shadowkat: (strive)
That may not be the best title in the universe and to be honest, I've no clue what to call this post. But after reading several rather interesting reviews of Buffy S8 on live journal, specifically [livejournal.com profile] stormwreath's review and the ensuing discussion, as well as posts in [livejournal.com profile] londonkds, and [livejournal.com profile] aycheb - I decided to write about what I think may be going in these comics and why I think Whedon is writing them and what he is trying to discuss through them.

Before I do so, want to clarify a few things:

Assorted caveats that loosely pertain to any discussion of this )

Buffy S8

First off, if you have not read the comics, you are not going to be able to follow this. Well, you could, but you might get confused. Needless to say, spoilers for the comics and the series up to and including Buffy S8 issue 22, Swell.

Buffy's Leadership Approach )

Is There Such a Thing as a Good Robbery? )

Harmony vs. Buffy - A Woman's Role in Society )
The Attack of the Vampire Kitties )

Buffy, the Vampires, and the Frayverse - the endgame )

Okay this is incredibly long. If you made it to the end, kudos! And it took me far too long to write it. Off to take a much needed walk.
shadowkat: (chesire cat)
Decided during my walk with Wales yesterday that I was going to stop watching politics on the news and stay as far away from it as possible until the election - since it appears to be bad for my blood-pressure. This morning reinforced that realization - when I was attempting to get news on Hurricane Gustave and instead got an opportunistic sincere??? speech from John McCain about how they were taking off their party hats and going to be Americans and support the people down South. more politics, look away, look away! )

Enuf of that.

Been watching Season 2, Dexter - and this is actually better than Season 1, which is saying something considering Season 1 was pretty good. Season 2 reminds me even more of what the writers were attempting to do with Angel and Spike, but without the metaphors. I think it works better without the gothic metaphors - because the problem with the heavy metaphors is they can and often are misinterpreted and confusing. Dexter - actually delves into grayer and far denser moral territory by not relying on metaphor. He's a serial killer who murders serial killers. Season 2 - delves into why Dexter is who he is and if it is possible for him to change. Is he merely an addict? Addicted to killing? Or is there a bit more to it than that? Also to what degree do we create killers? And to what degree are people like Dexter monsters? Are we all monsters? Dexter S2 Spoilers )

On the same wavelength, well at least in my brain, finished Whedon's Fray recently and was quite taken with this passage:

You do not want a war. You have known violence. You have suffered loss. But you have seen nothing of war. War is not just the business of death. It is the antithesis of life. Hope, tortured and flayed. Reason dismembered, grinning at its limbs in its lap. Decency raped to death. You will be a murderer. And more." The power in that passage is how true it is.
War hurts more than it helps. We justify it to ourselves, telling ourselves that the damage is merely collateral, we dare not look to closely, or we may see a monster staring back at us in the mirrored glass that sits behind the ruin. Ironic passage as well - because it reflects a world that sprouted from a WAR that was begun ages ago. A WAR that was meant to stop the demons, but merely pressed them into hiding and removed magic and wonder from the place.

Buffy S8 spoilery speculation )

Having a nice low-key weekend. My heart goes out to those who live in Mississippi, New Orleans, and South-Eastern Texas, with any luck Gustave will not be as bad as it looks.
shadowkat: (chesire cat)
Before I begin my rant diatribe post on poltics, on a positive note - I started reading Joss Whedon and Karl Moline's Fray series last night and am enjoying it, amazingly enough. FRAY )

Okay not as brief as I intended.

I am not currently watching the Democratic Convention, mostly because politics is giving me a headache at the moment and as far as I can tell Comedy Central does not appear to be covering it - dang-it! November really can't come fast enough. I've no clue what these people are going to do come November. At this point, there's a 50/50 chance McCain or Obama will win. I do know Hillary isn't going to be President, despite what her deluded supporters may think.

The Hillary Nitwits Supporters make no sense to me whatesover. In the paper this morning, a 61 year old woman in New Jersey who runs the organization PUMA (not to be confused with the word Cougar either as the animal or well, you know), stated "they can't keep us middle-aged women back! We'll support Hillary. She'll become President! Our voices will be heard!"

Ah.Okay.

I repeated this quote to a 62 year friend who stated: "WHAT? I am not middle-aged! I do not plan to live to be 112!"

First off, I hate to be the one to inform you of this, but unless you plan to live to be 112, at the age of 61, you are NO LONGER middle-aged. 60 is not the new 50 - no matter how many times you like to repeat it while you run on your treadmill. Second, Hillary lost the primary election, she ain't becoming President, that ship has long sailed, the majority of the delegates picked Obama. Plus, she caved. Gave a nice little speech and everything. Deal with it.

"So I'll vote McCain!" They scream like a bunch of bratty four year olds, no disrepect meant towards actual four year olds, who are beginning to look brighter and more adult than the Hillary Supporters by the minute. This begs the question why did they support Hillary to begin with?
pardon me while I get up on my soap box... )
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 02:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios