shadowkat: (Default)
Accomplished little today, outside of going to the pharmacy, picking up groceries, and painting a bit. I was very sleepy. I've seen somewhere that diabetes can cause fatigue. But so can menopause. Depression. Sleep deprivation. Etc. I did sleep well enough the night before - but had nightmares. Something about a plane. Traveling somewhere with my workforce. Being stranded and left behind. I'm on vacation - give it a break subconscious. Oh also made ice cream concoctions for the Ninja Creami - which can turn most things into ice cream. I made coffee yogurt/peanut butter chocolate ice cream (with protein powders), and tropical frozen yogurt ice cream with orange yogurt, banana (not yogurt just a banana), and a few slices of pinapple blended. Both taste good. Should be interesting.

Got off social media - which keeps exposing me to stories about nasty people that I really was much better off not knowing about. I do not want to know these people exist or about their problems - stop informing me they do, internet. Honestly. It's enough to make me miss the 20th Century. The information age/technological age is annoying and kind of scary.

1. Finished Bridgerton, at least until the second part of S3 arrives on June 13. As an aside, there's a bunch of television critics and columnists out there - that a) I wish I didn't know existed (thank you so much internet for that), and b) should be fired from their jobs and never get paid for anything they write ever again (note I'm not censoring them, just cancelling their profitability). Dear god. It's a fluffy romantic fantasy series, not the Bachelor (which by the way should be ripped apart). I won't irritate you with what they wrote. Except that I wish I didn't know about it.

Oh, don't do this? Someone on twitter found an nasty article about an actress's looks, and felt the need to tell everyone on twitter to send said article to the attention of the actress, her agent/representation & the producer of the television series. Telling them that they should take action against the publication in defense of all of the fans who look like the actress and relate to her, and have been offended by the article on her behalf.

I was appalled. The publication is very obscure (I've never heard of it until now - it's some bad British gossip fashion magazine, are there any good ones?) as is the columnist. Never heard of her either. And sending this to the actress and the producer of Bridgerton - isn't going to do anything but annoy them. They already know these idiots exist. They don't need to be reminded. And it's not illegal to write and publish that crap.

What can you do? Don't read it. Don't subscribe to the publication. Don't subscribe, buy, or read anything the writer writes. That's it. Ignore it.
Ignore the nasty people. Maybe they'll go away.

In case you've never heard of it (I don't know how - it's got a great marketing team) - Bridgerton is a series adapted from a series of "stand-a-alone" romance novels. Read more... )

2. Moved on to the last episode of X-men '97 - this series is a lot better than the original 90s series. Better written and animated, it also is closer to the comics, and has tighter plotting. I was surprised by the ending - since I went in unspoiled. This series surprised in lot of ways, it went dark, it killed off a major character, and it separated the main characters at various points. That's what the comics does. It also did a very good job of getting across the relationship between Magnus and Charles, along with Storm/Forge, Jean & Scott, Magnus/Rogue/Gambit and Rogue/Nightcrawler. One of the better animated adaptations.

Add to the above? We get cameos from Daredevil, Captain America, Fantastic Four, and various others. Disney has shown that it has a better handle on this than Fox did. So, go Disney. Also it went dark, which surprised me.
Although that may explain why the show-runner was fired.

3. Then on to Doctor Who - this is the new series on Disney + and BBC. Disney basically bought the rights to Doctor Who, with the view of co-producing and distributing it with the BBC. What this means is - higher production values, and exclusive distribution on Disney (so no commercials) in the US, and it gets to air at the same time as it does in the BBC, not months later like it did under BBC America and AMC.

I had reservations. But, Disney was smart about it. Read more... )

Regarding the episodes? Davies brought back Stephen Moffat for the fourth episode. Who'd I missed. I like Moffat's banter, and tricky plots. Read more... )

Overall enjoying this season quite a bit. Disney is treating it as S1. Although I'm pretty sure they got other episodes on from other doctors.

(Oh it just occurred to me - Disney owns first distribution rights to three of the longest running serials right now. X-men, Doctor Who, and General Hospital. Also Disney is older than all three of them and their creators put together. Disney started in the 1930s.)
shadowkat: (Default)
1. The Pitfall of Being a Fan of a Series of Books or of a writer, only to realize they are a complete asshole.

* I've spent more time this week than I wanted to ...thinking about JKR and the Harry Potter Fandom.

Wales stumbled onto JKR on Twitter via the NY Times. There was a fight with NY Times, who for reasons...had decided to JKR. This erupted into a fight on Twitter. Wales, not reading the article, dove in and said they should pick their battles and defend women's reproductive rights, and well when I tried to explain, she clarified that this including women who no longer had access to their reproductive organs. To which, I had to clarify further.
explaining why JKR is a transphobic bitch to someone who is unfamiliar with her work and the fandom )

* Penguin Puffin is apparently publishing the works of Roald Dahl, who as you may or may not already know is an anti-semitic asshole or was one. Read more... )

* And..I found out Twitter that..Scott Adams the cartoonist/creator of Dilbert is a racist Trump Supporter - and 80 newspapers pulled his cartoon due to racist content.

[ETC: To clarify? He was dropped from newspapers because of a racist rant on Youtube, not because of his satirical cartoon. The racist rant kind of changed how everyone perceived the satire in his cartoon.

Adams rant can be found HERE - if you wish to see it for yourselves.

The majority of newspaper publishers (with the possible exception of the right wing publications) considered it a racist rant and kicked Adams to the curb. Newspapers have dropped dilbert comic strip after a racist rant by its creator.]

Sigh. Remember when Dilbert was cool and innocuous? I've admittedly not been following it since well the early 00s if that. I stopped reading the Sunday funnies sometime around 2008. [ ETC: Not because I disliked Dilbert - I just no longer read print newspapers. I get a digital version of the NY Times. I'm not reading any Sunday comics at the moment - haven't for the last IDK, ten years? ]

2. The Pitfalls of Being in a Long-Running Fandom - Star Wars

Star Wars has always been a dicey fandom to participate in, but that is most likely true of all fandoms? It was even dicey in the 1980s when it more or less began. (The first film came out in 1977, so technically 1977.)

Got into a lengthy discussion/debate on a friend's journal posting about Andor, which I enjoyed. But isn't for everyone. Unlike most of the Star Wars stuff - it's geared towards the over-twenty-five group. Read more... )

Star Wars is a long-running fandom. Roughly doing the math? It's about forty years old? (Let's see I saw it at 11 or 12, I'm fifty-five now, so about forty.) And like most long-running fandoms, there's disagreement over well everything. And so much of it has to do with when you entered the fandom (if you ever truly did?), and the degree to which you invested, why, etc. Also what you watched, what is canon, what is good, what isn't good, what works, what doesn't, what makes a true fan, etc. And people are fannish in different ways - which I keep trying to explain to folks.

Not everyone likes to interact with other fans, some people are private about it. (I know I am.) Nor do you have to see everything or read everything to be a fan of a series. People can pick and choose. Not everyone feels the need to be a completist.

There's this view in fandom that if you're not "fanatical" - you aren't a fan. Not true. There are degrees. For example, you can be a fan of Star Wars and dislike the films. There's enough content out there now, that you could just be a fan of the comic books and be fine.
Read more... )

Comparing other long-running fandoms to Star Wars

The Buffy fandom had two problems, one is an asshole creator. At least George Lucas to date isn't an asshole. Although give it time, he's human, and from what I saw in the Industrial Light and Magic Documentary - could be a beast to work with. It took about twenty some years for all the dirt about Whedon to come out.

The other, like Star Wars, Buffy had content across multiple mediums. While lovely, it does pose issues with a fandom. The fandom fights over what is canon to the fandom - whenever you have multiple mediums. Read more... )

Doctor Who in Comparison to Star Wars

If Star Wars and Buffy are bad in this regard. Try Doctor Who. This is a 60 year old series. Worse, it's a 60 year series with large gaps between content, and different actors playing the lead role, different creators, different writers, and different companions. Read more... )

General Hospital - A Day-Time Soap Opera that is Celebrating it's 60th Anniversary next month, has the same problem.

60 years of a soap opera isn't going to be seen by everyone. It's impossible. Some fans may have seen all of it. Most will have seen sections. Read more... )

***

I can go on and on with examples. Star Trek has this problem, as does Battle Star Galatica (it has two competing versions), as does the Marvel Universe - the films vs the animation vs the comics canons. I am not a fan of the animated canon - the X-men, irritated me. I prefer the comics. But there are those who only saw the animated versions. Or only the movies.
Or only the television shows.

It makes navigating these fandoms dicey at best. And is among the many reasons I've often been leery of joining them.

It's late. Off to bed. [Sorry for the typos and leaving you with a rough draft of this post. I edited, so should be better now.]
shadowkat: (Default)
Finished watching Power of the Doctor - which was one hour of The Doctor, and one hour of commercials (the same ones over and over).

Oh well, Disney + is going to start streaming it soon - so this won't be a problem.

Possibly the best episode that I've seen of Chinball/Whittacker run. I tried watching various episodes but gave up half-way through due to boredom. There were a few decent ones in the first year or so.

This one was a good end to her run. And by far, one of the better episodes. It works on its own merits. The finale's of each Doctor's run are actually fairly good for the most part - or at least for the five Doctors that I've watched to date.

I was already spoiled on the regeneration. Although I was surprised by the Spoiler ) Not on the guest stars - but I also haven't watched the old Who, so didn't recognize them anyhow.

Considering it was set up for a lot of 60th Anniversary cameos - it had good plot, and worked all the way through. Also had good villains, albeit previous ones, which have been used repetitiously over 60 some years (which may well be on purpose - considering next year celebrates 60 years of the Doctor, sheesh, the 50th anniversary didn't feel like it was all that long ago, sometimes). I honestly think Stephen Moffat was the only one who came up with cool new villains/monsters, improving on the former ones. Moffat had the Time Angels, Parasites of the Air, and the Quiet. Plus River Song.

spoilers )

I actually liked the plot of this one better than the fiftieth anniversary special plot with all the cameos - which didn't make much sense. Also, this is one of my favorite versions of the Master.

I'm a bit leery of RT Davies taking over the mantle again - because his plots don't always make sense. OTOH, they tend to, on the average, make more sense than Chinball's.

I hope he hires some good writers and doesn't keep the previous crew.
shadowkat: (Default)
Mother: So your niece went to buy a pair of scissors and a pairing knife - and got carded. Apparently you have to be 20-21 years of age to buy scissors and a pairing knife.
apparently folks under the age of 20-21 can't buy scissors or pairing knives in Britain??? Who knew? Well, the British obviously...Don't suppose any Brits want to explain this? )
Mother and I discussed the subtle yet annoying cultural differences between countries that make one homesick.

Me: I remember being overseas in London, and after about two months, I got homesick for the weirdest things. Things that were readily available here and not so much over there.
Mother: You don't have to explain this to me, I lived in Australia.
ME: Oh, yeah. Although the differences over there aren't that pronounced, they are actually more like the US and the Canadians than Britain. Except for some things...like putting Beets on Burgers, which blew uncle D away.
Mother: Oh yeah, they put beets on all sandwiches over there - kind of like we do with onions, except for them its beets.

Question on FB: What is the one item you will always take off a burger or ask to be removed?
ME: Beets.
Uncle D: Eww. Where does that happen? I'd throw it in the garbage.
ME: Australia. They put it on burgers everywhere - doesn't matter where you go. Unless you specifically request they don't do it or remove it yourself.

I don't understand why. So, any Australians want to explain the beet fetish?

***

On my walk today - it was a lovely day for a walk, blue sky, no clouds, low seventies (although I still sweated like a pig) - ran into a veritable tribe of rather petite beautifully garbed young, Bangladesh Muslims. Read more... )

Meanwhile in the backyard - the orthodox jews are praticing Sukkor with little huts on their back porches that are lit up.

**

On said walk - which was mainly around the other section of my neighborhood, the more wealthier section - although I had to go through the poor section first - I didn't run into quite as many people as I did last year when I wandered about. Read more... )

***

Pop culture

1. Doctor Who News...apparently they got tired of Chinball, or Chinball got tired, one or the other - and a new show-runner has been announced. Guess Who? Russel T. Davies. (Who rebooted the series to begin with - about fifteen years ago? I lost track. I personally thought he moved on. Also I'd rather he reprise Torchwood, which I liked better in some respects.)

This brings up a few questions. 1) Is there a shortage of writers who want to helm Doctor Who in Britain? You'd think it would be popular. 2) Who will he pick as Doctor Who? Another white guy? A black woman? A woman? A black man? (I still want Idris Elba).3)Who will he pick as a companion? How about no one? Or better yet? Bring back River Song? I miss River. 4) Will Stephen Moffat write episodes? 5) Can we not have Mark Gatiss and Chinball write any, please?

2. I responded to an ASH tweet about Ted Lasso - that I found it hilarious that the show had named his character Rupert. And it had that wonderful subtle sense of humor. (I doubt he got it - or he's ignoring me. Most people do on twitter (thank god), with the exception of Maurice Bernard who plays Sonny on GH, who has actually responded much to my surprise and embarrassment. And Cat Sebastain (who I was charmed by) and Jay Eldin - who surprised me. And of course Barb Cummings and Shipperx.)

3. Fandom - sigh soap fandoms put other fandoms to shame when it comes to "shipper wars". Read more... )

4. Television shows...so far I've seen three new shows that are on broadcast cable not streaming. The difference is - I have to remember to tape the broadcast ones or lose the chance to see the show. While I do not have to remember to tape the streaming ones - you can watch those whenever.
(I prefer the streaming for that reason, also the lack of commercials. Streaming has made me rather impatient in regards to broadcast cable television - and as a result, I'm considering cutting the cable cord daily.)

I already told you about Ordinary Joe, which I'll give one more chance to, but it's unlikely I'll stick with - the narrative structure is not conducive to my current state of mind.

Big Leap - this is actually better than expected. It's a satiric relationship/work place drama about a reality show. It is not a reality show. It is a satiric drama about a reality dance show. Read more... ) The satire is kind of light - like Glee, it's not biting like Unreal. I found it enjoyable and fun in places. I also like dance - so that helps.

It takes place in Detroit, which is a nice change of place. I don't know about anyone else? But I'm tired of everything taking place in NYC, Boston, Seattle and LA.

Our Kind of People - it's a Black American "Dynasty" by way of Martha's Vineyard - specifically Oak Bluffs. Based on a book of the same name, with the writer as a consultant. Morris Chestnut, Joe Morton and Debbie Morgan were the only stars I recognized. The lead or protagonist, a single mom, who is a hairstylist, is very charismatic and I liked a great deal. Also, it's female centric. The leads are all female, and the power is female.
the set-up and general review )
I found it compelling if a tad on the soapy side. While I'm not crazy about prime time soaps, I don't mind them. And I like the local and set-up. Very female oriented. Nice to have something in Martha's Vineyard as opposed to NYC or LA for a change.

Haven't seen Foundation yet, might try it tomorrow. I also watched Million Little Things which I'm still considering renaming Million Whiny Things, although it is better than it was the first season. They are writing out the annoying Deliah, finally, along with her son - who they have no idea what to do with. My favorite characters are the psychologist (Maggie), Darcy (the war vet/PT therapist suffering from PTSD, single mom), and Rome the sensitive screen writer. The others get on my nerves at various points.
Although I do like Eddie (the former rock star, addict, who is currently paralyzed and in a wheel chair). My attention kept wandering during it.
Also the Connors - which I'm losing interest in, kind of par for the course with me and sitcoms. I last about a season or two, then get bored and forget its on.

***

Someone is playing loud music above me. I think they are trying to create it, not just listen - because it starts and ends, and is repetitive. All I hear is the vibrations. Sounds like synthesizers. I hate synthesizers. Synthesizers - I'm certain have a valid purpose and enhance music for some - personally, I think they destroy it, but to each their own.

***

Period started. PMS stopped. Cramps began. Nice swap that. So, still in perimenopause. I suppose this is good thing? It doesn't feel like a good thing, but I'm sure it is on some level. If anything it reduces my chances of stroke and heart disease, also osteoporosis, apparently.

Got a scale - I'm not sure it's working. It can't seem to make up its mind.

**

Had the weirdest dream last night. Read more... )

Picture from my walk to the grocery store today..

shadowkat: (Default)
This is Day 13 of 30 Days of Halloween Challenge

A favorite villain in a film, book or television series.

The Weeping Angels from Doctor Who

Stephen Moffat created the weeping angels - which if you blink, they move and if they get close enough - they throw you into another time line.

The Weeping Angels were an extremely powerful species of quantum-locked humanoids (sufficient observation changes the thing being observed), so called because their unique nature necessitated that they often covered their faces with their hands to prevent trapping each other in petrified form for eternity by looking at one another. This gave the Weeping Angels their distinct "weeping" appearance. They were known for being "kind" murderous psychopaths, eradicating their victims "mercifully" by dropping them into the past and letting them live out their full lives, just in a different time period. This, in turn, allowed them to live off the remaining time energy of the victim's life. However, when this potential energy paled in comparison to an alternative power source to feed on, the Angels were known to kill by other means, such as snapping their victims' necks.

Source - https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Weeping_Angel

I loved The Weeping Angels - best villain ever. I don't, however, consider them exactly monsters...
shadowkat: (Default)
This is Day #5 of 30 Days of Television Meme.

The prompt is - A quote from a television series that you find memorable or like

Mine is...

"We're all stories in the end..." - Doctor Who, The Girl Who Waited

shadowkat: (Default)
1. Meditation made me think of the Doctor Who episodes I saw last night. In the guided meditation or rather immediately after, the guide said as the world constantly flows and changes around you, try to focus on the physical changes in your body to ground you in the moment. Each small change in position.

It made me think of Doctor Who, because at the very end of Fugitives of Judoon, the Doctor states that she feels as if Time is swirling about her, past, present, future, and other timelines, and she's caught in its flow -- too fast to see what is happening and anxious that something is coming for her.

I found that oddly relatable. I feel as if I'm watching history and various changes on a cultural, political, workplace, and personal level swirl around me, and at times it's hard to ground myself.

Also, I've found oddly relatable, or maybe not so much, the constant struggle the Doctor has of being a woman in a patriarchial world, and how people are constantly dismissing her as the Doctor's companion or not worth listening to. I work in male centric workplace and am constantly dismissed, spoken over, or shut down. It's interesting to see it shown in Doctor Who -- because up until a year or so ago, it was a male-centric series, and at times quite sexist. To have the authority of that sexism suddenly be on the opposite side of it...is interesting.

Speculative fiction can often force us to see things from another angle. While meditation can calm the mind down enough to pay attention to it. For me, my mind gets very noisy. But then I live in a noisy world. The best thing about my little apartment is the silence.

2. I wonder sometimes how television critics pick which series to review and promote? Or television mags? They used to promote everything -- but that was when everything was pretty much 20-30 television shows, if that. Now? It's not humanly possible. There's over 1000.

What I spotted that was worth looking into?

* Lock & Key based on the popular comic books by Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodgriquez. It's a psychological horror comic. The set-up - The Lock family moves across country after the father's murder -- only to discover his ancestral home (which happens to be in New England - because they always are) is full of magical keys. One can even open a person's head, allowing them to revisit memories or even remove certain personality traits. Carlton Cuse of Lost is the show-runner. It premiers on Feb 7 on Netflix.

*I'm not okay with this - another horror-fantasy series based on a graphic novel, which follows a teenager as she navigates school, coming of age, family, sexuality and new superpowers. It's also on Netflix and starts Feb 26.

*Hunters - Jordan Peel's new drama starring Al Pacino about a team of Nazi hunters in 1970s New York - on Amazon Prime - Feb 21.

Also in EW was an excerpt from Suzanne Collins' Hunger Games Prequel - The Ballard of Songbirds and Snakes -- which focuses on a teen Corinalaus Snow, that is set 64 years prior to the Hunger Games novels. I have no idea why they thought this was a good idea. But okay.

3. Links That Won't Make Your Blood-Pressure Sky-Rocket or make you want to shoot people with water pistols.

* Did Tolkien Write the Lord of the Rings to Avoid Academic Work? - subtitle: "How a literary icon always felt guilty about his failings with Chaucer." LOL. I love that title.

* Cheer Captures What it Really Felt Like to be a Cheerleader - hmmm, I may check this out on netflix, more than one person on correspondence list has rec'd.

* For Petz - How West Side Story Was Reborn

* A Trillion Worlds To Explore...big data statistics have revealed among other things that our solar system is a kind of an oddball
shadowkat: (work/reading)
There's an article about fanfiction, fandom and shipping in the new romance magazine Blush, that's just been launched. (Got it via Smartbitches. )

1. Critiques?
tiny print and what is cult not cult )
2. Wrong-headed shipping or shipping bad guys with heroes...such as Kylo Ren and Rei, or Draco Malfoy and Hermonine, or Angelus and Buffy.

Quibbles aside..I don't ship the way the person being interviewed does. I don't really do or tend to do "wrong-headed" shipping. With a few rare exceptions -- and usually those are one's that fit the story thread and are canon. I don't tend to ship counter to the canon.
Read more... )

3. Canon vs. non-canonical shipping (not to be confused with m/m or f/f slash - which can be canonical or non-canonical depending on the series.).

Per the above, I ship with the canon or with the story-thread. And don't have a lot of patience for shipping against the story-thread. It's rare that I'll ship characters that aren't going to end up together, aren't written to be romantic love interests, and aren't written to be friends. And if they are friends or lovers or married and the story-thread leads to their inevitable separation and the demise of their relationship in a convincing manner that tracks -- and shows why, doesn't tell, I'll go along with it. (See Buffy/Angel above as an example. The writers successfully broke that ship up for me in S1 Angel.)
Read more... )

4. Where the line should be drawn regarding shipping...

shippers who try to influence the writing of the show )

5. My ships or the one's that I have shipped the hardest in recent years and still do to an extent?

Canonical Ships:
Read more... )

Nothing new though. I don't ship much any longer. Shipping for television shows is ridiculously painful.

Non-canonical?
Read more... )
But I can't say I was passionate about any of them.
shadowkat: eleanor the good place (wonder)
Received lots of lovely icons and vids from folks in my Fandom Stocking. Very happy with the result. Wasn't really expecting anything.

Lots of Killing Eve Icons, also some good MCU icons.

A Farscape drabble.

And a couple of interesting fanfvids.

1. "I Did Something Bad" by jarrow - vid on Killing Eve (Villenalle and Eve) -- and I really like that Taylor Swift song, one of the few of her's I like. She has a handful that are really interesting.

2. Die Young - Buffy by kaydeefalls -- this is a rather inventive fanvid, and one of the VERY few that isn't shippy. It remarks on the theme of Dying Young in Sunnydale...and life in that verse. It's rather fun and a fun song as well.

3. An interesting if rather dark look at the Tenth Doctor Who entitled "I Can Ride My Bike with No Handlebars" == the vid isn't great, but I found the song and the message interesting.

4. And.. Control - MCU Jessica Jones -- exploring her relationship with Kilgrave. Not as good as the first two, but the vid is good as is the song.

Also nice Killing Eve icons from cookiegirl and MCU icons from three other people. Also tarlanx gave me some Black Panther icons.

All in all, quite satisfied. Sorry I couldn't return the favor. ;-)

Some very generous folks out there.
shadowkat: (tv slut)
1. Interesting... Death of the Author - application of the literary theory.



Authors know more about their worlds than you do, but maybe don’t have all the answers. If you believe that only the text matters, then an author’s thoughts, beliefs, etc about the world they constructed on the page are no more relevant than your thoughts or anyone else’s; if it’s not on the page, it’s not canon. And that’s fine for you to believe, but as the author, I certainly don’t believe it, because among other things I know how much of the world I have to create in order to support what’s on the page. I have to know more about my world than my readers do, otherwise it’s going to be difficult for me to keep consistency of action (and consequence) across the work, both in characters and the world in general.

But, as it happens, sometimes writers and readers don’t find the same things important, with regard to the worldbuilding. As a result, readers sometimes think about certain things more than the authors have, and the authors get caught flatfooted when readers want to know more about that particular thing. Alternately sometimes the author kind of bullshits through something because they don’t think it’s important and later it comes back to bite them and has to be explained away.


Oh, and you should watch the youtube video...has some interesting things to say about fans interacting with text, and the degree the author has control over that.




Takeaways?

* Anne Rice notoriously doesn't allow fanfic of her characters or novels, because they are "copyrighted". Hee. How's that working for you, Annie?

* How fans fight with the author's intent and how they view it.

* Focuses on Fault in the Stars, Harry Potter, Catcher in the Rye, and Foucault.

Downside -- I'm not a fan of audible books, sorry. I had troubles paying attention to the youtube video.


2. Doctor Who - New Year's Resolution

So...you are in a dank underwater archaeological site and one of your artifacts has creepily wandered off. You go searching around, and voila find a really gross and creepy gray octopus looking life-form sliding up a wall. What do you do?

a) run away screaming?
b) scream for your assistant's aid and a camera?
c) back away slowly and get your friend the heck out of there
d) touch the thing?

I don't know about anyone else -- but I would run away screaming. Okay maybe not screaming. But definitely away. I would NOT touch the thing. Why do people in horror television series or science fiction television series do dumb things?

Other than that...I pretty much enjoyed the episode. Certainly had the most humor to date. It was very funny in places.

spoiler )
shadowkat: (Flowers and writing)
As I write my novel, I have to push away the internal critic in my head. Which up until roughly 2002 did not exist. It's not your everyday critic, it is the voice of the internet - the thousands, possibly millions of voices who rip apart art on a daily basis -- not just on a technical level, but on the increasingly subjective socio-political one. Over time, I've learned to hand-wave these voices...to realize some of what they say is worthy, the rest is noise. Troublesome. But noise.

It's not easy though. And makes me sort of miss the days before we could share our opinions and views, right, wrong or in-between within the blink of an eye to anyone who would care to read them or listen.

Been thinking about this off and on for a while now -- and have noticed a discernible pattern in how various critics amateur and otherwise review art -- particularly in fandoms. They have no issues with the art itself, the characterization, the plotting, no -- it's their interpretation of the theme or message conveyed that they are annoyed by. OR the travesty of a white author writing about a black character in a manner that is...dishonorable and prejudicial. OR the travesty of an LGBTQ relationship being broken apart by an untimely death -- a pseudo Romeo/Juliet (except Juliet is a boy) ending. OR that fascism seems to be the message of the work -- and really how dare they!

Here's the thing -- I can't help but wonder if people are missing the point of creating art? Or expression? In this propaganda soaked world, with every bit and piece of work being interrupted with marketing and advertising and product placement -- I can see why. How can you know the difference between propaganda and art or a commercial and a story? Particularly when many advertisers use stories to sell products. We're in a world -- where someone is constantly trying to sell you something whether it be an ideology, an idea, a product, a place, a point of view, a political candidate, a way of life -- it's something.
Read more... )
shadowkat: (Default)
1. Okay this is bugging me a little bit...

You are a six-foot to six-foot three guy, over 195 pounds, lead on a television series acting with women who are five foot or smaller, and some guys who are five-foot nine. And you decide to wander about the set and workplace with your penis hanging out. No one stops you. How is this okay? How does this promote a safe work environment? And why didn't anyone say no?

I told my mother this story over the phone today, and she asked why the lead actress on the show didn't do anything about it.
Read more... )

I find it disturbing that this happens and no one questions it or puts a stop to it.

2. Cold rainy day.

The rain feels like ice water. Was out in it -- to see MD for the first time in months. Also church which...had great music and a cute children's pagent about immigration.



3. Watching Manifest -- which is better when it isn't delving into the conspiracy theory or the mystical connections between the passengers -- who appear to have been the unwittingly subjects of a neurological experiment that cost them five years of their lives.

4. Doctor Who

Like I stated in last post, mixed feelings about the last episode and the season as a whole. I felt it was uneven and difficult to get into. Very episodic and moral themed, but not "Fun", if anything a bit too heavy handed on the morality in places -- which I think may have back-fired on them. You have to be careful about heavy-handed morality in stories, because if it is misread, whoa-boy.

I did like the "anti-violence" arc or do no harm. Every problem in every episode was resolved without direct violence from the main or lead ensemble. (I can't comment on the spider episode, because I didn't watch -- because, well, SPIDERS! But apparently they locked them in a room instead of killing them...people appear to have wanted them to be allowed to roam free. I vote for merciful shots in the head, but again Spiders!!)
Spoilers )
shadowkat: (Default)
1. So I decided to put up a fandom stocking for the first time ever. I've no idea if it will work. When it goes up...I'll show it. Mainly I want Cyclops fic, but I doubt I'll get any. I gave a lot of fandom options.
Read more... )
We'll see. It's been a tough couple of months. And I'm dreading next week...for reasons I won't go into. Really wish I could just fall madly in love with someone and be whisked away on an all expense paid trip to Hawaii.

2. Watching another James Marsters Q&A...okay listening to it. This is the November 2018 London one or the October, can't remember which. I like them because he really goes into the process of what doing television is like for an actor.
Read more... )

3. Doctor Who Finale

I have to admit I found most of this season rather slow and difficult to get into or follow. I'm not emotionally invested in anyone, really. Sort of like YAZ, but don't know a lot about her. Graham also is fun. But outside of that...meh.

I want to like Jodi Whittacker's Doctor, but frankly she irritates me in the same way that Matt Smith did at the beginning, until he grew on me, and David Capadali. Too frenetic and crazy energy all over the place. I want to tell her to chill.

This episode was okay. It's clear that the writer's were hammering home the theme of solving problems without violence and restraining from doing any lasting harm or killing anyone.

I'll write more later. When it's not 12 midnight and time for me to go to bed, or long past it.
shadowkat: (tv slut)
Saw both last week's and this week's Doctor Who episodes tonight, Witchfinders and Where it Takes You Away.

The season to date has admittedly been a bit uneven in the writing, but I think that's true of all the seasons I've seen, and pretty much all television series I've seen. I remember in the commentary to Farscape that the writers stated regardless of how many episodes you do, the nature of television is such that you will inevitably write a couple of stinkers, a couple of brilliant episodes, and a couple of in-between ones...it's the law of averages and really not a lot you can do about it.
Possibly true, but you'd think if a season only had six episodes...it would be tighter? Of course it's probably written very quickly on a low budget, so.

Anyhow...after reading all that preamble you're probably scratching your noggin and thinking, wait, what? You didn't like them?? Really?

Uhm. No. I actually did. I liked them a lot. I think the last two episodes are the best of the season so far. Well, with the exception of The Demons of Punjab and the second episode of season, which I think were a notch or two better than Witchfinder.

Both continue to push the thematic arc of kindness and mercy over violence, or resolving conflict through merciful means and negotiation with a bit of stumbling about here and there.

1. Witchfinder

I thought it was bit heavy handed in the metaphor -- but this is a kid's show. I liked the previous episodes a little better in regards to their metaphors, more subtle. I really don't need the writers to say "see, metaphor" and "it's about hate, and fear, and violence" - "got it?"

Yeah, sort of got it from the set-up. I mean hello, Witch Trials. A bit obvious. But wait, Alan Cummings is the guest star????? ALAN CUMMINGS??? All is forgiven. (I'd watch Alan Cummings read the bloody phone book.)

It was actually funny in places because of Alan Cummings.

spoilers )

2. Where it Takes You

First of all -- I want to go wherever they filmed this. It's beautiful. Or get a life-size picture of the Tardis on that forest hill top.

I enjoyed this episode, it was scary, it had well developed guest-stars, and it surprised me. Also while keeping with the general theme of resolving conflicts by not giving into violence, it was less preachy about it. And examined the other underlying theme of how to move on after losing someone or handling "grief" -- which has been featured in every episode that I've seen to date in some way or other.

Will have to agree with the majority of reviews that I've read -- it is by far the best episode of this season. I'd rank it first, with Demons of Punjab second, Woman who Fell to Earth Third, the second episode fourth, and Witchfinder Fifth. (I can't comment on the spider episode, because I didn't see it.)

spoilers )
shadowkat: (Default)
Just finished watching the apparently controversial Doctor Who episode Kerblam!. Why controversial? These are the reactions:

1. Urgh! Infuriating Kerblam! I need a protest button.
2. Half-way amusing Amazon satire which takes an weird twist into Middle-Dicksonian Territory...which later Dickens disowned
3. Workplace satire with an infuriating right-wing ending
4. My favorite plot so far...
5. I think it had a lot of plot holes and I didn't like it due to the plot holes..just did not work

Guess which one I agree with?

spoilers )
shadowkat: (Default)
Enjoyed this episode far more than I expected. I was expecting it to be preachy, but it wasn't. Or over the top with cheesy bad guys, it wasn't. Their special effects have improved dramatically over the past few years.

To date this season is sort of panning out for me the same way the previous one did. I like some episodes, I don't like others. The ones I like focus more on the companions relationships. But overall, I've enjoyed more than I thought. The Doctor herself isn't really registering for me anymore than the last one did. And seems to be more of a doorway or gateway into all of these tales. Not that this is really much of a problem for me -- in some respects, I think it works better that way. OTOH - I do miss some of the delves into the Doctor's character. She seems to be merely reacting to everyone else, and a bit of a passive participant. But that may just be me. I'm admittedly not a long-term viewer of the series, nor an obsessed fan. (I only watch the episodes once, and only own one set of DVDs. Also, not British, which depending on your pov may or may not make much of a difference. The British fans seem to think it does, the die-American fans do not.)

That said, I rather liked the episode. And was happy to get a bit more on Yaz. Spoilers below.

Spoilers )
shadowkat: (Default)
Been vegging and watching television today, or rather catching up.

1. Doctor Who: The Ghost Monument -- a solid secondary episode that propels the story forward, clarifies who the villain of the arc will be, and shows that each stand-a-lone is part of a broader arc. Also a secret, mystery, is hinted out that may be the central focal point of the arc.
I think I know what it is -- spoilers )

2. The Connors as previously predicted and stated, the series is actually better without Roseanne. But I'm not sure her fans will stick with it. It no longer has the insult heavy Roseanne humor that existed previously. What made me cringe is gone now. So I was right, I definitely could and have watched the Connors, and found that group funny without Roseanne in the midst of it.

Also this episode depicted a major problem in the US, and did it with compassion and humor. One a lot of people don't want to look at. Which is the amount of pain a lot of the lower middle class and working class are in. Hence the ophoid crisis. Roseanne dies from an ophoid overdoes -- due to increasing pain in her knees and legs. She'd had knee surgery, but never really recovered from it and became addicted to ophoids, finding ways to get a supply outside of doctors and insurance. The Connors aren't wealthy. They have full time jobs, all reside for the most part in the same multi-family home, and struggle to keep a float. They aren't racist or homophobic either. DJ is married to an African-American Female Army Officer who served in Afghanistan, with a daughter. Darlene's son is gay and possibly transgender. And they don't really care. They are politically incorrect and irreverent, but honest and caring.

Also the cast looks like most Americans. Gray haired. Wrinkles. Not beautiful or air-brushed. The house is scruffy looking, with an aging couch and a small kitchen. It's Middle America. And a sitcom that veers more towards realism than romanticism.

I enjoyed the reboot. It was funny in places and touching in others. I knew these people, worked with them over the years, and have met them. Sat in their kitchens. Listened to their jokes. This, I want to tell people is America, not How I Met Your Mother or Friends or The Big Bang Theory, which don't feel real at all.

3. The Good Place - Episode 4 - Jeremy Berimy -- I think it is episode 4. Better than the last two. They've moved rather quickly out of one paradigm into another.

spoilers )

4. Crazy Ex-Girlfriend is beginning to bore me. I kept wandering off during the episode. The best bit, and the only reason to bother with it is Patton Oswalt's musical number in the cemetary entitled "The Cringe", best musical number this season.

5. The Kids Are Alright is a rather charming retro-seventies family sitcom starring Mary McCormick -- about an Irish Catholic family in the 1970s. I wish they'd stop doing the stereotype. Not all Irish Catholic or Catholic families have that many kids. Mine didn't. And most of the people I knew back then didn't. My father's family did -- but they were 1930s-1950s, and it made sense back then. Catholic family, poor working class, with eight kids is a bit cliche and stereotypical. That said, McCormick and the guy who plays her husband are rather good in it and save it. Also the narrative voice reminds me a bit of The Wonder Years. So it's a satisfyingly warm family situation comedy with some good retro commentary. Sonny & Cher (which I watched as kid), the Aerospace Program (practically everyone who lived on my block growing up worked for the Aerospace program as either engineers or machinists), and the references to how Nixon wasn't to blame and Watergate was fake news (the Republicans actually said that and wanted Ford to pardon him) -- all are nice touches. But it's not quite to the same level as The Connors.

6. I've given up on The Neighborhood-- which has become more about father's and loser sons, and less about racial conflicts or community. It's sort of redundant and cliche in the jokes. I really loved the first episode, but the last two I've found unwatchable.

Ditto for Big Bang Theory.

7. In tooling about the net, and listening to recent pop songs -- several Taylor Swift, I've decided there's a lot of pain and rage and dissatisfaction out there. Taylor Swift is truly miserable and filled with rage. Her songs aren't what I'd call uplifting. Neither are Lady Gaga's for that matter.

I'm hunting happy music. Maybe Bobbie McFerrin?
shadowkat: (Default)
1. I overslept this morning by 30 minutes and I'm still tired. You'd think I'd be less tired. But no.

2. Cousin: Anyone who is worried about a Hurricane hitting them, you're more than welcome to evacuate to Chicago and stay with me!

Me (to my mother on the phone): Is my cousin living a hotel or mansion with multiple rooms?
Mother: No, she lives in a tiny apartment with her son and husband. Also is highly allergic to pets.
Me: So, I'm guessing she's hoping no one ever takes her up on this insane offer?

3. Doctor Who Fan to Neil Gaiman Regarding Gaiman's Love of the 13th Doctor

Neil Gaiman: I just watched "The Woman Who Fell to Earth". That was definitely the Doctor, not that I ever had any real doubts. But it's wonderful to see how much of the Doctor, she is.
Brendan TooGood:Oh so you're a new fan because the Doctor is a woman not a real fan of the show since the 1960s then.
Neil Gaiman: My first episodes of Doctor Who were the first William Hartnell Dalek story. You can read about it in my introduction to the first Doctor Who novelization.

Read more... )

4. Am I the only one who doesn't understand the point of Siri and Alexa? I can't get either to do much more than fumble through search engines and find nothing.

5. Mother: Nicki Haley resigned.
Me: Remind me again, which appointee she is?
Mother: The UN rep.
Me: Ah. Interesting timing. Why'd she go? She get fed up finally?
Mother: No one knows.
Me: Is it just me or is the Doofus having troubles keeping the vast majority of his appointees in office? There seems to be a high turnover. Everyone gets upset that they've appointed so and so, then six to eight months later, so and so has flown the coop. I almost want to tell them to just be patient...it will take care of itself.
Mother: Well, this is just before the November Mid-Terms so the timing is suspect.
Me: Okay. (Mother failed to elaborate.)
shadowkat: (Default)
[I have no idea what season this is? 13th?]

Just finished watching the New Doctor Who, starring Jodi Whittaker as the first female doctor, and with new show-runner, Michael Chinbale. (Sorry for misspellings, Who fans and internet spell checkers.)

And...

It was good. I was pleasantly surprised. I love Jodi's take on the Doctor, and love the team companion approach. Much prefer three companions to one. It gets rid of the romantic shipping with the Doctor, which frankly never quite worked for me. The only characters that made sense as romantic love interests for the Doctor were Doctor River Song and Missy/Master. Everyone else seemed a bit ludicrous and my suspension of disbelief hopped out the window. Rose Tyler? Seriously? Why would a 1000 year old alien, who is brilliant, immortal, and can travel back and forth through time and space in the blink of an eye... fall in love with someone who is the equivalent of a little kid, with zero knowledge of the universe, history, or anything else? They've zip in common. I can see him/her mentoring her or even becoming friends, but falling in love in a romantic way? No. Also, not helped by the fact that all the companions did increasingly dumb things. Platonic relationships work a lot better in these types of series.

Anywho...finally, we have a female doctor, and the story not mention the Whoverse just got a bit more interesting. I felt like they were repeating themselves for a while there. With the exception of the River Song arc, and Nine, the series felt very boilerplate. Now, it's a bit shaken. Less predictable. I like that. You need to shake up things a bit. It also got a less sexist. I'm sorry but the previous incarnations had a sexist undertone that irritated me. Even the Doctor River Song arc. This feels a wee bit less sexist.

I have to admit I leaped out of the Capadali/Clara arc due to boredom, also the fact that the actress playing Clara does little for me. And left for a bit during Tennent/Rose arc also do to boredom (and I'm rather apathetic about Billie Piper). I didn't like either pairing. Nine -- I found interesting, because the Doctor was played very dark and angsty by Christopher Eccleston. And Alex Kingston's take on Dr. River Song fascinated me, along with Rory/Amy and Matt Smith's Doctor. I did like Bill/Capadali, that pairing worked for me. This one, with Whittaker/et al appears to be working as well. I liked and cared about all the characters.

The story? It worked for the most part.

eh spoilers )

I'm sticking with this new Doctor, it was enjoyable, inspiring, comforting, and held my interest. Which is basically my criteria for most things nowadays.

Also, need icons.
shadowkat: (Default)
1. From elisi - This is not Going to Go The Way You Think - The Last Jedi is a Subversive AF and I Am Here For it.

spoilers ahoy )
* I kinda love Whil Wheaton -- his blog post I agree with for the most part. (I thought the action sequences went on too long. And no, cramming two movies into one isn't always a good thing.) - This is non-spoilery.

* We Need to Talk About Last Jedi Controversy

Read more... )
* Crazy Long Rolling Stone Interview with Mark Hamil and Rian Johnson

*
The Star Wars Last Jedi Backlash Controversy Explained


Some interesting passages from this link are below:


The Last Jedi is more or less a metaphorical depiction of the baby boomer generation (a generation that featured a lot of white dudes — good and bad — in positions of power) handing off leadership roles to younger generations, particularly millennials, who tend to be more racially diverse and to advocate having more women in positions of power. The series’ millennial good guys are a young white woman, a black man, a woman of Asian descent, and a Latino man, while its millennial bad guys are two white dudes.


spoilers )
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 10:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios