Comic Reviews: Buffy and Angel
Apr. 5th, 2008 06:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
shadowkatQuite the relaxing day. Got my pop culture addictions, a massage, hung out with Wales (who tolerates my pop culture addictions but woefully does not share them - if she or anyone else I know did, I wouldn't come online), had a glass of white torronges wine via Argentina, and an Aero chocolat bar. Life is good.
Regarding the pop culture addictions....
Angel After The Fall: First Night, Issue 6.
Unsurprisingly good. Actually better than I dreamed it would be. In my post on pop culture, I had discussion with![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
embers_log about short stories. She stated that what she enjoyed most about them was the economy of language - the precision, while novelists have a tendency to drone on and on. (Okay, those weren't her exact words, I'm paraphrasing, it's my journal - I can do that.) At any rate, as a writer, particularly one who does a lot of "business" writing - I appreciate the economy of language. Business people read too many emails - they want it clear and concise and to the point, cut the crap. (Not that you can tell by reading this journal, but what the hell, I've got to let loose somewhere occassionally.) Lynch is a master at economy of language. In a few pages he manages to convey why Spike and Illyria got together, why Connor is in hell and what he feels about Angel, and what happened to Lorne. In fact he may have the best take on Connor, I've seen. Not only does he appear to understand these characters and how they talk, he also gives them a dry sense of humor that enables the reader to laugh with the characters at the horrible situations in which they find themselves as opposed to at them.
In Spike's tale - he tells us three things in a short period of time: How Spike handled the battle in the alley, what he intended to do once things went to hell and the battle was over, how he found Illyria, and why he changed his mind regarding his intentions. His choices? Completely in character. The author did not change the character to benefit the plot or make a joke at the character's expense or be politically correct or for shock value. That's good writing.
I'm trying to keep this more or less spoiler free, so am not going into depth as to what happened. You can readstormwreath or shapinglight for that stuff.
This is just a general albeit somewhat subjective review, impossible to be anything but that.
The art? Not as good at Urru's but those who don't like Urru's(weird people, but they exist and many on my flist, believe it or not)[ETA: this was meant as a tongue in cheek joke - I personally think my own pop culture addictions are the height of WEIRD. I'm weird.], art may well enjoy these artists and may be psyched to learn Urru has jumped to the spin-off: Spike -After the Fall, so there will be a new artist doing Angel. Apparently this type of work is more time consuming for artists than writers, since Lynch is still doing both. Makes sense, Urru has to draw ten to twelve panels, many without dialogue, while Lynch has to provide the equivalent of two pages of dialogue. Comics is not really a writer's medium, it's an artists medium, which begs the question why are the writer's the rock stars here?
I did like the different styles, though. And I loved John Byrn's innovative comic strip take on Lorne's story. It fit Lorne perfectly. The style of the artwork and the dialogue fit each character - it's a hard thing to do without jarring the reader in the process. I know, I've tried it.
If you are a Connor fan - you should pick this comic. It provides us with the moment that we did not get in Origin, where Connor remembers what happened and how he deals with the confusion of having clear and conscise memories of not one but three different father figures, not to mention the knowledge that he slept with his surrogate mother and biological father's lover. His quip is in character and quite funny, as well as oddly touching. I'm not a huge fan of the character, to be honest, he got on my nerves on the series and I did not like Origin that much, a bit too sappy for my taste (which was my main problem with the Connor story on the series) - but in the comics - he is handled well, used sparingly, but effectively. The sentimentality undercut with sharp humor.
Overall rating? A + (Better than the last issue - which may be partly because I find Angel a tad boring as a character at the moment.)
Buffy S8, Issue 13 - Wolves at the Gate.
(As an aside, I had an interesting conversation with mother over the phone the other night. (It has to be over the phone, she lives more than a two days drive or an hour and a half plane flight away). It was a brief conversation. She was stating that in her book club, people were complaining about how puritanical Americans were about sex. My mother retorted - no, if anything they are obsessed with sex. It permeates everything. Newspapers. TV news. TV shows. Films. Books. Even Dancing with The Stars - they crack sex jokes. In this day and age, it is impossible to date someone without them assuming that you should have sex if the date goes well. Or at least that's what books, tv shows, and everything else tells us. Also, if you aren't having sex, are celibate, happen to be a "virgin" by choice - you are made fun and people think something is wrong with you. They also think something is wrong with you if you have had multiple lovers - although in today's world that is often considered bragging rights. I miss the old days when it was less prevalent. When you didn't see everything, when people didn't assume you had sexual intercourse after knowing someone 48 hours or two or three weeks, if that, as long as they were hot. One of the things I loved most about the Kim Harrison novel I just completed - was there was not one sex scene. Not one. The novelist was able to write a compelling story about a strong and sympathetic heroine, without talking about sex constantly. Shocking. )
I state this because Whedon and all's preoccupation with lame sex jokes is beginning to grate on my nerves. Methinks the man has been watching too many reruns of Sex and the City. Or someone has. Sure the show always had it as well, but for some reason it didn't grate as much, they seemed more subtle somehow, more tongue in check, more witty, and less in bad taste and the expense of the characters. Was that the female influence? Possibly.
Willow's interaction with Satsu made me wince. "So tell me what Buffy is like in Bed? Seriously did she give the high-pitched scream that I call her shoe-scream?" This by the way is the only dialogue we get from Willow. We don't see her talking to Buffy about it. We don't see her talking strategy. It's not like the series. And this is after an excruciatingly long bit with Xander and "his master" Dracula, with all of Dracula's racist slurs (which are in character) but grating.
It turns out by the way - that my analysis of last month's issue was once again right on the money. Buffy was using someone else to make herself feel better. Willow puts a soft spin on it and makes it out to be Satsu's fault. But Scott Allie the editor stated in an interview that the readers who were upset with Buffy's crass handling of Satsu's emotions were the most interesting and understood the character the best as well as the arc of the story. Whedon equalled that statement - with the announcement that she was just "experimenting". (In short he did it for two reasons 1)shock value - ie the same reason that Allie McBeal did the lesbian kiss episode, and Friends did a lesbian kiss episode or was that Sex and the City - it was all the rage in the 80s and 90s until Marti Noxon and Joss Whedon changed everything by creating the Tara/Willow relationship. By the way, Noxon really created that not Whedon. Noxon based it on a friends and convinced Whedon to take Tara in a different direction than he originally planned as well as to cast a completely different actress. 2) to explore Buffy's somewhat oblivious, self-centered, and crass handling of other's emotions. She may not be Parker Abrahms, but the modus operandi is surprisingly similar to both Abrahms and Angel. You know - the love them and leave them, don't show you give a damn attitude?)
There are other things that happen in the issue. Xander has an interminable and grating discussion with Dracula that made me wish Renee would kick them both. Andrew gives an annoying lecture that doesn't tell us anything new nor does it move anyone forward. The only things that happen in the book are Dracula decides to help (takes the whole issue for this to happen) and it's pretty clear he gave his secrets away while drunk to a witch, the Asian vampires find a way to remove the slayer's powers, one of them - the witch has the scythe that they stole from Buffy - which is the instrument they need to do it (makes sense it did after all give everyone their power via Willow another witch not to mention that one could find the way to do the opposite - a nifty little double-edged sword or scythe), and Buffy once again isn't working with her team so much as dictating to it ( did she learn nothing?).
My biggest problem with the arc so far is that these characters aren't evolving. They aren't moving forward. And I'm not learning anything new or different about them. I feel frustrated by the storyline. It feels at times like reading someone online's lame fanfic about the ongoing sexual and other misadventures of their favorite characters.
Not all the issues are like this by the way, if you are wondering why I keep bothering.
Some are quite good. I rather enjoyed the one in which Willow and Buffy visited the other dimension. The Faith arc had its moments. I also liked The Chain. These past few issues however annoy me the same way that Girl in Question annoyed a lot of Angel viewers. They are written by the same writer, so this should not surprise me, except I enjoyed Girl in Question a heck of a lot more - because it did provide some insight in the characters and was a clever take on Roderscrantz and Guilderstern - that old Tom Stoppard play.
I was unable to avoid spoilers in this review. Sorry about that. Not that I revealed all that much, unless of course you've been hiding under a rock and did not know about Satsu and Buffy.
(By the way - the Palely Festival discussion of that almost made that issue worth it. Marsters/Gellar and Brendon's banter was a hoot.)
The art is improving by the way. Or it's growing on me. Can't tell which. I liked it better than the writing.
Overall rating? B-
Interesting. I preferred Buffy the tv series over Angel, but I much prefer the Angel comics over Buffy. They are in my opinion 80% better overall not to mention much more satsifying. Maybe there's something to be said for being forced to tell your story in 12 issues as opposed to 44? 44 issues is giving the writers far too much time to drone on and on - reminiscent of a daytime serial - you get flashes of brilliance, but you have to wade through oodles of crap to get there.
Also picked up the latest Dresden novel by Jim Butcher - 20% at Barnes and Noble. Wales watched me buy these items in bewilderment. She doesn't understand why I spend money on such things. Nor do a lot of people apparently. I read a touching letter in the Angel After The Fall issue - from a solider stationed in Iraq, complete with photos. He was stating how these comics and the DVD's of the series had kept him going in Iraq and provided relief from stress.
He also stated that he had given up comics, sold his collection, when he got married. It was either his comics or the girl. But she made an exception for Buffy. I've been trying to wrap my mind around this. Why do women tell their boyfriends to give up their comics collections?
I mean it's not like he's telling her to stop buying shoes or jewelry. Actually shoes have a purpose. Jewelry? Not so much. I'd rather waste money on books or comics - you got a story that you can reread. Jewelry gets tarnished, is easily lost, and gets caught on things.
I'm a strange woman, I know.
Regarding the pop culture addictions....
Angel After The Fall: First Night, Issue 6.
Unsurprisingly good. Actually better than I dreamed it would be. In my post on pop culture, I had discussion with
embers_log about short stories. She stated that what she enjoyed most about them was the economy of language - the precision, while novelists have a tendency to drone on and on. (Okay, those weren't her exact words, I'm paraphrasing, it's my journal - I can do that.) At any rate, as a writer, particularly one who does a lot of "business" writing - I appreciate the economy of language. Business people read too many emails - they want it clear and concise and to the point, cut the crap. (Not that you can tell by reading this journal, but what the hell, I've got to let loose somewhere occassionally.) Lynch is a master at economy of language. In a few pages he manages to convey why Spike and Illyria got together, why Connor is in hell and what he feels about Angel, and what happened to Lorne. In fact he may have the best take on Connor, I've seen. Not only does he appear to understand these characters and how they talk, he also gives them a dry sense of humor that enables the reader to laugh with the characters at the horrible situations in which they find themselves as opposed to at them. In Spike's tale - he tells us three things in a short period of time: How Spike handled the battle in the alley, what he intended to do once things went to hell and the battle was over, how he found Illyria, and why he changed his mind regarding his intentions. His choices? Completely in character. The author did not change the character to benefit the plot or make a joke at the character's expense or be politically correct or for shock value. That's good writing.
I'm trying to keep this more or less spoiler free, so am not going into depth as to what happened. You can read
stormwreath or shapinglight for that stuff.This is just a general albeit somewhat subjective review, impossible to be anything but that.
The art? Not as good at Urru's but those who don't like Urru's
I did like the different styles, though. And I loved John Byrn's innovative comic strip take on Lorne's story. It fit Lorne perfectly. The style of the artwork and the dialogue fit each character - it's a hard thing to do without jarring the reader in the process. I know, I've tried it.
If you are a Connor fan - you should pick this comic. It provides us with the moment that we did not get in Origin, where Connor remembers what happened and how he deals with the confusion of having clear and conscise memories of not one but three different father figures, not to mention the knowledge that he slept with his surrogate mother and biological father's lover. His quip is in character and quite funny, as well as oddly touching. I'm not a huge fan of the character, to be honest, he got on my nerves on the series and I did not like Origin that much, a bit too sappy for my taste (which was my main problem with the Connor story on the series) - but in the comics - he is handled well, used sparingly, but effectively. The sentimentality undercut with sharp humor.
Overall rating? A + (Better than the last issue - which may be partly because I find Angel a tad boring as a character at the moment.)
Buffy S8, Issue 13 - Wolves at the Gate.
(As an aside, I had an interesting conversation with mother over the phone the other night. (It has to be over the phone, she lives more than a two days drive or an hour and a half plane flight away). It was a brief conversation. She was stating that in her book club, people were complaining about how puritanical Americans were about sex. My mother retorted - no, if anything they are obsessed with sex. It permeates everything. Newspapers. TV news. TV shows. Films. Books. Even Dancing with The Stars - they crack sex jokes. In this day and age, it is impossible to date someone without them assuming that you should have sex if the date goes well. Or at least that's what books, tv shows, and everything else tells us. Also, if you aren't having sex, are celibate, happen to be a "virgin" by choice - you are made fun and people think something is wrong with you. They also think something is wrong with you if you have had multiple lovers - although in today's world that is often considered bragging rights. I miss the old days when it was less prevalent. When you didn't see everything, when people didn't assume you had sexual intercourse after knowing someone 48 hours or two or three weeks, if that, as long as they were hot. One of the things I loved most about the Kim Harrison novel I just completed - was there was not one sex scene. Not one. The novelist was able to write a compelling story about a strong and sympathetic heroine, without talking about sex constantly. Shocking. )
I state this because Whedon and all's preoccupation with lame sex jokes is beginning to grate on my nerves. Methinks the man has been watching too many reruns of Sex and the City. Or someone has. Sure the show always had it as well, but for some reason it didn't grate as much, they seemed more subtle somehow, more tongue in check, more witty, and less in bad taste and the expense of the characters. Was that the female influence? Possibly.
Willow's interaction with Satsu made me wince. "So tell me what Buffy is like in Bed? Seriously did she give the high-pitched scream that I call her shoe-scream?" This by the way is the only dialogue we get from Willow. We don't see her talking to Buffy about it. We don't see her talking strategy. It's not like the series. And this is after an excruciatingly long bit with Xander and "his master" Dracula, with all of Dracula's racist slurs (which are in character) but grating.
It turns out by the way - that my analysis of last month's issue was once again right on the money. Buffy was using someone else to make herself feel better. Willow puts a soft spin on it and makes it out to be Satsu's fault. But Scott Allie the editor stated in an interview that the readers who were upset with Buffy's crass handling of Satsu's emotions were the most interesting and understood the character the best as well as the arc of the story. Whedon equalled that statement - with the announcement that she was just "experimenting". (In short he did it for two reasons 1)shock value - ie the same reason that Allie McBeal did the lesbian kiss episode, and Friends did a lesbian kiss episode or was that Sex and the City - it was all the rage in the 80s and 90s until Marti Noxon and Joss Whedon changed everything by creating the Tara/Willow relationship. By the way, Noxon really created that not Whedon. Noxon based it on a friends and convinced Whedon to take Tara in a different direction than he originally planned as well as to cast a completely different actress. 2) to explore Buffy's somewhat oblivious, self-centered, and crass handling of other's emotions. She may not be Parker Abrahms, but the modus operandi is surprisingly similar to both Abrahms and Angel. You know - the love them and leave them, don't show you give a damn attitude?)
There are other things that happen in the issue. Xander has an interminable and grating discussion with Dracula that made me wish Renee would kick them both. Andrew gives an annoying lecture that doesn't tell us anything new nor does it move anyone forward. The only things that happen in the book are Dracula decides to help (takes the whole issue for this to happen) and it's pretty clear he gave his secrets away while drunk to a witch, the Asian vampires find a way to remove the slayer's powers, one of them - the witch has the scythe that they stole from Buffy - which is the instrument they need to do it (makes sense it did after all give everyone their power via Willow another witch not to mention that one could find the way to do the opposite - a nifty little double-edged sword or scythe), and Buffy once again isn't working with her team so much as dictating to it ( did she learn nothing?).
My biggest problem with the arc so far is that these characters aren't evolving. They aren't moving forward. And I'm not learning anything new or different about them. I feel frustrated by the storyline. It feels at times like reading someone online's lame fanfic about the ongoing sexual and other misadventures of their favorite characters.
Not all the issues are like this by the way, if you are wondering why I keep bothering.
Some are quite good. I rather enjoyed the one in which Willow and Buffy visited the other dimension. The Faith arc had its moments. I also liked The Chain. These past few issues however annoy me the same way that Girl in Question annoyed a lot of Angel viewers. They are written by the same writer, so this should not surprise me, except I enjoyed Girl in Question a heck of a lot more - because it did provide some insight in the characters and was a clever take on Roderscrantz and Guilderstern - that old Tom Stoppard play.
I was unable to avoid spoilers in this review. Sorry about that. Not that I revealed all that much, unless of course you've been hiding under a rock and did not know about Satsu and Buffy.
(By the way - the Palely Festival discussion of that almost made that issue worth it. Marsters/Gellar and Brendon's banter was a hoot.)
The art is improving by the way. Or it's growing on me. Can't tell which. I liked it better than the writing.
Overall rating? B-
Interesting. I preferred Buffy the tv series over Angel, but I much prefer the Angel comics over Buffy. They are in my opinion 80% better overall not to mention much more satsifying. Maybe there's something to be said for being forced to tell your story in 12 issues as opposed to 44? 44 issues is giving the writers far too much time to drone on and on - reminiscent of a daytime serial - you get flashes of brilliance, but you have to wade through oodles of crap to get there.
Also picked up the latest Dresden novel by Jim Butcher - 20% at Barnes and Noble. Wales watched me buy these items in bewilderment. She doesn't understand why I spend money on such things. Nor do a lot of people apparently. I read a touching letter in the Angel After The Fall issue - from a solider stationed in Iraq, complete with photos. He was stating how these comics and the DVD's of the series had kept him going in Iraq and provided relief from stress.
He also stated that he had given up comics, sold his collection, when he got married. It was either his comics or the girl. But she made an exception for Buffy. I've been trying to wrap my mind around this. Why do women tell their boyfriends to give up their comics collections?
I mean it's not like he's telling her to stop buying shoes or jewelry. Actually shoes have a purpose. Jewelry? Not so much. I'd rather waste money on books or comics - you got a story that you can reread. Jewelry gets tarnished, is easily lost, and gets caught on things.
I'm a strange woman, I know.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 04:31 pm (UTC)Please accept my apologies.
The comment about weird people - was meant as a joke, making fun of my own tastes as well as everyone elses. If it helps at all, I did say at the end of the post that I'm a strange woman. The truth is I consider my pop culture addictions to be very weird. So my apologies if it offended you.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 04:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 05:48 pm (UTC)My sense of humor is snark. I don't like physical humor or the humor in Whedon's books, but the snark in Lynch's is my sense of humor. He writes the same way I do. His conversational style is similar to mine. It's why I laugh out loud reading his comics. Drew Goddard doesn't write snark. It's different.
I don't know how to explain this. Except to say, we will have to agree to disagree. It's a bit like I say tomato while you say tomatoe,
or you like Astaire, while I prefer Gene Kelly, or I like the Stones while someone may prefer The Beatles...we can't explain why, it just is!