shadowkat: (tv)
Woke up in an irritable mood for some reason - although did manage to thirty minutes of pilates exercises on my mat after a shower (yes, I know it would have made more sense to reverse the two, which occured to me while I was in the shower). Then made the mistake of reading the reviews in Entertainment Weekly - the reviewers in that mag used to be good, now they just grate on my nerves much the same way someone pulling their fingernails down a chalk board would. The television and movie reviews are *too* subjective, which I didn't realize was possible, and self-congratulatory. Providing me with very little insight on whether or not I'll them. In some cases they read like rants that I can read for free on the internet. Which begs the question - has the internet negatively affected the art of reviewing or was it always like this? Gillian Flyn is the worste of the bunch - she sounds like Carrie Bradshaw from Sex in the City, without the class.

Speaking of reviewing things....this is the first in a series of reviews on lesser known or below the radar tv shows that I think deserve a second look.

Journeyman

I've seen about four episodes of this one so far, which is enough to review it. Not that I don't judge tv shows on the basis of one episode - I do, there's too bloody many of them not to, but the ones that spark my interest - get four or five before I committ to them.

Journeyman on the surface appears to be yet another in a long series of shows about a guy or gal who helps strangers each week often to their own detriment. This trend started with the highly successful men on the run from (you fill in the blank) threat, typified by The Fugitive. It was followed by the man because of a weird science experiment must save others - The Incredible Hulk, The Six Million Dollar Man, and then jumped to the man who must redeem himself by saving others - Highway to Heaven, Angel, Forever Knight, and finally the man who gets stuck or lost or is part of an agency that travels through time - must save others to get back to his own time - Quantum Leap, TimeCop, and Time Tunnel.

I have never been much of a fan of this format - find it repetitive and predictable. It also has a tendency to leave me unsatisfied since the show keeps you by never resolving the problem at the center - which is why the person is forced to keep saving people even though he'd clearly be happier doing something else. With Angel - it was the curse and the hope for a possible shanshue which would make him human and allow him to be with Buffy, his one true love. Of course the character never achieves this - an apt metaphor for how life is about the journey not the destination or the proverbial carrot which in truth is little more than an illusion we have created to motivate ourselves. With Sam on Quantum Leap - it was saving enough people or hitting the perfect time solution so he could go back to his wife and family. Which of course never happened - instead he discovered that he became "saved" and left the earthly plain or something like that, the last episode of Quantum Leap was annoyingly surreal. The Fugitive may have been the only series that had a satisfying and/or optimistic ending - and it was a two hour movie event that set a record.

The time travel television series, episode on sci-fi tv shows, book, or film is not a favorite genre of mine either. Because they tend to focus too much on "the coolness" of traveling back in time. The main character spends a lot of time wandering around in the past, may even change a few things, but is the same - that character remains unaffected by what they've done, their lives aren't changed that much, no one seems to have missed them or noticed that they've left, and whatever they did in the past was clearly meant to be. Instead of using the idea to explore the potential problems of traveling through time - this is ignored.The only film I've seen that delved into the problems was The Butterfly Effect - not a great movie by any stretch of the imagination, but at least it explored what happens when you try to fiddle with your past. And how nothing ever turns out perfect. There is always a trade-off or price to be paid. Tweak one thread in the pattern of life - you tweak them all. Also, the last episode of Star Trek Next Generation - entitled All Good Things Must Come to An End did an interesting examination of how our choices affect what comes next in our lives and how we are the sum of all our experiences not just a few isolated ones.

What never interested me that much in regards to time travel or science fiction tv shows in general is the science. I go into the show not expecting the science to be accurate. Heck, TV can't even do an accurate legal show - why would they be able to do one that deals with quantum physics? As long as it isn't silly or really out there? I'm fine. Also helps that I don't know that much about quantum physics or physics in general - unlike law or criminal procedure, which I do know something about.

Journeyman, despite what it looks like, is not your typical time travel tv show or man saving strangers to his own detriment each week or for his own salvation. It is interested in exploring something the others in this genre weren't - which is what happens in the present when the guy is sucked back into the past? What effect does his absence have on his current life? And does whatever he accomplishes in the past justify what goes wrong when he is sucked backwards? The whole metaphor of losing one's present by dwelling too much on one's past is examined in great depth here. The other issue it explores is what effect does his ability to time travel have on the people he loves the most? How does it help or hurt them? The B plot line is not how saving lives is making Dan (the time traveler) a better person or changing the world in a great way, but how it is affecting his life in the present and his loved ones, how they are dealing with it or not as the case may be.

Unlike most sci-fi/fantasy shows - Journeyman is more interested in examining its characters. The action, the time periods, the science of it - are all secondary to the character exploration. I've never seen a time travel show do this before. It sticks closely to Dan's point of view, only veering to include his wife, Katie, and brother, Jack to get a glimpse of how his travels are affecting his current life. We don't know why he's traveling any more than he does. We aren't given any more information than Dan is given.

Each time Dan goes back in time, his current life is affected but not by what he is done in the past - but by his mere absence. In one episode, his wife finds herself alone on a plane that they boarded together. She has to explain to the authorities how he disappeared from the plane when it was in the air. The result is that both Dan and Katie (his wife) are barred from plane travel and the newspaper where Dan works - does an article on the gaps in security at that airport. That's just one example. Also time works differently - unlike Doctor Who, where the Tardis can take the Doctor and his companion back to the exact time they left or for that matter Back to the Future, where Marty McFly reappears and his family never knew he was gone - in Journeyman three days may have passed when for him it was no more than a couple of hours or vice versa. Also unlike Doctor Who or Marty, he has no control over it and little warning. In the world of Journeyman - time travel is not fun and an apt metaphor for how little control we have over the events in own lives and the lives of others. We are stitches in the fabric of life, not weavers of the fabric. We also get bits and pieces of Dan's life - since he only travels back in time in his own neighborhood and surroundings - so we see who owned his house before he did, what he used to do, what his wife used to do, what his relationship with his older brother had been like and where he came from.

The show is by no means perfect. Some of the A plot lines or savings of the week feel a bit cliche and underdeveloped. The twists are often telegraphed - such as last week's episode where Dan saves a man by thrusting him into danger. Or the delivery of a baby on an airplane during the 70s, they went a bit too far with the costumes, those of us who lived in the 70's know people did not dress quite that colorfully. But those are minor points and are floating more and more to the background as the series advances and its B plot lines come to the forefront. The only drawback of the B plot line taking center stage is that you can't just jump into the series and be able to follow it. You sort of have to watch from the beginning.

If you haven't tried Journeyman yet and have zip to do at 10 pm on Monday nights, now's the time.
shadowkat: (Default)
[Can't decide what is worse the period before the job interview or the period after? The interview itself isn't such a big deal, but before you worry if you've prepared enough and after you worry if you screwed up. Right now, I've just about convinced myself I didn't get the job and will have to go through the whole thing again soon. As a result, I find myself feeling quite bristly and depressed this morning - much like the weather outside my window. Hoping mood clears up by 4pm - have a concert that I'm going to at Lincoln Center. It's free and I'm seeing it with the NYC Movie Critics Group I recently joined.

As an aside - you ever feel as if you have been thrown into a play, you don't know the lines, you don't know what role you are supposed to play, and feel as if you are just fumbling about making a complete and utter fool of yourself?]

Warning much snark below, because this is TV and I refuse to take it seriously. Plus TV is a safe topic to snark about, right? It's not like religion or politics? Okay, yes, I realize this is a niave and stupid statement coming from an individual who started her online writing career posting television essays to fanboards.

Well, I've watched this week's premieres more or less, only one I missed was the pilot for Friday Night Lights and well anything that is on the pay cable channels, a la Showtime and HBO - because even I can't watch everything. After awhile it all starts to become one big blur anyways. Plus I do not own a DVR or Tivo, nor can I tape anything any longer. Somewhat limited here.

What I did watch:

1. Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip - already discussed in a prior post. I'm worried about it.
Only three people on correspondence list besides myself are devoted. That is not good, since currently correspondence list's reactions to new series and the Neilsen's reactions to new series appear to be in synch. Frex - everyone online that watched the show the previous week, with four exceptions (myself included) was disappointed. Half did not try it a second week. (While they all came back for Heroes). Damn. Studio 60 is the only show on tv that does not have sex or violence featured as a plot point. Which begs the question: Can we watch something that is propelled purely by dialogue and not by sex and violence? (That's meant to be a rhetorical question by the way.)

2. Heroes - seen the episode twice now - at 7pm tonight, because there was zip else on. All I'll say is: It is not an series that improves on a second viewing. But don't worry about it - according to the entertainment mags - it's the next big hit - or this year's "Lost". People adore it. And Hiro? He's apparently the break-out performance this year or "pop culture" trend. The poster child for Geekdom - at least according to the mags. Heroes according to TV Guide spoilers - is supposed to get even better as we move forward. There's even a possibility that the evil super-powered serial killer is not who I think it is, which would be cool. Heck anything with Adrian Psdar in it, I'm willing to watch. And yes, I like Hiro too. Is there anyone out there who doesn't? It would be like not liking a puppy dog or something?

4. Veronica Mars - I enjoyed it. But - it had problems and I worry about its longevity. Granted, Rob Thomas is not good at introductions or summary episodes, and the man clearly hates exposition and/or wrapping up loose ends. Because, the Keith Mars subplot that hung over from last season, you know the one with Kendall Casablancas and the suitcase? I needed the internet to explain it to me or rather numerous people sharing what they picked up. Not one person - but several different posters. The fact it took ten or fifteen people exchanging information in two discussion threads on two different lj's for me to figure out what actually did happen (and I still might have a few facts off), should tell you something right there.

Here's what I managed to get from the online crowd: ( specifically [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink, Masq, and [livejournal.com profile] herself_nyc's lj's, thanks guys, because I was as lost as you were) : Spoilers )

The problem with the subplot - which would have been clearer if it were the only mystery we had to figure out or was at least directly linked to whatever Veronica was doing - was this subplot was threaded or cut within the VM mystery and the Logan/Dick story. The Logan/Dick - VM stories actually coincide. Keith's seemed like we were watching another show or rather it reminded me of when I was attempting to flip between VM and Lost last year and got predictably confused. Last season Thomas struggled with the transistions between Keith and Veronica's mysteries a bit as well. It's why the pacing got so slow at times and the story got muddled. It worked fine when the two stories jivved. Not when they had zip to do with each other. The first season this was not a problem - since Keith's mystery and Veronica's were more or less one and the same.

I liked the rest of VM. spoilers fairly vague for S2 VM, S3 VM. )

Enjoyable, just confusing and slow in places. VM is an odd show - it tends to pick up steam for me later in the season, the first five episodes? I tend to be ambivalent about. This worries me, since VM only got 13 this year. This show needs more than 13. [Am wondering if VM may work better on DVD as a telenovela? People who've watched the DVD's seem to react differently than those of us who watch it as it is broadcast.]

4. Lost - Not sure how long I'm going to stick with Lost for numerous reasons - the main one being that most of the social groups I've joined like to do things on Wedensdays. The other - well, see behind the spoiler cut.

Spoilers for Lost )

5. The Nine - not bad. But not something that's going to keep me home or awake on Wed nights either. And next week - watching the Project Runway finale. I skipped the reunion. I don't need to watch tv to see people cut each other into ribbons. But am very curious to see who wins out of the finale four, especially now that I've seen everyone's runway shows. Personally? I'd pick either Laura or Uli, but I'm betting the judges pick Jeffrey - who of the four seems to have the most versatile look. Sorry, I should be talking about the Nine not PR here. Which may tell you something. The Nine was interesting. It reminded me a great deal of Spike Lee's The Inside Man. Except I liked the Inside Man a bit more.

spoilers )

6. Grey's Anatomy - remains my comfort show. Watching Grey's feels a bit like drinking a glass of ice cold water on a hot sweaty day or just snuggling up with coco in front of fire while it is snowing outside. It's refreshingly simple and comforting. And one of the few shows in which I like most if not all of the characters. Okay, I do like Derek, just not when he's being McDreamy or Meredith's love interest. spoilers for S2 and vaguely S3 Greys )

I'm love Grey's for Christina (who makes me laugh), Alex, Izzy, George, Callie, the Chief, Dr. Sloan, Burke, Bailey, and Addison. That's why I watch it. And this episode was more enjoyable the last two partly because it focused more on these characters and less on Meredith.

7. BattleStar Galatica - still packs a punch. And watching the websoides did help.
I liked aspects of it. The Starbuck(kara Thrace)/Leoben storyline is going to get on my nerves soon.
spoilers for BSG )

[Updated: For a truly excellent analysis of this episode go here: http://coffeeandink.livejournal.com/636582.html?style=mine#cutid1.
Coffeeandink really points out how the episode works and why the writers chose to do what they did. Reading it changed my mind.]

8. I also watched Nip/Tuck - spoilers )

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 08:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios