shadowkat: (Default)
Doing laundry - which makes it difficult to make dinner or take a shower until it is done. (It's in the basement and I'm on the third floor - and requires an elevator - and it's a shared laundry room with 77 other apartments in the building. Although at the moment it is just me and one other guy. And for the most part it's well maintained. Actually, it's the best laundry room/situation I've had since moving to NYC in 1996. I've now been without my own laundry machines far longer than I had them. There's pros and cons either way, as you all know.)

Anyhow just have 19 minutes and forty-eight seconds to go.

The laundry is now done and safely put away. Even though I had to navigate around a woman (who looked much like a kid herself), a baby carriage, and two toddlers to do it. She was speaking on the phone via her earphones and not in English. Dinner made and eaten. Hair washed and dried. Mother called. Soap watched. Lunch made.

Tired.

Been a long and busy week, looking forward to having a shorter week next week. I'm annoyed that the inauguration is on Martin Luther King Day, although I fully intend to ignore it (the inauguration not the holiday - which I thankfully have off) Read more... )

In college, I had a creative writing professor who told me once that I was an interesting writer because I was interested in exploring the uncomfortable emotions and thoughts that most people veer away from. He'd picked up a pattern in my short stories. The one that won Second Place in a Literary Competition was a short story in the point of view of a business man on a plane. The man was annoyed by this chatty older woman sitting next to him - who reminded him of his mother. And his guilt at not knowing how to take care of her or what to do, and kind of wishing she was gone. But at the same time not wanting her gone. The woman dies of a heart attack as the plane lands, and he struggling with the aftermath of that, and the troubling mix of emotions. I called it Just a Bunch of Clouds. My father read it - and struggled with it - it hit too close to home. He felt he couldn't share it with his family. So, I veered away from writing anything like it again. Yet, I still find myself doing so - here, and well, in my other writing. I also find myself seeking out stories that explore those monstrous emotions. Because I think all humans have them, and understanding them - looking at them, helps not so much to combat them as to not to be drowned by them or overtaken, and in the end just to let them drift off like a bunch of clouds?

What I found compelling about the New York/Vulture article on Neil Gaiman, was not the women's allegations (which I pretty much already knew from the Tortoise Media coverage and other places and are just horrific to the point of making me cringe inwardly, not to mention unsanitary) - but rather the struggle he and Palmer had engaged in combating his urge to do it.Read more... )Also why people are attracted to people who have these compulsions. Why were women throwing themselves at him? Why did people put tattoos of him on their bodies? Why the worship of a human? Why is it that people with monstrous compulsions or have chosen to hurt others - have families, children, success, etc - while others who actively chose not to hurt others, and to help people - do not? What is it about charming toxicity that is so attractive? And how did people evolve to this point.

So many songs and stories state - a good person is defined by the people around them, the number of friends, family members, people who love them and those who come to their funeral? If this is true? Then how does it describe folks like Hitler, Trump, Whedon or Gaiman - who have all of that?

I don't know. I can't figure it out.

It's late. And I find myself with more questions this week than answers.

The other bit that I found compelling about the article - was it how it was written - and how much it reminded me of another article written in 2022 about another popular cult writer, in the same magazine. Read more... )

David Lynch died at 78 today. And he was the king of showing how reality can bend and twist in on itself. How our perceptions can lie. And often there is a nightmare lying beneath the pristine sunny surface. Fascinated with the dark underbelly of the human condition - he often explored it through surrealistic films. A friend of mine - loves the film Mullohand Drive - and has seen it multiple times. While my favorite film may be Blue Velvet - which shows darkness beneath the American Suburban landscape.
I'm thinking of him now, in the back of my mind as I write this. Because Lynch like myself was fascinated by the duality of the human condition, the dark and light warring for dominance, yin and yang. Seeing clearly the good and bad in humans, and how they can turn on a dime - falling into the abyss, with a single act.

Twin Peaks may well have been his masterpiece in that respect until it slid a bit too far down that dark slope, sliding into incoherence.

Is it wrong to ask these questions? To ponder these things? To look into the dark nether regions of the human psyche, from the safety of my arm chair? I do not know. And I often wonder if I repel you by doing so.
shadowkat: (Default)
1. I may be cancelling my cable soon - I can't get NY1 unless I upgrade to the $120 a month option, and seriously? Not sure it's worth it.

Optimum appears to have fixed the problem - the DVR is working finally, as is the internet. Read more... )

2. I listened to several podcasts at work - because I was bored and gone were the days in which I had to entertain myself by doodling or listening to music or surfing the net... now, when I'm bored, I can entertain myself with podcasts on my mobile phone via youtube. Gotta love technology.

* Joss Whedon, His Life, His Work, He's Here via Connecticut Public Radio. Read more... )

* Willow, a podcaster, feels the need to talk about Neil Gaiman, prefacing it with the fact that she's been a huge fan of his works and now has to figure out how to deal with the fact that well...maybe she shouldn't continue to support him in any way The bulk of this - is the podcaster explaining why she's going to put her collection of Neil Gaiman books in a cabinet with the collection of Harry Potter books, out of sight and out of mind. And will no longer support him financially in any way - ie. by buying his books, etc.
But if people want to do something other than that - that's up to them and on them, and no judgement. (Actually there's lots of judgement, but she's trying very hard not to convey it.)

I also briefly listened to this Felicia Day Speaks to the Joss Whedon issue - basically she states: "I'm not going talk about Joss because I don't want my experience to negate someone else's experience with someone. He was an amazing friend and mentor to me, but at the end of the day, I can only represent me, and I definitely can't negate other people's experiences, so I'm not going to say anymore."

To wit, Michael Rosenbaum relates that he can identify - he knew Kevin Spacey, and never had any bad experiences. He did two movies with him, and never had any issues. But Day refuses to say more than, yes, that's the same thing she had with Whedon.

I give Day credit for that.
my two cents such as it is )

3. Dancing with the Stars

Mother informed me that the people on this show were getting paid upwards to $650,000, and the winner got $50,000 on top of the signing fee of $100,000 or more.

I was shocked. I thought the contestants did it for free. They don't. They are paid for every episode they are in.

Mother got this information off of instagram or FB, she can't remember.

Also, apparently there was a huge controversy about Chandler (the Disney Star).

* I was apparently right, the audience didn't vote for her because they saw her as a professional dancer who hadn't improved.

* they resented that the race card was raised at all - since the audience didn't care about the race of the dancers. And considered it irrelevant.

* The husband of the choreographer, who did the final tennis ball dance number with the Bachelor and winner, was furious with Carrie Anne - the judge - for critiquing and ripping apart his wife's choreography, which he thought was fantastic. Carrie Anne wanted Chandler (Disney Star) to win not the Bachelor.

I looked it up. How Much Do they Make on Dancing with the Stars
blurb )
Mother said the gymnast made about $650,000. The rugby player was up there as well, with at least $650,000 or more.

Well, that explains a lot. I wondered why some of these folks did this. I thought it was for exposure. Nope. Money.
shadowkat: (Default)
1. While on Threads this week - I discovered...that apparently someone went after and attacked David Tennant.

Who would go after David Tennant? He's a sweetheart. Be like attacking a puppy dog? Seems insane.

So...I looked it up. David Tennant vs. well UK Conservative Transphobes

Sigh.

Tennant has a non-binary child. He's an actor who has a right to his opinion. He's not a politician making policy for others. And he's advocating for the rights of his child and others. I applaud him for that.
Read more... )
2. Speaking of flawed humans specifically writers with huge fan followings, and unfortunately toxic behavior patterns, I did an online survey on Whedon's shows today via the Association of Buffy Studies. It kept asking me if I associated certain actors with Whedon shows - but alas was Dollhouse, Firefly and I think Nevers heavy on the actors - because I had no clue who a lot of them were. Who is Clark Gregg? He sounds familiar?
It also asked if Whedon's behavior influenced me in regards to his fictional content?

Yes and no. Or I don't have a simple response to that, any more than I do to Rowling's fictional content - that I read prior to discovering she's a transphobic bully.
Read more... )
3. Hand feels better. Aloe Vera Gel is a miracle worker. Highly recommend. Blisters are pretty much non-existent now, and the redness has gone away. Aloe Vera and cold water - nothing else. (I'm kind of lucky I had nothing else, except for five different brands of Aloe Vera Gel. I got a lot of it to make my own hand sanitizer, also for sunburn.)

Also found a chai tumeric ginger latte tea mix that you just add hot water too. Helps greatly with digestion. Along with Physillium Husk and Miralax for IBS-C.

4. Television

Found two shows to watch:

* Acolyte -Disney + which reminds me a little of Andor. Like Andor - it takes place before Star Wars. This one takes place before Phantom Menace. Only drawback is it does rest on a rather cliche plot device - the evil twin. But I adore the lead actress in the role. And she's doing a good job of playing dual roles.

I'll probably like it better than most. I like the Star Wars world, and actually love the television series and films that have zip to do with the original three films or the Skywalker/Vader Legacy. My favorites are Andor, Rogue One, and Mandalorian...I've not tried Akoshka, or Rebels. And the Clone Wars - I watched the cartoon version, not the Lucas one.

* The Bear - Hulu (or Disney +) - which is a half-hour comedy (feels more like a Dramedy since I don't laugh during it) about a chef trying to create a fancy restaurant out of his family owned restaurant in Chicago.
It's a workplace comedy/drama. I love it. Season 3 just dropped.

***

Tried House of Dragon S2 - my difficulty with it is the subject matter, which is the same difficulty I have with Dune, which I outgrew about sixteen years ago? Just not in the mood for either.

5.) I'm flirting with horror. But I'm wise enough not to watch it at night before bed. I have enough difficulty sleeping as is, I do not need help. I have a love/hate relationship with horror films. Considering trying MidSommer, Hereditary, Talk to Me, and Babanook. Also, maybe, The Witch, which my brother loves and tried to show me once.

Oh, there are a few intriguing horror movies coming out...Longlegs...looks intriguing. It's kind of Silence of the Lambs meets the occult meets well puppetry?

6. The tower fan is actually keeping my apartment cool. Amazing that. I may not require a portable A/C in the living room, and just replacing the one in the bedroom will suffice. Also, I can just get another window A/C since this was PC Richards faulty A/C not the apartment or my fault.

7. Books

Saw a meme about memorable books off the top of your head. And I realized all mine were made into movies or television shows. Which means my memory is very visual? I'm sure I can think of a few memorable ones that haven't? Or have, and I've not seen the movie?

So, below is a list of books that weren't made into films or I've not seen the films, but were memorable. In other words - if it was made into a film or television show - I didn't see it, or it wasn't made into one.
books I've found memorable off the top of my head that either weren't made into films or I didn't see the film )
At the grocery store today - a young woman had a library book. She was in front of me at the checkout line. And there was this lovely library book sitting there on the conveyor book at Met Fresh, while she put down her food from the cart.

Me: I'm trying figure out what book you've got there? I'm curious?
Young Woman (she had a blond braid, blue eyes, fresh faced with freckles, no makeup, mid-late twenties, about average weight and height): It's about two people who develop a video game.
Me: Oh cool. Is it non-fiction.
YW: No, fictional. It's really good. I'm not that far - but so far I'm really enjoying it. And I really like having a real book in my hands.

Gives me hope for the future. E-books are slowly getting on my nerves, in that I have no idea how far I truly am in them and can't scan ahead to see if it gets better or flip back to figure something out. Or look at the cover. On the other hand? It's nice to read a book privately without someone seeing what you are reading - particularly on subways. Although, I've had some interesting conversations about books I was reading on the subway. I miss the days in which everyone was reading books, magazines and the paper as opposed to cell phones. I rarely even see an e-book. Just people on phones. It's sad.

Anyhow, found the book she had. Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow by Gabrielle Zevin - it was the 2022 winner of the Good Reads Choice Awards apparently.
brief synopsis )

Kind of reminds me of Halt Catch Fire in a way.

I love books. I like books more than people. I think it's because they are easier to connect to? No rejection from a book. You can escape into their worlds. Be in another person's head. Rage. Feel. Whatever.

Everyone needs a safe space, I suppose. Mine has always been books.
shadowkat: (Default)
For Buffy and Angel fans...or rather Tara, Anya, Spike, Cordelia, Dru and Giles fans, and fans of the actors who portrayed them?

Buffy Cast Reunion on Audible - Slayers by Amber Bensen and Christopher Golden

It's basically an interview with Golden, Benson, Marsters, and Chase.

Extensive Interview with Marsters about Spike for the 20th Anniversary with Radio Times

excerpt )

And..
Inside Joss Whedon’s ‘Cutting’ and ‘Toxic’ World of ‘Buffy’ and ‘Angel’ (EXCLUSIVE)


"Interviews that Variety conducted with 11 individuals who worked directly on “Buffy” or “Angel,” or were closely familiar with the productions during their runs on The WB and UPN, painted a portrait of Whedon as a talented, collaborative writer-producer with a pattern of inappropriate, imperious and disparaging behavior toward those who worked for him. Whedon created a “cult of personality” around himself, according to these sources. Those on the inside of Whedon’s circle basked in his attention, praise and friendship; those on the outside got the opposite: scorn, derision and callousness. (Everyone Variety spoke with did so on condition of anonymity, either so they could speak freely or out of concern for their careers.)

Variety also reached out to 40 other actors, writers, producers and directors from “Buffy” and “Angel” — including Sarah Michelle Gellar, Michelle Trachtenberg, Amber Benson, Eliza Dushku, David Boreanaz and Alyson Hannigan — all of whom declined to participate in this story."

Which is interesting - the actors declined to participate, but the crew and writers did on the condition of anonymity. Making it difficult to know how much of what they state is true? Except this happens a lot - most of Burn it Down - about similar allegations on various television and film sets in Hollywood - were all done with anonymity. However - if you listened to any of the Q&A's at the cons - the actors did verify most of it over the years.

***

I've only been an obsessed or huge fan of a few things in my lifetime, and not in the same way. And it's often fleeting.

We all have something that just jives with us. Don't we? But it also at some point disappoints - when we find out a touch too much about it. Which is too often the case in this day and age.

I find it interesting how fans and folks who worked on Buffy have reclaimed it as their own. They did it by writing their own fanfic.
shadowkat: (Default)
Well, today's accomplishments included getting my two robot vacuums to work. So, I now have a black and white robot vacuum - I got the white I-Life one - because I was having issues with the black one. But once it arrived the black one was working again. Then today, couldn't get either to work.

One apparently needed the bin to be cleaned and re-inserted. The other? I just needed to turn on. I went to youtube and discovered it had an on/off switch.

I've named Spike and Buffy. They get along pretty well considering.

Other accomplishments?

As I've been promising for the last two months, I finally set up my little art space/studio in my apartment. Basically, I converted my remote from home work station to an art/painting station, since I can't work remotely any longer. I'd actually bought the desk for artwork - so I'm happy about that. And now I have an easel set up, which can store my paints.

See picture below:



Even started on the sunflower. It's not great. But if you consider that the last time I painted or drew anything at all was approximately eight years ago? It was sometime in 2014 or 2015? I can't remember. In short, I'm a tad rusty. Drawing and painting are like any skill - practice makes perfect.
Although it is in some results a trained mental muscle.

I've always been good at art or so I've been told by various art teachers (I've taken a lot of courses on art throughout school and post school, also outside school). One in college told me that she wished she'd gotten me earlier. (I waited until my senior year to take an art course, while my freshman roommate majored in art - she became a financial advisor and has self-published three books now, one on finances, and two that are a series of historical novellas.) I'm an intuitive artist. Not a commercial artist. Freshman roommate was more of a commercial artist.

I don't like commercial art - never have. Also don't like commercial writing - tends to bore me. I don't do paint or write on demand or by numbers well. Never could color within the lines. It's not how I think. Nothing wrong with it - just not how I think is all.

The rusty bit - also a result of the fact that I couldn't get my hands to stop shaking today. I don't know why. Tremor was just worse today than usual.

The other accomplishment?

I made a low-carb/low-sugar gluten-free chocolate mousse pie. The only sweetner is a teaspoon of maple syrup, and fruit. Maybe a little sugar in the semi-sweet chocolate chips that I melted and the gluten free graham craker crust.

Ingredients:
Read more... )
See picture below:



The difficulty is that blood sugar is still higher than I'd like it to be. health crap )

***

Still watching Peaky Blinders - which evolves as the seasons progress. The characters change, as does the setting, attire, and problems.
It does a good job of getting across the time period from 1919 to 1930 in Britain. Also, focuses on the lesser known Birmingham, and Northern England. Along with the issues with Ireland, Belfast, and the IRA conflict during that period.

It is an anti-hero series. And it's violent, albeit not as violent as Game of Thrones, Walking Dead, or House of Dragon. More in lines with The Sopranoes and The Godfather. People get shot, people get beaten up.
Sexual violence is implied not shown, and there's not much of it.

I like the fact that it doesn't romanticize the anti-heroes. You know they are anti-heroes. There's no question about that.

It's well-written. I find myself re-winding a lot for the dialogue. I got the close-captioning on. Also, the acting is top notch. Not a weak link in the bunch.

I'm on S5, which is a bit bleaker than the previous seasons, possibly because it starts with the stock market crash. S4 is possibly the least bleak or the most satisfying.

***

Stumbled across an announcement that James Marsters attended the premier of Sarah Michelle Gellar's Wolf Pack in support of the actress, and walked the red carpet with her, along with her husband and co-stars.

The announcement also mentioned the toxic work environment on Buffy. I'm fascinated by stories of toxic work environments, because I've been in so many myself and am in one now. Misery loves company and all that.

From what I've been able to piece together from Gellar's interviews which all reference it now - is that Gellar doesn't much like talking about it. And kind of talks around it. Understandable - it's difficult to prove that sort of thing even when its going on. People are terrified to speak up, and the bullies have a tendency to be kind and nice to people who either aren't working directly for them, or that they like. So there's also quite a bit of gaslighting. And enabling. Go into any hostile work environment, and I guarantee you'll find folks defending the bullies, and telling you that the employee is to blame. Or it's in their head. They are also very good at finding scapegoats. Fighting these assholes is close to impossible in our society. Like it or not - we live in a society that enables and rewards bullies.

But when pressed does mention it - kind of vaguely. She's tough, and has been accused of bad behavior herself - so, that's part of the reason. What she has said is that - she felt it was important to put 100 percent of herself into it, and didn't understand why others didn't feel the same way. And discovered later that may have been a mistake - since she got burned out, early on. Also that, she got into trouble for standing up for the cast and crew - and shutting things down after 15 hours. "We promised 13, it's been 15 hours, we're done for the day. I'm going home." Having watched the out-takes, I believe that. They went way beyond what other series do in regards to takes. Most do five takes per scene, maybe ten. Buffy did thirty. I got bored watching it. I mean they literally redid each line about fifteen to twenty times. Until everything was perfect lighting, camera, etc. That's brutal. I'm surprised they got away with it. Fox, WB and UPN clearly was letting Whedon do whatever he damn well pleased.

According to the Hollywood Reporter - Gellar's husband is less vague, as is Seth Green, and others.
Read more... )

This does clarify a few misrepresentations in the press at the time the show was airing. During 1997-2003, Gellar was portrayed as the Diva on Buffy, and the main problem. Whedon loosely stated that he was used to it - he had to deal with Roseanne. And Hannigan had alluded to it. As had others. She was blamed for Buffy ending in S7. Whedon was praised in the fandom, and Gellar got a lot of backlash. Typical bully behavior - as a friend told me recently, when I describing bullying behavior at work - they want to control the narrative. Whedon worked hard to control the narrative.
And people tend to see and believe what they want to see and believe.

But there were always signs. There always are. If you look closely enough.

However, I like how Gellar chose to deal with it now. Which is to state, "this happened in the past. I learned from it. Dwelling on it - gains me nothing. Talking about it - solves nothing. I'm proud of the work I did, the work the cast did, and the show we created. We can be proud of that, without condoning the toxic work environment that produced it. And I've moved on, incorporating the lessons I learned from that time period and ensuring it doesn't happen again on my watch."

What's interesting, albeit not surprising, is that both Gellar and Marsters have stated separately that they can't re-watch most of S6 and S7. Read more... )

I give her a lot of credit for all of that. (And I wouldn't call myself a fan of Gellar's by any stretch of the imagination.) But what she's doing isn't easy in that business. It means turning down certain jobs, and not getting others. Also, it's easier said than done. I will state, I'm doing the same thing - I'm incorporating the lessons learned from previous experiences. And not staying silent when bullied. And supporting others who are bullied in the work force.

***

Anyhow, off to bed. Hope your Saturday or what's left of it was uneventful and peaceful.
shadowkat: (Default)
Mainly because I'm bored of writing about myself, COVID, Current Events, family and work. COVID because it's not really the Corona Virus Diaries without it )

I'm inundated by spam mail.

***

1. Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power trailer actually looks good. I liked the first trilogy of films by Jackson, I did not like the second or the Hobbit films. But I do agree that Tolkien's world building is amazingly detailed and ripe with possibilities, also he wrote a lot of short stories and novellas that take place in the world prior to the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings.


2. Be wary of what you worship. Lila Shapiro's article/profile on Whedon takes a sharp and not necessarily kind look at the fandom that built up around him. I was in that fandom, albeit not necessarily to that degree. I've never met the man. I've never interacted with him. I never wanted or bought an autograph. I just read all his interviews (mainly to understand the process and how he came up with the world and his intent behind the stories he told), watched what he did and analyzed it for free on the internet. And I was often very critical of it.
fandom and the television show-runner )

[As I was writing this, mother called and felt the need to tell me that my brother read the article -
family interlude )

Anyhow, Shapiro points out how being fannish about a writer or celebrity can make it difficult to accept their failings. And based on the interaction I just wrote about above, she may well have a point. After all my brother was able to hand wave Whedon's failings as if they were nothing, while they bother me.
fandom and Joss Whedon continued )

Oh and As a Former ‘Buffy’ Obsessive, Watching Joss Whedon’s Downfall Feels Crushing — and Inevitable (Column)

excerpt )

family interlude )

I need to get ready for bed, and clear my head. Early wake up call for tomorrow. It occurs to me that Shapiro's article triggered my own PTSD on multiple levels, and that may well be the reason I wish to discuss it?

My writer's block right now - in regards to story-telling or writing my novels is due to a fear of having absolutely no one willing to beta them. I told this to mother who told me that she had a choir director who was eager to read my next book. And loved my writing.


Y2/D309

Jan. 19th, 2022 09:43 pm
shadowkat: (Default)
Well, I got laundry done today, after being thwarted on Monday. Feel rather accomplished actually. I managed to do the equivalent of seven loads between 6am - 8:30 am. I clocked into work at 7:55 am. (Working remotely today). I was able to finally wash my duvet, duvet cover, throw blanket, pillows, sheets, towels, and assorted clothing. It was actually kind of peaceful and easy doing it at 6 am on a Wednesday morning, no one was done there. This most likely would not have been the case on a Saturday or Sunday. Evenings are often good as well. The trick to doing laundry in an apartment complex is to pick a time no one else wants to do it.

Also went grocery shopping at the health food store after work, and scored gluten free ravoli via Cappelli's made with almond flour. I wanted the Beecher's World's Best gluten-free mac and cheese - but this was by far the healthier option. Apparently they can't have both in at the same time.

My entire immediate family, that isn't in Britain, ordered free At Home COVID Tests from the Federal Government. The one in Britain doesn't need them - the British are ahead of us on this one, and she's well stocked.
She apparently had her first in-person class last week. I wish I was studying Critical Race Theory and Global Economics in London. Well, okay, maybe not - I hated school. But I loved London. Theater in London is far better than theater in NY, granted they are different, but London theater is more affordable and accessible, also there's a greater emphasis on the classics. Helped by the fact that Britain has various State sponsored theaters - such as the National Theater, and the Royal Shakespeare Theater. And a greater wealth of talent. The best theater actors often pop up from Britain. I miss London Theater. Not that I'd be partaking, I'm not exactly partaking in NY. But I've gone a very long time without seeing live theater - the longest I've ever gone. Up until 2020, I was seeing at least one to two shows a year. I was even scheduled to see Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf with a friend when Broadway shut down.

I miss live theater. I truly love it more than any other brand of cultural entertainment.

COVID took my theater away from me. Let's hope it's temporary.

**

Anyhow, worked from home today and will work from home tomorrow, then back in the office. Work was somewhat productive. We'll see if it becomes more so tomorrow. I sometimes feel as if I'm pushing a piece of paper up a cliff at work. They keep adding layers of bureaucracy. It's ironic, but the bureaucracy was added by the private company consultants, not the folks in government.

Out of boredom more than anything else, okay, curiosity, I checked to see the responses to the Whedon article on Twitter - which was vocal but not quite as expected. Also FB on it - far more active, since they made it into the article.

Re-sharing this insightful interview with Claudia Black:

Claudia Black on the Nevers and Breaking Cycles of Trauma

There's also an interesting thread on Twitter...that pointed out things that had never occurred to me or not in that way, before...regarding Buffy:
It's by a young woman who imprinted on Buffy as a teen and is dissecting how she related to the series.

Constance Grady
[profile] constancegrady
·
Jan 17
I often think of Buffy in relation to the Atwood quote, "You are a woman with a man inside watching a woman. You are your own voyeur.” Part of the reason it worked extraordinarily well for me as a kid was that it seemed as though the show understood that … and that, for instance, Angel's morning-after speech to Buffy was so painful because it was exactly what the enemy in her mind was going to say.

Anyway. It's interesting to see these blindspots play out in real life.



This never really occurred to me, but it makes sense. The ingrained misogyny in women is that male voice inside our heads. Whedon doesn't appear to realize the guy inside his head is inside the women's heads too, the poster notes. I find that fascinating.
more of the thread )

Sorry for all of the Whedon crap. I'm just fascinated by it for some reason or other.

***

It's late, must go to bed. Another early wakeup call tomorrow.

It is supposed to snow tomorrow. It's quiet now, and warmer today. So we shall see.

Random Photo of the Night..


shadowkat: (Default)


I went into the office today. And, ran into CB and Jay (who are on the A schedule).

CB and Jay: Hello SK
Me: Uh, wait...

I wander about and run into Chidi and Moscow (who are not on my schedule. I'm on the B schedule, they are on the A schedule).

Me: Okay, am I here on the wrong day?
Moscow: Yup.
Chidi: Hi Sk, oh, you came in on the wrong day.
Me: But, last week was Monday, Wed, Friday -
Chidi: The holiday threw everything off.
Moscow: I can give you a print-off of the right schedule? If you want it.

Silly me, I figured if last week was Monday, Wed, & Friday. This week would be Tuesday and Thursday. Apparently I was wrong. I swear everyone in my organization flunked logic 101.

Me in an email to management: So, I didn't get the updated schedule and came in on the wrong day. Not a problem, I can just WFH tomorrow and come in again on Friday.
BYT: Do you need the updated schedule, I can send it to you?
Me: Moscow already did.
BYT sends it anyhow.
Me in followup email: Or maybe I should just come in tomorrow and stay out Thursday and Friday?
BYT: No, stay out Wednesday only.
Me: Okay, now I'm confused. Do I stay out Wed and Thursday or just Wed?
[Also, am I being penalized for an honest mistake?]
BYT: No, I'm not penalizing you, I'm trying to work with you.
I meant to say stay out Wed and Thursday, and go back to the B schedule on Friday.

Chidi was upset at the end of the day for spending the entire day talking to his cubicle wall mate, and not getting work done. Apparently he's suffering from the same cabin fever that I am. I honestly think I came in on the wrong day - because I could not handle being cooped up another day in my apartment. Three was more than enough.

the last half of the January Meme, because I drew a blank on the first half and want to answer it briefly, besides it is the end of January any how.. )

**

Mother called to inform me that she just ordered the free COVID test from the US federal government online. While I informed her that I had purchased about $85 worth of masks and sent them to her.

ME: They are available? (the tests, not the masks - the masks have been available for ages and alas, are not free).
Mother: Yep, just ordered one online. I just called to tell you that.

Mother has finally accepted the fact that she cannot bring my Dad home. She no longer can envision him with her, and the person she does envision is no longer him - it's who he was before COVID began. He's too far gone now. It's as if he's living inside his dreams, with mother, and the rest of us, occasionally jumping in and out of them. Today he was doing a cross-word puzzle in his head, with various old co-workers, and hunting the key to it, so he could win a $1000. It made no sense, and sounded like a dream. It's true in a way, as some of us age the membranes between dreams, memories and reality seem to grow thin. Reality blurs.

The mind is weird.

Anyhow, the US Government has decided to send the highly accurate rapid at home tests to all residences within the US starting the last week in January.

"COVID-19 tests will start shipping in late January. USPS will only send one set of 4 free at-home COVID-19 tests to valid residential addresses."

Go HERE.

This is a savings of $28-60 per box. That's how much they were charging for the things at pharmacies, until they ran out of them.

At work, co-workers advised that most folks had either been exposed to COVID or had it. And that the true number of people who either had it or tested for it or died, wasn't recorded. I agree with that - I know too many people who tested positive that aren't in the system, because they took the at-home test, which is accurate in regards to positive test results.

Wales informed me that she definitely had COVID and tested positive, got it from the Met, most likely. Poor thing. She had herself all revved up, going to opera, delivering food - and wham. Oh, getting the tickets she got for the MET is a sign of the times - normally it's completely sold out.
**

I kind of fell down the rabbit hole on Twitter regarding the Whedon article. There are some true assholes on social media, mainly hanging out on Twitter, hence the reason I'm careful on Twitter. People tend to ignore me on Twitter - I only have 41 followers, and most of them are folks I knew here, or on Soap Twitter. I like being ignored. Being a Big Fan Name is something I do not want ever again. I kind of became that once - in the Buffy fandom, and it was scary.

The Whedon interview was weird. Read more... )

***

Should go to bed. Current game plan is to get up at the same time as today, 5:40 am, and do laundry at 6 am. The laundry room opens between 6 am and 9pm.

Maybe no one will be down there? One can hope.
shadowkat: (Default)
I've read through the NY Magazine aka Vulture Whedon article now, and ..I find I don't come to the same conclusions as the author does.

conclusion of the article )

Perhaps because I've met people like Whedon in my life time, too many to count, across industries. Narcissists are very charming, and more than one thing. But I don't see Whedon as a victim here - but as someone who is well-off and invested in playing the victim.

He reminds me a great deal of Steve Carroll's character in The Morning Show. Is he mentally ill? Yes, most likely. And as Claudia Black previously stated - I do hope he gets help for it. But the mental illness doesn't excuse his behavior, it doesn't remove culpability or accountability.

Also, I watched Snyder and Whedon's Justice League's back to back, and well, you know there's a problem when the least offensive version and most entertaining was Snyder's. I'm not necessarily a huge fan of Snyder (actually I'm rather ambivalent and I don't tend to seek out his work for the most part, it's very stylistic, with not much emphasis on script, he has a painting background and is into video games), but Snyder's Justice League was not only the better film it was the least offensive.

There's changes Whedon made that underscore an offensive frat boy sexist humor, that I kind of handwaved in the Buffy and Angel series, but was blatantly obvious here.

I also read the Wonder Woman script, and the original Buffy script. So...there you go.

The writer of the article spends more time critiquing Whedon's fandom or the fans of his work - as if they are somehow complicit in his downfall or worse in enabling his actions. I don't agree with that assessment. They were and are fans of the art, they don't know him. They fell in love with their perceptions of his work and the performance he provided. My friend embers_log certainly did not endorse any of these actions, she didn't know about them. She loved the performance or what she perceived.
**

Why does this intrigue me, right now?

I'm discussing this because it fits with a theme of works that I gravitated to this weekend for reasons I'm not quite certain I understand. Except that I've always been fascinated by why we do what we do, the dark underbelly of humanity or those dark impulses.

From Frankenstein to Dexter. In each, the individuals involved are putting on delicate performances. They are brilliant men, some may say genius. And yet, they are also incredibly good liars. I told a friend once, that humans are good liars, particularly at lying to ourselves.
meta narrative on Dexter, Frankenstein, Whedon, Buffy, and Yellowjackets - with major spoilers for Frankenstein and Dexter, vaguer ones for Buffy and Yellowjackets )

**

On Twitter, Michael E Knight's comment at fan event was posted, and I thought it telling in a way...

Last night on the JPS/MEK zoom, MEK said about these times we’re in:

“I don’t know anyone who’s thriving right now. In 10 yrs, we’re gonna look back at now & be like ‘that was really some shit’. You don’t know you’re living through something biblical until it’s over.”


I think this is true. Trauma can take many forms. And affects people differently. But, there's a caveat here, it does not excuse or justify hurting others to benefit one's self. The actor who I quoted, to my knowledge, has always been kind and never hurt a soul.
shadowkat: (Default)
Done nothing to celebrate it. It's been a drab, gloomy day, and all attempts to do laundry were thwarted. (Ah, what I wouldn't give some days for my own washer/dryer. When and if I retire - I'm retiring to a place where I have them or at the very least a reliable service.)

Slept poorly, and I've been fending off the January uglies - which seem to be a combination of depression/anxiety or general malaise. Not helped by hot flashes.

Anyhow, bought/ordered KN95 masks for mother. About 50 of them, for about $83 via Amazon. Two boxes worth. I swear - I think I've spent close to $500 on masks in the last two years if not more. I also have lots of the cheap and free useless ones in my desk at work and at home.

Mercury is in retrograde, or so I'm told, so it may be best to take a social media hiatus. (Of course I'm ignoring that advice.) Instead I wandered about in Twitter, and found this...interesting, if mildly disturbing and slightly unsettling one about Joss Whedon, whereupon he responds to the allegations against him by playing the victim. For once, it would be nice for someone to take accountability for it.

Joss Whedon Breaks his Silence on the Allegations Against Him

It's worth reading if you are interested in the history of the Buffy fandom, Whedon's perspective on it, and interacted with it online. Since it delves into that history - and that surprised me. Starts out talking about the Whedon Studies Association - almost as if the writer is making fandom somewhat complicit in Whedon's rise and downfall, and perhaps fandom is? I don't know any longer.

Excerpt 1 - about the scholarly fans and Whedon.. )

There's a bit of a disconnect in these stories...because what you have is a very wealthy, privileged family, who has never had to worry about money. Who lives in splendor. And got work easily. And you have a show that many identified with - but their perception of it wasn't what was inside the creator's head completely. Also there's a kind of disconnect between how fans viewed the cast and crew and creator's relationships on and off screen, and what it actually was.

excerpt 2 - early days of internet fan culture )

I've become increasingly aware of this disconnect between what we want to be real and what actually is. Reality is far more complicated than what most perceive, and yet also far simpler. I think having a father who seems to be slipping in and out of various realities inside his head has made me more aware of this - of how reality in of itself can be little more than a construct of our own minds and perceptions of things.

There's new a game out entitled Wordl. Perhaps you've heard of it? It's all over social media. I tried it. I suck at it. I suck at word games, my father does too - even though we are both wordsmiths. But that's not a requirement of this sort of game. It's a spacial counting game with letter and word configurations. Plays havoc on anyone with dyslexia or spatial issues. I kept getting the number of letters I needed in each word wrong, and the squares confused me, as did the letter set up. Also I kept flipping everything around.

But the internet assumes anyone can do it, and everyone loves it, and it is the game we "all" need right now - emphasis on all. Why do we do this? Assume that what works for a few people or even several hundred, works for everyone? What's up with that?

I think sometimes this is the flaw in all of it. This assumption that we live in a one-size fits all world, and I've become increasingly aware that we don't. We can't be completely communal, no matter how much we may want to be, we are unique organisms, with unique gifts, perceptions, and ways of thinking - we cannot be treated the same.

**

I'm tired. And in a kind of malaise. Mercury is in retrograde or so they say. It's Martin Luther King Day - and depending on your perspective, we've either come a long way towards the kind of world King envisioned or hardly moved at all. Hard to know how King himself would view it. When he died, the world appeared to be in chaos, and yet it is also in chaos now. Is it better or worse than it was in 1968? I honestly do not know. I was one years old and have no memory of it.

I know in some ways we've advanced further than I thought possible, but others, we still seem to be hopelessly stalled. There are too many bigoted fools in the world and I dearly wish there were less - either culled from the population by a virus and natural means, or having changed their minds.
But alas, neither seems to be happening - and that frustrates me. But I'm also not surrounded by them - or near them or really know many, so maybe, I'm wrong about that.

Unlike Whedon, in the excerpts above, the sun is very much my friend. And I wish I could be sitting in his sun drenched house, just a few blocks from the beach. Without him or his artist girlfriend. Just trade abodes for a few minutes. Or hours. Or days. Or weeks. Or months. Where he can work looking out on a gray, drab, colorless world or a cubicle wall in a office with no windows...going to and from work in the dark, with the days slowly getting longer, but no where fast enough, and the sun seems at times to have taken an interminable holiday. And I can work in sun-drenched splendor, in an airy home.

I don't want anything else from his life though, just the home so briefly described in the article. I want the sun. I want to bath in it daily as I did in Hilton Head, for the sun is the enemy of the virus and all that comes with it. But then, I am not a vampire.

Random Photo of the Night...

Y2/D221...

Oct. 23rd, 2021 06:35 pm
shadowkat: (Default)
Gloomy day. I slept in. Well late for me at any rate, woke up around 9. I thought 7:45 and got confused. Took a long shower, hair took forever to dry.

Binge-watched New Amsterdam - I'm about seventeen episodes behind. I whittled it down to twelve. Deleted the Grey's episodes. I no longer like or care about the characters on Grey's - it's been on too long, I think. Should have ended about ten years ago. It's at 18 seasons now, the longest running medical drama in history - flew past ER's record ages ago.

Considering going back to Squid Game - but I'm feeling a bit blah at the moment, and I don't think its a good idea right now. New Amsterdam made me cry but at least I liked people.

Also thinking about going to church tomorrow, in person, mainly because I want to do the activity at 1pm behind the church in the Gazebo, with tea and tarot cards. But...I'm on the fence - not about the activity, I just hate taking the subway anywhere on weekends at the moment. They do work on the weekends, and the trains are always screwy.

Television has decided ...okay the whole pandemic thing was interesting for about eighteen months, but bored now - time to move on. So they are acting like it is completely over and everything is fine. (If they were going to go that route - I wish they'd never mentioned it to begin with. Also, I love how television series have folks dying of pancreatic cancer peacefully and in their sleep - I know three co-workers who have it, have had it, or died from it. There's nothing peaceful about pancreatic cancer.) Will state that New Amsterdam dealt with it more realistically than say, Grey's Anatomy has.

Read an article about struggling with depression - which I've been dealing with off and on for a while now. What a lot of folks don't understand about depression is that it's not one thing or definable. It varies by individual. And everyone experiences it differently and in different variables or degrees. Which is why it is really hard to treat - because human beings like to things to be simple. One size fits all. Find a pill. Or a method. Treat it. Bye Bye.
It also can come and go. Kind of like the weather.

It's also almost impossible to discuss. Mental health is hard to discuss. There's so much stigma attached to it. We have a tendency to write folks off. And if someone handles depression, anxiety or trauma differently than we do - same. It's sad.

**

GH fandom: It's completely unrealistic that anyone would file charges against Nina for keeping Sonny's identity hidden from his family, Sonny, everyone in Nixon Falls for nine months. That would never happen in real life.
ME: You do realize we are talking about a television soap opera that had Luke and Laura fighting villains who froze the state of New York utilizing a diamond called the Ice Princess? Reality kind of jumped out the window in the 1980s. This is relatively tame in comparison.

Oh, speaking of fandoms... someone posted this rather touching comment by Will Wheton (shared from his Tumblr account):

Wil Wheaton

Another question from my Tumblr Ask Me thingy:

Q: I have more of an opinion question for you. When fans of things hear about misconduct happening on sets/behind-the-scenes are they allowed to still enjoy the thing? Or should it be boycotted completely? Example: I’ve been a major fan of Buffy the Vampire Slayer since I was a teenager and it was currently airing. I really nerded out on it and when I lost my Dad at age 16 “The Body” episode had me in such cathartic tears. Now we know about Joss Whedon. I haven’t rewatched a single episode since his behavior came to light. As a fan, do I respectfully have to just box that away? Is it disrespectful of the actors that went through it to knowingly keep watching?

Answer: I have been precisely where you are, right now. In fact, we were just talking about this a few days ago, as it relates to a guy who wrote a ton of music that was PROFOUND to me when I was a teenager. He wrote about being lonely and feeling unloved, and all the things I was feeling as a teenager.

He grew up to be a reprehensible bigot, and for years I couldn't listen to one of the most important bands in my life anymore.

But this week, someone pointed out that he was one member of a group that all worked together to make that thing that was so important to me. And the person he was when he wrote those lyrics is not the person he is today. And the person I was when I heard those lyrics doesn't deserve to be shoved into a box and put away, because that guy is a shit.

This is a long way of saying that Joss sure turned out to be garbage. Because of who I my friends are, I know stuff that isn't in the public, and it's pretty horrible. He's just not a good person, and apparently never was a good person.

BUT! Buffy is more than him. It's all the actors and crew who made it. It's all the writers who aren't Joss. Joss is part of it, sure, and some of the episodes he wrote are terrific.

At least one of the episodes he wrote was deeply meaningful to you at a moment in your life when you'd experienced a loss I can only imagine. The person you are now, and the 16 year-old you were who just lost their dad, are more important than the piece of shit Joss Whedon revealed himself to be.His bad behavior is on him. He has to live with it, and the consequences of it. 16 year-old you, who just lost their dad, shouldn't have to think about what a shit Joss Whedon is for even a second. That kid, and you, deserve to have that place to revisit when you need to go there.

I can't speak for the other actors, even the ones I know. But I will tell you, as an abuse survivor myself who never wanted to be in front of the camera when he was a kid: it's really okay for you to enjoy the work. The work is good and meaningful, and if nobody is going to watch it because of what one piece of shit did two decades ago, what was it all for?

I'm not the pope of chilitown, so take this for what it's worth: I believe that when some piece of art is deeply meaningful to a person, for whatever reason, that art doesn't belong to the person who created it, if it ever did. It belongs to the person who found something meaningful in the art.
If it feels right to you to put it away and never look at it again, that's totally valid. But if it brings you comfort, or joy, or healing, or just warm familiarity to bring it out and spend some time with it, that's totally valid, too.

I've written a lot of words. I hope some of them make sense and are helpful to you.

https://wilwheaton.tumblr.com/.../i-have-more-of-an...



I know that Charisma has stated in various places that her words on Twitter were in no means meant to shame or ask fans to stop watching Buffy and Angel. She worked hard on both. [By the way, the Charisma on Twitter is a truly beautiful and admirable soul. I am loving her tweets. Been following her since February.] They were aimed at those who were hiring Whedon and continuing to enable his abusive behavior in the industry. The art is collaborative, and to stop watching and enjoying it - helps no one.

I think we as a society have a tendency to worship other human beings. We even like to think of God or Gods as reflections of ourselves. (I don't, stopped in my twenties.) Anyhow, the tendency to fan worship humans is a zero-sum equation doomed to failure. People can't withstand that kind of adoration - they are too flawed. Mother used to tell me that the Australians call it tall poppy syndrom - someone gets too big headed or too tall in the field, they get themselves cut down to size. We aren't meant to be worshiped. Adoration is toxic to the human soul.

I could see it happening with Whedon. Fans adored him - because they believed in some weird way that the show they loved was Whedon. It's not. It never was. No work of art is that person. We interact with art, so in a way art is all of us or that interaction. Buffy, as an example, changed as I interacted with it. It became something else through each interaction. And I didn't do it in a vacuum. I discussed it with others, read fanfic, read meta, wrote fanfic and meta - and even collaborated on fanfic and meta - this resulted in a new experience of the series each and every time I did it. To the point that I might as well have watched hundreds of different versions of Buffy every time. I never just saw one. And now, over twenty years later - it's hard to know which version was the original or even the actual one and if such a thing even exists.

Music is similar. Eric Clapton may be a racist bigot and insane anti-vaxxer, but Tears of Heaven is still a beautiful song, beautifully performed by Clapton.

Or acting, Mel Gibson may be horrific in some respects, but his performances in Gallipoli, Year of Living Dangerously, Mad Max, and even the Lethal Weapon series are no less moving or brilliant.

I remind myself of this constantly when people disappoint me, or when I disappoint myself (which is more often than I like to admit...this year has been insanely hard in that respect), that we are all more than one thing. Insanely complicated. Ever-changing. And far from perfect. Deeply flawed, yet in part due to those deep flaws, uniquely beautiful creatures worth saving and remembering.

But it is hard to remember that sometimes or realize it, particularly when I'm hurting inside and want to rail at the world around me for disappointing me.

**

I've not left my apartment today. Lounged in sweats, a white t-shirt, and binge-watched television. Talked to mother. Wrote on the internet (but not that much.)

Simply floating ....downstream. Some days, it's the best I can do.

Random Photo of the Day...this round a cartoon found on FB that made me laugh...

shadowkat: (Default)
Bro got home okay, and had a long chat with Mother, who regaled me with their trip to London - and niece's current set up.
So I felt the need to regale you with it too )

Mother still can't see father, but will most likely be released from the Arbor next week - to her home and the home health care aids again. Because she can walk to the bathroom, and get in bed by herself. They are promising that they will provide her with the care she needs at home, even if they have to use an outside service. She can't go back to the Preston and be near my father. Also this is a better room and ironically cheaper, because Medicare pays for it. But she also can't see my father - because of the COVID outbreak - until October 6.
**

Work was better today - mainly because I got pro-active and came up with a few things I can do that will make my job and possibly others easier. Plus I bought bags from Amazon, which I'm hoping are nice. I'm in desperate need of a new cross the body bag. The current one is ragged.

I'm debating buying hair dye - Overtone (which is allegedly good for the hair and has no ugly chemicals). But on the fence about it. I do need a haircut - I'm just procrastinating. Tempted to throw caution to the winds and get a massage.

Found an interesting pod-cast for television/film geeks and James Marsters/Buffy fans out there - Inside You - with James Marsters - the Dark Side of Buffy with Michael Rosenbaum. The start of it? They go in detail about film shoots, lenses, long lens and wide lens shots and hitting your marks. And what that means. (And oh my god, I'm such a geek - I love details like that. )
Note - having just listened to all of it now - don't expect any major revelations.Read more... )

It's interesting, if you like this sort of thing. I followed it up with a podcast with Charisma, who has charmed me on Twitter. What's weird is these folks are my age. I didn't think they were my age. I thought they were a lot younger when they were playing teens on Buffy and Smallville, and I was my 20s and 30s.

Like I said I'm a geek. I like to hear other folks' stories. I find people interesting. I probably would have made a great journalist in another life. Who knows, maybe there's a version of me in a parallel universe who is a journalist, with kid, and either a wife or husband.

***

COVID

From the NY Times Briefing:
tonight's news round up )
***

Sigh.

****

Parents walking on the beach in 2017. (Now they can't see each other, because of COVID and related issues.)

shadowkat: (Default)
I've finally watched all six episodes of The Nevers. The best episode is actually the last one, which was written by Jane Espenson and directed by someone I've not heard of, and reviewed by Phillipa Gossellet.
(Whedon had on foot out the door at this point.)

I'm not crazy about the series, and its unlikely I'll continue with it - if it makes it to a second season.

Before I continue with a review? I was blown away by this article, which is an interview with Claudia Black, who guest stars in episode 6 of The Nevers.

Claudia Black on Her Surprise 'The Nevers' Role, the Joss Whedon Situation, and Breaking the Cycles of Trauma

While Black didn't witness anything untoward in regards to Whedon's behavior on the set, she states that it was clear he was under a lot of pressure, and things had begun to dissolve. And just because no one reported anything, didn't necessarily mean it wasn't there. And there was a heavy feeling that everyone had to cater to Whedon and see his vision through - which doesn't tend to lend itself to a successful work environment.

excerpt )

The Nevers - Review

There's aspects of this series I enjoyed, but not enough to hold my interest to continue. The problem is two-fold, too many characters, and too much focus on a somewhat trite and convoluted plot, that utilizes sci-tropes and gimmicks that tend to irritate me.

Frankly the series had some of the same problems that I had with Marvel Agents of Shield. Which I kept giving up on.

Thematically? It's fine. A little preachy in places - characters like to launch into long monologues and sermonize. I get bored and my attention wanders.

Lacks the humor of Whedon's earlier series. (Or it has jokes, but they flew over my head.)

What worked? I found the lead character of Mrs. True interesting, she's complicated and well-played by Laura Donnelly (and in a guest role - Claudia Black).

Also, the concept of people obtaining odd and often inconvenient super-powers was a nice one - if heavily borrowed from Marvel Comics.

But outside of Mrs. True, I kept losing track of the characters, and everyone mumbles. I had to use close-captioning at various points. Ben Chaplin's cop is rather interesting, and written smartly for once. But everyone else is just kind of there.

Also, Claudia Black is excellent in episode six, which is an intentional mind-fuck of an episode. I was kind of spoiled on it, because I read the article with Black. Also, I could kind of see it coming - since the series structurally reminds me a great deal of Marvel Agents of Shield and Dollhouse. But watching Black made me want to re-watch Farscape. (I adore Claudia Black.)

What doesn't work?

Everything else. But it's worth stating that there are a couple of sci-fi tropes that I've grown weary of, and this has pretty much all of them.
I'd list them, but I'd be spoiling you on the series more than I already have.

It's very busy, and when we get to the great reveal - it's not that interesting. I was disappointed, mainly because I'd seen it done elsewhere far better. spoilers )
shadowkat: (Default)
This is just...so insanely ironic, if you know anything about the back-story behind the Buffy Movie - that lead to Whedon's chance to redo it on Television.

Chris Terrio, the original screenwriter of Justice League is furious with how Whedon vandalized his script

excerpt )

- Why this is so ironic?

Whedon's Issues with the Buffy Movie


excerpts )

So, Whedon's original script was ruined in his opinion, and vandalized by the actors, a rushed production schedule and the director. Then several years later, he got the chance to redo it - his way.

Scan about thirty years later? Whedon does the exact same thing Sutherland and Kuzui's did to him, to Snyder/Terrio and all.

30 years later - Whedon is on the opposite side of his own argument. Ironic.
shadowkat: (Default)
Justice League's Director Joss Whedon's Controversial Toxic History"

The opening was straight out of every old horror movie: Teen couple sneaks into a darkened building. Ominous background music swells. He wants to go up to the roof and make out. She thinks she hears a noise; he says it’s nothing.

And then she turns into a monster and pounces on him.

“Welcome to the Hellmouth,” the 1997 pilot episode of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” wore its trope-flipping female empowerment on its sleeve, and audiences devoured it.

Showrunner Joss Whedon had arrived.

Twenty-four years later, Whedon is facing multiple allegations of being the monster himself. Many of the female stars from “Buffy” are done with him. “Justice League” star Ray Fisher has accused him of being racist and abusive in a Hollywood Reporter story that also details a witness’ account of Whedon’s boast that he would make actress Gal Gadot “shut up and say the lines.” The latest details hit as “The Nevers,” HBO’s Whedon-created show about Victorian women with superpowers, is set to debut Sunday, and Whedon is so radioactive the network isn’t even using his name.

It’s an ironic twist of cinematic proportions for the auteur who, for decades, was Hollywood’s go-to male feminist.


I realized today while fighting with a Whedon fan on the Whedon Studies board on FB, that I am angry at Joss Whedon. But it's an empty anger.
regarding monsterous acts by writers that I once respected )
How do you reconcile the art of someone you once ...respected, with the truth of who they were? Or the truth of how they acted? Does that change how we view the art that we loved or once loved? Or not at all? Can we look past the abusive actions of the artist and see the art clearly for what it is, ever again? Does it taint our love for it? God knows.

It's something I'm still grappling with, apparently.
shadowkat: (Default)
The day flirts with me, but my sore body after walking 3.2 miles around a Graveyard on Monday, and 2.5 miles on Sunday, could only handle a walk around the block. Also it's dry outside, the air filled with tree pollan.
Pretty though - bright blue sky, and sun filled.

I'm bored at work. So, I started listening to Renegades: Born in the USA Podcast on Spotify. For those who don't know about it? Barack Obama and his friend, Bruce Springsteen, have gotten together in Springsteen's barn this past winter to record a series of podcasts about the divide in America and how to come together. They chat about their odd friendship, their backgrounds, and what they have in common and what they don't - along with various events in our history - snatches of song and speeches.

It's part, stroke the old ego, and part insightful commentary on the various racial and class divides. snippets from the podcast based on my haphazard memory )

I found it insightful - about the two men and about our world. Also a nice companion to Michelle Obama's book Becoming - which I recently finished. It's insightful as well, but also aggravating in places. I like her husband's better - it's more succinct. Michelle kind of rambles around her theme a bit. But she does mention how it is important to let people in. Open up and let them in. I thought, I'm trying, Michelle, I am trying.

My mother believes I am. But I don't know. I am a tad stand-offish, I guess.
But I'm shy and retiring too in my way, I suppose. And every time I get interested in anyone and try to strike up a close friendship or romance, they leave town on me. I don't know if it's a New York thing or just a thing.

Mother: Didn't the last guy move to France?
Me: Yes, to take care of his uncle who has dementia. He left in 2018. It was king of hard to keep a long distance relationship, it's not like we dated. Also I suck at long-distance relationships.
Mother: Most people do. You're brother is the only one I've noticed that maintained it - and only for short periods of time.
Me: I can't even maintain friendship and family long-distance that well, outside of you. Ames comes and goes.

On Twitter, discovered a lengthy interview with Ray Fisher regarding what happened with Whedon et all on the set of Justice League. It's more detailed than the previous interviews, and not all that surprising. Just manages to underline my current take on Whedon and Hollywood - aptly summed up by one responder as : "Hollywood is filled with assholes." Yep.

If you are at all curious, HERE's The Article.

My take aways? Whedon was an asshole on that set. And a lot of white folks don't understand racism or aren't sensitive to it. (I picked up on this during the Barack/Springsteen conversation, along with Michelle's book, but also talking to folks in my workplace.)

Katherine Forrest, a former federal judge who conducted the WarnerMedia probe, tells THR in a statement that in interviews with more than 80 witnesses, she found "no credible support for claims of racial animus" or racial "insensitivity."

I don't know, I watched the two films and compared them - I'd say what that I found the Whedon film to be insensitive racially (and gender wise) on multiple levels. But that may be subjective on my part.

excerpts )

From the above? Whedon pissed off some interesting folks. Patty Jenkins, Gail Gadot, Jeremy Irons, and apparently everyone in the cast. (That cast included Amy Adams, Ben Affleck, Henry Caville, Diane Lane, Joe Morton, Jeremy Irons, Jason Momoa...).

I think he'd have gotten away with it, if his version of Justice League wasn't such a bad film, and hadn't bombed at the box office. What's interesting is why HBO/Warner Brothers stuck with him after that? I'd have fired his ass. How'd he get to do the Nevers? Maybe they gave him a break due to the impossible circumstances? Or he had something on one of the execs, who finally left?

Anyhow, from what I read - I'd say the Whedon Cut was racially insensitive, and from what I saw of Whedon's cut - as compared to what Zack Snyder did? The Whedon version was racially insensitive and gender insensitive. I mean I was offended by it - when I compared the two films. You don't necessarily see it without the comparison - and I think the reason for that - is people think, oh, it's a comic book or that's just the medium. We hand-wave a lot of things. OR that's just Whedon's sense of humor. Or it's not like it's not like that in the comics or cartoon.

It's not the medium. You don't have to do it that way. That's what I think is coming out right now - that excuse, oh we have to do it this way, is just that an excuse, it's justified. There's no reason why you can't have a diverse superhero team, where all the characters have an arc and agency, not just the White Guys. It can be done. And it can be done well.

Going back to Barack and Springsteen's podcasts...I've made it through four so far, I think there are eight? Anyhow, going back to the podcasts, they make an interesting point about the cinema of my childhood, and theirs - the 1970s Westerns, where we have ingrained in us the loner hero, who has no home, no roots. No community. And this fear of being domesticated. I think that's partly the old school Hollywood writers and directors problem at the moment - they are stuck in that mindset. I know Whedon kind of is. That toxic white male loner mentality. John Wayne's misanthropic character in The Searchers. Or Clint Eastwood in High Plains Drifter and later The Unforgiven. It's ingrained in a portion of our society and breaking out of that mold is not easy - I don't think. But necessary. To find community and roots...which is hard for outsiders to do.

***

On the COVID front? Still being inundated with bereavement notices and requests to take the vaccine via workplace.

Sis-in-law told mother that she is going to take the second dose of the Moderna. She'll just get sick is all. She now has a two boils on her leg, but it appears to be getting better - and she'll survive. Niece apparently is lined up to get the vaccine next week.

Family is making headway. I may get to see them all again in the not too distant future.

Huzzah! Also I'm thinking of sending my niece flowers to congratulate her for getting into the London School of Economics Foreign Exchange Program (she had to apply and worked hard for it) and on her up-coming graduation.

shadowkat: (Default)
1. Rock Star Television Critic Alan Sepinwall reviews The Nevers in Rolling Stone Magazine

My takeaways?

It has the flaws of most of Whedon's television serials.

Excerpt )

Whedon sucks at plot and world-building. Always has. That was my difficulty with all of his series. Also he tends to be at his best when he's dealing with a clear, relatable and universal theme that he knows well. Such as the hellish aspects of high school. Or growing up and dealing with annoying parents. Subverting slasher film tropes, and romance tropes.

But if you pull him out of that - he tends to fall apart. Also I'm not certain six episodes gives him enough time to pull his shit together.

I'll probably try it for myself when it airs on HBO Max, but with low expectations. But I wasn't that turned on by the trailer. I don't like Victorian Steam-Punk (I don't like the Victorian Era - it annoys me, I'm starting to think that maybe I lived through it in another life and still have PTSD from the experience, hence the annoyance?)

The above review also makes a point about how it is hard not to see the show in light of the allegations. The allegations cast a long shadow over the art, apparently. I'd agree - I picked up on it in the synopsis.

2. I had a number #2, but for the life of me I can't remember what it was.
Here, have a picture instead.


shadowkat: (work/reading)
When comparing films or anything really - it's important to pick items that are related to each other and similar in medium. For example? I wouldn't compare the Buffy movie or Buffy comics to the Buffy television series - they are three different mediums, you kind of have to take that into account. Same with say Justice League - you don't compare the films to the comics - different mediums, different requirements. Nor do I compare Snyder's films to say the Marvel films - two different verses, different characters - be like comparing Apples to Tomatoes. Nor would I compare Justice League to the Avengers - again Apples to Tomatoes.

In regards to Justice League - and why it offers film geeks a great opportunity to see what works and what doesn't - is we are comparing two different cuts on the same film. Add to that, we have a film that the studio involved chose to re-shoot/rewrite and re-score with a new collaborative team - while essentially keeping footage, story, and writing from that team. It would be like your beta being hired to step in and rewrite your fanfic and adding stuff to it without your approval, then publishing it with your name on it along side theirs. Or someone being hired by your agent and publisher to re-write your novel, and publishing it under your name and theirs, without your approval - which happens all the time with "work for hire" gigs, particularly films. [Actually it has happened with a few novels as well, and more than one film and television series.]

Director's Cuts also provide you with the ability to compare to original cuts of a film, see what the studio got rid of, and what the artist's original vision was - and understand how the business of film affects the final product for good or ill. Note - not all director's cuts add to the original or are that different. Nor are all that great. Blade Runner - is an example of one where the Director's cut added something to the movie, although it remains controversial as to whether that was an improvement or detriment. While Superman II (Richard Donner) is an example of a cut that added nothing to the film.

In addition to the above? It's important to pick films and subject matter that you enjoy. For example? Magnificent Ambersons by Orson Wells, has an original that varied greatly from the Director's cut of the film. But I don't like the film. I have no interest in it.

Justice League works for me - because I've seen both films, I'm familiar with the work of both directors, and the source material (for the most part). Also I know the characters fairly well or well enough. I've seen at least five to ten films or works by both. Pretty much everything except for about two or three items.

Knowing the filmmakers work - makes this kind of analysis more interesting, in that if you were to ask me - say a week or so ago, which filmmaker was better at dialogue and humor - I'd say Whedon. I'd also say Whedon was better at characterization and emotional character moments. Both, aren't the best at plotting. And I'd have said Whedon was better at layers, metaphor, and narrative. Snyder - I'd have said was better at cinematography, action scenes, plot (not by much) and that's about it.

Folks? I've changed my mind. In respect to Justice League? Snyder actually is better at dialogue, humor, characterization, emotional character moments, action, story, and cinematography. I was surprised by this, since I generally prefer Whedon's films and works to Snyder's. Snyder tends to be dark, somewhat Randian in tone, and not memorable in the dialogue department. He's still not exactly stellar in the dialogue department - but he is so much better here than Whedon. Also, weirdly, I sensed more of a Randian/conservative theme coming from Whedon's group than from Snyder's.

That's why I feel the need to analyze why - because I was surprised. I don't get surprised by films that often. Also the comparison provides some insight as to what works and what doesn't and why. In particular dialogue - which is a lot harder to write well than people realize. In addition - dialogue needs to accomplish several things: 1) Be true to the character and/or reveal character, 2) Provide information, and 3) Further the plot.

How you do it - will determine how your reader or viewer responds to your characters and story. But it's even harder, or at least I think it is, for characters you've not created and in particular those that your audience may be as familiar if not more familiar with than you are. (I think most fanfic writers would appreciate that. It's why I don't like writing fanfic, I get self-conscious. For me, when I read or watch something utilizing characters I've fallen in love with - I get thrust out of the story when the characters say something out of character or do something out of character.)

Justice League Film Comparison Regarding Use of Dialogue or Why I'm Glad I'm Not a Screenwriter

There's an interesting article about the three original scripts associated with Justice League - that was published in 2019.

Excerpt about the three scripts, the original, the Snydercut, the Whedon Reboot )
What happened? Joss Whedon was hired to "help" punch up the script of Justice League. And on the 2017 film, Whedon's only credit is "script" which he allegedly co-wrote with Chris Terrio. It's worth noting, before we go any further that he did not write the script by himself, and Terrio never worked directly with him. He had help with the script from Geoff Johns (a writer of the Justice League and Teen Titans comics) and Jon Berg. Per the article above Whedon's script was based around Snyder and Terrio's rewritten script, but had significant alterations by a team of writers including Geoff Johns, Joss Whedon, Allan Heinberg, Seth Grahame-Smith, and Andrea Berloff. They also largely edited and re-wrote Chris Terrio and Zack Snyder's original script.

In addition, Whedon is known for his script-doctoring skills and got his start fixing other people's scripts. He did that even as a show-runner on various television series. But Whedon also is a comedy writer - who came from situation comedy writing - specifically Roseanne, which is know for it's insult humor and slapstick. Also Buffy often had similar low brow and slangy, quips. Snyder - or so it was claimed, was dour with his script and humorless. They wanted to "humanize" and "lighten it up".

Note - there is only one screenwriter credit on the Snyder version - Chris Terrio does the script, Snyder directs. On the Whedon version - there's Whedon and Terrio. We also know from the article above on Whedon's Reboot, Johns, and various others who had a hand in the script - with Whedon directing and shooting the new footage. I point this out - because there's an old adage amongst film geeks and screenwriters - the more writers involved with the script - the worse the film will be. Same with the old adage about too many chefs in a kitchen? There's a reason a team of writers rarely if ever gets an Oscar or is nominated for any film.

Luckily for comparison purposes there are scenes that only the dialogue was changed. Otherwise this would be harder. (Also I'm referencing youtube and this Site for the Justice League 2017 script. My memory isn't perfect or word for word. Along with other online comparisons, and the movies on HBO Max.)

1. Diana's Dialogue with A Terrorist

Read more... )

2. Bruce Recruits Barry

Bruce Wayne recruits Barry Allen )

What I found fascinating and surprising is that Snyder's version focuses on female empowerment, while Whedon's focuses on Nerdy Socially Awkward Boy empowerment often at the detriment of women. And it's the nerdy boy's hero-worship of the White Male Superhero. Women and Minorities in Whedon's version are either pushed into the side-kick category or objectified. The shifts in the dialogue get this across. While Diana's scene is truncated, the Flash's isn't - if anything they added dialogue to it.

They do however remove the first introduction to the Flash, and replace it with a joke, that kind of falls flat. Jokes require build up and continuity to work well. Here it feels off, and unnecessary. The Flash isn't annoying or grating in Snyder's version, he is in Whedon's. He comes across as a bit of a jerk in Whedon's version - and it's hard, as a result, to care about him, while in Snyder's you do care about him - and he isn't a jerk at all. i would have expected the opposite.

3. Bruce Attempts to Recruit Aquaman Bruce Attempts to Recruit Aquaman )

One more example, I think in regards to dialogue that was changed while the directorial footage is essentially the same. Changing the meaning of the footage - which had originally been shot with different dialogue.

4. Justice League's Fight with Superman Read more... )

In each of these sections the character is often sacrificed in the dialogue by the Whedon version for jokes, witty banter, or for exposition (explaining the mother boxes), while in the Snyder version the dialogue is focused on further plot and revealing the characters. In the Snyder - funny moments are either situational (Flash being thrust into Arthur - which worked better for humor purposes) or small lines, like Bruce knowing Icelandic and paying Arthur more money than he asked for. Or, in Flash's section the quick exchange - "I need friends", Bruce - "Great". There's hidden irony there - since Bruce doesn't quite have them either.

Rule number 1 with dialogue - it has to be true to the character. And in regards to exposition - it's better to show than tell in film. Info dumps in film work better when we can see them.

I thought it would be better to show the differences in the dialogue above then merely tell you about them. [Whether that worked or not, I don't know. I had to see the film for myself to get it, so it may not have.] Some of the Whedon cut's changes and adjustments are rather baffling. And others, are well, offensive. Most of what he does with Diana is offensive - and in a way that surprised me.

To be fair to Whedon, he's not the sole writer on his version - and he was catering to a lot of people above him, who hired him, and had been nitpicking at the film for quite some time. Yet, here's the thing - being familiar with Whedon's other works - the added jokes, quips, and demeaning content - is boiler-plate Whedon. I've seen this in the Avengers, Buffy, Firefly, Dollhouse, Dr. Horrible and Angel, along with in the comics and the portions of the X-men film that he script doctored. He's not doing anything he hasn't done in his other works. He was actually hired to do insert it.

Undercutting a dramatic moment with humor - which is normally something that I enjoy, can work in some situations - but it matters how you do it. In this instance the undercut is at the expense of the characters - and in particular women and minority characters. So, it stood out more here - because it was outside of his own stuff, it wasn't evenly braced against the empowering moments with those characters, and it wasn't softened by the other writers/directors that Whedon had hired. Here he's putting it into someone else's story, and redirecting and re-editing that person's footage. As a result these items, which I recognized as Whedon's style of humor, stand out in stark contrast and not in a good way. That surprised me - because I hadn't noticed how demeaning Whedon's humor can be to minority and women - until I watched and compared the films. When it was gone, the film was actually better, less jarring. And the characters of Wonder Woman, Lois, Cyborg, and Aguaman had more agency and came across as less silly or only there to support Batman and Superman. They had agency, they were leads, and they were more important - in Snyder's version.

There are a few adjustments though that make sense, and make the scene tighter - in say the Aquaman scene with Bruce. But in the Flash scene they add dialogue - which unnecessarily lengthens the scene. Also there's additions of dialogue by Whedon et al in the Superman fights the Justice League sequence that makes no sense, and renders the scene somewhat silly. Not comical - just silly and grating. Superman wouldn't talk yet - he'd just been resurrected. And he doesn't know that Batman orchestrated it. Nor would he necessarily remember the particulars of his fights with Batman in Bvs.S. Snyder is a stickler for these sorts of details, while Whedon doesn't tend to be.

Another thing I noticed about the Whedon cut's use of humor - it often made the film somewhat "campy" or "silly" and in other areas..."crass and cringe-inducing". I'm not sure Whedon respected the material in quite the same way as Snyder did or the characters.

In the Avengers, some of this works, mainly because it fits the characters. But I don't think it works with DC's characters quite as well, and not here.

As previously noted, there's a continuity problem in regards to small details - these characters and the tone of who some of them are - have been previously set up in other films, that have the tonal quality. Clark, Bruce and Diana were previously set up in Man of Steel, Batman vs. Superman, and Wonder Woman. Whedon's Justice League jumped away from that continuity of character, along with other things. Whedon tries to refer to BvS with an exchange between Clark and Bruce in the Justice League fights Superman sequence, but it doesn't quite work - if anything it is jarring, and it threw me out of the story. Clark wouldn't talk at this point. He's never been much of a talker to begin with.

Anyhow, I think dialogue matters in film, and if used poorly or inadequately, it can pull the viewer out of the story or jar them. It's true of other stories as well - fanfic, novels, etc. If your characters don't sound genuine to the reader - the reader is gone.

[ETA: Fixed some typos and changed Whedon's addition to "underlined" text, and Snyder's to "bold" text, since blockquotes automatically turn it into italicized text.]
shadowkat: (Default)
Didn't do much today but veg in front of the television and surf the net. Did straighten a few papers though. Partly due to a headache - which began at 1 and didn't leave until 5pm.

1. Falcon and the Winter Solider

I have a vague knowledge of the comics upon which all of this is based, so wasn't as surprised by a few things in the first two episodes as others were.

spoilers )

Outside of the spoiler, which worked better than expected - in that it becomes something the Falcon and Winter Solider bond over. Bucky is basically annoyed with Sam for not following through on Cap's request, mainly because Bucky has made it all about him. A fact that Sam calls him on - and rightfully so. Also, the unspoken word in the room is systematic racism.

Bucky isn't racist, but the system is. And Sam knows that.

The story kind of circles around and plays with the theme of racism, and disadvantaged on multiple levels. Also how difficult the world has become post blip (or post one billion folks coming back after being gone for five years).

I found WandaVision more compelling, but that's mainly because I don't find military ops all that entertaining.

2. Nancy Drew - for a change we didn't have the gang investigating a supernatural mystery - instead we were delving into Bess's checkered past, and the vengeance her former husband (an abusive user and crook) enacted.

Of the CW shows, so far Nancy Drew and Superman are holding my interest.

I am considering trying Kung Fu which airs April 7, I think - which has a female Kung Fu artist as the hero.

3. Whedon Studies posted various things - on FB, one on the Nevers, one a lovely fan picture of Buffy by a non-scholar, and yet another post with Charisma Carpenter detailing her abuse at Whedon's hands. I decided to tell them there was more to that story - which, ahem makes it worse, and depicts a systematic sexism in the industry at large that they may not want to examine. Whedon's behavior much like others is just a symptom of a far more widespread problem. WB and Fox, and those in charge of those studios are at the root of it - the hired and enabled and in some cases pressured Whedon and others like him to behave in this fashion. It's getting better, but as long as people enable selfish asshole syndrome it will continue.

What is, however, most troubling about the Cordelia story on Angel, now that I've examined the Justice League films...is this:
Read more... )
shadowkat: (Default)
1. Ben Affleck Returns as Batman in the Flash Film.

It will also have Michael Keaton in it.
Read more... )
There's speculation that DC may use the Flashpoint film to ret-con the DC film verse or reset it. Undoing the Snyderverse and Nolan's stuff. Kind of a reboot. Similar in a way to what they did in Days of Future Past with the X-men. But seriously? Anything could happen at this point.

The Flash movie's history is insane, apparently. And would take volumes to explain or so I've been told. Apparently it's been in development for years and had countless directors attached. It's so complicated it has a Wiki page devoted to it. LOL! So we'll see if it ever gets made or released.

2. Ten Things Whedon and Geoff Johns/Jon Berg added to Justice League that weren't necessary and kind of baffling

[Also offensive in a few places. So offensive that I'm kind of leery of Whedon now. I can barely look at interviews or photos of the man without cringing.]

Joss Whedon took a hatchet to the original Justice League, chopping away at Zack Snyder's vision and refilming more of the movie than necessary.

I'm tempted to do a meta about dialogue and humor, and how certain types of low-brow frat boy style humor doesn't work. But ...meh. I think I made the point already elsewhere.

Anyhow... a few excerpts:
Read more... )

It's funny back in 2017 - I thought Whedon's Justice League was okay, with some jarring and cringe inducing moments, but overall not that bad. Then forgot it. Completely. I also thought he probably would make a better film than Snyder. In 2021, I find Whedon's film bordering on unwatchable, and my opinion of Whedon has tumulted, while I enjoyed Snyder's film and find aspects of it not only memorable but haunting.

Have I changed? Or has my perception/perspective merely changed? Or a little of both? Because the films for the most part are the same.


3. Coming to a television screen near you...

* HBO MAX - Kate Winslet plays a small-town detective in Mare of Easttown. It takes place in Pennsylvania and features a character who is a small town PI, with wrinkled clothes, and a bit of a grump. Premier's April 18.

* PBS - Hemingway Documentary by Ken Burns. Three parts. Airs - April 5

* ABC - Rebel - Katy Sagal plays an Erin Brockovinch type - legal advocate (it's produced and created by Erin Brockovnich).

* Netflix - Shadow and Bone - the fantasy series that adapts the Shadow & Bone and Six of Crows books. Focuses on orphan Alina Starkov - who may have the ability to upturn her world. Airs - 4-23

*THEM - on 4/8 Amazon Prime - it's an Horror anthology drama, that delves into America's cultural divides. The 50's set first season titled Covenant - is about a Black family from North Carolina who moves into then-all-white Compton, California. They battle the racism outside their hours and the evil of the supernatural sort inside it.

I plan to start Streaming "The Falcon and the Winter Solider" on Disney Plus this weekend.

4. Ames wants me to try these three books:

This Is Happiness: a lovely novel with sort of a sleepy start that rambles about life in a small Irish village in the 1950s about to get electricity. Male narrated/lead. It would likely remind you of your summer in Whales.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/04/books/review/this-is-happiness-niall-williams.html

A Gentleman in Moscow (has become one of my very favorite books): Is a 30-year saga of the Count Alexander Ilyich Rostov, who is placed under house arrest inside the Metropol Hotel in Moscow in 1922. It is an "elegantly drawn era with the story of Count Alexander Rostov. When, in 1922, he is deemed an unrepentant aristocrat by a Bolshevik tribunal, the count is sentenced to house arrest in the Metropol, a grand hotel across the street from the Kremlin." Male narrated/lead.

Rules of Civility is by the same author as "Gentleman.." and I think you'd like this a lot, female narrator/lead. Bonus: it works well as an audio book (although now that I've had a listen, I want a hard copy to re-"read" at some future time). Shorter than the other 2, I think. It's set in NYC in the late 1930s through a couple of decades, but mostly 1930s-early 1940s: "On the last night of 1937, twenty-five-year-old Katey Kontent is in a second-rate Greenwich Village jazz bar when Tinker Grey, a handsome banker, happens to sit down at the neighboring table."

All 3 books are about the same length, 300-400 pages. Depends what you might want in a read (or a listen). I think you would enjoy all 3. All of them have very excellent quips peppered throughout and are very well written, good stories.
__

It should be noted that Ames and I share the same sense of humor. Kind of dry sardonic.

I don't know. I'm moody at the moment. And kind of hit the wall with the pandemic. I'm making myself wait until April to get a hair cut. But I want one now.

5. The Nevers Cast Previews the Series and Discusses the Vibe on the Set

They will be positive - it's a promotional article. Also Whedon only directed six episodes of a project he cast himself, and picked the crew and writers for. During a pandemic. He left it (allegedly) due to personal exhaustion. (I don't know, his announcement came on the heels of the Justice League investigation, and I honestly think he was ass hole on the Justice League shoot. But it was also a toxic situation long before he arrived, he just made it worse. And he had help - lots of help. Basically white boys being assholes. Typical Hollywood. On the Nevers, he surrounds himself with folks who keep him in check, and it's not a superhero film.)

excerpt )

And The NEVERS trailer.

Whedon did direct all six episodes, and wrote two. They were supposed to have ten but Whedon left.

I'll probably check it out. I was considering skipping, but what the heck. It's free. I'm already paying for HBO Max.

In case you haven't figured it out by now? I've debated the whole Whedon thing with myself (and other people but mainly myself) in this journal for about two months now - and have come to the conclusion, that...he was guilty of everything they alleged. He was an asshole. He probably deserved whatever happened. They'd be a fool to hire him to show-run a television show, or direct a large scale film ever again.

But it's not my job to judge. Or my business for that matter. And it probably doesn't matter.

But I did learn stuff - so that's good.

People claim things are a waste of time? I don't think anything is - we learn from the silliest and craziest things.
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 10:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios