Reviews...

Jan. 1st, 2021 09:34 pm
shadowkat: (Default)
1. Making my way through Bridgerton - I've seen episode 4 now, which actually address the race question, making me wonder about the academics and critics. Rhimes is admittedly subtle in how she deals with it in the early seasons of her series, then slowly as they move forward, she starts to be less so. Laying the groundwork, and kind of sneaking it in there - so she hooks the white racist liberals who have no clue they are racist, and wham.

I applaud her for it, actually. spoilers for Bridgerton and I'm about to inflict my opinions onto you all - read at your own risk )

2. I've decided I'm addicted to chocolate. I had some, and my irritation disappeared. Like a salve or something. Spoke to mother tonight. She was funny. Apparently my father asked her if she lived nearby.
off-beat sense of humor at play again...not for the faint of heart.. )

3. His Dark Materials S2

Finished watching His Dark Materials S2 today. It's not as good as S1.
But I kind of knew that going in.

I think it veers from the books a bit, but I don't remember enough of the books to be certain. I'm almost positive that spoilers ).

It does get a bit heavy-handed in its metaphors. But the casting continues to be spot on, and I like the twist. That said, I find it a little preachy/ranty in regards to the authoritarian religion bit. HBO - this works better, than it did in movie theaters. They'd never get away with that in the movies. In fact, the movie got blasted by the Catholic Church who felt, and rightfully so, slandered by the text.

I kind of hand-waved a lot of this when I read the books, helped by the fact that I have my own difficulties with the Judeo/Christian religion. This actually really is a biting critique of Judeo/Christian religions and Muslim religions or authoritarian based, patriarchial religion. And it was counter to CS Lewis's pro-Authoritarian based patriarchial religious novel, aka Chronicles of Narnia. (I hand-waved that in the Chronicles of Narnia as well, also I think it helped that Lewis isn't nearly as heavy handed with his metaphors.) Pullman outright states they are going to take down the authority - aka God. And Lyra is meant to be Eve, and to fall, bringing about the end of Paradise, and the advent of knowledge.

It's grating, but I love Lyra, and Will, and all the characters. Also Ruth Wilson is rather brilliant as the complicated Mrs. Coulter. There's also a strong theme about agency, and how growing older is not a bad thing. Pullman had issues with how Lewis and other writers romanticized childhood and placed it on a sort of pedestal. Arguing that growing older and becoming an adult is not a bad thing. In the Narnia books - only children can travel to Narnia, when they grow older - they can't go, and slowly forget. Pullman found that to be offensive. He also had problems with the latent misogyny in the Narnia novels. It helps if you see Pullman's novels as a kind of a critique of the Narnia style fantasy novel. Lev Grossman's The Magicians is equally a critique of that style novel but in another way.

His Dark Materials - is revealed in this season. spoilers )

Overall a good adaptation of the books, as I remember them. But problematic in some of the same ways. Golden Compass is still by far the best of the three. This season like the prior one, ended on a cliffhanger. More of one actually...curious to see how it gets wrapped up, assuming the pandemic doesn't get in the way of things.

4. Finished Great Pottery Throw-Down

I didn't like Series 3 as well as the prior two. Series 1 is by far the best, and Series 2 isn't bad. The change in judges and hosts kind of weakens things. Although in some respects the new host is better equipped and less awkward. The new judge is in contrast more awkward and less equipped.

The challenges got on my nerves a bit at times in the third series - there was way too much emphasis on decoration and illustration. It's pottery not drawing class. And I felt the judging was far too subjective in the third season. Jacob who had a crack in his toilet, beat out Matt as potter of the week - when Matt's toilet was flawless. Granted the design/illustration could be more bold - but that's a subjective thing. Also Rosalind won - top
potter based on her illustrations, not on the actual pots. It felt flawed to me, somehow.

Curious to see if they pull off a fourth season.
shadowkat: (Default)
So, Time released it's list of The 100 Best Fantasy Books of All Time, which it selected with the assistance a panel of leading fantasy authors—N.K. Jemisin, Neil Gaiman, Sabaa Tahir, Tomi Adeyemi, Diana Gabaldon, George R.R. Martin, Cassandra Clare and Marlon James

Below is the list and a meme. Bold the ones, you've read and state if you recommend them, found it memorable, or disliked it and it was skippable, and god knows why it's there. Italicize the ones you own and have been meaning to read. Underline anything of interest and you want more information or a recommendation/review on.
100 Best Fantasy Books of All Time )
So, of the books above, which have you read, and which if any do you recommend?

[As an aside, there's a lot of books by the same writers, and a lot by the panelists - who allegedly were not permitted to vote on or nominate their own novels. Which is interesting. Also they left a lot of Hugo winners off that list - such as The Goblin Emperor - which I actually liked better than some of the other selections. These things are terribly subjective, aren't they? Maybe we should all come up with our own list?]
shadowkat: (Default)
1) Star Trek Universe Panel at ComicCon

Includes: What's coming up in Star Trek Universe, Panels and Q&A with Discovery (they do a read through of the final episode of the season - Act I), Q&A and panel discussion with Picard, and with Lower Decks

Star Trek Universe Panel at Comic Con )

2. ) I saw the Twenty Years of Dresden with Jim Butcher but it wasn't very good. Butcher isn't great at these things. I like his books better than I like Butcher, who apparently married one of his fans. He didn't have much to say about Peace Talks. And kind looks at the books as popcorn and he's gotten better by writing less or learning what didn't need to be written.
He is a huge Robert B. Parker fan (Spenser series) and Amber Series. Which explains a lot. Also why I like Dresden - I love Robert Parker's novels and he reminds me a lot of Parker.


3.) His Dark Materials Panel

Includes trailer for S2, which is really good. It's at the start.

Q&A with His Dark Materials Cast )

4.) The Collider Panel - Directors of Film and Television discussing the process of directing a film

"Robert Rodriguez (Alita: Battle Angel), Colin Trevorrow (Jurassic World: Dominion), and Joseph Kosinski (Top Gun: Maverick) take part in a wide-ranging and in-depth discussion about the craft of directing and projects past, present, and future. Moderated by Collider's editor-in-chief Steven Weintraub."
Directors on Directing )
shadowkat: (Peanuts Me)
1. Malcolm Gladwell on How to Talk to Strangers -- rather interesting. Read more... )

2. 9/11 is History Now -- Here's how it is being taught in the classroom

excerpt )

3. Stacy Abrams discusses Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Political Themes with in it, also why a remake won't work

I actually agree with what she says. Read more... )

4. EW's Fall Television Preview finally arrived. And it has lengthy articles or snippets on various upcoming series that look interesting.

* I'm most excited about His Dark Materials -- which is a book series that has been adapated and is airing simultaneously on BBC and HBO. I loved the books (actually I liked the books a lot better than Game of Thrones, far more enjoyable.)

It's an interesting world with some interesting ideas.

Watchman is also coming, but it looks dark and depressing and...sort of similar to all the other dystopian stuff that I've seen of late. Also talked about it in previous posts.

Others of note that are on streaming channels?
Read more... )

* On CBS (not the streaming channel, the network) and for [personal profile] cactuswatcher who asked about this some time ago...EVIL got a good review in EW. Read more... )

There's other shows too -- but I've already mentioned them in prior posts. Also, EW apparently gave up on talking about everything. It used to, but at this point, let's face it -- it's impossible. They just feature the stuff that they found interesting or got to check out prior to publication.

Of the new stuff?

I've decided to try on network television the following:
Read more... )

The streaming? I only have netflix, amazon and HBO. Also Broadway HD, which is via Amazon and will be cancelled soon.

I am not getting Apple, FB, or CBS All Access. I may do a free trial again of Hulu in December. And I may get Disney +, but I'm waiting for a bit. Right now all it has is the Mandalorian as new content.
shadowkat: (Default)
1. Co-worker: I've been hearing discussions here and there about Game of Thrones. I don't want any spoilers. I haven't watched Season 8 yet. Did you see the finale?
Me: Yes.
Co-worker: Did you like it?
Me: No. (Pause)
Co-worker: Okay -- hmmm, no spoilers.
Me: Eh, I should tell you one thing. If you are a fan of Dany? Don't watch Season 8. Skip it.
Co-worker (who is a huge fan of Dany -looks at me): Oh?
Me: Yeah. It's a warning. I know you love that character -- trust me on this -- skip Season 8.

I told my mother, who'd been watching but had to stop at S5, what happened. She also loved Dany. I sort of did, although when I realized the show was going to jump the shark and become a different show entirely, I stopped caring. Was deeply disappointed in some respects, it started out as a brilliant discourse on political machinations and how we are our own worst enemies...only to turn into well...

For the record, I didn't like the finale for a lot of reasons.

Reviews...that articulate my difficulties better than I can:

* Finale Review of GOT by Julie Berman, Time's film and television critic
Read more... )
Yet still mixed feelings..as this review conveys from the Washington Post:

Finale While Lacking Goes Out on an Important Note - Stories Matter
Read more... )
And.. CBS This Morning Discusses the Difficulty of Sticking the Ending for Television Series -- and how the Internet Affects that.

Vox Review of Game of Thrones
Read more... )
Also...

Danerys Tells All - New Yorker Interview

Read more... )

Ah, found another one, courtesy of beer_good_foamy, this is Chuck Wendig...who I don't always agree with..I've read one of his books. Don't remember which one. It was a while ago.

Endings are not stoppings on Game of Thrones and how we conclude our stories

Read more... )

2. If you are over Game of Thrones and ready to move on to a really promising adaptation of a cool series of fantasy novels?

HBO's Trailer is already giving us the best adaptation of His Dark Materials that we deserve

His Dark Materials is a series of fantasy novels by Phillip K. Pullman, which were written in response to CS Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia, which Pullman had issues with. They are insightful works -- with a young female heroine, and introduce the idea of daemons -- your soul takes on the form of animal that is a daemon and is attached to you. Although it's a bit more complicated than that. And it has a good cast.

I'm really looking forward to it. I loved His Dark Materials.
shadowkat: (Shadow -woman)
The Golden Compass - directed by Chris Weitz ( a new director), starring Daniel Craig, Ian Mckellan (as the voice of the Polar Bear), Nicole Kidman, Derek Jacobi, Christopher Lee, Eva Green amongst others - is based on first of a triology of Young Adult novels written by Philip K. Pullman. Prior to becoming a movie, it was a radio play and a live action 6 hour play put on by the Royal Theater in London. The novels are entitled (in the US) The Golden Compass, The Subtle Knife, and The Amber Spyglass and comprise "His Dark Materials". They came out, with little fanfare in the US sometime around 2001, possibly before. Were best sellers and unlike Harry Potter, won critical awards and acclaim. What's interesting about the novels - is up until now, no one ever raised a ruckus on their content, at least not that I'm aware of. Suprised me when I read them - since the content is far more controversial than Harry Potter or The Da Vinci Code and incredibly critical of "organized Christianity" specifically the Catholic Church, the Anglican Church, and most "fundamentalist" sects interpretation of Revelations. (It critiques the whole battle between the angels in heaven, pointing out that maybe Lucifier wasn't such a bad guy and Gabriel is a monster - the fight is about free will. By the way, this is by no means the first book to critique Christianity's literal interpretation of Revelations. Terry Prachett and Neil Gaiman do it in "Good Omens".)

The movie in comparison to the books is actually quite tame, in fact I'm not even sure you can figure it out from what you see on the screen. So why the religious sects have chosen now to get all hot and bothered over it, I don't know. Desire for free publicity? Ghod, is everyone a publicity whore?

The novels aren't easy reading and fairly complex. They are also quite dark, far darker in some respects than the Harry Potter novels. Unlike most *popular* fantasy novels for children, these books center on the trials and tribulations of an adolescent girl. It is her coming of age story, not "his". And the adolescent girl is tough, tomboyish, prickily, courageous, and at times quarrlesome. I fell in love with the books because of the girl, who is called Lyra.

The film, which was cowritten by Pullman and Weitz, closely follows the book upon which it is based. To such an extent, I felt as if the pages had sprung to life. There are only a few discrepancies - which I didn't catch since I read the books over five years ago. I remember them much better than the Potter books, but not well enough to notice slight differences.

Now the books are densely plotted and detailed, more so than most Young Adult fiction - these come closer in style to Tolkien than Lewis, if that helps. Most of my friends barely made it through the last one. And to be honest, it took me a while to get into them. The reason is that Pullman introduces a couple of tricky metaphors - daemons (the human soul lives outside their body in the form of an animal entitled a daemon. The animals can touch you and you can touch them. Whatever the animal feels the human feels and vice versa.), the aliethometer or golden compass, and finally "dust" - the material that sprouts from a human form when it dies and is in the areas between worlds.

All of these concepts are explained in the film, but I'm not sure most viewers would be able to understand them if they hadn't read the books. Much like Harry Potter - the film more or less assumes you've read the books if you are watching it. But unlike Potter - it's not as popular. (Pullman got a bit preachy in his books, and as a result lost his reader; JKR did a better job of hiding her message amongst layers of metaphor in Potter. Not that Pullman didn't try and to be fair, Pullman's message was a tad harder and bit more complicated to express than JKR's.) I only compare the two because they literally started around the same time and were both on the Children's best seller lists.

The flaw in the film may be that much like the first two Potter films (which I also found a bit busy at times) - it attempts to cram too much into two hours of screen time. It wants to put the whole book on the screen - well the whole book except for the final chapter (which I had no problems with) and as a result loses a bit in character development - although, most of the characters (Asrial/Coulter and The Witch) don't really get developed that much until the later books. The book was over 300 pages long.It is not as "simple" as Lewis' The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe - which has less characters and only two or three tasks. Lyra's journey is similar to the heroine of The Snow Queen, which may partly explain why I loved it. We all have our favorite story tropes. Some love the whole hero's journey aka Luke Skywalker/Hercules myth. Me? I love the Snow Queen - about the girl who faces her fears and prejudices to journey into the cold desolate north to rescue her male friend from the icy clutches of the Snow Queen, who metaphorically may be her adult self. Here - Lyra rescues her friend Roger from the icy clutches of Mrs. Coulter and the GOB. There's a twist in this tale that is not in The Snow Queen, which I won't spoil you on, but other than that the stories are similar - including polar bears, gypsies (here egyptians), witches and a cowboy.

Will you like it? Ah. Hard to tell. I'm not sure anyone who hasn't read the books can follow it or for that matter appreciate it. (This is how it may differ from Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, and Narnia - all of which could be appreciated if you had never read the books.) The guy in front of me found it silly (then again he didn't appear to be the sort who'd like this sort of thing - far more of Transformers type of guy.) This is not a boy's story so much as a girl's. The conflicts are not resolved with "fighting" - they are resolved with wit and cunning. The little girl never really fights anyone. And the main villian doesn't fight people either - she manipulates. Which makes it a bit low on the blood and guts and violence that people seem to get off on in these things. IT does have it's scarey bits - but they aren't "physical violence" so much as emotional and mental. That's not to say it does not have moments of violence - it does. Just, more subdued. There's a rocking fight between two polar bears and a huge battle at the end.

Is it for kids? Not sure. It's complicated. Not sure if most kids below the age of 10 could follow it. But I'm not around kids that much, so I may be wrong about that. There were kids in the theater. The small children were bored. Not enough action. Too much talk to hold their attention. I think it may be too old for them. But then I thought the book was too old for the market it was directed at. For some reason people think books concerning children should be for children, I'm not entirely sure that is true. Not saying kids shouldn't read it (I read Lord of the Rings and Dune in the sixth and seventh grades) but they may not fully understand it.

I enjoyed the film more than Narnia. It's beautiful. And well cast. A bit too busy perhaps, but I loved seeing my favorite bits from the book come to life. I'm hoping it does well enough for the next two films to be made.

Overall rating? B

PS: Did have some interesting previews. Most memorable? A computer animated version of Horton Hears A Who (which looked surprisingly good - I think they finally figured out a way to adapt Dr. Seuss for the screen.) And Inkheart about a father and daughter who have the ability to bring items in books to life whenever they read them aloud, which of course causes them problems when they bring a villian from the novel Inkheart to life and can't figure out how to get him back into the book before he destroys the world.

[No time to edit. Off to bed. Must get up at 6 am.]
Page generated May. 31st, 2025 01:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios