shadowkat: (tv)
Just finished watching the Jake Kasdan film The TV Set, produced by Lawrence Kasdan and Judd Apatow, starring David Duchvony, Signorney Weaver, Ion Gruffud, Justine Bateman, and Judy Greer. It's a film that got limited distribution due to the fact that it is basically an insider tale about what it is involved in creating a television pilot.

If you have any interest at all in television analysis, the process of making a tv show, or the television industry - you probably should rent this film. And make sure you watch the commentary with Judd Apatow and Jake Kasdan, skip all the other special features but that one. It's a great discussion about the obstacles involved in creating a tv series. Judd Apatow and Kasdan were the creators and writers behind the tv series Freaks and Geeks, which got cancelled after one season. Kasdan also was a co-creator of The Ben Stiller Show, and Apatow did Undeclared. Both have since left tv and gone on to film. They state quite simply that while it is difficult to get a movie made, once you are making it, the studios tend to leave you alone unless of course you go over budget or become expensive, which Apatow tries really hard not to do because he does not want to become their problem. While in television, the studio is always bugging you; they never leave alone. You never ever reach the point in which they are "committed" to your project, not threatening to pull the rug out from under you, or telling you it won't work.

The film is a bit of a satire - it makes fun of the process, depicting everything from the casting process to the actual presentation in front of the critics and networks.

The problem with television or creating television is you do not have control and someone who knows little about your vision is constantly telling you how you need to change it so that it will air. There's a great line that the studio head, Lenny, tells the writer in the film:"We don't want it to be too original. Let's get rid of the originality, so it can work."
Read more... )

From the commentary, most of the people who saw The TV Set were television writers and tv insiders, and they all said the film made them not want to do a tv show. It is a grueling process. That takes a lot of time and more often than not goes nowhere. After watching this, I thought - it is a minor miracle that good shows like Buffy, BSG, the Sopranos, Lost, or Heroes ever get made let alone make it to the tv screen. Not so surprising that the Bachelor and countless reality shows do. Freaks and Geeks died an early death because the network wanted to put on a game show in it's slot.

If you aren't that interested in the process of making a tv show or like satire, the TV SET may bore you. It's a lot like Robert Altman's The Player, filled with inside jokes and focused on the process. The other commentaries including The Making Of - are a waste of time, mostly self-congratulatory, with lots of bits about how great everyone is. They give little insight into how or why the film was made. The best commentary is the Apatow/Kasdan one, even if you don't like Judd Apatow or his comedies and think he's an chauvinistic asswipe, which I do. The film is mandatory viewing for anyone who wants to discuss the making of or quality of television shows in any depth or for that matter aspires to be involved in the process. According to Apatow, it's actually being used by some to teach courses on the topic.
shadowkat: (Default)
Just finished watching "Sleeper" - episode 2.2 of Torchwood. (You remember the time in which it was hard to figure out the names of these episodes and you had to be an obsessed fan in order to do so? Now all you have to do is click info on your remote and there it is along with a composite summary. The information revolution really has changed things.)

Will now have to hunt through flist for all the spoilery reviews that I skipped when everyone else saw the episode, which was sometime last week. BBC America is roughly two weeks behind the UK BBC and net airings. Annoying that. Guess that's how everyone outside the US without the ability to download stuff felt about Buffy, eh? Also, by now, everyone is on to the last episode and sick of talking about it. Fun being late to the party. Not that I care all that much. Not really in the Torchwood fandom. And hardly obsessed. It's sort of nice actually. Being emotionally and cereberally invested in a tv series is exhausting not to mention incredibly time consuming. While watching it sort of casually is fun and entertaining.

on the joys of not being fannish and a shipper regarding Torchwood, or rather not a relationship 'shipper' for tv shows in general )

Anywho...have mixed feelings about this episode. It wasn't as much fun as Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Although it does have a few funny lines - which are delivered a bit too flatly. I'm guessing that's a fault of direction not acting? The overall theme is interesting, but I think it was addressed in some ways far better in both BattleStar Galatica (version2) and Star Trek The Next Generation. Here, I found it a bit uneven and obvious.

Huge Spoilers for Sleeper, vague ones for Heroes, Lost, Battlestar Galatica S1-2 )
shadowkat: (tv)
Should be asleep, not in bed typing away on lj. For some bizarre reason, I always get uptight before a trip - mine is on Wed. Still have to deal with work, printing off boarding passes, calling car service, packing, and straightening up tomorrow. Sorry been less than responsive on this journal of late - been a bit busy/stressed.

Finally watched all of the Life episodes I had saved on my DVR this weekend (watching the episodes with Wales, who kept pointing out all of the implausible plot threads, made me realize how silly the show truly is. Yet as Wales put it - sort of fun.) As well as the latest installments of Journeyman (which I'm going to miss now that it's been cancelled - thanks to the writer's strike - we actually get to see all thirteen episodes that were filmed and written or its a causality of the strike and we would have seen them anyway depends on which news source you've read), Nip/Tuck (which may have not only jumped the shark but hired tap dancers to tap across the shark), and Friday Night Lights (which may be the most adult soap opera I've seen in my life. Thank God they've finally wrapped up the horrid Landry/Tyra murder/rape plotline). Also quite a few Blood Ties and Moonlights.

This brings me to the dreaded list: my list of favorite tv shows for 2007. Note, I said my favorites, not the best tv shows of 2007. Since I have rather ecclectic tastes...you are bound to agree with a few of my choices and wonder what the heck I've been smoking regarding the other ones. (Rest assured I'm thinking the same thing about most of the best/worst lists I've seen to date as well. Mad Men continues to bewilder me - granted I only watched twenty minutes of the pilot with Wales, and both of us were sleepy or distracted at the time, but it bored and grated on my nerves. Yet it appears to be the *trendiest* thing in pop culture since I don't know the mini-skirt.) One of the best bits about being human is that no one agrees on everything. Bits and pieces sure. But not the whole enchilda. It's also one of the most frustrating things.

MY Top Ten Favorite TV shows in no particular order:

1. Heroes (I liked this series better in 2007 than 2006. In 2006 I found it visually stunning but somewhat slow and a bit cliche in places. With weak female characterizations. Then it took off and surprized me with some interesting character evolutions and twists and turns.
HRG is as complicated as you get. Is he a villian, a hero? Both. Company Man, The Future Episode are two of my favorites.)
2. BattleStar Galatica and Razor. Brilliant depiction of the muggy ambiguity of human conflicts. Dealt realistically with torture, war, racism, union uprisings, and religious discrimination. Who are the good guys? Who are the bad guys? The line becomes murkier and murkier as we move along. It may be the most brilliant commentary on the inane pointlessness and horror of war on tv since MASH. Both series ask the same question - who is the real enemy here and what is this fight really about? And finally, is war about survival or destruction?
But that's not why I watched BSG. I watched it because I enjoyed the characters. I continue to be gripped by their emotional struggles. I love the writing, production, acting, and music.
It simply entertains me and rivets me in a way few television shows do.
3. Burn Notice - a fun show with a hot lead and a great supporting cast. Sort of a combo McGyver/The Equalizer/and Magnum PI but with a better cast. Also unlike those shows it's not episodic, it has a clear through thread...
4. Supernatural - horror with a grin and a bit of noirish angst thrown in. IT's a HP Lovecraft meet Raymond Chandler pulp novel come to life as written by Stephen King. Gritty.
With homages to real folk and urban horror legends. The second season was much much better than the uneven first. Not for the faint of heart, politically correct or squeamish, but anyone who appreciates a good politically incorrect - you'll have a blast. And there's a bit of heart as well...the bond between the two brothers lies at the center of this tale.
5. Smallville - scoff all you like, in 2007 Smallville kicked ass. The women came into their own. Clark is no longer at the center of the action - instead we spend an equal amount of time on Lois, Chloe, Lana and Kara. Lana may be the best surprise - a dark avenger, and perfect foil for Lex.
6. Pushing Daisies - quirky as all get out, with a children's book narrator and a dark undertone - this satirical murder mystery series gives the genre new life. It's like nothing else on TV.
7. Journeyman - found out this will be cancelled. Shame. It was just beginning to get good. Each episode delves deeper into the gaps between the characters. How the time travelers travels affect those around him as well as himself. Not always in a good way. How it causes a type of disconnect, so that he in effect is caught observing life not really living it.
8. Reaper - I know, I know, everyone and their mother prefers Chuck. But I find this one more realistic and charming. These are guys I've met. The women in it are real, I know them. They aren't drop-dead gorgeous or fashion models. And the male leads aren't perfect either. The best has got to be Sock, an overweight, hulk of a guy, who was huge his entire life (reminds me of Adam Baldwin) except Sock is the anti-Adam Baldwin. It's not deep. And played more for laughs than angst. A nice bit of fun.
9. Desperate Housewives - has oddly gotten good this season after two lacklustre seasons in a row. The gay couple. Dana Delany and Nathan Fillion. And I haven't laughed so hard in a long time - watching Gabby and Carlos. This show made me laugh harder than any of the sitcoms currently on.
10. Lost and Friday Night Lights (tie). I enjoyed both. For different reasons. Lost had it's fair share of lacklustre episodes. But it continued to amuse and thrill me. My favorite was the one in which they found the car - it made me laugh my head off. Friday Night Lights surprised me - I didn't want to like it, but found I did in spite of myself. Perhaps the best nighttime soap opera I've ever seen.

Other shows that entertained: Ugly Betty, Brothers & Sisters, Project Runway, The 4400 (I'm probably the only person who still watchs this show), Dresden Files (short lived, but I loved every moment and bought the DVD), Veronica Mars (not as good as earlier seasons but the finale ended the way a good noir tv series should in the rain with the heroine inadvertently causing the downfall of everyone she loved very reminiscent of Chinatown), Dirty Sexy Money, Damages and Chuck.

I'm still watching Grey's Anatomy but it wasn't really a favorite.

Okay, off to sleep since already in bed.
shadowkat: (Default)
The box meme

On a gloomy Sat, where one just wants to curl up and read a good book, came up with this meme that has been rolling about in my head most of the week or ever since I read the spirtuality meme online and had an interesting, albeit brief discussion with [livejournal.com profile] frenchani in my lj.

Meme – descriptive trait.
Box – a square, rectangle or even a circle, contains items, often a defined category with label attached.

Purpose – predicting behavior and interests and personality of individual answering the questions. Determining a commonality of interest or traits in order to select friends, spouses, lovers, members of a group, employees, applicants to graduate or undergraduate programs, and private schools. Knowing who fits where, who clicks with whom. Who should be excluded and who included.

Categories/questions obtained from applications, marketing questionnaires and surveys, quiz memes, online dating matches & email questionnaires.

Rules: 1. Define the category that you are answering. EX: What do you consider your country of origin to be? What does that mean to you, is it important?
2. Is it important others share these traits? Rate importance on scale of 1-10, 10 vital, 1 not. Would you reject or select someone based on their answer? How important is their answer to you? (ex: Define Liberal or conservative – what does it mean to you and how do you perceive the category that you aren’t? If you define yourself as liberal, do you dislike and reject conversatives?)
3. Length : one word or as many as you want.

Here’s the list of questions. I’m just doing 10. You can do as many or as little as you want. The questions have one thing in common, with the possible exception of the last one, done in honor of Halloween, is that they are all used to define what people are like, categorize, and reject or select them based on their answers.

1.Country of origin (also state or territory depending on where you live)
2. religious heritage (not to be confused with religion you currently practice or don’t)
3. racial background or ethnicity
4. age
5. gender
6. height and weight
7. education
8. Television watching habits: TV shows currently watch, how many hours a week, what you enjoy, how much is news related – tv news shows you watch
9. Movie watching habits: Types of movies you watch, movies you enjoy, most recent movies, favorites
10. Reading habits: Books, magazines, newspapers, journals you are reading
11. Listening habits: Radio stations, music, ipod, mp3, just CDs, tapes
12. Food – favorite foods, food issues, foods won’t eat – Vegetarian, Non-Vegetarian, Vegan?
13. Liberal or Conservative? (can be economic or social or both)
14. Religious belief (not to be confused with heritage: ie. Are you practicing a religion and do you believe in God?)
15. Sexual Orientation
16. Sports/Athletic Pursuits (what you watch, what you play, how much time you put into watching, do you bet on them)
17. Married or single
18. Do you drink (alcohol)? Socially? Extensively? Alone? Not at all?
19. Smoke or don’t smoke?
20. Fashion or Favorite Clothes (do you pay attention to fashion? Are you a shopper?)
21. Current Abode – home you live in (apartment, house, boat, trailer) and where
22. What state or country or territory do you currently live in? What village, city, suburb?
23. Children ? (Do you have them, how many, do you plan on having them, how do you feel about them? )
24. Occupation Currently Have and Occupation Currently Dream of. (Can be one and the same)
25. What do you fear?

I’m cut tagging my answers for length and well other reasons.

“country )

“religious )
“racial )

“Age” )
“gender” )

“height )

“educational )

“TV )

“Movies” )

“Reading )

Okay, do with that what you will. Off to run errands and such.
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 07:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios