May. 11th, 2015

shadowkat: (reading)
So, I've been hunting for ways to get book reviews, and discovered a few things that I did not know, and explain a heck of lot.

* Did you know that many of the Amazon.com reviews are actually paid for by the author?
Go HERE.
And the people providing them are paid reviewers or volunteers through a service?

*Also ARC's are apparently prior to publication or at the galley stage. And you have to pay for an ARC review -- it's not free. So the publisher provides a free book to the ARC reviewer at the cost of the author.

*Library Journal won't review books that have been published. Only those about to be published with few exceptions:

Books are selected for their potential interest to a broad spectrum of libraries. Only a few areas of publishing fall outside LJ‘s scope: textbooks, children’s books, very technical or specialized works (particularly those directed at a professional audience), and books in languages other than English. We do, however, consider bilingual editions. Books previously published abroad are eligible if they are being released here for the first time and have a U.S. distributor.

We prefer to receive materials three to four months in advance of publication date since our primary goal is prepublication review (although our collection development and readers’ advisory forums allow for rich postpublication coverage‚ submission info below). We will accept bound galleys, bound page proofs, or bound manuscripts (only one copy is necessary). Those publishers (small houses) that cannot supply advance bound galleys may submit finished books, but these should be sent as early as possible with the words “In lieu of galleys” and the publication date affixed to the cover. We generally avoid reviewing books later than date of publication, though we do make exceptions for reference and heavily illustrated works‚ if F & Gs are not available, send the finished book as early as possible.


Libraries are odd about which books they will shelve. For one thing, they don't take self-published books unless an LCCN is attached, mainly because there's no catalogue number that can be indexed. Which makes sense. Although, rarely even then. Also, they
restrict based on content. Both policies are a wee bit ironic, if you think about it.
My Dad, who is self-published, couldn't get his books on Library shelves, but a local book seller was willing to shelve them.

That said, I did find two places. Most of the sites recommend asking book bloggers to review your book. Does anyone know of any book bloggers? My book isn't available on Kindle until next week. So I have time. Most book bloggers prefer Kindle.

Hmmm.

Marketing one's book is not easy. And, if you're not careful, wickedly expensive. Actually this is the hardest part of the process. And the most confusing. Also, according to Create Space, my book will be available on External Distribution Outlets in 6-8 weeks - think June 15 or 30. External Outlets are Baker & Taylor, Ingrams, Academic and Libraries (once LCCN# is accepted), and Resellers/Wholesellers/Independents. E-book will be available on Kindle by next week. And I'll, hopefully, have 15 copies of it to distribute by the end of this week.

The process also requires a lot of patience and perseverance. And no ego. Thick skin.

Sort of understand why a lot of fanfic writers stick with fanfic. A) You have a ready-made, happy audience, b) You don't have to spend any money. Win-Win.
shadowkat: (warrior emma)
1) OUAT Season Finale

Well, the ending surprised me. I'll give it that. [I was admittedly aggravated through most of it -- mainly because I've grown weary of the writers treading over the same ground - and from every vantage point imaginable. Seriously, how many different ways do we need to tell the Snow White story? Aren't there any other fairy tales or stories that we can reference? The Snow Queen - this fall was a breath of fresh air. And, I'm tired of Rumple and Belle's love story -- it's hard to root for it, when Belle is written so badly.]

That said, there were a lot of rather clever ideas expressed about the nature of storytelling and writing. As well as the function of stories. With the evil villain (if you ignore Rumplestilskin who appears to be complicit in all evil doing) being the author of the text.

In retrospect, I think the episode was a nifty satire of self-indulgent storytelling, where characters are acting out of character, or the author's favorite/representative character in the text is a sort of Marty Stu, who can do no wrong and has absolute power. It also, as a side-note satirized "the retcon" and "characters serving plot-twists or theme". So, I was somewhat impressed by that. Enough to not delete the episode, and rewatch at a later date. I think it sort of needs to be rewatched to be fully appreciated.

spoilers )

2. The Good Wife Season finale

Not as good as the last four seasons. And I sort of saw the ending coming a mile a way.
Been waiting for that twist for a while now. Overall this has been an uneven season, with just few well-written episodes scattered throughout. The political satire almost overtook the series, along with the cases ripped from the headlines.

spoilers )

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 23rd, 2025 04:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios