shadowkat: (Ayra in shadow)
I finished reading and watching two narratives that featured the victimized girl trope in two different ways. And of course there's the third one, that haunts me, the works of Joss Whedon - who of all writers appears to be the most obsessed with the trope.

[WARNING: This post is highly critical of Joss Whedon's writings, if that offends or bothers you in any way, please skip this entry. I understand why it would, I used to be the same way. It's tough to be a fan. I have hidden the criticism behind lj cut tags to aid you in avoidance.]

Just finished watching the tv series Nikita's two part season finale tonight - which in some respects is the originator of the trope in my experience. Although I'm certain people did it prior to Luc Besson, the French auteur who did both the original film Nikita and The Professional - a 12 year old Natalie Portman is taken in by a male hitman and trained to hurt those who victimized her and killed her parents. Besson did quite a few of these films. The Fifth Element is also Luc Besson. In the tv series - for those who don't know it - Nikita's family is killed, becomes a felon herself, and is taken in by Division (a counter-intelligence agency) and turned into an assassin. After Division kills her lover, Daniel, she goes Rogue, with the sole purpose of taking down Division and evening the scales - redeeming herself for the people she killed or the families she destroyed. One of those people she fights to even the scales for is Alex, who she rescues and trains to become an operative like herself and places in the heart of Division. The Television version of Nikita varies from all the other's including Joss Whedon's Dollhouse and most notably the original film and the Canadian television series starring Peta Wilson, as well as Alias another off-shoot - in this way: the trainer and rescuer of the victimized girl is female. The women take center stage in this drama, turning the tables on the men.

Spoilers for Season Finale of Nikita )

Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Steig Larrson (hereinafter: "Girl" or GWTDT)

Before going too in depth on this novel - I should provide a bit of background on Larrson. Larrson prior to being a journalist was a sci-fi fan, who wrote for and edited science fiction fanzines.

Here's a quick blurb from wiki:

Who is Steig Larrson )

"Girl" or GWTDT - feels a times like reading a journalistic piece in The Financial Times or
The Economist or maybe The Wall Street Journal. It has that same weird emotional distance. You can tell the writer was a journalist. Also the translator, Reege Keeland, is definitely British or UK - since the English translation has UK spellings and UK words - examples include arse (not ass) and gaol, not jail - although he uses both. Also "boot" not "trunk". These are minor but pop out. In some respects it is more realistic since someone from Sweden is far more likely to learn British English than American English. I hope Fincher is aware of this while doing an American version of the film. Possibly since he cast two Brits in the male lead roles.

The first 250 pages of Girl read like a financial journalistic piece in well The Financial Times business section. I felt like I was reading a business journal. After page 250 - when we meet Lisbeth Salander - the girl in question, or the girl with the dragon tattoo - the novel starts to take off. She's far more interesting than Blomkvist - the financial journalist who has gotten in over his head on not one but three matters. He's the damsel in this tale and the kind caretaker. Larrson unlike many of his mystery/thriller contemporaries, flips the two roles. Larrson also explores in precise and often graphic detail the victimized female trope and it is not pretty.

cut mainly for vague plot spoilers and the fact that I am at times highly critical of Mr. Joss Whedon stories and writing - so please avoid this section if criticism of Whedon makes your blood pressure sky-rocket. I understand how you feel, I used to be like that myself. So read at your own risk. )
shadowkat: (Default)
[As an aside, anyone else having troubles with lj today? Been very slow and I had at least two error messages getting into it. ]

Don't know why feel compelled to write in journal today, maybe my mind is just far too busy and I need to download thoughts, make sense of them. I blame living alone and too much time talking to myself. Hee.
Did consider going to a movie today - but long lines and well, wasn't quite in the mood. Did not want to see Brokeback Mountain or Memoirs of A Geisha badly enough to wait in a long line. So after going to book store, where I flirted with Elizabeth Bear's WorldWired (decided should read Hammered first, but good news is Bear has now made not one but two of my local booksellers - the indie Book Court, and the big chain Barnes & Noble. Now if only they'd carry Caitlin Kieran and Charles Lamb, all would be right with the bookselling universe, also wouldn't mind Iron Dragon's Daughter - which I cannot find), - instead bought CJ Cherryh's Cyteen (yes, I'm a Cherryh fan - goes back to adolescence), and Charles De Lint's "Forests of the Heart" - which appears to be a Native American Fantasy - rare that. Usually fantasy novels take place in medieval Europe. Haven't read Charles De Lint before, but someone mentioned him on correspondence list recently and I got curious. Been flirting with Cyteen since it was mentioned on ATPO back in 2004. Pricey, hence the delay. Yes, I know I should read what I have first or, go to the library. I buy books like some women buy shoes or paintings. It's my thing - I like knowing they'll be there for me to read whenever without any imposed financial deadline. No one telling me when I have to finish. I like to meander my way through books, languish inside the pages, take my time, ruminate, re-read sentences. No speed-reader am I, but you no doubt figured that one out by now.

Came home and started watching the extras on my new Chicago DVD, and during it started ruminating about cultural purism - actually it had an annoying way of interrupting my enjoyment of the DVD, distracting me. To the point, that I feel compelled to write this entry. To share my frustrations on the topic.

I should start off by stating that I am as far from a cultural purist as one can get. Well, okay, not that far, I appreciate the need to preserve original works of art and the need for copyright and trademark law to exist - laws that protect the authenticity of original works of art in the marketplace - keep them from being unduly altered or changed. By the same token, I like it when someone takes an original work and spins a whole new interpretation of it. I love derivative works - as they are called in copyright law - sometimes better than the original, sometimes the same as, I believe the derivative adds to the original, not taints or contaminates or erases as the purist may fear. an argument against cultural purism, which I'm certain I've spelled wrong. )

My five positive things for today, yesterday and Sat - I'm doing a bad job of keeping up with this:

Read more... )

Okay public for now...somewhat nervous about it - since I sort of well, tone in the above is a little dicey.
I blame my workplace for this new agressive tone. I have to be more clipped at work, more assertive in writing style and methinks it bleeds into my journal at times. Apologies in advance.

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 02:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios