shadowkat: (Default)
2025-04-22 08:20 pm

Fandom Bits and Pieces...among other things

1. Everything We Learned at the Star Wars Celebration 2025

Takeaways?

I really want to see Andor S2.

excerpt )

Also, apparently the new Star Wars movie starring Ryan Gosling, and directed by Shawn Levy, entitled Star Wars: Star Fighter - takes place post Rise of Skywalker, and with all new characters. (Smart move. The better films pull away from the Skywalker story arcs.)

Also, I may try Ashoska again.

2. Not a fandom bit - but R.I.P Pope Francis. I'm saddened by this news.
Also he accomplished a lot in short period of time - shifting the course of the Catholic Church, promoting kindness and humility. (I also hope he talked some sense into devout Catholic and wannabee Fascist, Vance, who saw Francis before he died.)

3. Buffy Redux

So, I've been rewatching Buffy episodes intermittently. Picked up on a few things that I hadn't previously picked up on? Read more... )

4. Daredevil Born Again

I liked the season finale, and for the most part the series. It's similar yet different than Netflix's Daredevil, which had defter writing. However both are fairly uneven.

Fisk is clearly Marvel's commentary on the Fascist asshole in the White House or the Hitler Wannabee. Fisk even kind of looks like him, without hair. And that makes watching this - an odd experience.

The message at the end is Daredevil can't take on Fisk alone, which sets up S2 to be more of a group effort. People are speculating already on who will be joining the cast. Already slotted are Karen and Frank Castle (Jon Bernthal) aka The Punisher. Also Lily Taylor, and Mathew Lillard in a recurring role.
shadowkat: (Default)
2023-04-23 06:20 pm
Entry tags:

Reviews...television and otherwise (Picard mainly)

1. Finished Picard. Note? You can legitimately just watch Season 3 and skip the first two seasons without too much difficulty. Season 3 for the most part acts as a stand-a-alone. Or, if you want you can watch S1, skip over S2, and watch S3. Or watch all three.

Your appreciation of S3 Picard may well depend on how much you appreciated or enjoyed S2. I didn't like S2. I thought it was silly, badly plotted, and self-indulgent, also spent far too much time spent on time travel, Song, and Q. Those who loved S2 - I've noticed, did not like S3 and were annoyed. Why? S3 barely references it. Outside of the first five minutes, everything from S2 is summarily dropped. Seven and Raffi are really the only characters carried over. And Laris, disappears completely from the story after the first ten minutes of the first episode - and is never mentioned or seen again. In other words, if you don't like S2, don't worry about it. If you loved it? Wait a few years to see S3, by that time you've have forgotten S2 and it won't matter.

I made the mistake of hurrying to watch all of S1 and S2, so I could see S3, only to discover by the second episode that I needn't have bothered. Because it's as if those seasons didn't happen. Sure they give us back story on who Raffi is, and how Seven ended up in Starfleet. But you don't really need it - since Picard S3 fills that in anyhow. It's almost as if the writers were told to write it as a stand-a-lone, and to forget the previous two seasons entirely. The only characters from those seasons that appear are Picard, Laris (briefly - long enough to summarily write her off without killing her), Raffi and Seven.

This is a Reunion Season - with the original STNG cast being front and center. And if, like me, what you want is more of those characters, and to learn more about them, and see one last adventure with them, then you will love S3 Picard, and hand wave the plot and continuity weaknesses, among other things.

There are continuity and plotting weaknesses. And a potential Marty Stu in Jake Crusher, although having watched the entire season now? I'm on the fence. I live in fear of creating one - and remain unclear on the definition of it, which was coined (surprise surprise) by a fan critic of fanfiction.

The trope originated from Paula Smith, who coined it in “A Trekkie’s Tale”, a parody Star-Trek fan fiction. It was intended to mock authors whose characters were clearly based on wish fulfilment, self-inserts and idealized versions of themselves.

In fan fiction, the origins of the term Mary Sue are simple. They describe a character that has been added to an already existing fictional universe and:

* Gains power/ becomes overpowered without any struggle or journey of earning it.
* Gets attention from the original established characters (including those who it is uncharacteristic of eg. if they are anti-social, untrusting).
* Resolves the entire conflict almost single-handedly, removing any obstacles.

Despite beginning in fan fiction, Mary Sue characters are visible in films and TV series of many kinds.


Okay now that I have the definition? No, the character of Jake Crusher doesn't really fit it. He only fits point two. Points one and three, not so much.

I'm also on the fence as to whether Rey in Force Awakens really fits it. I don't think so. She only fits maybe point two.

I thought a Mary Sue or Marty Stu was a character who was unbeatable or overly skilled or had too many skills, say a surgeon and an auto-mechanic. But that just means diverse. Turns out - I don't have to worry. I don't tend to read a lot of fanfic, so I am admittedly oblivious to these definitions.

spoilers )

To sum up without spoilers? It stuck the ending, and will provide fans of the series a satisfying ride with old friends, and a nice wrap up of their characters arcs.

2. Wolf Pack

Made it through four episodes of this eight episode series. It's not bad.
Among the better series that Gellar has done post Buffy. It helps that she's not the lead, and more in the background. The focus is on the teens, and we're mainly in their point of view. Gellar has graduated to the Anthony Stewart Head and Jenny Carpenter roles.

It also gets better as you go. Episode 4 was spooky. And the cast got a bit more appealing as I went. So clunky to start, improves by Episode 4.

[It's on Paramount Plus.]

3. Shadow and Bone

With the exception of Captain Kirigan (who is kind of moustache twirling), this is a fun series. I love the Crows. Kaz, Jesper, Inel, Nina, and Wylan, are fun. The six, is undoubtedly Matthias. Alina & Mal are okay, the privateer and his crew make them more interesting. As Genya makes Kirigan a bit more interesting.

The leads are kind of boring, the supporting characters on the other hand are rather fun. So much so, I wish I could just watch the supporting characters and ditch the three leads (Mal, Alina, and Kirigan). I think that may well be the weakness of this series.

I'm on episode 3 - I think.

4. Question on The Mandalorian S3 - do I have to watch the Book of Boba Fett first - or can I skip it? I'm unclear on this. Boba Fett is 7 episodes - so it's no great hardship - except they are all filmed rather darkly, and I'd need to watch them at night with the lights turned off in order to see them (same was true of Picard and Shadow and Bone. So time consuming. I may do it anyhow - because I like Ming-Li Weng. But is it worth it? That one got bad reviews. (Not that this means anything. Star Wars is like Star Trek -in that the fandom is rather vocal about what they like and dislike about it. And they do not agree. At all. I mean all the Star Wars films and series have gotten bad and good reviews. Depends on who you talk to.)

5. Finished Mel Robbins - Take Control of Your Life: How to Face Your Fears and Take Back Control of Your Life or something like that. I'm horrible about remembering book titles. In attempting to download the companion workbook - I got the workbook and video training sessions instead. I don't think she has the separate workbook that just goes with the book any longer. I think it got updated to the videos and workbook.

My difficulty with pop psychology self-help books - and life coaching - is I get confused. Actually this is true of the therapeutic process in general. Therapists, life coaches, sociologists like to label people or put them in nice neat defined categories. Which, while understandable, isn't really practical.

Robbins does acknowledge and understand that many of us have trauma or experienced traumatic events in our lives without it being familial, sexual abuse, or physical abuse. There's also emotional abuse. Also it may not necessarily seem severe or horrific to an outside viewer. This puts Robbins slightly above the rest, who don't appear to get this. I give Robbins a lot of credit for picking up on that.

However, she does fall into the trap of generalizing, which leads to confusion. I mean, I found myself at the end of this contemplating whether I'm a chameleon like Robbins, or experiencing imposter syndrome, or just run and hide, or quieting my voice? It's hard to know. Possibly a little of all of the above, or none of them? We're not always the best judge of these things.

Robbins example of lying or a chameleon is - apparently she lied to her boyfriend that she was an expert fly fisherman, when in reality all she'd done was trolling - and got caught when she was introduced to his best friend - an expert fly fisherman on a fly fishing trip.

I can and I can't identify? Have I done this? Yes and no. Not quite to that extreme. Read more... )

The problem is? I think we all have some of these tendencies? Self-isolate out of fear? (Considering we all just came out of a pandemic...) Imposter syndrome (it's a current psychological catch-phrase)? Not being Authentic or lying to avoid conflict and fit in? (I caught my niece doing it with me in 2021. And I did it with her. )

I'm not sure there's an easy fix here? I just want to meet more people, be more connected, and less lonely. Which takes me back to Picard S3 and why I enjoyed it - it's heavy on the theme of connection. spoilers for Picard )

Sometimes fiction provides more and better answers than non-fiction?
shadowkat: (Default)
2023-04-12 09:04 pm
Entry tags:

No one is perfect, not even Star Wars...(among other nutty things)

Both The Artist Way and the audio book I Thought it was just me (it isn't)(aka the book about Shame) decided to talk about "perfectionism" at the same time. This is what I call..."Kind of drilling home the point, Universe".

The gist as I remember it, because I don't feel like hunting down the passages and reprinting them here - is we're not perfect. It's not going to be perfect. This need to be perfect - is (per the Artist's Way) "egotism". Per the Shame book, it's well the same thing, but more nicely put. Revising revising revising that first chapter and never getting any further, or erasing, erasing, erasing and never drawing the picture, or trying to constantly fix it...there comes a point in which you let it go and move on.
rambling on about perfectionism and using George Lucas's Star Wars as an example )
And, I saw a video on Instagram - where Mark Hamil is stating in an interview in the late 1970s/early 1980s that the dialogue in Star Wars was challenging at times, and actually their biggest challenge. There was one line for example that he begged Lucas to change. It gave him nightmares. He still remembers it to this day. (I do not. So I looked it up.)
The line Hamil got Lucas to cut out of the film )
Anyhow - that's an example of how something extraordinary is deeply flawed at the same time. And not extraordinary to everyone. The only way to create is to muddle through, and leave the ego at home. Also admit that I have no control over anything but my reactions to things, and even that is ...questionable. But hey, good news, everyone else is in the same boat.

Actually this is how I reassure myself when I sit on the stool struggling with a big poop - everyone goes through this. the joy of pooping )

***

I posted more watercolors on FB, and my Aunt (who is a professional artist - she has a degree in Fine Arts) told me to keep doing these paintings - since I could make a really good book out of them. (I was planning on switching to drawing and painting people and dogs. However, the Universe apparently has other plans - since I ended up coming home and drawing two more pictures of people on the subway.)

I now have completed three sketches, waiting for paints to be applied. And just when I thought I was done with the subway people - more pop up. more about art )

***

I've chosen not to worry about my workplace this year. At all. I'm not going to stress over it. I've no control. None. So I'm going to focus my energy on other things - things I can control. My New Year's Resolution was not to worry about the uncontrollables.
work discussions )
I figure I'll let Crazy Workplace take care of itself. So far that's kept my blood pressure down this year. Also, I'll let the future take care of itself. This means ignoring fretful co-workers - who insist on making everyone around them paranoid.

Will state that the switch in train times and platforms is resulting in more cardio - that new train platform is insanely long, also the new stair case is longer and steeper.

So far? It's working, I'm not worrying about it. Any of it. Go me. I honestly think all of that meditating during the pandemic paid off. (The pandemic is technically still going on - the virus hasn't exactly gone away -new cubicle aisle mate was out sick with it for about five days. She's quiet. Barely speaks a word to anyone.)

Wales meanwhile keeps texting that she is furious at her workplace for being conservative anti-feminist assholes. All these horrible things happening to women world-wide and in our country and she's working with these people. I don't know what she is doing at work - but I hope it's not discussing abortion rights. Honestly, there are just certain things that are not safe for the work place. Politics of any stripe is among them.

Does remind me of the transphobic discussion I had with a coworker awhile back. The discussion haunts me, because I didn't say half the things I wanted to say. I thought about them after the fact - like two months after the fact.
Transphobia is actually just the fear of strange penis sightings and/or presence of in the girl's restrooms )

***

In other news, or going back to Star Wars. Mark Hamil posted a picture of himself, Harrison Ford, and Eric Idle partying in the 1970s or early 80, in London while filming The Empire Strike's Back (which came out in 1980 - so it would have to have been either 1978 or 1979.). Apparently the Rolling Stones also showed up at the party, but aren't in the picture which was taken by Carrie Fisher.

My response to Hamil was:

"So basically the Star Wars cast, the Rolling Stones and Monty Python partied in the late 1970s (I'm guessing 1979?) - gotta love the 70s."

It is kind of cool. To have your fav's cross paths. I mean Hamil crossed paths with George Harrison, who were fans of each other.
shadowkat: (Default)
2023-02-24 09:20 pm

Pitfalls of Being in Fandoms

1. The Pitfall of Being a Fan of a Series of Books or of a writer, only to realize they are a complete asshole.

* I've spent more time this week than I wanted to ...thinking about JKR and the Harry Potter Fandom.

Wales stumbled onto JKR on Twitter via the NY Times. There was a fight with NY Times, who for reasons...had decided to JKR. This erupted into a fight on Twitter. Wales, not reading the article, dove in and said they should pick their battles and defend women's reproductive rights, and well when I tried to explain, she clarified that this including women who no longer had access to their reproductive organs. To which, I had to clarify further.
explaining why JKR is a transphobic bitch to someone who is unfamiliar with her work and the fandom )

* Penguin Puffin is apparently publishing the works of Roald Dahl, who as you may or may not already know is an anti-semitic asshole or was one. Read more... )

* And..I found out Twitter that..Scott Adams the cartoonist/creator of Dilbert is a racist Trump Supporter - and 80 newspapers pulled his cartoon due to racist content.

[ETC: To clarify? He was dropped from newspapers because of a racist rant on Youtube, not because of his satirical cartoon. The racist rant kind of changed how everyone perceived the satire in his cartoon.

Adams rant can be found HERE - if you wish to see it for yourselves.

The majority of newspaper publishers (with the possible exception of the right wing publications) considered it a racist rant and kicked Adams to the curb. Newspapers have dropped dilbert comic strip after a racist rant by its creator.]

Sigh. Remember when Dilbert was cool and innocuous? I've admittedly not been following it since well the early 00s if that. I stopped reading the Sunday funnies sometime around 2008. [ ETC: Not because I disliked Dilbert - I just no longer read print newspapers. I get a digital version of the NY Times. I'm not reading any Sunday comics at the moment - haven't for the last IDK, ten years? ]

2. The Pitfalls of Being in a Long-Running Fandom - Star Wars

Star Wars has always been a dicey fandom to participate in, but that is most likely true of all fandoms? It was even dicey in the 1980s when it more or less began. (The first film came out in 1977, so technically 1977.)

Got into a lengthy discussion/debate on a friend's journal posting about Andor, which I enjoyed. But isn't for everyone. Unlike most of the Star Wars stuff - it's geared towards the over-twenty-five group. Read more... )

Star Wars is a long-running fandom. Roughly doing the math? It's about forty years old? (Let's see I saw it at 11 or 12, I'm fifty-five now, so about forty.) And like most long-running fandoms, there's disagreement over well everything. And so much of it has to do with when you entered the fandom (if you ever truly did?), and the degree to which you invested, why, etc. Also what you watched, what is canon, what is good, what isn't good, what works, what doesn't, what makes a true fan, etc. And people are fannish in different ways - which I keep trying to explain to folks.

Not everyone likes to interact with other fans, some people are private about it. (I know I am.) Nor do you have to see everything or read everything to be a fan of a series. People can pick and choose. Not everyone feels the need to be a completist.

There's this view in fandom that if you're not "fanatical" - you aren't a fan. Not true. There are degrees. For example, you can be a fan of Star Wars and dislike the films. There's enough content out there now, that you could just be a fan of the comic books and be fine.
Read more... )

Comparing other long-running fandoms to Star Wars

The Buffy fandom had two problems, one is an asshole creator. At least George Lucas to date isn't an asshole. Although give it time, he's human, and from what I saw in the Industrial Light and Magic Documentary - could be a beast to work with. It took about twenty some years for all the dirt about Whedon to come out.

The other, like Star Wars, Buffy had content across multiple mediums. While lovely, it does pose issues with a fandom. The fandom fights over what is canon to the fandom - whenever you have multiple mediums. Read more... )

Doctor Who in Comparison to Star Wars

If Star Wars and Buffy are bad in this regard. Try Doctor Who. This is a 60 year old series. Worse, it's a 60 year series with large gaps between content, and different actors playing the lead role, different creators, different writers, and different companions. Read more... )

General Hospital - A Day-Time Soap Opera that is Celebrating it's 60th Anniversary next month, has the same problem.

60 years of a soap opera isn't going to be seen by everyone. It's impossible. Some fans may have seen all of it. Most will have seen sections. Read more... )

***

I can go on and on with examples. Star Trek has this problem, as does Battle Star Galatica (it has two competing versions), as does the Marvel Universe - the films vs the animation vs the comics canons. I am not a fan of the animated canon - the X-men, irritated me. I prefer the comics. But there are those who only saw the animated versions. Or only the movies.
Or only the television shows.

It makes navigating these fandoms dicey at best. And is among the many reasons I've often been leery of joining them.

It's late. Off to bed. [Sorry for the typos and leaving you with a rough draft of this post. I edited, so should be better now.]
shadowkat: (Default)
2022-12-04 08:48 pm

Andor - a Review

Finished Andor finally on Disney +. The series is twelve episodes in length, each episode is about an hour in length. The last episode has a big teaser at the end of the credits that connects the series to Rogue One, and Star Wars: A New Hope. (No, it's not a person or droid so much as an activity, so no worries or anticipation there, at least.)

It stars Diego Luna, with Stellan Skarsgaard (Alec Skarsgaard's father), Forrest Whitacker, Geneive O'Reilly, Andy Serkis, Alan Tudyk (he plays the droid K-2SO) and Fiona Shaw rounding out the cast. vague spoilers? I'm never sure what are considered spoilers - so cutting just in case ) It's set between Revenge of the Sith and Rogue One, and follows the escapades of one of the members of the Rogue One team, Cassian Andor (portrayed by Diego Luna in both films). It's his backstory.

Part character piece, part thriller, part political espionage film - it kind of blends and blurs genres as it goes. For the most part, it works, but there are pacing issues here and there (which apparently are par for the course with these shows), vague spoilers again ) The action scenes are loud, the parlor speaking scenes too quiet.

When we're focused on the dynamic and engaging Cassian Andor - the minutes fly on by. Stellan Skarsgaard's character is also rather dynamic. Both are kind of anti-heroes in different ways. Read more... )

It does have some other interesting and captivating characters - Read more... )The action takes place in multiple places and planets, and clearly they had a large production budget or very good special effects.

My only quibble with it - is the political maneuverings going on with Read more... ) They all mumble, and I had troubles following it or focusing on it. It was boring. There was a lot of pointless chit-chat and talking around things. I'm not certain Star Wars lends itself well to the political bits. Bablyon 5 - it's not. Bab 5 is among the very few sci-fi shows that I think handled political maneuvering and espionage well. The others kind of flirt with it, but don't quite handle it well. Farscape did handle it better than most. But Bab 5 was by far the best in that department.

Read more... )

But other than that, it's rather good. Compelling. And by far the best thing I've seen in the Star Wars franchise since maybe Force Awakens.

Diego Luna holds the story together well, and has the charisma to lead the series. Stellan Skarsgard does as well. And the rest of the cast is equally good.
shadowkat: (Default)
2022-11-26 10:12 pm

This, That and the other thingamig.

1. Stop Making Employees Turn on their Cameras at Work.
excerpt )

2.) On Linked In - I saw this...which I can't find, but it said - "Be kind. It's more important to be kind to others than to be right. To see their needs, and help them."

It also had a post on how leaders - delegate, listen, encourage, and mentor. Bosses - micromanage, criticize, talk, and direct.

3). Andor is excellent. Four episodes in and I'm impressed. They have Stellan Skarsgard, Diego Luna, and Fiona Shaw.

The production scale is on line with the better films within the series.
It reminds me a little of Rogue One - which is the film that it is a prequel/spin-off from. Personally, I rank the Star Wars films, Empire, Star Wars, Rogue One, Return, Force, Last Jedi, Rise, Solo, the prequels.

It's about a man who is hunting for his sister, but he runs into trouble doing so - and ends up with the Empire pursuing him. Somewhere along the way he gets drafted by Stellan Skarsgard to help with a big heist...and we go from there.

The cast is excellent, the writing is excellent, and so is the production.

It is by far the best thing I've seen done in the Star Wars franchise since maybe Rogue One? Or Force Awakens?

4) Chidi saw Wakanda Forever a week or so ago. I asked him about it a week or so ago, I think. It was before he took off for the holiday at any rate.

Chidi: Eh, it was okay.
Me: Didn't you see it in 4D?
Chidi: Yup.
Me: What is 4D?
Chidi: you get sprinkled with water, smell things, and your chair moves around...you basically feel everything in the movie.
Me: So, an amusement park ride?
Chidi: Yeah..but frankly, if I'd not seen it 4D, I'd have gone to sleep. It kept me amused. These superhero films are all alike.
Me: And yet you loved Top Gun.

[Sorry couldn't resist. From my perspective, all Tom Cruise films are alike.]

Chidi is a film snob. And why is it all film snobs love gory horror flicks?
Wales is the same way.

I've yet to meet a film snob who isn't into horror flicks. Specifically gory slasher and torture flicks.

I wonder about humanity some times.

I plan on seeing Wakanda Forever with movie buddy tomorrow. (Note not Wales - that would be horrific. Wales can't handle loud noises. She was jumpy during TAR. She would drive me nuts during Wakanda Forever - I wouldn't be able to watch the movie.) When seeing a movie - it is very important to pick the right person to see it with. Unfortunately, we don't have our pick of movie theaters. UA Court Street closed down without warning a week ago.
I remember when it went up - there were petitions from the entitled white folks living in Brooklyn Heights against it - they were afraid it would bring in the wrong element. Wales and I argued and scoffed at them. Movie buddy, Wales, and I all loved the theater. Was it perfect? No. But it was fun to watch action flicks in - people shouted at the screen, applauded, and you had a nice diverse group. It was mainly a Black Theater, in that Black Americans came by the busload to see films there, and often went there after shopping downtown Brooklyn. The gentrification of Brooklyn is slowly pushing them further East and North.

The pandemic is probably the reason it closed. Shame. Of the two, I'd have rather kept Court over Cobble Hill, but Cobble Hill is a small art house theater, and not as pricey to maintain, so survived.

Anyhow, suffice it to say - we will not be seeing the film in either 3D or 4D. I want to see a movie, not go on an amusement park ride. If I wanted an amusement park ride - I'd go to an amusement park. Also I don't particularly want to be beaten up by my chair during a superhero film. The friend who saw Rise of Skywalker in 4D (among the first to made for that - which by the way explains my issues with Rise of Skywalker), said she didn't particularly like being beaten up by her chair during the movie. Some people do. People are weird. I'm convinced Chidi has some form of ADHD, he cannot focus on things - he has to constantly jump about.

5. Mathew Perry's Memoir...I think it's called Friends, Lovers, and the Big Terrible Thing. Not positive. Been listening to it on audible - which I heartily recommend. It's like having a one-sided conversation or listening to someone tell you their story - with all the rambling and nonconsecutive jumping around that happens when people do that. I'm not sure it works reading it - though. He's a good writer, he just needs a good editor. I'm not sure they exist in publishing houses any longer. You kind of have to hunt them down in the wild, hog tie them, and convince them to work for you at a hefty fee.

Anyhow, what hits me about it - is how the man drank or did opioids pretty much all the time. Read more... )
shadowkat: (Default)
2022-10-09 06:34 pm

Cooler with lots of sunshine

But I've been meandering through most of the weekend with brain fog. It doesn't stay, it kind of weaves in and out - the brain fog - so I'm not really certain who the culprit is.

Finally met up with Wales - which was a minor miracle of sorts. Read more... )

**

Still watching the BBC's documentary series on Africa, which I find comforting and informative. It shows both the wonder and brutality of nature, often simultaneous. And beyond beautiful in its majesty. But also depicts how the planet is changing constantly.

I'm slowly falling in love with Africa's majestic and dangerous beauty. I'd love to go there - but am partly scared to. I love the natural world. It leaves me breathless. And all I need to do is look at it - to see God.

Some, I suppose see the face of God or lack thereof in people, but I see God in the natural world and the infinite expanse of space.

I've come up for a metaphor for my life - I'm a dung beetle attempting to push camel dung up a sand dune in the middle of the Sahara.

**

Alaska Daily pilot was good, and it appears to be worth watching, simultaneously reminding me of why I could have been a really good investigative journalist and why I chose not to. (I have the same pit-bull mentality and intellectual curiosity, also I will drive folks nuts with questions and dig. But I don't like conflict, and I don't like destroying lives even if it is for a good cause.)

Anyhow, I like the lead character played by Swank and the supporting cast.

***

Still working my way through Rings of Power - mainly because I love the character of Galaderial, and find various others fascinating. Also, I'm curious about the back stories of various bits referred to in Lord of the Rings.

Rings of Power isn't exactly published fanfic - for two reasons, 1) the rights were acquired by Amazon to all of Tolkien's published and "unpublished" works, or the side materials. (Many of which I saw on display at the JP Morgan Library back in 2018. The artwork on the covers and inside Tolkien's novels was done by JRR Tolkien - he was an accomplished artist. He designed his own maps, drew the characters, and designed his own covers.) Tolkien was kind of brilliant - or had a brilliant imagination - he created his own elfish language from old English, his own folklore, mythos, and world - and started it at an early age. 2) They are accessing Tolkien's other works [ETA - apparently I'm wrong, it's just the finished published works (Lord of the Rings, Hobbit) along with all the Appendices to those works, the estate won't give anyone the rights to his unfinished stories] and Tolkien created a detailed enough world - that it kind of writes itself.

I'm not just dipping into Tolkien (one of my two childhood fan obsessions), I'm dipping back into Star Wars. I picked up from Amazon on the Kindle, a romance novel about Princess Leia and Han Solo's marriage and courtship post Return of the Jedi, or rather what happened to them immediately after that movie ended. I've always been curious - and kind of want to read a story about it. I found it via Smart Bitches - it's called... Star Wars: The Princess and the Rogue by Beth Evans.

I've always been willing to buy published fanfic relating to Star Wars, weirdly it's the only fandom that I've done that with - possibly because Lucas left a lot off the screen, and I always wanted more.
shadowkat: (Default)
2022-07-09 10:38 pm

Everything Everywhere All At Once...(and other crap)

Finished watching Everything Everywhere All at Once starring Michael Yeoh, and directed/written by Dainel Kwan. It co-stars an unrecognizable Jamie Lee Curtis. [It's now available for rental or purchase on "On Demand", Amazon, and various others.]

The description doesn't quite fit the film. "When an interdimensional rift ruptures reality, a hero must access her newfound powers and set things to rights."

That's not it. I mean it is? But not really? And it is admittedly a very hard film to describe. I amazed it got made, I can just imagine the pitch.

Chidi (coworker) didn't like it, nor did his friends. And I get why. But I ...found it to be surprisingly comforting. It kind of made me feel better?

It is a film that most likely does not work for literal thinkers or anyone who thinks in a concrete matter of fact sort of way. But I don't think like that - I think metaphorically, and in patterns, so it worked for me? I don't know. It just did.

It's a long film. Funny in places, and moving in others. With lots of action and visual jokes, some that are rather crude and phallic in a pseudo-feminist sort of way? But at its heart is a mother/daughter story, about two people who feel very alone and isolated, finding each other somehow.

At any rate - it poses the existential view - "if nothing matters, if we are just specs in a multi-universe, rocks on a cliff, than nothing we do matters - and we should just cease to exist" - then provides the counterpoint, that within all of that are particles of joy, of meaning, of connection. That none of us are truly alone, and there are people who will always love us and care for us. And there are other ways to fight - through kindness. You can let go, but also follow and hold on tight at the same time. And you can feel everything all at once.

At any rate it comforted me. Which was unexpected. I thought it would give me a headache.

***

Mother has informed me that she thinks my father will die this week. My brother has made arrangements to fly up or rather down on Wednesday. But she doesn't want me to come yet. There are reasons for this - unlike my brother, I don't get much time off. I have three weeks of vacation time left, two personnel days, and three bereavement days. She doesn't know when they can have the funeral and she wants me to come at Christmas time (she doesn't want to spend Christmas alone.)
Read more... )
So.

I really could use a couple of real hugs about now. Tight warm hugs. The type that knocks the wind out of you.

I read an article today that explained why I've been feeling kind of ill the last few weeks. Upset stomach. IBS. Headaches. Fatigue. Hot flashese, more than usual. Low energy. Lack of focus. Irritable.

Apparently ... There are Physical Effect of Grief. I guess this is kind of obvious. But I didn't realize it. Also my Dad's still here so why...but I guess I'm losing him and well, grief.
excerpt )

Had this the last two weeks now - and was wondering what was wrong with me. Was it the metroformin? Menopause? Nah. Grief. Good to know.

Off to order more CBD, I guess. (I get them via Winged)

Have a horrible headache, combination tension sinus headache. Took a herbal sleep aid. (I can't do anything stronger than herbal. It will make me ill. So Melotonin, Chamomille, Lavender, and L-Thenanine, is about the best I can manage.)

All of which is made worse - by the fact that I've no clue what to do about my family situation next week. This is the main source of my stress - not having a clue what to about anything. I've gotten loads of advice - none of it remotely useful. I feel like I'm being pulled in various directions or everything everywhere all at once. [Do not give me more advice on this subject. Also the decision has been made by my family - that I'm to stay put until further notice.]

***

It was a pretty day today. Did take a brief walk to the fruit and veggie store (digestive track was too troublesome to do more than that) and got ice cream (I know, don't care. It made me feel better. )

Also finished Obi Wan Kenobi on Disney Plus, which I enjoyed but with one caveat. I could not see a good portion of the action sequences, and Obi Wan's reunion with Anakin due to the darkness of the film. It was as if it was all filmed in the same dark caverns as Stranger Things, Game of Thrones, Dune and one too many sci-fi films to count. Stop this. I need to be able to see the bloody thing to enjoy it. It's headache inducing - literally - it gave me a headache.

Other than that - I enjoyed it. Read more... )
shadowkat: (Default)
2020-09-16 06:39 pm
Entry tags:

Day #17 of 30 Day Film Challenge

Day #17 of 30 Day Film Challenge.

Favorite Film Sequel

First, thank you for all of your comments. Sorry I've not been replying - no real time, and I can't focus on much at the moment on anything - work is about all that I can currently manage. And that's giving me headaches.

Hmmm - when I went to find my movie on youtube, discovered it's playing at various movie theaters. Which is odd. Are movie theaters open now? Are they playing it because they can't find anything else? Has my computer decided to jump back to the 1980s...because can I go too? (There's a few classmates I'd like to neuter or smack upside the head.)

Oh. Apparently it's the 40th Anniversary of this particular film or it was in May, they had to wait until now to celebrate - because, well, we were all locked down in May. We are still now - just not all of us, and in various stages.

Anyhow...this is the rare sequel that I actually preferred to the original film and in this specific series? It's actually my favorite film in the series, period. Most sequels tend to be let downs. Unless they are stand-alone films like the Marvel films. Few build well on their source material. And in the case of this film - not only did it build well on the source material, it expanded on it, and overtook it - and out shone it. If it hadn't, I honestly wonder if we'd have had the franchise that we do today.

Another tidbit on this film? I saw it in 1980. I was eagerly anticipating it. And remember my brother and I persuading my father to take us. We saw it at the Midland Theater in Kansas City, a huge theater, about an hour from our home - on the balcony. It's the same theater that we saw the silent film presentation of Napeolean, and various musicals. It was an event, and it was amazing.

shadowkat: (Grieving)
2020-09-15 06:23 pm
Entry tags:

Day #16 - of the 30 day film challenge

Day #16 of 30 Day Film Challenge.

These prompts aren't getting any easier...

A Film that is Personal To You



I saw the film in 1977.

We were the first kids on our block and among my friends to see it. We saw it opening weekend.

I was around 12 years old at the time. A skinny little girl with pig tails and long legs.

And we saw it the summer before we moved to Kansas City from West Chester, PA. It was to be our very last summer in Pennsylvania.

Prior to Star Wars - my idea of science fiction was horror films.Read more... )
When I looked at this selection - the first film that popped into my head was Star Wars. I tried to think of another film, a more obscure, cool film, but no...the only film that came to mind was Star Wars for all the reasons outlined above.
shadowkat: (Default)
2020-08-02 06:48 pm

Television reviews...

1. I May Destroy You - the Michaela Cole British Dramedy that is premiering on HBO this month...and got rave reviews in the UK Guardian and New York Times made me realize that my taste has somewhere along the line greatly diverged from today's television critics and pop culture's.

I tried to watch it. I made it through about three episodes before I gave up. It's well...an HBO series, and like 98% of HBO's series, feels the need to go towards graphic hyper-realism. Actually, in regards to this series? That may well be an understatement. Here, you feel like a voyeur, and not always in a good way - although I'm not sure there is a good way..

Micaela Cole is definitely brave - Spoilers )

So, once again, I find myself at odds with the television critics, and realizing how subjective an art-form television truly is.

2. Beecham House - it airs on PBS, and is one of the more compelling things I've seen on Masterpiece Theater - from the BBC in recent years. It's less soapy than Dowton, and does a better job with diversity than Sandition. I gave up on Sandition - since I adored the novel I read, and this kind of drifted away from it. Howards End - I also kind of gave up on. Beecham House is a bit more compelling and far more happens in it.

John Beecham and his family have made a life for themselves in Delhi. He has a son by a native of the country, who is also a member of an important family. And as a result, he must keep his son hidden along with the truth.
Unfortunately, an old friend shows up from London, and from the East India Company - which John has long since left. The friend who initially saves John's life, appears to have nefarious reasons for doing so. Nothing is quite as it seems, and the series revolves around political intrigue and a mystery. Well-cast, and compelling - also rather easy to follow for a historical - it's better than expected. It is directed and written by an Indian director/writer, and filmed in Delhi.

Takes place during the French occupation of India.

3. The Mandalorian this is written and directed by John Faverau and stars various people, including Nick Nolte in voice acting role, Takiti Wakiti, Carl Weathers, and various others. It's a space western that takes place in the Star Wars Universe shortly after the Rebellion won in Return of the Jedi. The Mandalorian is part of guild of bounty hunters, in his sect, they wear body armor and never remove it. He's kind of a gunslinger of sorts. Not unlike Boba Fett, but tougher. Needed more money that he's received with smaller bounties - he goes after a big score from an ex-Imperial leader. And given little to no information on what it is.

It's well-written, fun, easy to follow, and fits neatly within the Star Wars Universe. Faverau unlike Rian Johnson and JJ Abrahams, actually is a decent story-teller. He keeps things simple, and is a huge Star Wars geek, who fell in love with Lucas' world at an early age. Lucas, while not a great story-teller, is excellent at world-building. (If you enjoyed the stories in Star Wars, Empire and Force Awakens - you can thank Lawrence Kasdan for that.) Lucas is among the greats at setting the stage and building a world. But not that great at direction or story-telling. Faverau is good at story-telling, dialogue and direction, he doesn't need to worry about the world - someone else took care of it. Faverau as proven by the Marvelverse is particularly good at playing in someone else's world. Not everyone is.

Star Wars due in part to how well Lucas built the world, and how open-ended he left it, lends itself quite well to fanfiction, franchise writing, and spin-offs. You can do a lot with Star Wars. And unlike Star Trek which has a rather rigid rule-book (just ask Ron Moore and the folks who tried to break the rules in DS9 etc), Star Wars is fairly open-ended. You're not stuck with the Federation. People don't have to be moral or nice. There's no political correctness. It can be gritty and quite dark, or the exact opposite. It's in some ways more like our own - in part because Lucas wrote it as a parable on the Vietnam War and wanted it to be gritty, yet hopeful.

You don't need to be a fan to follow this - I don't think. But I also wouldn't know - since Star Wars was among my first fandoms or film franchises that I fell in love with. being a star wars fan, why this is better than the last three movies, and what I want in a series )

4. Heart and Souls - old Robert Downey Jr. flick, circa 1980s, with Kyra Sedwick, Alfre Woodward, Charles Grodin...

It's not as good as I remembered. And I apparently blended it and the one he was in with Cybil Shepard and Peter Gallagher in my head. They are two separate films. Read more... )

I saw it on HBO of all places.
shadowkat: (Default)
2020-04-05 09:50 pm
Entry tags:

Rise of Skywalker - Movie Review

And a break from our previous programming to discuss a movie. I finally saw the last Star Wars film or rather the last one in the George Lucas series of films featuring the "Skywalkers" aka "The Skywalker Sage". It FINALLY popped up "On Demand" - so I rented it for $5.99 from Optimum. I have it until Tuesday. 48 hour rental. Gotta love technology. (I was beginning to wonder if I'd have to subscribe to Disney + to see it. Although I may subscribe anyhow - just to see all the old movies and animated series - which I find insanely comforting. I wonder if Darby O'Gill and the Little People is on it? That's the musical with a very young Scean Connery that I saw as a kid at school way back in the 1970s.)

Anyhow, Rise of Skywalker wasn't quite as bad as I expected. I kind of enjoyed it actually. It was for the most part, a fun, thoughtless, fluffy fast-action piece of entertainment. The kind of thing you lose yourself in for a bit and forget later. (In short the perfect distraction for well anyone who feels like they are stuck in the psychological horror flick from a mundane hell.) So, as a result,it held my attention. (I had a lot of fun snarking at it, and rolling my eyes at various parts.) Being spoiled for most if not all of the plot points, most likely helped. (I knew who Rey was for example.) Also the fact that I came in with VERY low expectations mainly because practically everyone on my correspondence list that saw it - either disliked it a great deal or were ambivalent. My co-workers kind of enjoyed it, except for Chidi who prefered Last Jedi.

If you want a fun action movie, with lots and lots of action, a simple plot structure, some banter, and lovely special effects and visuals - this is your movie.
It does help if you've seen the other movies -- otherwise I think you'd be lost. This is NOT a stand-a-lone flick. It also helps if you weren't heavily invested in the thematic scope of Last Jedi and the side characters Last Jedi developed or in love with that movie.

I sort of fall in the middle regarding Rise, in that I enjoyed it for what it was - a JJ Abrahms film. From a critical angle? It's not a very good movie. The plot doesn't quite track from Last Jedi. Although to be fair, Last Jedi doesn't quite track from Force Awakens either. There are moments in it that are played as high drama, but are well, just plain silly. I rolled my eyes or grinned at the cheesiness. It was weirdly comforting.

The special effects are uneven - mainly due to the fact that they made the decision to intersperse Carrie Fisher's Princess Leia throughout the film, in some shots, it looked like Carrie, in others it looked like a CJI version of Carrie and felt off somehow. This kind of skewed the effects. At various points, I got thrown out of the story by the feeling of looking at obvious CGI. Try as we might - it's still not quite possible to digitize a human in a way that looks real to the naked eye. But I was expecting this - from various reviews that I'd read, so it came as no great surprise.

Before going into spoilers, I'll state this - I agree with rosegriffiths, who stated in her review of the film, that Rise kind of has some of the same problems as Last Jedi but in another way. Where Jedi had something new to say, Rise kind of repeats what was already said in the first trilogy of films (and better said in those films for that matter). Where Jedi's plot was overly busy and at times difficult to follow because its doing too much at the same time, Rise's is almost too simple and difficult to follow - because it doesn't quite track with what came before, and it like Jedi kind of loses the characters in the mix. But, I kind of cared more about the characters in Jedi than in Rise, which felt sort of rushed, while Jedi had better and more isolated character moments. In this way the two films sort of remind me of Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. Empire did a better job of getting across the character moments, while Return was a bit too focused on wrapping up the plot and I kind of lost the characters in the mix (also Return like Rise was a bit too silly in places for words.)

spoilers )

Overall a mixed bag. It felt very much like an amusement ride of a movie. But there were some good moments here and there and overall, it was easier to follow than the previous effort from a plot perspective, if not as well done in regards to fight sequences and isolated character moments. Jedi was better on a character and thematic level, Rise better on a plot and overall action level.
shadowkat: (work/reading)
2019-02-06 08:33 pm

Shipping and Fandom

There's an article about fanfiction, fandom and shipping in the new romance magazine Blush, that's just been launched. (Got it via Smartbitches. )

1. Critiques?
tiny print and what is cult not cult )
2. Wrong-headed shipping or shipping bad guys with heroes...such as Kylo Ren and Rei, or Draco Malfoy and Hermonine, or Angelus and Buffy.

Quibbles aside..I don't ship the way the person being interviewed does. I don't really do or tend to do "wrong-headed" shipping. With a few rare exceptions -- and usually those are one's that fit the story thread and are canon. I don't tend to ship counter to the canon.
Read more... )

3. Canon vs. non-canonical shipping (not to be confused with m/m or f/f slash - which can be canonical or non-canonical depending on the series.).

Per the above, I ship with the canon or with the story-thread. And don't have a lot of patience for shipping against the story-thread. It's rare that I'll ship characters that aren't going to end up together, aren't written to be romantic love interests, and aren't written to be friends. And if they are friends or lovers or married and the story-thread leads to their inevitable separation and the demise of their relationship in a convincing manner that tracks -- and shows why, doesn't tell, I'll go along with it. (See Buffy/Angel above as an example. The writers successfully broke that ship up for me in S1 Angel.)
Read more... )

4. Where the line should be drawn regarding shipping...

shippers who try to influence the writing of the show )

5. My ships or the one's that I have shipped the hardest in recent years and still do to an extent?

Canonical Ships:
Read more... )

Nothing new though. I don't ship much any longer. Shipping for television shows is ridiculously painful.

Non-canonical?
Read more... )
But I can't say I was passionate about any of them.
shadowkat: (Default)
2019-01-26 07:13 pm

Youtub Podcasts...

1. Stephen King on writing, films, etc. )

Why do readers always ask writers where they get their ideas from?

I was asked this as well.

Answer? No clue, they just come to me. From the world around me, from what I've seen, heard, thought about...read.

Usually it's like a movie unfolding inside my head or that I'm channeling.

And I have to put it on paper to make sense of it. Or tell it aloud. I used to just tell it aloud.

Whether anyone else wants to read it or hear it, doesn't seem to matter. I remember being surprised that this doesn't happen with everyone. You don't have stories constantly unfolding every few months in your head? Weird.

What King states? "I'm working on a novel and I don't know if it will ever get done. I don't plot, it unfolds as I write it. I don't know it will be a novel until it gets done, until I finish it."

I'm the same way. Sometimes I finish, sometimes I don't.

Some writers know everything ahead of time, like John Irving writes the last line first -- I tried that once, it doesn't work for me. I lose interest. As King puts it, "It's like eating the icing on the cake first." Why eat the cake after that?

Another good bit..."when writing a character, you have to look, you have to see, you have to be curious about people." One of the problems he has with third rate fiction is the writer puts the character through the paces but they don't really grow or evolve, you don't get to see the character.
And his critique of 50 Shades - I agree with. "The problem with it is that Ana, the main character, really only has two default settings -- if things get good? Oh my!, and if they are bad, "Oh god". And it's every other line." He's right. That was my problem and I read all three of them. Also, he's right -- what works in them is the sex scenes (also the text messaging is hilarious) -- this is actually the critique that I'd make of James Patterson's novels as well, the action scenes are fine, but it reads like an outline with characters that are rather stock and have no depth.


2. How the Original Star Wars was saved in the editing room )

They show various bits that were in the unedited version and what happened when they were deftly removed and the film improved considerably. Also explain the number of edits and rewrites. The film that Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, etc made wasn't the one that aired -- a lot of scenes they did never made it to the screen. Small wonder that they were shocked by its success. It was a bad movie that a good editor made into a good one.

(Last Jedi suffered from bad editing, a lot of that film made no sense, and it didn't follow the arc set up in the first film. It's a mess because the director had too much control and JJ Abrahams and others ...didn't take a stronger hand in the editing room. I know a lot of folks liked it, but most of the people I've met either went to sleep during it, or were completely lost. I'm a long-time fan and I could barely follow it and felt it drug in places.)
shadowkat: (Default)
2017-12-29 11:03 pm
Entry tags:

Last Jedi Links and a bit on what Last Jedi and Doctor Who have in common

1. From elisi - This is not Going to Go The Way You Think - The Last Jedi is a Subversive AF and I Am Here For it.

spoilers ahoy )
* I kinda love Whil Wheaton -- his blog post I agree with for the most part. (I thought the action sequences went on too long. And no, cramming two movies into one isn't always a good thing.) - This is non-spoilery.

* We Need to Talk About Last Jedi Controversy

Read more... )
* Crazy Long Rolling Stone Interview with Mark Hamil and Rian Johnson

*
The Star Wars Last Jedi Backlash Controversy Explained


Some interesting passages from this link are below:


The Last Jedi is more or less a metaphorical depiction of the baby boomer generation (a generation that featured a lot of white dudes — good and bad — in positions of power) handing off leadership roles to younger generations, particularly millennials, who tend to be more racially diverse and to advocate having more women in positions of power. The series’ millennial good guys are a young white woman, a black man, a woman of Asian descent, and a Latino man, while its millennial bad guys are two white dudes.


spoilers )
shadowkat: (work/reading)
2017-09-25 09:24 pm
Entry tags:

The Princess Diarist by Carrie Fisher - Review and Meta

[Before going into the review, for those following the trials and tribulations of my air conditioning. After two sleepless nights, no, make that three, Super Installed new A/C and removed existing, broken A/C, which barely kept the room at 78 degrees at night. (Granted it could have been worse.) It's been between 26-32 C or 80-90 F the last few days, with 70-80 at night. ]

Finally finished reading The Princess Diarist by Carrie Fisher. This was published in the Fall of 2016, shortly before her untimely death. It is the last thing she wrote, and an interesting bookend to her writing career, which was heavily colored by insane celebrity status she achieved when she starred in a low budget sci-fi 1970s film entitled "Star Wars".

The book unlike her previous works is essentially about how Star Wars affected her life and changed it. And how she dealt with it. It's also about an ill-timed affair with a married co-star that she'd been infatuated with at the time. And how that threw her for a loop, considering her father had left her mother, along with his two young children via an affair with Elizabeth Taylor.

On a much larger scale, it's also about how the toxicity of our celebrity obsessed culture. And how starring in a little low-budget sci-fi film at the age of 19 can turn one's life upside down for good or ill.

I'm not sure if you are under the age of say, 46 or 47, you can completely understand the cultural phenomenon "Star Wars" is and was? And while Fisher attempts to explain this in her book, I'm wondering if you kinda had to be there? Not necessarily in Fisher, Hamil, and Ford's shoes, but around at the time, and cognizant of what was happening around you. Knowing that movies well weren't like that and this was a game-changer, a watershed moment in human history. A demonstration of just how certain advances in technology can change cinema forever. And a preview of what was to come.

Before Star Wars, the only film that had people lining up for it was possibly Gone With the Wind. And it wasn't around blocks. Star Wars created the term - "blockbuster", which Fisher describes as meaning a line that is broken up by blocks. It busts the blocks. The lines for Star Wars from the time it opened until roughly six or seven months later were around blocks. I remember my father driving us to two hours away to see it. We'd never done that before. It was different than anything we'd seen -- nothing was quite like it. George Lucas redefined the cinema experience with Star Wars, he'd created surround sound, special effects that no one had seen before, and incorporated robots, puppetry, and creatures in his film that weren't obviously humans in cheap makeup. You had space-cruisers rocketing through space shooting each other. Lucas had combined the popular action/adventure cinema tropes of the 1940s and 50s into one movie - he'd combined the Western with the WWII drama with the Swashbuckler. Watching Star Wars was like seeing an Errol Flynn flick, a John Wayne flick and a WWII James Garner flick all at once. And it was fun. Not scary, like most sci-fi films and television series had been, but fun. And not campy either.

Today, years later, the first film seems rather quaint, I suspect, and the special effects mediocre.
People have been perplexed by what they saw as wooden acting. Or the cheesy hair styles. But this was 1977. Back then, we had cheesy hair styles, and bell bottom pants. And well, special effects...were not as good as Star Wars.

Before Star Wars, sci-fi didn't do well at the movies. Mostly B movies. Before Star Wars, there weren't any blockbusters or event films, outside of maybe Gone with the Wind. (Wizard of OZ flopped.)
For years, Star Wars was the highest grossing film. And people could not wait for the second one.
It had a fandom to rival any fandom out there...and it had done something Doctor Who and Star Trek had yet to accomplish, it took sci-fi mainstream.

Fisher's book can broken up into three segments.

The first -- explains how she ended up in Star Wars.
She briefly details her audition, which she has just a vague recollection of. Apparently Brian De Palma and Lucas were doubling up their auditions. De Palma was auditioning for Carrie and Lucas for Star Wars. Lucas was the least talkative of the two. Fisher notes how this was not her first role in a film. At the age of 16, she was in Shampoo, as Lee Grant's promisicous daughter, who sleeps with Grant's lover, Warren Beatty. And prior to that she did her mother's shows. A high school drop out, due to going on tour or doing Broadway with Mom, Carrie ended up going to the Center for Performing Arts in England. And from there, auditioned for the role of Princess Leia. She notes how she practiced for her second audition with her friend Miguel Ferrar, the cousin of George Clooney, and son of Rosemary Clooney, who'd tried out for the Han Solo role. Then, Fisher goes on to explain how she ended up infatuated with Harrison Ford, and how they fell into bed together...resulting in an awkward, secretive, three month affair -- that up until now, no one knew about but Fisher and Ford.

This is prelude to the actual diaries...which make up the center section of the book, and are a bittersweet May-December romance between two actors, far from home, and in their first leading roles in what they believed at the time to be cult low budget sci-fi film that few people would see. (Because that's what sci-fi films were like in the 1970s, they were cult efforts that few people saw. No one expected this film to do well. How could they have known? The cast, with the exception of Alec Guiness, was unknowns, and even Guiness was hardly star power. And it was science fiction. Not to mention low-budget. Fisher and the cast were paid to scale, $500 a week. Flown economy class. And told to take care of their own accomodations.) When Carrie Fisher and Harrison Ford had their affair they honestly didn't think it was a big deal. Fisher was infatuated with Ford. She never expected him to be interested in her, let alone kiss her, so when they end up in bed together, she finds herself starring at him and wondering, WTF? How in the heck did this happen? And where do we go from here?
She describes it in the book and in interviews afterwards as a three-month one-night stand, and a product of a location shoot. And insists that as far as she knows, Harrison hadn't done that with anyone else before or since. He, also, most likely regretted it later. He'd thought her more experienced than she actually was.

The diaries are well written, and touching. At various points, nineteen year old Fisher wonders why she tries to connect with others, if it's even possible to do so? She's introspective, flailing, and not sure of her own feelings. Is this love? How can it be? She barely knows him. Does he feel the same way about her? She asks, and gets nowhere. The most she gets is the conversation the two have on-screen in Empire Strikes Back, where she says "I love you" and he states, "I know". After reading the diaries...which unlike the rest of the book, are poetic and hopeful, I understood some of the odd interactions I've seen between Fisher and Ford in interviews and tribute specials. At the AFI - Fisher tells Ford during her tribute speech, "Harrison gets nervous every time I open my mouth and talk. He should be made aware as should you all, that my memory is foggy and sucks." Then later, "Harrison hates doing love scenes, okay maybe he just doesn't like doing them with me." And Ford's expression is exasperation and grumbling. I find that odd, since to my knowledge they hadn't really done any...but turns out they had, just behind the scenes.

If you read the diaries without the prelude, not sure they would make sense. They are bittersweet mainly due to what comes after. And touching in that the woman writing them fails to see her own brilliance and beauty, not to mention her compassion and insight into the human condition. What it is like to fall in love with someone who doesn't love you back or not as much as you love them. What it is like to be infatuated ...and awkward with a guy, tongue-tied. You can see why so many people fell in love with her. Yet in the book, she seems to think it was with Leia not her. And is rather confused.

Up until the final section, I'd thought this book was just about Fisher's affair with Ford, but no, it's about much more than that. The final section discusses fame and being the source or object of adoration...what it was like to have people come up to you on the street or at a convention, regale you with personnel stories about how you or rather the role you played in a film some 40 years ago, changed their lives. At first, she ate it up, wow, she thought, I'm in a movie people are flocking to see and is the biggest thing ever! Then, it overwhelmed her. They had promote the film. They thought it was a low-budget sci-fi film. I remember their promotional campaign. Ford, Hamil, and Fisher wandering about the country and the globe, from talk show to interview, touting a film that as Fisher puts it didn't require touting. Ford at first did most of the talking. None of them had ever done it before. At first, they thought they had to answer all their fan mail personally -- because they'd never received any before. And they all did it. Then realized no, you don't have to, that's what managers and public relations people do. As the years passed, Fisher was continuously thrown by her fame as Leia. And had a love-hate relationship with it.

spoilers and rather long, meta on fandom, Star Wars and Fisher )
shadowkat: (rainbow strength)
2013-10-06 06:55 pm

Personal Histories, opinions and dispatches

Because LJ is annoying the hell out of me at the moment - I'm cross-posting from here and deleting my post on LJ.

ETA: ARRGH! I can't delete the LJ entry - it won't let me. Why I don't just stay on Dreamwidth and cross-post, I don't know. At any rate sorry for the duplicate, ignore the previous one if you are on LJ and read this one instead. Or neither as the case may be.

1. The bagger at the grocery story check out line was hilarious.
Read more... )

2. I'm rather impressed with Scandal but with one caveat, the last two episodes of S1 onwards. Scandal is sort of like Farscape, the first season is not very good, but after that it takes off like a bandit. Read more... ) Pope in some respects is Walt White's counterpart and a far sexier and savvier, not to mention more likeable Glenn Close from Damages. No, it's not as smartly written as Breaking Bad, but in some respects it is a lot more fun and far more entertaining - particularly in how it satirizes, parodies and subverts various television and genre tropes in a sly and increasingly subtle ways.

3. Flashback to 1977

In the fall of 1977...more than twenty years ago today, I was about 10, 11 or 12 (don't really remember which nor do I feel like doing the math to figure it out). And awkward. how I got to be a Dwarf, granted a 5'10 female dwarf, in Snow White and the Seven Dwarves )

That same year, we saw Star Wars. Not only did we see it. We were the first people in our neighborhood and amongst our acquaintance who saw it - opening weekend no less. Now, you've got to understand this was a huge deal in 1977. Movies back then aren't like they are today. You don't get to see them on TV six months later. Or rent them. Or buy them. There were no DVDs or VHS, or DVR's or Cable. That didn't start to come about until five years later with HBO and the VCR - which I think was around 1982, can't remember. You also wanted to be the first to see the movie - or people would spoil you on the whole plot. And back then, in 1977, THIS was the movie to see according to my Dad (and shortly thereafter, EVERYONE who mattered). We drove all the way out on opening day to East Whiteland to see it - only to find out it was completely sold out (this was a three hour drive, I think we ended up going to a fancy restaurant to deal with the disappointment). So the next day, we drove all the way out to another movie theater in Exton, (albeit a much much closer one - say a one hour drive)...and saw it there.

My father was clearly desperate, which was odd, considering he was never that much into movies. And not particularly into sci-fi. Unlike my paternal grandfather, my father was not a horror fan. Possibly that's the reason? My grandfather adored science fiction films and horror - he read them and watched them voraciously.

Frankly, I remember being skeptical about the movie at the time, and somewhat resistant.Read more... )
shadowkat: (work/reading)
2012-02-10 10:44 pm

Die! Writer! Die!: When the Characters Become More Real & Important than their Creator

[This thing is chock-ful of typos and I'm too bloody tired to proof or edit it, so...I hope you'll forgive me. I'll try and edit it tomorrow. Okay it is tomorrow, later tomorrow. ]

I am irrationally attached to your characters. There. I said it. I’ve reached a point where even if I don’t like everything a work of fiction does, I believe the characters enough to the point where I almost react to them as if they are real people. Do you know this feeling? It’s where a show or a book can fuck up and do some ridiculous plot you hate and you don’t care about but you still watch or read along because their faces and I just want to hold them all so tightly. - Mark Watches regarding Buffy the Vampire Slayer TV Series third season episode "Lovers' Walk".

http://markwatches.net/reviews/2012/02/mark-watches-buffy-the-vampire-slayer-s03e08-lovers-walk/

I don't know if this is true of anyone else. But every so often I will run across something said in a book, a post online, a blog, an email, or a tv show that sort of states clearly and succinctly what I've felt, but didn't quite realize it. It's obvious of course when I read it. And I think...yes, THIS, exactly.

Today, I came home and scan read this week's Entertainment Weekly, which had a lengthy article entitled Shippers. And it talked about how people become obsessed with relationships or characters in a television series - specifically in relation to the Twilight books (which turned shipping mainstream even if it existed long before that) and television series such Castle, Bones, Supernatural and The Vampire Diaries (four shows that I don't really ship anyone in and of the four, only one that I'm still watching.) Apparently David Boreanze (ex Angel, now Booth on Bones) has become a "mainstream" shipper icon thanks to Buffy, Angel, Bones, and the fact that he is 6 foot with chiseled model good-looks. (Which probably means James Marsters is the icon for the cult underground shippers like myself...I never did like the popular boys. Geek may have gone mainstream, but I haven't.)

And of course...there's my past history with tv shows and books or stories in general where I've fallen head over heels in love with the characters. I could care less about the writer - some nasty god or goddess who takes the characters in directions that do not always meet with my approval. I've been known to write better and more interesting outcomes for my beloved characters inside my own head.

Breaking the Fourth Wall or Die Writer Die, When Characters Become More Important than the Writer, contains spoilers for Sherlock Holmes novels, Star Trek Next Generation, Buffy, Angel, and the first version of Battle Star Galatica, also mentions Star Wars. )

Off to bed. I've got a headache. I think I've been writing too much this week. None of it creative writing. I miss that. And it boggles my mind when people tell me that they need internet programs to get themselves to write daily - at least 750 words a day. I think - if you need someone or something to make you write, maybe you shouldn't be writing? Life is to short to make yourself do things in your spare time that you don't enjoy. I love writing. I write better than I breath, unfortunately this is very true. Be better health wise and spirit wise, not to mention for sleeping and singing, if I breathed better. I don't need writing courses, I need breathing courses and singing courses...I've decided I'm going to try to learn how to sing. It's never too late for that? Right?

[This post was edited this morning. I added a few bits and corrected things. Such as Rechenbach Falls.]
shadowkat: (chesire cat)
2008-04-02 08:00 pm

Completely Mindless, somewhat lame, spontaneous fandom pop culture war poll

So here's my completely mindless and spontaneous pop culture fandom war poll. The questions pertain to wars that I've seen on fan boards and live journal posts since 2002. I could only post 15 questions. So that left out a few cool ones. All the questions - I've seen heated discussions about online, believe it or not, that's why they came to mind. I mean a couple of people really hate or love some of these choices with a PASSION, almost as if their very lives depended on it. Also, you have to make a choice, no, indecisive wish-washy - oh I love everyone. Because what's the fun in that? You can skip questions of course. Outside of that? No real rules.

And since I posted it, I'll take it too. Although, you probably can already guess most of my answers. ;-) (ETA: on the last question - I wavered. I like both, and I read one more than the one I picked, at least recently, but that's mostly because the other requires too much brain-power, and I'm mentally drained at the moment.)

[Poll #1164928]