shadowkat: (warrior emma)
This is the second question/assignment of The January Talking Meme. I've gotten seven questions in all. So the next one won't be until the 10th, that is unless someone poses another question in between now and then.

For January 5th - [livejournal.com profile] ann1962 asked- What is the hardest thing you've ever had to write, that went against your more spontaneous style?

Hee, besides answering this question? Just joshing. I'm tempted to say the stuff I have to write for a living - but then I'd have to find a way to explain it, without giving away too much about my workplace (a big no-no on a public blog), besides what I have to write for a living - is not that hard. I've had much harder writing assignments, such as that collaborative fanfic that I attempted to write back in the summer of 2002. Granted 75% of the time - was spent smoothing the rumpled feathers of various other writers involved (if you've ever done this - you know what I'm talking about), the other half was attempting to write the next chapter of a story using someone else's ideas, concept, and plot - which I did not necessarily agree with or thought is really stupid. But I can't exactly say that over email to someone I don't know that well, can I? I guess I could...Suffice to say, that wasn't the hardest thing I've had to write, believe it or not. Discovered I was actually better at collaborative writing than I thought, just didn't find it all that enjoyable - way too much drama.

No, the hardest thing I've ever had to write that went against my spontaneous style was oddly enough a poem. I state oddly, because poems are meant to be intuitive, or spontaneous.
And in most cases they are - at least for me. I can write prose poetry rather well. But this wasn't just any old poem, no it was the bane of the English Lit Major's existence...the deadly, insanely difficult...English SONNET!!! And of course, being a SONNET, it must be in iambic pentameter, because otherwise it isn't an English SONNET!

This sort of goes against my general vibe. Because sonnets have a precise rhythmic structure. With not only a specific rhyme scheme, but a specific rhythmic count.


A Shakespearean, or English, sonnet consists of fourteen lines written in iambic pentameter, a pattern in which an unstressed syllable is followed by a stressed syllable five times. The rhyme scheme in a Shakespearean sonnet is a-b-a-b, c-d-c-d, e-f-e-f, g-g; the last two lines are a rhyming couplet.


It's a bit like writing a musical composition or playing an instrument. Or knitting a sweater. You have to count. A lot. Not only do you have to count - you have to keep track of your count. And you have to count in a specific rhythmic pattern.

Keep in mind, I was a English Lit Major, not a math major or a music major or a science major, but an English "LITERATURE" Major, with a minor in cultural anthropology (basically myths, folk narratives, and epics). I was avoiding math. [Or attempting to. God or The universe, who is a bit of comedian, clearly had other plans - because I do a lot of math now for a living. But that's another story. I'm trying to stay on topic here.] There was also the slight issue ...that I don't count well. Never have. Apparently it's genetic and called dyscalculia (in case you are curious). My aunt has it, and I have a form of it, as does my mother. However my mother and I have managed to compensate for it. Obviously, because I do financial analysis at work all the time. But financial analysis isn't the same as writing a sonnet. For one thing - you can use excel and a calculator. For another...there is no counting or crazy rhyme scheme to keep track of.

But my creative writing poetry course required that I write a sonnet. Or at least make an attempt. (I tried to get out of it - or substitute something else.) And...I'm sorry to say, I don't think I pulled it off. Oh I thought I wrote a sonnet. Or at least I hoped that I had, I honestly couldn't tell - which is saying something in of itself. I mean if you can't tell if you wrote one or not - you clearly can't write one. At any rate, from my perspective it was a sonnet. But my professor disagreed, and graded it a B + for effort.

In case you're wildly curious below is my ill-fated attempt to write a sonnet, demonstrating in of itself how this was indeed the hardest writing exercise that I ever tackled.

The English Major

Dreams like half finished sentences
Cloud my mind and spiritus
With paragraphs of weariness
As I start to lust for past tenses
Verbs conquer nouns and adjectives
Grammar fails when you touch me
With arms like parenthesis;
And I wonder how active
They must be to cause an interim -
Blocking me, yet, not making sense
As you part, not end, our sentence
Leaving me with a semicolon;
Hanging in space, dear letter head
What happened to the period?


I was told that it was a very clever poem, but unfortunately, not a sonnet. The exercise did, however, give me a whole new appreciation for Shakespeare. The dude was not only prolific, he was prolific in iambic pentameter. Must have been a great musician or at the very least fiendishly good at knitting.
shadowkat: (Default)
Was thinking about this today, after reading a review by NPR of the current tv season where they stated that we all know that there are no new stories and people just redo the same ones over and over...

True and not true. Yes, similar tropes or archetypes get revisited. But there is a difference between say doing another remake of Pride and Prejudice or Shakespeare or Dicken's Christmas Carol or It's A Wonderful Life - and using themes or archetypes in those tales and spinning a different tale entirely. It's sort of the difference between rebooting Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and well doing True Blood, the Vampire Diaries or Rachel Morgan - Bounty Hunter. Or for another example? The difference between rebooting or remaking Forever Knight, and doing Angel.

Read more... )

Also was thinking of a few writers who have been overdone. To the point in which you wonder if it's a right of passage or something to perform or do a version of this writer's work? In regards to Shakespeare? I always thought the great Shakespearean actors: Olivier, Gielgud, Stewart, Wells, and Brannagh went a bit overboard - I think they've done five plays each as films and theater productions. But no one beats Derek Jacobi, who I think did them all. LOL!

As a former English Major, and theater geek, I can say that I've seen and done my fair share of it. Performed, watched, and recited more Shakespeare than I can list.
(Plays I've seen? Read more... )

Out of curiousity, I decided to see just how many ways people have adapted and/or filmed Shakespeare plays and which ones. Is it really as many as I think? I was admittedly surprised - since it turned out to be more. Hint? Much Ado has actually been filmed four times, even more than that on tv, and has several musical interpretations as well as having a Klingon version (yes, someone translated and performed it in Klingon.) But Romeo & Juliet has everyone beat with 48 film versions in multiple languages, I swear they filmed it once a year. As does Hamlet - which has the most adaptations. When they say everyone does Romeo & Juliet and Hamlet, they aren't kidding.

According to Wiki? Hollywood has made over 250 films based on Shakespeare's Plays. This is not counting television productions, loose adaptations such as 10 Things I Hate About You, or
A Thousand Acres nor is it counting ballets and musicals such as West Side Story.

a few examples - Taming of the Shrew, Hamlet, MacBeth, Much Ado, Corinalaus, and Romeo & Juliet. )
It blew my mind how many times some of these plays have been done. I don't think anyone has had their work performed and adapted more than Shakespeare. There's clearly something about Shakespeare that has a universal appeal which transcends both time and language. Personally, I have quibbles, there aren't that many good women's roles in Shakespeare. The few good female roles are either women posing as men, or in the tragedies. The best role may be Lady Macbeth. Part of the reason for this was back then, women weren't permitted to perform on stage. It's a very male dominated group of plays. So..again why the focus?
shadowkat: (Default)
So, got curious and checked out Whedonesque's discussion of the preview pages of Buffy issue #34, which annoyed me when I looked at them, but admittedly it's hard to tell whether an issue is worth reading based on preview pages, just as it is impossible to tell if a book is worth reading based on the first five pages. I usually check out first five, middle ten, and last five. Just as I normally give a tv series at least five episodes before I kick it to the curb, with a few exceptions.

Anyhow...the discussion is a rather interesting one on the comic book medium and how various people relate to that medium. It's worth noting that not everyone enjoys all mediums. My brother hates live theater or "plays". He loves rock or live music performances. But plays with dialogue, dance, and people singing to a story on stage? Not so much. Has 0 patience for them. I'm the exact opposite - I love live theater and plays. But tend to fall asleep or become incredibly bored during a live music performance, with few exceptions.
about comics, Shakespeare and tv shows, no spoilers.. )
shadowkat: (Default)
[As an aside, I'm being kept awake by needless fretting. I know it's silly but am doing it anyhow. Anyone else out there prone to fretting and worrying? Won't say what here, because means I'll have to lock the post, and would prefer to keep public for now. It's job related, let's leave it at that, shall we?]

cut for the people on my flist who do not want to read a long late night post on feminism, slash and romantic fiction/fanfic. )

[See? Scarey posts like the above is what happens when I'm unemployed for two days.]
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 01:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios