist or economic expert and can provide insight? Please do so.

Salon.com describes John McCain's Tax Plan which would cut taxes even more thant George Bush has

My comments )

Barack Obama's Emergency Economic Plan, detailed on his site

From Invesztor Centric - Barack Obama and John McCain battle over the Economy

my comments )

I don't know how reliable this next link is, since it is by commentator Ken Oblierman, McCain's Economic Plan created by Republican Lobbyist

Also not sure about this one: Economic Plans Compared

This blogger did some digging and has compared the economic plans side by side, complete with cool cartoon graphics! And having done a quick read through? It's actually less biased than I thought. She breaks down each of the economic plans with numerical bullet point and headings, making it easy to understand.

For each candidate's platforms:

John McCain: http://www.johnmccain.com/landing2/?sid=google&t=newlanding&r=johnmccain

Barack Obama:http://www.barackobama.com/index.php

How Barack and John will change our tax bills: CNN Money Article about Tax Plans

Not sure about reliability or biasis.

Congressional Record on the Economic Policy issue Barack Obama supported in Congress:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barack_Obama/Economic_Policy

(This is RELIABLE. And unbiased.)

And here's a site that has a debate over the two plans along with comments, and experts supporting them, and a poll on which one you agree with, go here:

http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/who-has-the-right-plan-for-america-s-economy

[It appears to be reliable and unbiased.]

This is depressing, but also possibly the most reliable - it comes from the Tax Policy Center, a non-partisan Tax Policy Center.

Here it is: http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/411750_updated_candidates_summary.pdf

(Note it is a PDF not html format)

What the rest of the world thinks: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/2049446/Barack-Obama-beats-John-McCain-in-European-vote-US-election-2008.html

The skinny? The Russians love McCain and see him as the one to lead us out of economic debt. Of course they also love George W. Bush. They tend to prefer fiscal conservatives.

The Europeans prefer Barack Obama.

Considering how bad the Russian Economy has been for the last several years, I'm not sure I'd value their opinion on anything, but that's just me. (The Europeans on the other hand have the Euro, which kicked the dollar's ass recently, and have been doing MUCH better.)

An interesting blog post about Barack Obama's Economic Policy - stating it is actually more Capitalistic than one thinks. This is based on the NYT Magazine article that my Dad read a while back - where he told me Obama's plan is fairly pragmatic, and that it takes the best portions of the last five President's economic plans, yes including the Bushes and Reagan.

Go here: http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2008/08/20/barack-obama-economic-policy-wonk?tid=true

Here's the New York Times Magazine piece by economist David Leonhardt - an economic Columnist for the NY Times. The piece compares the two plans and analyzes them. It's an interesting article - stating Obama is a pragmatist taking portions from several different plans.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/magazine/24Obamanomics-t.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin

[Sorry for the length - I tried to shorten a bit by cut-tagging.]
shadowkat: (strength)
Dreary day. Spent much of it indoors, eating too much, reading the Barack Obama book, and watching tv - specifically my DVD of the BSG miniseries, the Torchwood episode entitled Adrift (we are three episodes behind in the States), and Mad Men, which is almost too deep for my overstressed brain to deal with at the moment but at the same oddly gripping. I find myself fascinated by Donald Draper, Peggy, and Vincent Karthesier's disenchanted ambitious married ad exec who can't figure out what it is he wants, jealous and resentful of what other's have.

At any rate, I read this passage in Audacity of Hope by Barack Obama this morning that I wanted to share, for reasons that should be apparent when you read it. Say what you will about Obama, he is certainly a thoughtful individual.

For many practicing Christians, the same inability to compromise [he was talking about abortion] may apply to gay marriage. I find such a position troublesome, particularly in a society in which Christian men and women have been known to engage in adultery or other violations of their faith without civil penalty. All too often I have sat in a church and heard a pastor use gay bashing as a cheap parlor trick - "IT was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve!" he will shout, usually when a sermon is not going so well. I believe that American society can choose to carve out a special place for the union of a man and a woman as the unit of child rearing most common to every cultur. I am not willing to have the state deny American citizens a civil union that confers equivalent rights on such basic matters as hospital visitation or health insurance coverage simply because the people they love are of the same sex - nor am I willing to accept a reading of the Bible that considers an obscure line in Romans to be more defining of Christianity than the Sermon on the Mount.

Perhaps I am sensitive on this issue because I have seen the pain my own carelessness has caused. Before my election, in the middle of my debates with Mr. Keyes, I received a phone call from one of my strongest supporters. She was a small business owner, a mother, and a thoughtful, generous person. She was also a lesbian who had lived in a monogamous relationship with her partner for the last decade.

She knew when she decided to support me that I was opposed to same-sex marriage, and she had heard me argue that, in the absence of any meaningful consensus, the heightened focus of marriage was a distraction from other, attainable measures to prevent discrimination against gays and lesbians. Her phone message in this instance had been prompted by a radio interview she had heard in which I had referenced my religious traditions in explaining my position on the issue. She told me that she had been hurt by my remarks; she felt that by bringing her religion into the equation, I was suggesting that she, and others like her, were somehow bad people.

I felt bad, and told her so in a return call. As I spoke to her I was reminded that no matter how much Christians who oppose homsexuality may claim that they hate the sin but love the sinner, such a judgement inflicts pain on good people - people who are made in the image of God, and who are often truer to Christ's message than those who condemn them. And I was reminded that it is my obligation, not only as an elected official in a pluralistic society but also as a Christian, to remain open to the possibility that my unwillingness to support gay marriage is misguided, just as I cannot claim infallibility in my support of abortion rights. I must admit that I may have been infected with society's prejudices and predilections and attributed them to God; that Jesus' call to love one another might demand a different conclusion; and that in years hence I may be seen as someone who was on the wrong side of history. I don't believe such doubts make me a bad Christian. I believe they make me human, limited in my understandings of God's purpose and therefore prone to sin. When I read the Bible, I do so with the belief that it is not a static text but the Living Word and that I must continually be open to new revelations - whether they come from a lesbian friend or a doctor opposed to abortion.

This is not to say that I'm unanchored in my faith. There are some things that I'm absolutely sure about - the Golden Rule, the need to battle cruelty in all its forms, the value of love and charity, humility and grace.


my own philosophical/religious musings on the topic )
shadowkat: (dolphins)
I want to share this speech on race that Senator Obama gave in Pennsylvania today, which moved me as I read it during my lunch-break at work. I don't care whether you vote for Obama or not, or even if you are an American. This is interesting and important speech about racism and pretty much states how I feel about racism but have never found the words to express my views.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/18/us/politics/18text-obama.html?em&ex=1205985600&en=06a539b9d149224f&ei=5087%0A

Here's a snippet - regarding Reverend Jeremiah Wright who recently made some incendiary remarks about whites, muslims and race from a black perspective.

"The man (Jeremiah Wright) I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth – by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS."

“People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters….And in that single note – hope! – I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories – of survival, and freedom, and hope – became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn’t need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish – and with which we could start to rebuild.”

"Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety – the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love. "

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America – to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.

The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through – a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.

Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.” We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow. "
shadowkat: (chesire cat)
Been reading Barak Obama's Audacity of Hope - which is great. But, decided I wanted to see what all these guys have actually done - not what they say they plan to do, or promise they will do in order to persuade us to elect them. Actions after all speak louder than words. So in an attempt to get past the rhetoric and name-calling, below - for your reference and my own - are links to the each one of the main Candidates "Voting Records", "Bills that They've Sponsored", and "Comparisons of their Voting Records". (I ignored Huckabee, because I honestly don't see him as much of a contender in this race anymore.) Most of the links are from objective sources - merely interested in reporting the data not in persuading us to vote for *their* candidate. I tried to avoid any links that contained an emotional pov or endorsement of one of the candidates listed in an attempt to provide myself and anyone who happens upon this post with as much impartial information as possible.

John MCcain's voting record: http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=53270

Barack Obama's voting record:http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490

Hillary Clinton's voting record:http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=55463

Hillary vs. Obama - article links on their voting records compared:

1. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jan/22/hillaryclinton.barackobama

Excerpts: Clinton and Obama differed most famously on the 2005 energy bill that helped pad the profits of oil and gas companies while expanding ethanol use. But while Clinton adopted the consensus liberal stance against that bill, which Obama backed, the contrasts in their records give neither one a leg up with true-blue Democrats. On immigration, ethics, gun control, and other controversial questions, Clinton and Obama tended to switch off, each wearing the liberal mantle some of the time.

One little-mentioned split occurred on a proposal to restrict Pentagon spending on cluster bombs, which explode and scatter thousands of tiny weapons over a vast area. Those small bombs are prone to going off years after a battle, sometimes killing and maiming Middle Eastern children who mistakenly trigger them. Israel came under fire from the UN and international human rights groups for its use of cluster bombs during its 2006 war with Hizbullah forces in Lebanon. In the autumn of that year, with memories of the conflict still fresh, several Democrats sought to limit US defence spending to cluster bombs that would not be used in civilian areas....

Obama voted in favour of limiting use of the bombs, while Clinton and 69 other senators opposed the spending limits, defeating the proposal.

2. Ethics Comparsion - go here:

http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/barack-obama-vs-hillary-clinton-records-on-transparency-lobbyists-and-ethics/

3. How have Clinton, Obama, and McCain been Voting on Trade Issues?

http://benmuse.typepad.com/custom_house/2008/02/how-have-clinto.html

Excerpt:"McCain voted "pro-trade" in all the 13 roll calls I looked at in which both he and Clinton voted. Clinton voted pro-trade in 54% of them. I haven't scored Obama because he only entered the Senate in 2005 and wasn't there to vote in more than half of the roll calls included here. However, from 2005-2007, he and Clinton voted the same way in each roll call I've included."

"I'd also like to draw your attention to several posts during the past week on Barak Obama's likely trade stance. Jonathan Dingel posted an excerpt from a Guardian article by Daniel Koffler, which argued that Obama had a deeper understanding of the power of markets than other Democratic and Republican candidates: Is Obama better on globalization? Simon Lester agreed: Is Obama Better Than Clinton On Free Trade? Lester points to this post by Greg Mankiw to illustrate Obama's grasp of economic issues: The Pigou Club watches the debates . Emmanuel disagreed, pointing to Obama's record on agricultural and ethanol subsidies (Obama represents Illinois, an important agricultural state): Obama is the Protectionist's Choice, Too. Emmanuel's post also suggests the sorts of roll calls that might be used to expand this data set, and the potential for changing the relative standing of the candidates reached here. To the extent that the roll call information sheds light on this debate, it suggests that Obama and Clinton may behave similarly."

4. Gov.Track -on which bills sponsored by the candidates while in Congress and the overall trend of their voting record:

- Obama's : http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=400629
-Obama's Bills: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=400629&tab=bills

- Clinton's:http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=300022
-Clinton's Bills: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=300022&tab=bills

-McCain's:http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=300071
-McCain's Bills:http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=300071&tab=bills


5.The National Journals' Vote Tracker - Obama the Most Liberal Senator -

http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/

Key Votes Used to Track - or Senate Vote Comparison - http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/votes.htm
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 03:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios