My morning laugh or snorfle....

[shadowkat]

Okay...this made me laugh, really really hard this morning.

You may have to be a lawyer to totally appreciate it. Or rather a lawyer who knows something about copyright law. I don't know.

But here it is - grabbed from fandom lawyers:

Here: http://community.livejournal.com/fandom_lawyers/50914.html

and

here: http://www.fanhistory.com/index.php/Meyshi

The scoop? Apparently some Harry Potter fanfic writer out there, called Meyshi thought they could sue other fanfic writers for parodying their work and filed DMCA claims against them with LJ - telling LJ/6 Apart that these writers should have their entries deleted. (The gal is allegedly under the age of 18 - which makes me wonder about her parents.) At any rate - 6 Apart in their ultimate wisdom - sent notices to the writers Meyshi complained about - telling them that they needed to delete their entries or that LJ would do it for them since they were in violation of US Copyright law. One of the writers being told he had to delete his story and was being sued by Meyshi for his parody of her work, directly contacted J.K. Rowling's attorneys and told them about it. Rowling's attorneys got really interested in the matter. Not in the whole fanfic thing, interestingly enough - they don't care about that given JKR's public stance on it - but, on the fact that a fanfiction writer thinks they have the same rights the JKR does regarding Potter fic and Potter characters. Meyshi, since being contacted by JKR's attorneys, has submitted apologies to all concerned and even asked the person who contacted the attorney's for help with characterization.

ROFL!!!

Yes, I'm probably evil to find this hilarous, this I know.;-) Ohhh, I love fandom lawyers, really love them. My favorite community by far. (It's basically a community of non-practicing, semi-practicing, and practicing attorneys who like cult stuff and are fans.)

Comments

[shadowkat67.livejournal.com]

Icons aren't really a violation of copyright - it's covered under the "fair use" loop-hole. All you are doing is putting it up in your journal - no money is made off of it and in some ways you are advertising the product you ripping off of. And often changing it. Plus - think about it, how much money would it take to crack down on every person on the internet who has cropped and played with a photo or piece of art? And 6 Apart even crazier - because that would cost them about 90% of their users.

Vids on the other hand...but even those are permissible depending on the situation or YouTube would be in trouble.

Like I said - the internet is the wild wild west when it comes to copyright law. You can only police so far. What most attorneys have done is adopted a stance of going after the *obvious* infractions - such as Meyshi's claims, the posting of entire books, television scripts, and magazine articles, spoiler pages of scripts of tv shows that have not aired yet or books that haven't been published yet, downloading of games, movies, music or tv shows that are protected from free distribution. That stuff they will and have to go after. Same deal with obvious infractions of fan art - ie. mass producing t-shirts, coffee cups, etc with pictures and logos from a tv show or movie for your own profit and sold at fan conventions often in competition with actual licensed producers of the same items.

It's mostly common sense, which an alarmingly number of people appear to be lacking for some reason. LOL! Meyshi clearly has none. I mean you don't have to be a lawyer to know that you don't own the Harry Potter characters Rowlings does. Hello! And I'm beginning to wonder about Six Apart which also doesn't appear to have much in the way of common sense.