shadowkat: (Default)
1. Watched the The Old Guard tonight - the movie starring Cherliz Theron and Kiki Layne (who was in If Beale Street Could Talk - I highly recommend "If Beale Street Could Talk", if you've not seen it - it was hands down the best film I saw last year and this year to date.)

Anyhow, The Old Guard felt less like a movie and more like the pilot of a television series. It's clunky in the same way that television serial pilots are, with lots of exposition, and set-up, but a feeling that future episodes might carry more weight. And - much like pilots of television serials - it's last scene was by far the most intriguing. I think that pretty much tells you everything you need to know about the movie without getting spoiled. In other words, if it were a television series? I might stick with it for a bit. But as a movie? Eh..it's not bad, just clunky. The villains are kind of cliche. Although it is progressive with LGBTQ relationships and casting. But there's not much to the plot - lots of expository material. Go watch "If Beale Street Could Talk" and "Mad Max: Fury Road" instead.

2. I'm irritable.

Also, NYC has made me dislike bicyclists. I'm perfectly fine with bicyclists anywhere else. It's just here that I'd like to strangle them. Or poke them with a large stick while they ride by me on the sidewalk. That's right, in my neighborhood, people are riding their bikes on pedestrian paths, sidewalks, etc. The only relief from the nasty fiends is Greenwood Cemetery - which prohibits bike riding. It's the only place in the city that prohibits the riding of bikes. Ah...

3. Flirting with various forums on Comic Con.

Whedon appears to have left it. Not quite sure why - can't find anything discussing it and it was sudden. Either that - or they don't want to let me attend it for some reason, but I'm neither that egotistical nor paranoid. I mean why would anyone care if I attended? I lurk. And I'm not a journalist. I'm nobody. I think he asked that they remove it. But Nathan Fillon may have him drop in on his Q&A, so that's possible. Fillon's is also more doable - it's on Sunday. I kind of want to do Cherliz Theron - Badass Heroine - and a Q&A on her career. I like Cherliz Theron. She plays tough characters. It should be noted that I've never done a comic-con in my life. And I dislike Zoom. So, we'll see if this works.

OOOhhh, I found something really really cool - Star Trek Universe It has the creator of Rick and Morty, and the casts of Discovery and Picard on it. The Discovery Cast will do a scene read-through. https://comiccon2020.sched.com/list/descriptions )
shadowkat: (chesire cat)
This time I decided to add other Whedonverse characters to the mix to spice things up a bit. If you don't them or didn't like the other shows, makes the poll rather easy.
Rules are the same - pick the one you enjoyed watching on the show the best or thought was the most fun, interesting, whatever. Don't over think. Just go with your gut. Quick responses.

I wanted to include a question regarding Mark Watches - do people care what the guy says about your favorite character? Does what Mark says affect whether you read his reviews of Buffy? Perhaps a better question is - will you read a blog or review or discussion board that bashes your favorite character? Or give up on it? Will you read people who do it? I ask, because, I'm not sure if the answer is as simple and obvious as I think it is. my two cents )How do you feel about it? Do you feel the same way? Differently?

[ETA: This poll had harder choices than I thought. First one that I really struggled picking between characters on. Good luck! Again...hope more than 10 people do this or I will look silly.]

[Poll #1852210]
shadowkat: (Alicia)
Where I blatantly take the Star Trek meme on my flist and turn it into a meme for the tv shows and a series that I was "ahem" far more of an insane fan of and actually own and can remember. We'll see if it works. [I don't remember most of STAR TREK, I'll do some of the questions in a separate meme.]

29 Days of Whedonverse )
shadowkat: (tv)
Joss Whedon's series Dollhouse ended on Friday, January 29. It will air, or so I'm told, much later this year in the UK, so if you are in the UK or are waiting for the DVD's to come out, you may want to stop here - beyond this point are massive plot spoilers.

(The US will get Being Human and Merlin several months later. Hmm, if I didn't know any better I'd assume the only countries developing television series were UK and US. US is horrid at importing media from other countries, yet quite adept at stealing ideas from them (Being Human per example is being made into a US series for SyFy) and exporting all sorts of media abroad. Over 30% of the royalty income that film and tv distributors receive is from foreign rights distribution alone. The internet has merely made it easier. This is in a way a wise move - because much like the industrial age before it, whomever owns and controls the flow of new technological power source or in this case the information source/outlet, runs the world. It is about power. Always has been, always will be. Who has it, who wants it, and how people who have it wield it. The media outlets in the US wield a lot of power...a frightening amount, when I think about it.)

I mention this in part because it is among the central themes of this series. Joss Whedon is a fascinating writer - because he likes to examine the uses and abuses of power. In Dollhouse - he poses the question - what happens if someone can literally program or deprogram the human mind much as they might a computer - so that human bodies become avatars, blank slates until a personality or program is downloaded into them. Sort of a dark twist on Cameron's AVATAR concept - where the male hero gets to walk again due to being downloaded into a human/alien AVATAR body and save the world. Here, the results are far more horrific and the issues far less simple. Where Cameron's film tends to be a mindless, albeit tightly plotted, thrill ride, with some feel-good moments (depending on who you are) and a happy ending, Whedon's tv series is a creepy exploration into the abuses of power, identity, and self-empowerment and not least of all trust.

cut for massive spoilers on Dollhouse S1 and S2, Angel the Series, Buffy the Vampire Slayer the series (just tv), Doctor Horrible, Toy Story, and Firefly )
shadowkat: (Default)
Yes, a continuation of the monster essay, or treatise that I wrote in 2003. Sigh, some people write fanfic on tv shows, I write essays on tv shows.

Fans - Breaking the Fourth Wall & the Media Critics )
shadowkat: (Default)
Watched the Firefly episode, Safe, the other night on my Firefly DVDS (the Xmas present I got from my parents last year). Considered skipping it, since it was my least favorite episode and the only one that made me really cringe and want to change channels when it first aired. The ignorant villagers who decide to burn the telepathic girl at the stake motif is a TV pet peeve of mine - this comes from seeing one too many Westerns do it, everything from Little House on the Prarie to Dr. Quinn to well, Gunsmoke. Firefly reminds me more of Gunsmoke meets the adventures of Han Solo and Chewie before they met Luke, which explains why I like it. At any rate - when I re-watched the episode, I noticed something I hadn't before, which allowed me to forgive the writers for using that old Western cliche. The sequence was necessary to address a central theme in the episode as well as emphasize why Simon and River stay with Serenity and why they gave up everything.

The episode is called Safe - and safe is like most words in the English vernacular - it can mean more than one thing. Depends on the context. Here it stands for people - not things. People who you can feel "safe" with or can "trust" to protect you even at great cost to themselves.

A summary of the episode may be in order, but since I find summarizing things deadly dull, I'll just summarize and analyze at the same time - to entertain myself. (This in a nutshell is why I do not have a professional career as a movie or television critic - I don't follow the established rules.)

Spoilers for Safe )
shadowkat: (Default)
To be honest, I've always been a little leery of identifying myself as a "fan" of anything. Not sure why. I think it's the fanatic aspect of the word that unnerves me. For you see - the obsessive aspect of myself is not one I like to stroke or endorse, so much as discourage. When I reacte obsessively to something, I start wondering why.

I'm thinking about this today due to three things I read. Two online - in scrollgirl and fresne's livejournals, where they kindly provided me with information on two of the huge fandom kerfuffles people on flist mentioned but provided vague info on, causing my curiousity hackles to rise. It's sort of like mentioning that there's a monster out there, but not providing any info on where, what it looks like and whether it hurt anyone. I'm find myself craning my neck going, what, where, how? Show me! If it weren't for scrollgirl and fresne, I would have remained perpetually at a loss, which might have been a good thing. Not sure. Not really sure why I'm so fascinated with weird fan behavior or social interaction - more so to be honest than the shows the behavior is associated with. The third, was an article in EW about Serenity - the up-coming Joss Whedon sci-fi. What was odd about the third, was that it was not a review or even a teaser so much as brief essay on how the film came about and how weird it was that it did. The essay did not show Whedon or the internet fans in the best light, in my opinion. But that might just be me.

Serenity article )

the BTVS fandom stuff - ramble on fanfic, the last seasons of the show, and flist postings on kerfuffles... )

PS: Thank you to the anynomous friend who gave me two months paid lj. Don't know what to do with the two months paid lj, but appreciate the thought!
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 05:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios