shadowkat: (Aeryn Sun- Tired)
[personal profile] shadowkat
[Figure this should be safe and won't get any pedantic arguments/fights. But you never know with the Buffy fandom. At any rate, mind my blood-pressure in responses, I have a sinus head-ache from hell and a hellish work week with crazy bureaucrats and pedants. This is a mild distraction.]

[ETA: Almost wish I asked where you are in the viewing of series. Are you brand new to the series, watched it live in the 1990s-2003 (and since seen it 20 times or more, okay that may be an exaggeration...then again maybe not), or only watched the first three seasons all the way through and haven't seen most of the later seasons yet...although not really sure it matters one way or the other..]

[Poll #1822636]

Date: 2012-02-29 08:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
The big mistake in s4 is that they replaced Walsh as the main villain with Adam. I never could take Adam serious, whereas Walsh was one of the best villains the show had.

Completely agree. Had more or less the same problem. Unfortunately they had no choice - since Lindsey Crouse told them - whoops, I'm not available any longer going to do a movie, bye. They had a lot of problems with their guest/non-lead cast because Fox refused to pay them well. Very small budget.

And the only thing I ever liked Nathan Fillion in was Doctor Horrible, mostly because I wasn't supposed to take him serious in that one.

I liked him in Two Guys, a Girl and a Pizza Place...but he disappointed me in Firefly and everything else for some reason. Don't know why.


Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 08:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios